Zurück zu Fähigkeiten

contract-review

guia-matthieu
Aktualisiert Yesterday
1 Ansichten
111
20
111
Auf GitHub ansehen
Anderegeneral

Über

Diese Fähigkeit analysiert Verträge systematisch, um Risiken, ungünstige Klauseln und Verhandlungschancen zu identifizieren. Sie ist für die Prüfung von Lieferantenvereinbarungen, Partnerschaften, Arbeitsverträgen und Due-Diligence-Dokumenten konzipiert. Das Werkzeug markiert problematische Klauseln auf Grundlage rechtlicher Rahmenwerke und Risikomatrizen und unterstützt Entwickler bei der Bewertung von Verträgen vor der Unterzeichnung.

Schnellinstallation

Claude Code

Empfohlen
Primär
npx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code
Plugin-BefehlAlternativ
/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
Git CloneAlternativ
git clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/contract-review

Kopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren

Dokumentation

Contract Review

Systematically analyze contracts to identify risks, unfavorable clauses, and negotiation opportunities before signing.

When to Use This Skill

  • Reviewing vendor/SaaS contracts
  • Analyzing partnership agreements
  • Evaluating client service agreements
  • Reviewing employment contracts
  • Due diligence on M&A documents

Methodology Foundation

Based on legal contract analysis frameworks combined with:

  • Risk assessment matrices
  • Common clause libraries
  • Industry-standard benchmarks
  • Negotiation leverage analysis

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Identifies risky clausesRisk tolerance level
Flags unusual termsWhat to negotiate
Compares to standardsFinal accept/reject
Suggests alternativesBusiness trade-offs
Summarizes obligationsLegal counsel needs

Instructions

Step 1: Contract Overview

Initial Assessment:

ElementWhat to Capture
PartiesWho's bound
TypeService, license, partnership
TermDuration, renewal
ValueTotal commitment
JurisdictionGoverning law

Step 2: Risk Categories

Clause Risk Matrix:

CategoryLow RiskMedium RiskHigh Risk
LiabilityMutual capsUncappedUnlimited indemnity
TermMonthlyAnnualMulti-year auto-renew
DataStandard DPACustom termsBroad usage rights
IPLicense onlyWork for hireAssignment
Termination30-day noticeFor cause onlyPenalties

Step 3: Clause-by-Clause Analysis

Key Clauses to Review:

Payment Terms:

  • Net terms (30/60/90)
  • Late payment penalties
  • Price escalation clauses
  • Audit rights

Liability & Indemnification:

  • Cap on liability (multiple of fees)
  • Carve-outs (willful misconduct, IP)
  • Indemnification scope
  • Insurance requirements

Termination:

  • For convenience vs. for cause
  • Notice periods
  • Transition assistance
  • Data return/destruction

IP & Data:

  • Ownership of deliverables
  • License scope
  • Data usage rights
  • Confidentiality obligations

Step 4: Benchmarking

Industry Standards:

ClauseTypicalFavorableUnfavorable
Liability cap12 mo fees24 mo feesUncapped
PaymentNet 30Net 45Net 15
Termination30 days60 days90+ days
Auto-renewal30-day opt-out60-day opt-out90-day opt-out

Step 5: Generate Recommendations

Output Structure:

  1. Executive summary (2-3 sentences)
  2. Risk rating (Low/Medium/High/Critical)
  3. Red flags (must address)
  4. Yellow flags (should negotiate)
  5. Green flags (acceptable)
  6. Recommended redlines
  7. Questions for counsel

Examples

Example 1: SaaS Vendor Contract Review

Input:

Review this SaaS contract summary:
- 3-year term with 90-day auto-renewal notice
- Unlimited liability for data breaches
- Vendor can change pricing with 30-day notice
- Data can be used for "service improvement"
- Termination only for material breach

Output:

## Contract Review: SaaS Vendor Agreement

### Risk Rating: HIGH

---

### Executive Summary

This contract heavily favors the vendor with limited termination rights, uncapped liability exposure for you, and one-sided price increase provisions. Recommend significant negotiation before signing.

---

### Red Flags (Must Address)

| Clause | Issue | Risk | Recommendation |
|--------|-------|------|----------------|
| **Auto-Renewal** | 90-day notice for 3-year contract | Lock-in risk | Reduce to 30-60 days |
| **Pricing** | Vendor can change with 30-day notice | Budget risk | Cap increases at 5%/year or CPI |
| **Termination** | Material breach only | Lock-in risk | Add termination for convenience with notice |
| **Liability** | Unlimited for data breaches | Financial risk | Cap at 24 months of fees |

---

### Yellow Flags (Should Negotiate)

| Clause | Issue | Recommendation |
|--------|-------|----------------|
| **Data Usage** | "Service improvement" is vague | Define scope, exclude training AI |
| **Term Length** | 3 years is long | Request 1-year with renewal option |
| **SLA** | None mentioned | Require 99.9% uptime with credits |

---

### Green Flags (Acceptable)

- Standard confidentiality provisions
- Reasonable IP license terms
- Clear support response times

---

### Recommended Redlines

**Priority 1 (Deal Breakers):**

Section 8.2: Change "90 days" to "30 days" Section 12.1: Add "and termination for convenience with 60 days written notice" Section 14.3: Add "not to exceed 24 months of fees paid under this Agreement"


**Priority 2 (Strongly Preferred):**

Section 5.1: Add "Price increases shall not exceed 5% annually" Section 9.4: Change "service improvement" to "providing and improving the Service for Customer"


---

### Questions for Legal Counsel

1. Is unlimited data breach liability acceptable given our cyber insurance coverage?
2. What's our exposure if we need to exit before term completion?
3. Are there regulatory implications for the data usage clause?

---

### Negotiation Leverage

**Your Position:** First-year customer, significant deal size

**Their Likely Flex:**
- Auto-renewal notice period
- Liability caps
- Pricing caps

**Their Likely Firm:**
- Base term length
- Core data usage rights

Example 2: Quick Risk Assessment

Input:

Quick review - key concerns only:
- Unlimited indemnification for IP claims
- 2x annual fees liability cap
- Net 45 payment terms
- 60-day termination notice
- Standard DPA included

Output:

## Quick Risk Assessment

### Overall: MEDIUM RISK

| Clause | Rating | Note |
|--------|--------|------|
| Indemnification | HIGH | Unlimited IP indemnity is risky |
| Liability Cap | GREEN | 2x is standard |
| Payment | GREEN | Net 45 is favorable |
| Termination | GREEN | 60 days is reasonable |
| Data Protection | GREEN | Standard DPA |

### Priority Action

**Address Indemnification:**
- Request mutual cap on IP indemnity
- Propose "lesser of [amount] or 12 months fees"
- Alternative: carve out for willful infringement only

**Everything Else:** Acceptable, proceed if IP indemnity resolved.

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Identifying common risk patterns
  • Comparing to industry benchmarks
  • Structuring negotiation priorities
  • Flagging unusual clauses

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Provide legal advice
  • Know jurisdiction-specific requirements
  • Assess strategic business importance
  • Replace qualified legal counsel

When to Escalate to Human

  • Contracts over $100K annual value
  • Non-standard or heavily negotiated terms
  • Any regulated industry requirements
  • Indemnification or liability questions

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts:

  • "What's the worst-case scenario for the liability clause?"
  • "Draft redline language for [specific clause]"
  • "How does this compare to [competitor] contracts?"
  • "What should we ask for in return if we accept [term]?"

References

  • ACC (Association of Corporate Counsel) Contract Guidelines
  • IACCM Contract Terms Benchmarking
  • Tech Contract Negotiation Best Practices
  • Standard SaaS Agreement Templates

Related Skills

  • rfp-response - Creating proposals
  • nda-generator - Confidentiality agreements
  • terms-analyzer - Terms of service review

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: Legal
  • Complexity: Intermediate
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 30-60 min per contract
  • Prerequisites: Contract access, business context

GitHub Repository

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
Pfad: skills/legal/contract-review
0
ai-skillsanthropicclaude-codeclaude-skillsmarketingmcp-server

Verwandte Skills

llamaguard

Andere

LlamaGuard ist Metas 7-8B-Parameter-Modell zur Moderation von LLM-Eingaben und -Ausgaben in sechs Sicherheitskategorien wie Gewalt und Hassrede. Es bietet eine Genauigkeit von 94-95 % und kann mit vLLM, Hugging Face oder Amazon SageMaker eingesetzt werden. Nutzen Sie diese Skill, um Inhaltsfilterung und Sicherheitsguardrails einfach in Ihre KI-Anwendungen zu integrieren.

Skill ansehen

cost-optimization

Andere

Diese Claude Skill unterstützt Entwickler bei der Optimierung von Cloud-Kosten durch Ressourcen-Dimensionierung, Tagging-Strategien und Ausgabenanalysen. Sie bietet einen Rahmen zur Senkung von Cloud-Ausgaben und zur Implementierung von Kosten-Governance für AWS, Azure und GCP. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie Infrastrukturkosten analysieren, Ressourcen richtig dimensionieren oder Budgetvorgaben einhalten müssen.

Skill ansehen

quantizing-models-bitsandbytes

Andere

Diese Fähigkeit quantisiert LLMs auf 8-Bit- oder 4-Bit-Präzision mittels bitsandbytes und erreicht dabei eine Speicherreduzierung von 50–75 % bei minimalem Genauigkeitsverlust. Sie ist ideal für den Betrieb größerer Modelle mit begrenztem GPU-Speicher oder zur Beschleunigung von Inferenzvorgängen und unterstützt Formate wie INT8, NF4 und FP4. Die Fähigkeit integriert sich in HuggingFace Transformers und ermöglicht QLoRA-Training sowie 8-Bit-Optimierer.

Skill ansehen

dispatching-parallel-agents

Andere

Diese Claude-Fähigkeit verteilt mehrere Agenten, um drei oder mehr unabhängige Probleme gleichzeitig zu untersuchen und zu beheben. Sie ist für Szenarien konzipiert, die unabhängige Fehler umfassen, die ohne gemeinsamen Zustand oder Abhängigkeiten gelöst werden können. Die Kernfähigkeit ist die parallele Problemlösung, bei der pro unabhängigem Problembereich ein Agent zugewiesen wird, um die Effizienz zu maximieren.

Skill ansehen