lead-scoring
Über
Diese Fähigkeit ermöglicht es Entwicklern, Lead-Scoring-Modelle zu erstellen, die Vertriebsleads priorisieren, indem sie Firmographic-Fit, Verhaltenssignale und Intent-Daten kombiniert. Sie ist für die Priorisierung eingehender Leads, das Setzen von Qualifizierungsschwellen und die Analyse der Lead-Qualität konzipiert. Die Methodik basiert auf etablierten Rahmenwerken wie HubSpot's Lead Scoring und Forrester's B2B Buyer Journey Forschung.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsgit clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/lead-scoringKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Lead Scoring
Prioritize leads using a systematic scoring model that combines ICP fit, engagement behavior, and buying intent signals.
When to Use This Skill
- Designing a new lead scoring model
- Prioritizing inbound leads for SDR follow-up
- Setting MQL thresholds for sales handoff
- Analyzing lead quality by source
- Optimizing marketing spend by lead score
Methodology Foundation
Based on HubSpot's Lead Scoring methodology and Forrester's B2B Buyer Journey research, combining:
- Firmographic/demographic fit (who they are)
- Behavioral scoring (what they do)
- Intent signals (buying readiness)
- Negative scoring (disqualification)
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Designs scoring model structure | Point values for your business |
| Calculates lead scores | MQL threshold for handoff |
| Identifies high-intent behaviors | Which behaviors matter most |
| Segments leads by score | Sales follow-up priorities |
| Suggests model improvements | Model weight adjustments |
What This Skill Does
- Model design - Create scoring framework with fit + behavior + intent
- Score calculation - Apply model to lead data
- Threshold setting - Define MQL/SQL qualification levels
- Segmentation - Group leads by score for routing
- Optimization - Analyze score-to-conversion correlation
How to Use
For Model Design:
Help me create a lead scoring model for [Business Type].
Our ICP:
- Company size: [Range]
- Industries: [List]
- Titles: [Target titles]
- Geography: [Regions]
Key buying signals we track:
- [List website pages, content, actions]
Current conversion rates:
- Lead to MQL: X%
- MQL to SQL: X%
- SQL to Won: X%
For Lead Scoring:
Score this lead:
Company: [Name]
Size: [Employees]
Industry: [Industry]
Title: [Contact title]
Location: [Geography]
Behavior (last 30 days):
- [List pages visited, content downloaded, emails opened]
Instructions
Step 1: Define Fit Score (0-40 points)
Company Firmographics:
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Company size matches ICP | +10 |
| Industry in target list | +10 |
| Geography in target regions | +5 |
| Revenue in target range | +5 |
| Company size too small | -10 |
| Industry excluded | -20 |
Contact Demographics:
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Title is decision maker | +10 |
| Title is influencer | +5 |
| Title is end user | +3 |
| Student/Personal email | -15 |
| Competitor domain | -40 |
Step 2: Define Behavior Score (0-40 points)
Content Engagement:
| Action | Points |
|---|---|
| Pricing page visit | +15 |
| Case study download | +10 |
| Product demo video watched | +10 |
| Blog post read | +2 |
| 5+ pages in session | +5 |
| Return visit within 7 days | +5 |
Direct Engagement:
| Action | Points |
|---|---|
| Demo request form | +30 |
| Contact sales form | +25 |
| Free trial signup | +20 |
| Webinar registration | +10 |
| Newsletter signup | +3 |
| Email opened | +1 |
| Email clicked | +3 |
Step 3: Define Intent Score (0-20 points)
Third-Party Intent:
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| Researching your category (Bombora/G2) | +15 |
| Competitor comparison searches | +10 |
| Job posting for related role | +5 |
| Funding announcement | +5 |
| Technology install matches | +5 |
Step 4: Apply Negative Scoring
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| Unsubscribed from email | -10 |
| Bounced email | -20 |
| No engagement 90+ days | -15 |
| Marked as spam | -30 |
| Competitor | -100 |
Step 5: Set Thresholds
| Score Range | Qualification | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | Hot MQL | Immediate sales call |
| 60-79 | Warm MQL | SDR outreach 24hr |
| 40-59 | Marketing Qualified | Nurture sequence |
| 20-39 | Early Stage | Educational content |
| 0-19 | Not Qualified | Monitor only |
| Negative | Disqualified | Suppress |
Examples
Example 1: Scoring Model Design
Input:
Help me create a lead scoring model for B2B SaaS (marketing automation).
Our ICP:
- Company size: 50-500 employees
- Industries: Tech, E-commerce, SaaS
- Titles: VP Marketing, Director Marketing, CMO
- Geography: US, Canada, UK
Key buying signals:
- Pricing page, demo request, case studies
- Marketing automation category on G2
Output:
## Lead Scoring Model: Marketing Automation SaaS
### Fit Score (Max 40 points)
**Company Fit (20 points)**
| Criteria | Points |
|----------|--------|
| 50-500 employees | +10 |
| 500-1000 employees | +5 |
| <50 or >1000 employees | +0 |
| Tech/E-commerce/SaaS industry | +10 |
| Adjacent industry (Retail, Media) | +5 |
| Non-target industry | +0 |
**Contact Fit (20 points)**
| Criteria | Points |
|----------|--------|
| VP/Director Marketing, CMO | +15 |
| Marketing Manager | +10 |
| Marketing Coordinator | +5 |
| Non-marketing title | +0 |
| US/Canada/UK | +5 |
| Other geography | +0 |
| Personal email (@gmail) | -15 |
| Competitor domain | -40 |
### Behavior Score (Max 40 points)
**High-Intent Actions**
| Action | Points |
|--------|--------|
| Demo request submitted | +25 |
| Pricing page visit | +15 |
| Case study download | +10 |
| Product tour completed | +10 |
**Engagement Actions**
| Action | Points |
|--------|--------|
| 3+ pages in session | +5 |
| Return visit (7 days) | +5 |
| Webinar registered | +8 |
| Blog post read | +2 |
| Email clicked | +3 |
| Email opened | +1 |
### Intent Score (Max 20 points)
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
| G2 category research | +10 |
| Competitor comparison | +8 |
| Marketing hire posting | +5 |
| Series A/B funding | +5 |
### Negative Scoring
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
| Unsubscribed | -10 |
| No activity 90 days | -15 |
| Email bounced | -20 |
| Competitor | -100 |
### Thresholds
| Score | Status | SLA |
|-------|--------|-----|
| 70+ | 🔥 Hot MQL | Call within 5 min |
| 50-69 | 🟢 MQL | SDR contact 24hr |
| 30-49 | 🟡 Nurture | Email sequence |
| <30 | Monitor | No outreach |
Example 2: Individual Lead Scoring
Input:
Score this lead using the model above:
Company: GrowthTech Inc
Size: 180 employees
Industry: SaaS
Title: VP of Marketing
Location: San Francisco, US
Behavior (last 30 days):
- Visited pricing page (2x)
- Downloaded "Email Automation Guide"
- Attended webinar "Marketing Automation 101"
- Opened 4 emails, clicked 2
- Visited 8 pages total
Intent: Showing on G2 for marketing automation research
Output:
## Lead Score: GrowthTech Inc
### Overall Score: 83/100 🔥 HOT MQL
### Score Breakdown
**Fit Score: 35/40**
| Factor | Points | Notes |
|--------|--------|-------|
| Company size (180) | +10 | Perfect ICP |
| Industry (SaaS) | +10 | Target industry |
| Title (VP Marketing) | +15 | Decision maker |
| Location (US) | +5 | Target geography |
| **Subtotal** | **35** | |
**Behavior Score: 38/40**
| Action | Points | Notes |
|--------|--------|-------|
| Pricing page (2x) | +15 | High intent signal |
| Content download | +5 | Educational engagement |
| Webinar attended | +8 | Active learning |
| 8 pages visited | +5 | Deep exploration |
| 4 emails opened | +4 | Engaged with nurture |
| 2 emails clicked | +6 | Taking action |
| **Subtotal** | **38** | |
**Intent Score: 10/20**
| Signal | Points | Notes |
|--------|--------|-------|
| G2 category research | +10 | Active buyer research |
| **Subtotal** | **10** | |
### Qualification: HOT MQL
- **Action Required**: Immediate SDR call (within 5 minutes)
- **Talking Points**: Reference webinar attendance, pricing interest
- **Ask**: "What prompted your marketing automation research?"
### Next Best Actions
1. Call within 5 minutes (hot lead SLA)
2. Reference webinar + pricing page visits
3. Offer personalized demo with VP Marketing use cases
4. Connect on LinkedIn (warm outreach)
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Structuring scoring models systematically
- Calculating scores from provided data
- Recommending thresholds based on best practices
- Identifying model gaps
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Access your CRM data directly
- Know your actual conversion rates
- Predict individual lead outcomes
- Account for offline interactions
When to Escalate to Human
- Setting final MQL thresholds (needs sales alignment)
- Weighting decisions (requires business judgment)
- Model validation (needs historical data analysis)
- Edge cases (unusual company profiles)
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts
- "Adjust the model for enterprise (1000+ employees) leads."
- "What score would trigger an immediate call for us?"
- "Compare scores for these 5 leads and rank them."
- "What behaviors should we add to increase accuracy?"
Model Refinement Cycle
- Build initial model → Deploy
- Track score vs. conversion rate
- Adjust weights based on data
- Add new signals quarterly
- Remove low-correlation factors
Checklists & Templates
Lead Scoring Model Template
## [Company] Lead Scoring Model v[X]
### Fit Score (Max X points)
| Criteria | Points |
|----------|--------|
### Behavior Score (Max X points)
| Action | Points |
|--------|--------|
### Intent Score (Max X points)
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
### Negative Scoring
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
### Thresholds
| Score | Status | Action |
|-------|--------|--------|
### Review Schedule
- Quarterly weight review
- Monthly threshold check
Model Audit Checklist
- All ICP criteria have point values
- High-intent behaviors weighted appropriately
- Negative scoring prevents bad leads
- Thresholds align with sales capacity
- Model reviewed in last 90 days
References
- HubSpot Lead Scoring Guide
- Forrester B2B Buyer Journey Research
- Marketo Definitive Guide to Lead Scoring
- SiriusDecisions Demand Waterfall
Related Skills
icp-matching- Deep ICP definitionpipeline-forecasting- Score aggregation to forecastdeal-risk-scoring- Post-MQL deal health
Skill Metadata
- Domain: RevOps
- Complexity: Intermediate
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 30-60 min for model design, 2 min per lead
- Prerequisites: ICP definition, behavior tracking capability
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
content-collections
MetaDiese Skill bietet eine produktionsgetestete Einrichtung für Content Collections – ein TypeScript-first-Tool, das Markdown/MDX-Dateien in typsichere Datensammlungen mit Zod-Validierung umwandelt. Verwenden Sie ihn beim Erstellen von Blogs, Dokumentationsseiten oder inhaltsstarken Vite + React-Anwendungen, um Typsicherheit und automatische Inhaltsvalidierung zu gewährleisten. Er behandelt alles von der Vite-Plugin-Konfiguration und MDX-Kompilierung bis hin zur Deployment-Optimierung und Schema-Validierung.
polymarket
MetaDiese Fähigkeit ermöglicht es Entwicklern, Anwendungen mit der Polymarket-Prognosemärkte-Plattform zu erstellen, einschließlich API-Integration für Handel und Marktdaten. Sie bietet außerdem Echtzeit-Datenstreaming über WebSocket, um Live-Trades und Marktaktivitäten zu überwachen. Nutzen Sie sie zur Implementierung von Handelsstrategien oder zur Erstellung von Tools, die Live-Marktaktualisierungen verarbeiten.
creating-opencode-plugins
MetaDiese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, OpenCode-Plugins zu erstellen, die in über 25 Ereignistypen wie Befehle, Dateien und LSP-Operationen eingreifen. Sie bietet die Plugin-Struktur, Event-API-Spezifikationen und Implementierungsmuster für JavaScript/TypeScript-Module. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie den Lebenszyklus des OpenCode KI-Assistenten mit benutzerdefinierter ereignisgesteuerter Logik abfangen, überwachen oder erweitern müssen.
sglang
MetaSGLang ist ein hochperformantes LLM-Serving-Framework, das sich auf schnelle, strukturierte Generierung für JSON, Regex und agentenbasierte Workflows unter Verwendung seines RadixAttention-Prefix-Cachings spezialisiert. Es bietet deutlich schnellere Inferenz, insbesondere für Aufgaben mit wiederholten Präfixen, was es ideal für komplexe, strukturierte Ausgaben und Mehrfachdialoge macht. Wählen Sie SGLang gegenüber Alternativen wie vLLM, wenn Sie constrained decoding benötigen oder Anwendungen mit umfangreicher Präfix-Weitergabe entwickeln.
