commission-intelligence
Über
Diese Fähigkeit ermöglicht es Claude, Verkaufsprovisionsberechnungen zu erklären, Auszahlungsdiskrepanzen zu klären und Vergütungsszenarien für die Planung zu modellieren. Sie ist nützlich für Entwickler, die Tools für die Analyse von Vertriebsvergütungen, die Quotengestaltung oder die Streitbeilegung erstellen. Die Fähigkeit basiert auf etablierten Prinzipien der Vertriebsvergütung und verarbeitet Strukturen wie Quotenerreichung, Beschleuniger und Splitting-Regeln.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsgit clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/commission-intelligenceKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Commission Intelligence
Demystify sales compensation by explaining commission calculations, identifying discrepancies, and modeling payout scenarios.
When to Use This Skill
- Reps questioning commission statements
- Designing or updating comp plans
- Modeling quota and OTE scenarios
- Resolving payout disputes
- Planning territory changes
Methodology Foundation
Based on Alexander Group Sales Compensation Design and WorldatWork Incentive Compensation principles, covering:
- Base + variable structures
- Quota attainment mechanics
- Accelerators and decelerators
- Split and overlay rules
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Explains calculation logic | Final payout approvals |
| Identifies discrepancies | Exception handling |
| Models scenarios | Plan design choices |
| Documents rules clearly | Policy changes |
| Calculates examples | Quota assignments |
What This Skill Does
- Calculation explanation - Break down how commission was computed
- Discrepancy identification - Find calculation errors or data issues
- Scenario modeling - Project earnings under different assumptions
- Plan documentation - Clarify complex comp plan rules
- Dispute resolution - Provide clear audit trail
How to Use
Explain this commission calculation:
Rep: [Name]
Role: [AE, SDR, etc.]
Quota: $[Amount]/[Period]
Closed this period: $[Amount]
Comp plan rules:
- Base: $X
- OTE: $X
- Variable: X% of base
- Commission rate: X% up to quota
- Accelerator: X% above quota
Deals closed:
- [List deals with amounts and close dates]
Statement shows: $[Commission Amount]
Rep expected: $[Expected Amount]
Instructions
Step 1: Understand the Comp Plan Structure
Common Structures:
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Revenue Commission | % of deal value |
| Quota-Based | % payout based on attainment |
| Tiered | Different rates at different levels |
| Draw | Advance against future commissions |
| MBO | Bonus for specific objectives |
Step 2: Calculate Attainment
Attainment % = (Closed Revenue / Quota) × 100
Example:
- Quota: $500,000
- Closed: $450,000
- Attainment: 90%
Step 3: Apply Commission Rules
Standard Calculation:
Base Commission = Closed Revenue × Commission Rate
With Quota Thresholds:
- Below 50% attainment: 0% payout (common)
- 50-100% attainment: Linear payout
- Above 100%: Accelerator rate kicks in
Accelerator Example:
Plan: 10% up to quota, 15% above quota
Quota: $500K, Closed: $600K
Commission:
- First $500K × 10% = $50,000
- Next $100K × 15% = $15,000
- Total: $65,000
Step 4: Handle Special Cases
| Scenario | Rule |
|---|---|
| Split deals | Divide credit per agreement |
| Multi-year | Recognize per year or upfront |
| Churn/Clawback | Deduct if customer cancels |
| Ramped quota | Reduced quota for new hires |
| SPIFs | One-time bonus amounts |
Step 5: Reconcile Discrepancies
Common Issues:
| Issue | Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Missing deal | Not in CRM | Add deal, recalculate |
| Wrong amount | Incorrect ACV | Verify contract value |
| Wrong rate | Tier confusion | Check attainment level |
| Split error | Credit allocation | Review split agreement |
| Timing | Revenue recognition | Check close date vs. pay period |
Examples
Example 1: Commission Explanation
Input:
Explain why Sarah's commission is $12,500:
Rep: Sarah (AE)
Quota: $200,000/quarter
Q4 Closed: $175,000
Comp plan:
- OTE: $200,000 (50/50 split)
- Variable: $100,000/year = $25,000/quarter
- At 100% attainment: Full $25K variable
- Linear payout from 50-100%
- Accelerator: 1.5x above 100%
Deals:
- Acme Corp: $80,000 (Oct 15)
- Beta Inc: $45,000 (Nov 3)
- Gamma LLC: $50,000 (Dec 20)
Total: $175,000
Output:
## Commission Breakdown: Sarah - Q4
### Step 1: Verify Closed Revenue
| Deal | Amount | Close Date | ✓ |
|------|--------|------------|---|
| Acme Corp | $80,000 | Oct 15 | ✓ Q4 |
| Beta Inc | $45,000 | Nov 3 | ✓ Q4 |
| Gamma LLC | $50,000 | Dec 20 | ✓ Q4 |
| **Total** | **$175,000** | | ✓ |
### Step 2: Calculate Attainment
Attainment = $175,000 / $200,000 = 87.5%
### Step 3: Apply Commission Formula
**Plan Rules:**
- 50% threshold: Below 50% = $0
- 50-100%: Linear from $0 to $25,000
- 100%+: 1.5x accelerator
**Calculation:**
Sarah is at 87.5% (between 50% and 100%)
Linear formula: Payout = (Attainment - 50%) / 50% × Full Variable Payout = (87.5% - 50%) / 50% × $25,000 Payout = 37.5% / 50% × $25,000 Payout = 75% × $25,000 Payout = $18,750
### ⚠️ Discrepancy Found!
**Statement shows**: $12,500
**Calculated**: $18,750
**Difference**: $6,250 underpaid
### Likely Cause
If system shows $12,500, it may be calculating:
$12,500 / $25,000 = 50% payout
This would happen if:
1. One deal not credited (Beta Inc $45K?)
2. Wrong formula (% of revenue vs % of variable)
3. Deal attributed to different quarter
### Recommended Action
1. Verify all 3 deals in commission system
2. Check if Beta Inc close date is in Q4
3. Confirm formula is linear 50-100%, not flat rate
4. Escalate to compensation admin with this breakdown
Example 2: Scenario Modeling
Input:
Model commission scenarios for Mike:
Current:
- Quota: $400,000/quarter
- OTE: $240,000 (60/40 split)
- Variable: $96,000/year = $24,000/quarter
- Rate: 6% of revenue up to quota
- Accelerator: 9% above quota
Q1 pipeline:
- Committed: $320,000
- Best case: $450,000
- Upside: $600,000
What would Mike earn in each scenario?
Output:
## Commission Scenarios: Mike - Q1
### Plan Summary
- Quota: $400,000
- At-quota commission: $24,000 (6% × $400K)
- Accelerator: 9% above quota
### Scenario Analysis
#### Scenario 1: Commit Only ($320K)
Attainment: 80% Revenue: $320,000
Commission at 6%: $320,000 × 6% = $19,200
Quarterly Variable: $19,200 Annualized: $76,800 vs OTE Variable ($96K): -$19,200
**Status**: Below quota, standard rate applies
---
#### Scenario 2: Best Case ($450K)
Attainment: 112.5% Revenue: $450,000
Below quota: $400,000 × 6% = $24,000 Above quota: $50,000 × 9% = $4,500
Total Commission: $28,500
Quarterly Variable: $28,500 vs At-Quota ($24K): +$4,500 (19% bonus)
**Status**: Accelerator kicks in, strong quarter
---
#### Scenario 3: Upside ($600K)
Attainment: 150% Revenue: $600,000
Below quota: $400,000 × 6% = $24,000 Above quota: $200,000 × 9% = $18,000
Total Commission: $42,000
Quarterly Variable: $42,000 vs At-Quota ($24K): +$18,000 (75% bonus)
**Status**: Excellent quarter, maximizing accelerator
---
### Summary Table
| Scenario | Revenue | Attainment | Commission | vs Plan |
|----------|---------|------------|------------|---------|
| Commit | $320K | 80% | $19,200 | -$4,800 |
| Best Case | $450K | 112% | $28,500 | +$4,500 |
| Upside | $600K | 150% | $42,000 | +$18,000 |
### Key Insights
1. **Break-even point**: $400K (100% attainment)
2. **Accelerator value**: Each $10K above quota = $900 extra
3. **Commit gap**: Need $80K more to hit quota
4. **Upside potential**: 75% more commission if pipeline converts
### Recommendations for Mike
1. Focus on moving $80K from Best Case to Commit
2. Push for upside deals - 9% rate is lucrative
3. Prioritize larger deals for accelerator impact
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Explaining commission math step-by-step
- Identifying calculation discrepancies
- Modeling what-if scenarios
- Documenting plan rules clearly
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Access actual payout systems
- Make policy exceptions
- Override approved calculations
- Handle edge cases without rules
When to Escalate to Human
- Policy exceptions or special approvals
- Historical adjustments requiring audit
- Plan design decisions
- Legal or HR compensation issues
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts
- "What if Mike closes an extra $50K deal?"
- "Show me the break-even point to hit OTE."
- "Compare this plan to a flat 8% rate."
- "Model the impact of increasing Mike's quota by 20%."
Refinement Cycle
- Document plan rules clearly
- Run sample calculations
- Verify against actual statements
- Build exception handling guide
- Create rep-facing FAQ
Checklists & Templates
Commission Dispute Resolution Checklist
- Verify all deals in calculation
- Confirm close dates in pay period
- Check split/overlay credits
- Validate attainment tier
- Review for clawbacks/adjustments
- Compare to plan document
Comp Plan Documentation Template
## [Role] Compensation Plan - [Year]
### Structure
- Base Salary: $X
- OTE: $X
- Variable: $X (X% of OTE)
- Pay Period: [Monthly/Quarterly]
### Commission Mechanics
- Quota: $X/[period]
- Base Rate: X%
- Accelerator: X% above quota
- Threshold: X% minimum attainment
### Special Rules
- Splits: [Policy]
- Clawbacks: [Policy]
- Ramping: [New hire policy]
### Examples
[Include 3 scenarios at 80%, 100%, 120%]
References
- Alexander Group Sales Compensation Design
- WorldatWork Incentive Compensation Handbook
- Salesforce Sales Cloud Commission Documentation
- Xactly Commission Best Practices
Related Skills
pipeline-forecasting- Project commission from forecastdeal-risk-scoring- Prioritize high-commission dealsquota-planning- Set achievable targets
Skill Metadata
- Domain: RevOps
- Complexity: Advanced
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 15-30 min per analysis
- Prerequisites: Comp plan document, deal data
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
llamaguard
AndereLlamaGuard ist Metas 7-8B-Parameter-Modell zur Moderation von LLM-Eingaben und -Ausgaben in sechs Sicherheitskategorien wie Gewalt und Hassrede. Es bietet eine Genauigkeit von 94-95 % und kann mit vLLM, Hugging Face oder Amazon SageMaker eingesetzt werden. Nutzen Sie diese Skill, um Inhaltsfilterung und Sicherheitsguardrails einfach in Ihre KI-Anwendungen zu integrieren.
cost-optimization
AndereDiese Claude Skill unterstützt Entwickler bei der Optimierung von Cloud-Kosten durch Ressourcen-Dimensionierung, Tagging-Strategien und Ausgabenanalysen. Sie bietet einen Rahmen zur Senkung von Cloud-Ausgaben und zur Implementierung von Kosten-Governance für AWS, Azure und GCP. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie Infrastrukturkosten analysieren, Ressourcen richtig dimensionieren oder Budgetvorgaben einhalten müssen.
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
AndereDiese Fähigkeit quantisiert LLMs auf 8-Bit- oder 4-Bit-Präzision mittels bitsandbytes und erreicht dabei eine Speicherreduzierung von 50–75 % bei minimalem Genauigkeitsverlust. Sie ist ideal für den Betrieb größerer Modelle mit begrenztem GPU-Speicher oder zur Beschleunigung von Inferenzvorgängen und unterstützt Formate wie INT8, NF4 und FP4. Die Fähigkeit integriert sich in HuggingFace Transformers und ermöglicht QLoRA-Training sowie 8-Bit-Optimierer.
dispatching-parallel-agents
AndereDiese Claude-Fähigkeit verteilt mehrere Agenten, um drei oder mehr unabhängige Probleme gleichzeitig zu untersuchen und zu beheben. Sie ist für Szenarien konzipiert, die unabhängige Fehler umfassen, die ohne gemeinsamen Zustand oder Abhängigkeiten gelöst werden können. Die Kernfähigkeit ist die parallele Problemlösung, bei der pro unabhängigem Problembereich ein Agent zugewiesen wird, um die Effizienz zu maximieren.
