Zurück zu Fähigkeiten

decommission-validated-system

pjt222
Aktualisiert Yesterday
6 Ansichten
17
2
17
Auf GitHub ansehen
Testenworddata

Über

Diese Fähigkeit bietet einen strukturierten Prozess zur Außerbetriebnahme validierter Systeme und gewährleistet die Einhaltung von Datenspeicherungsvorschriften sowie eine ordnungsgemäße Archivierung. Sie behandelt wichtige technische Schritte wie die Validierung der Datenmigration, den Zugriffsentzug und die Benachrichtigung der Beteiligten. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn ein System aufgrund von Lebensende, eingestelltem Support, Konsolidierung oder regulatorischen Änderungen ersetzt oder stillgelegt wird.

Schnellinstallation

Claude Code

Empfohlen
Primär
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Plugin-BefehlAlternativ
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativ
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/decommission-validated-system

Kopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren

Dokumentation

Decommission Validated System

Plan and execute the controlled retirement of a validated computerized system while preserving data integrity and meeting regulatory retention requirements.

When to Use

  • A validated system is being replaced by a new system
  • A system is reaching end-of-life with no replacement (business process eliminated)
  • Vendor discontinues support for a validated product
  • Consolidation of multiple systems into a single platform
  • Regulatory or business changes render a system obsolete

Inputs

  • Required: System to be decommissioned (name, version, validation status)
  • Required: Data retention requirements by regulation (21 CFR Part 11, GLP, GCP)
  • Required: Replacement system (if applicable) and migration scope
  • Optional: Current validation documentation package
  • Optional: Data volume and format inventory
  • Optional: Business owner and stakeholder list

Procedure

Step 1: Assess Data Retention Requirements

Determine how long data must be retained and in what form:

# Data Retention Assessment
## Document ID: DRA-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Regulatory Retention Requirements
| Regulation | Data Type | Retention Period | Format Requirements |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------|
| 21 CFR 211 (GMP) | Batch records, test results | 1 year past product expiry or 3 years after distribution | Readable, retrievable |
| 21 CFR 58 (GLP) | Study data and records | Duration of study + retention agreement | Original or certified copy |
| ICH E6 (GCP) | Clinical trial records | 2 years after last marketing approval or formal discontinuation | Accessible for inspection |
| 21 CFR Part 11 | Electronic records | Per predicate rule | Original format or validated migration |
| EU Annex 11 | Computerized system records | Per applicable GxP | Readable and available |
| Tax/financial | Financial records | 7-10 years (jurisdiction-dependent) | Readable |

### System Data Inventory
| Data Category | Volume | Format | Retention Required Until | Disposition |
|---------------|--------|--------|------------------------|-------------|
| [e.g., Batch records] | [e.g., 50,000 records] | [e.g., Database + PDF reports] | [Date] | Migrate / Archive / Destroy |
| [e.g., Audit trail] | [e.g., 2M entries] | [e.g., Database] | [Same as parent records] | Archive |
| [e.g., User data] | [e.g., 200 profiles] | [e.g., LDAP/Database] | [Employment + 2 years] | Anonymise and archive |

Got: Every data category has a defined retention period, format requirement, and planned disposition. If fail: If retention requirements are unclear, consult regulatory affairs and legal. Default to the longest applicable retention period.

Step 2: Plan Data Migration (If Applicable)

If data is migrating to a replacement system:

# Data Migration Plan
## Document ID: DMP-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Migration Scope
| Source | Target | Data Category | Records | Migration Method |
|--------|--------|---------------|---------|-----------------|
| [Old system] | [New system] | [Category] | [Count] | ETL / Manual / API |

### Data Mapping
| Source Field | Source Format | Target Field | Target Format | Transformation |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|---------------|---------------|
| [e.g., test_result] | FLOAT(8,2) | [e.g., result_value] | DECIMAL(10,3) | Precision conversion |
| [e.g., operator_id] | VARCHAR(20) | [e.g., user_id] | UUID | Lookup table mapping |

### Validation Approach
| Check | Method | Acceptance Criteria |
|-------|--------|-------------------|
| Record count reconciliation | Source count vs target count | 100% match |
| Field-level comparison | Sample 5% of records, all fields | 100% match after transformation |
| Checksum verification | Hash source vs target for key fields | Checksums match |
| Business rule validation | Verify key calculations in target | Results match source |
| Audit trail continuity | Verify historical audit trail migrated | All entries present with original timestamps |

Got: Migration plan includes mapping, transformation rules, and validation checks that prove data integrity was maintained. If fail: If migration validation fails, do not proceed to decommission. Fix the migration issues and re-validate.

Step 3: Define Archival Strategy

For data that will be archived rather than migrated:

# Archival Strategy

### Archive Format
| Consideration | Decision | Rationale |
|--------------|----------|-----------|
| Format | [PDF/A, CSV, XML, database backup] | [Why this format survives the retention period] |
| Medium | [Network storage, cloud archive, tape, optical] | [Durability and accessibility] |
| Encryption | [Yes/No — method if yes] | [Security vs long-term accessibility trade-off] |
| Integrity verification | [SHA-256 checksums, periodic verification schedule] | [Prove archive is uncorrupted] |

### Archive Verification
- [ ] Archived data is readable without the source system
- [ ] All required data categories are included in the archive
- [ ] Checksums recorded at time of archival
- [ ] Archive can be searched and retrieved within [defined SLA, e.g., 5 business days]
- [ ] Periodic integrity checks scheduled (annually)

### Archive Access
| Role | Access Level | Authorisation |
|------|-------------|--------------|
| QA Director | Read access to all archived data | Standing authorisation |
| Regulatory Affairs | Read access for inspection support | Standing authorisation |
| System Owner (former) | Read access for business queries | Request-based |
| External auditors | Read access, supervised | Per audit plan |

Got: Archived data is readable, searchable, and verifiable without the original system. If fail: If data cannot be read independently of the source system, the archive is not compliant. Consider exporting to an open, standard format (PDF/A, CSV) before decommission.

Step 4: Execute Decommissioning

# Decommission Checklist
## Document ID: DC-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Pre-Decommission
- [ ] All stakeholders notified of decommission date and data disposition
- [ ] Data migration completed and validated (if applicable)
- [ ] Data archive created and verified (if applicable)
- [ ] Final backup of complete system taken and stored separately
- [ ] All open change requests resolved or transferred
- [ ] All open CAPAs resolved or transferred to successor system
- [ ] All active users informed and redirected to replacement system (if applicable)

### Decommission Execution
- [ ] User access revoked for all accounts
- [ ] System removed from production environment
- [ ] Network connections disconnected
- [ ] Licenses returned or terminated
- [ ] System entry removed from active system inventory
- [ ] System moved to "Decommissioned" status in compliance architecture

### Post-Decommission
- [ ] Validation documentation archived (URS, VP, IQ/OQ/PQ, TM, VSR)
- [ ] SOPs retired or updated to remove references to decommissioned system
- [ ] Training records archived
- [ ] Change control records archived
- [ ] Audit trail archived
- [ ] Decommission report completed and approved

### Decommission Report
| Section | Content |
|---------|---------|
| System description | Name, version, purpose, GxP classification |
| Decommission rationale | Why the system is being retired |
| Data disposition summary | What data went where (migrated, archived, destroyed) |
| Validation evidence | Migration validation results, archive verification |
| Residual risk | Any ongoing data retention obligations |
| Approval | System owner, QA, IT signatures |

Got: Decommissioning is controlled, documented, and approved — not just "turn it off." If fail: If any checklist item cannot be completed, document the exception and obtain QA approval before proceeding.

Validation

  • Data retention requirements assessed for all data categories
  • Data migration validated with record counts, sampling, and checksums (if applicable)
  • Archive created in a format readable without the source system
  • Archive integrity verified with checksums
  • All user access revoked
  • Validation documentation archived with defined retention period
  • SOPs updated to remove references to decommissioned system
  • Decommission report approved by system owner, QA, and IT

Pitfalls

  • Premature decommission: Turning off a system before data migration is validated risks permanent data loss. Complete all validation before pulling the plug.
  • Unreadable archives: Storing data in a proprietary format that requires the original system to read defeats the purpose of archival. Use open formats.
  • Forgotten audit trails: Archiving the data but not the audit trail means the data provenance cannot be demonstrated. Always archive audit trails with their parent records.
  • Orphaned SOPs: SOPs that still reference a decommissioned system confuse users and create compliance gaps. Update or retire all affected SOPs.
  • No periodic archive verification: Archives degrade. Without periodic integrity checks, data loss may go undetected until the data is needed for an inspection.

Related Skills

  • design-compliance-architecture — update the system inventory and compliance architecture after decommission
  • manage-change-control — decommissioning is a major change requiring change control
  • write-validation-documentation — migration validation follows the same IQ/OQ methodology
  • write-standard-operating-procedure — retire or update SOPs referencing the decommissioned system
  • prepare-inspection-readiness — archived data must remain accessible for regulatory inspections

GitHub Repository

pjt222/agent-almanac
Pfad: i18n/caveman-lite/skills/decommission-validated-system
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Verwandte Skills

evaluating-llms-harness

Testen

Diese Claude Skill führt den lm-evaluation-harness aus, um LLMs über 60+ standardisierte akademische Aufgaben wie MMLU und GSM8K zu benchmarken. Sie wurde für Entwickler entwickelt, um Modellqualität zu vergleichen, Trainingsfortschritt zu verfolgen oder akademische Ergebnisse zu berichten. Das Tool unterstützt verschiedene Backends, einschließlich HuggingFace- und vLLM-Modelle.

Skill ansehen

cloudflare-cron-triggers

Testen

Diese Fähigkeit bietet umfassendes Wissen zur Implementierung von Cloudflare Cron Triggers, um Workers mithilfe von Cron-Ausdrücken zu planen. Sie behandelt das Einrichten periodischer Aufgaben, Wartungsjobs und automatisierter Workflows, während häufige Probleme wie ungültige Cron-Ausdrücke und Zeitzonenprobleme behandelt werden. Entwickler können sie zum Konfigurieren geplanter Handler, zum Testen von Cron-Triggers und zur Integration mit Workflows und Green Compute verwenden.

Skill ansehen

webapp-testing

Testen

Diese Claude Skill bietet ein Playwright-basiertes Toolkit zum Testen lokaler Webanwendungen durch Python-Skripte. Es ermöglicht Frontend-Verifizierung, UI-Debugging, Screenshot-Aufnahme und Log-Einblick bei gleichzeitiger Verwaltung von Server-Lebenszyklen. Nutzen Sie es für Browser-Automatisierungsaufgaben, führen Sie Skripte jedoch direkt aus, anstatt deren Quellcode zu lesen, um Kontextverschmutzung zu vermeiden.

Skill ansehen

finishing-a-development-branch

Testen

Diese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, abgeschlossene Arbeiten zu finalisieren, indem sie testet, ob Tests bestehen, und dann strukturierte Integrationsoptionen präsentiert. Sie leitet den Workflow für das Zusammenführen von Code, das Erstellen von PRs oder das Bereinigen von Branches nach Abschluss der Implementierung. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Ihr Code bereit und getestet ist, um den Entwicklungsprozess systematisch abzuschließen.

Skill ansehen