revenue-attribution
Über
Die Revenue-Attribution-Funktion analysiert Marketing- und Vertriebs-Touchpoints, um Umsatzanteile mithilfe von Multi-Touch-Modellen wie First-Touch, Last-Touch und linearer Attribution zuzuordnen. Sie dient dazu, Ausgaben zu rechtfertigen, die Kanalmix-Optimierung voranzutreiben und die Kampagnen-Rendite zu bewerten, indem sie bestimmt, welche Aktivitäten Konversionen vorantreiben. Dies ermöglicht eine intelligentere Budgetverteilung und löst Zuordnungsstreitigkeiten zwischen Marketing und Vertrieb.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsgit clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/revenue-attributionKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Revenue Attribution
Determine which marketing and sales activities drive revenue using multi-touch attribution models, enabling smarter budget allocation and campaign optimization.
When to Use This Skill
- Justifying marketing spend to leadership
- Optimizing channel mix allocation
- Evaluating campaign ROI
- Resolving marketing/sales credit disputes
- Building attribution reports
Methodology Foundation
Based on Bizible/Marketo Multi-Touch Attribution and Google Analytics Attribution Models, covering:
- First-touch attribution (awareness credit)
- Last-touch attribution (conversion credit)
- Linear attribution (equal credit)
- Time-decay attribution (recency-weighted)
- Position-based (U-shaped, W-shaped)
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Explains attribution models | Which model fits your business |
| Calculates credit distribution | How to act on insights |
| Identifies top-performing channels | Budget reallocation amounts |
| Shows model comparison | Final attribution policy |
| Highlights discrepancies | Exception handling |
What This Skill Does
- Model education - Explain different attribution approaches
- Credit calculation - Apply models to touchpoint data
- Channel analysis - Compare performance by source
- Model comparison - Show how results differ by model
- Optimization recommendations - Where to invest more/less
How to Use
Analyze attribution for this closed-won deal:
Deal: [Company Name]
Value: $[Amount]
Close Date: [Date]
Sales Cycle: [Days]
Touchpoint Journey:
1. [Date] - [Channel] - [Action]
2. [Date] - [Channel] - [Action]
...
[List all touchpoints chronologically]
Questions:
- Which channels deserve credit?
- Compare first-touch vs last-touch
- Recommend budget allocation
Instructions
Step 1: Understand Attribution Models
| Model | Logic | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| First-Touch | 100% to first interaction | Awareness measurement |
| Last-Touch | 100% to final conversion | Direct response |
| Linear | Equal split across all | Long consideration cycles |
| Time-Decay | More credit to recent | Sales-assisted journeys |
| Position-Based | 40/20/40 (first/middle/last) | Balanced view |
| W-Shaped | 30/30/30 + 10 remainder | Include MQL moment |
Step 2: Map the Customer Journey
Document all touchpoints with:
- Timestamp - When it occurred
- Channel - Source (Paid, Organic, Email, Event, etc.)
- Action - What happened (visit, download, demo, etc.)
- Stage - Awareness, Consideration, Decision
Step 3: Apply Attribution Model
First-Touch Example:
Journey: Paid Search → Email → Webinar → Demo → Close
Revenue: $50,000
First-Touch Attribution:
- Paid Search: $50,000 (100%)
- All others: $0
Linear Example:
Same journey, 4 touchpoints:
- Paid Search: $12,500 (25%)
- Email: $12,500 (25%)
- Webinar: $12,500 (25%)
- Demo: $12,500 (25%)
Position-Based (40/20/40):
- Paid Search: $20,000 (40% - first)
- Email: $5,000 (10% - middle)
- Webinar: $5,000 (10% - middle)
- Demo: $20,000 (40% - last)
Step 4: Aggregate by Channel
Sum attribution across all deals to see total channel contribution:
Channel Performance (Position-Based):
- Paid Search: $500K attributed (35%)
- Events: $300K attributed (21%)
- Organic: $280K attributed (19%)
- Email: $220K attributed (15%)
- Referral: $150K attributed (10%)
Step 5: Calculate ROI by Channel
Channel ROI = Attributed Revenue / Channel Spend
Example:
- Paid Search: $500K revenue / $100K spend = 5x ROI
- Events: $300K revenue / $200K spend = 1.5x ROI
Examples
Example 1: Deal-Level Attribution
Input:
Analyze attribution for TechStart Inc:
Deal: TechStart Inc
Value: $75,000 ARR
Close Date: March 15
Sales Cycle: 62 days
Touchpoint Journey:
1. Jan 12 - Google Ads - Clicked ad, visited pricing
2. Jan 15 - Organic Search - Blog post read
3. Jan 22 - LinkedIn Ad - Whitepaper download (MQL)
4. Feb 1 - Email nurture - Opened 3 emails
5. Feb 10 - Webinar - Attended "Product Demo Day"
6. Feb 18 - Direct - Requested demo (SQL)
7. Mar 5 - Sales - Discovery call
8. Mar 12 - Sales - Proposal review
9. Mar 15 - Direct - Signed contract
Compare first-touch, last-touch, and position-based.
Output:
## Attribution Analysis: TechStart Inc ($75,000)
### Journey Summary
- **Total Touchpoints**: 9
- **Marketing Touchpoints**: 6 (Jan 12 - Feb 18)
- **Sales Touchpoints**: 3 (Mar 5 - Mar 15)
- **Sales Cycle**: 62 days
- **Key Conversion**: LinkedIn whitepaper (MQL), Demo request (SQL)
### Model Comparison
| Channel | First-Touch | Last-Touch | Position-Based | Linear |
|---------|-------------|------------|----------------|--------|
| Google Ads | $75,000 | $0 | $22,500 | $8,333 |
| Organic Search | $0 | $0 | $3,750 | $8,333 |
| LinkedIn Ads | $0 | $0 | $7,500 | $8,333 |
| Email | $0 | $0 | $3,750 | $8,333 |
| Webinar | $0 | $0 | $3,750 | $8,333 |
| Direct (Demo) | $0 | $0 | $7,500 | $8,333 |
| Sales | $0 | $75,000 | $26,250 | $25,000 |
### Position-Based Breakdown (Recommended)
**First Touch (30%): $22,500**
- Google Ads gets full first-touch credit
- Drove initial awareness and pricing interest
**MQL Touch (30%): $22,500**
- LinkedIn Ads: $15,000 (whitepaper = MQL)
- Webinar: $7,500 (influenced SQL)
**Last Touch (30%): $22,500**
- Demo Request: $7,500
- Sales (Close): $15,000
**Middle Touches (10%): $7,500**
- Organic: $2,500
- Email: $2,500
- Other: $2,500
### Insights
1. **Google Ads** initiated the journey - valuable for awareness
2. **LinkedIn Ads** drove the MQL - critical conversion point
3. **Sales** closed but didn't initiate - last-touch overstates
4. **Email** nurtured but didn't convert alone - assist role
### Channel Recommendations
| Channel | Attribution | Action |
|---------|-------------|--------|
| Google Ads | High first-touch | Maintain/increase for awareness |
| LinkedIn Ads | High MQL driver | Invest more for lead gen |
| Webinar | Solid influence | Continue as mid-funnel |
| Email | Assist role | Optimize, don't cut |
Example 2: Multi-Deal Channel Analysis
Input:
Analyze Q1 attribution across these closed deals:
Deal 1: $50K - Google Ads → Email → Demo → Close
Deal 2: $30K - Event → LinkedIn → Demo → Close
Deal 3: $80K - Referral → Demo → Close
Deal 4: $45K - Organic → Webinar → Email → Demo → Close
Deal 5: $25K - Google Ads → Event → Demo → Close
Total Q1 Revenue: $230K
Channel Spend:
- Google Ads: $15K
- Events: $25K
- LinkedIn: $8K
- Email: $3K
- Webinar: $5K
- Referral: $0
Which channels should we invest more in?
Output:
## Q1 Channel Attribution Analysis
### Total Revenue: $230,000
### Attribution by Model
#### Position-Based Attribution (40/20/40)
| Channel | First | Middle | Last | Total | % of Rev |
|---------|-------|--------|------|-------|----------|
| Google Ads | $30,000 | $2,500 | $0 | $32,500 | 14% |
| Events | $12,000 | $5,000 | $0 | $17,000 | 7% |
| LinkedIn | $0 | $6,000 | $0 | $6,000 | 3% |
| Email | $0 | $11,000 | $0 | $11,000 | 5% |
| Webinar | $0 | $9,000 | $0 | $9,000 | 4% |
| Referral | $32,000 | $0 | $0 | $32,000 | 14% |
| Demo | $0 | $0 | $30,500 | $30,500 | 13% |
| Sales/Close | $0 | $0 | $92,000 | $92,000 | 40% |
### ROI Analysis
| Channel | Attributed Rev | Spend | ROI |
|---------|----------------|-------|-----|
| Referral | $32,000 | $0 | ∞ (Best) |
| Google Ads | $32,500 | $15,000 | 2.2x |
| Webinar | $9,000 | $5,000 | 1.8x |
| LinkedIn | $6,000 | $8,000 | 0.75x |
| Events | $17,000 | $25,000 | 0.68x |
| Email | $11,000 | $3,000 | 3.7x |
### Efficiency Ranking
1. **🥇 Referral** - $0 cost, $32K attributed → Infinite ROI
2. **🥈 Email** - 3.7x ROI → High-value nurture
3. **🥉 Google Ads** - 2.2x ROI → Profitable acquisition
4. **Webinar** - 1.8x ROI → Solid mid-funnel
5. **LinkedIn** - 0.75x ROI → Below break-even
6. **Events** - 0.68x ROI → Expensive for return
### Recommendations
**Increase Investment:**
- **Referral Program**: 14% of revenue at $0 cost
- Formalize referral rewards
- Target: 2x referral deals in Q2
- **Email Nurture**: 3.7x ROI
- Expand sequences
- Add $2K budget for tools
- **Google Ads**: 2.2x ROI
- Profitable, test 20% budget increase
- Focus on high-intent keywords
**Optimize/Test:**
- **LinkedIn**: 0.75x is below target
- Test new audiences before cutting
- Could be essential for certain segments
**Reduce/Reallocate:**
- **Events**: $25K for $17K attributed
- Evaluate which events drive pipeline
- Consider smaller, targeted events
- Reallocate $10K to Google Ads
### Proposed Q2 Budget Shift
| Channel | Q1 Spend | Q2 Proposed | Change |
|---------|----------|-------------|--------|
| Google Ads | $15K | $20K | +$5K |
| Events | $25K | $15K | -$10K |
| LinkedIn | $8K | $8K | — |
| Email | $3K | $5K | +$2K |
| Webinar | $5K | $6K | +$1K |
| Referral | $0 | $2K (rewards) | +$2K |
| **Total** | **$56K** | **$56K** | Rebalanced |
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Explaining attribution model mechanics
- Calculating credit across touchpoints
- Comparing models side-by-side
- Identifying channel efficiency
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Access actual CRM/analytics data
- Track offline touchpoints automatically
- Account for brand lift effects
- Prove causation (only correlation)
When to Escalate to Human
- Choosing official attribution model for company
- Budget allocation decisions over $50K
- Complex B2B journeys with multiple stakeholders
- Reconciling attribution across systems
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts
- "How would results change with time-decay model?"
- "What if we excluded sales touchpoints?"
- "Show me channel performance by deal size."
- "Build attribution for all Q1 deals (I'll provide data)."
Attribution Maturity
- Basic: Last-touch only
- Intermediate: First and last comparison
- Advanced: Position-based or custom
- Expert: ML-based algorithmic attribution
Checklists & Templates
Attribution Report Template
## Attribution Report: [Period]
### Summary
- Total Revenue: $X
- Deals Analyzed: X
- Model Used: [Position-Based]
### Channel Attribution
| Channel | Revenue | % | ROI |
|---------|---------|---|-----|
### Top Insights
1.
2.
3.
### Budget Recommendations
| Channel | Current | Recommended | Rationale |
|---------|---------|-------------|-----------|
Touchpoint Tracking Checklist
- UTM parameters on all campaigns
- CRM synced with marketing automation
- Offline events logged manually
- Sales activities timestamped
- Content downloads tracked
References
- Bizible Multi-Touch Attribution Guide
- Google Analytics Attribution Modeling
- Forrester B2B Attribution Research
- Marketo Revenue Cycle Analytics
Related Skills
pipeline-forecasting- Predict revenue by sourcelead-scoring- Score by attributed channelad-spend-optimizer- Automate budget shifts
Skill Metadata
- Domain: RevOps
- Complexity: Advanced
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 30-60 min for analysis
- Prerequisites: Touchpoint data, deal values, channel spend
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
llamaguard
AndereLlamaGuard ist Metas 7-8B-Parameter-Modell zur Moderation von LLM-Eingaben und -Ausgaben in sechs Sicherheitskategorien wie Gewalt und Hassrede. Es bietet eine Genauigkeit von 94-95 % und kann mit vLLM, Hugging Face oder Amazon SageMaker eingesetzt werden. Nutzen Sie diese Skill, um Inhaltsfilterung und Sicherheitsguardrails einfach in Ihre KI-Anwendungen zu integrieren.
cost-optimization
AndereDiese Claude Skill unterstützt Entwickler bei der Optimierung von Cloud-Kosten durch Ressourcen-Dimensionierung, Tagging-Strategien und Ausgabenanalysen. Sie bietet einen Rahmen zur Senkung von Cloud-Ausgaben und zur Implementierung von Kosten-Governance für AWS, Azure und GCP. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie Infrastrukturkosten analysieren, Ressourcen richtig dimensionieren oder Budgetvorgaben einhalten müssen.
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
AndereDiese Fähigkeit quantisiert LLMs auf 8-Bit- oder 4-Bit-Präzision mittels bitsandbytes und erreicht dabei eine Speicherreduzierung von 50–75 % bei minimalem Genauigkeitsverlust. Sie ist ideal für den Betrieb größerer Modelle mit begrenztem GPU-Speicher oder zur Beschleunigung von Inferenzvorgängen und unterstützt Formate wie INT8, NF4 und FP4. Die Fähigkeit integriert sich in HuggingFace Transformers und ermöglicht QLoRA-Training sowie 8-Bit-Optimierer.
dispatching-parallel-agents
AndereDiese Claude-Fähigkeit verteilt mehrere Agenten, um drei oder mehr unabhängige Probleme gleichzeitig zu untersuchen und zu beheben. Sie ist für Szenarien konzipiert, die unabhängige Fehler umfassen, die ohne gemeinsamen Zustand oder Abhängigkeiten gelöst werden können. Die Kernfähigkeit ist die parallele Problemlösung, bei der pro unabhängigem Problembereich ein Agent zugewiesen wird, um die Effizienz zu maximieren.
