Zurück zu Fähigkeiten

write-incident-runbook

pjt222
Aktualisiert 2 days ago
1 Ansichten
17
2
17
Auf GitHub ansehen
Metawordai

Über

Diese Claude Skill generiert strukturierte Incident-Runbooks, um Reaktionsabläufe zu standardisieren und zu verbessern. Sie erstellt Dokumente mit Diagnoseschritten, Lösungsmaßnahmen, Eskalationspfaden und Kommunikationsvorlagen. Nutzen Sie sie, um die MTTR bei wiederkehrenden Alerts zu reduzieren, Teammitglieder zu schulen und Alerts direkt mit Lösungsprozeduren zu verknüpfen.

Schnellinstallation

Claude Code

Empfohlen
Primär
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Plugin-BefehlAlternativ
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativ
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/write-incident-runbook

Kopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren

Dokumentation

Write Incident Runbook

Actionable runbooks → guide responders through incident diagnosis + resolution.

Use When

  • Doc response procedures for recurring alerts|incidents
  • Standardize response across on-call rotation
  • Reduce MTTR via clear diagnostic steps
  • Training for new team on incident handling
  • Establish escalation paths + comm protocols
  • Migrate tribal knowledge → written
  • Link alerts → resolution (alert annotations)

In

  • Required: Incident|alert name|desc
  • Required: Historical incident data + resolution patterns
  • Optional: Diagnostic queries (Prometheus, logs, traces)
  • Optional: Escalation contacts + comm channels
  • Optional: Prev incident post-mortems

Do

Step 1: Choose Template

See Extended Examples for complete template files.

Select per incident type + complexity.

Basic runbook template structure:

# [Alert/Incident Name] Runbook
## Overview | Severity | Symptoms
## Diagnostic Steps | Resolution Steps
## Escalation | Communication | Prevention | Related

Advanced SRE template (excerpt):

# [Service Name] - [Incident Type] Runbook

## Metadata
- Service, Owner, Severity, On-Call, Last Updated

## Diagnostic Phase
### Quick Health Check (< 5 min): Dashboard, error rate, deployments
### Detailed Investigation (5-20 min): Metrics, logs, traces, failure patterns
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete template)

Key components:

  • Metadata: Service ownership, severity, on-call rotation
  • Diagnostic Phase: Quick checks → detailed → failure patterns
  • Resolution: Immediate mitigation → root cause fix → verify
  • Escalation: Criteria + contact paths
  • Comm: Internal|external templates
  • Prevention: Short|long-term actions

Got: Template selected matches incident complexity, sections appropriate for service type.

If err:

  • Start basic, iterate per incident patterns
  • Review industry examples (Google SRE books, vendor runbooks)
  • Adapt per team feedback after first use

Step 2: Diagnostic Procedures

See Extended Examples for complete diagnostic queries and decision trees.

Step-by-step investigation w/ specific queries.

6-step checklist:

  1. Verify Service Health: Health endpoint + uptime metrics

    curl -I https://api.example.com/health  # Expected: HTTP 200 OK
    
    up{job="api-service"}  # Expected: 1 for all instances
    
  2. Check Error Rate: Current % + breakdown by endpoint

    sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]))
    / sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) * 100  # Expected: < 1%
    
  3. Analyze Logs: Recent errs + top err msgs from Loki

    {job="api-service"} |= "error" | json | level="error"
    
  4. Resource Util: CPU, memory, conn pool status

    avg(rate(container_cpu_usage_seconds_total{pod=~"api-service.*"}[5m])) * 100
    # Expected: < 70%
    
  5. Recent Changes: Deployments, git commits, infra changes

  6. Dependencies: Downstream service health, DB|API latency

Failure pattern decision tree (excerpt):

  • Service down? → Check all pods|instances
  • Error rate elevated? → Check specific err types (5xx, gateway, DB, timeouts)
  • When started? → After deployment (rollback), gradual (resource leak), sudden (traffic|dep)

Got: Diagnostic procedures specific, expected vs actual vals, guides responder.

If err:

  • Test queries in actual monitoring before doc
  • Screenshots of dashboards for visual ref
  • "Common mistakes" section for missed steps
  • Iterate per responder feedback

Step 3: Resolution Procedures

See Extended Examples for all 5 resolution options with full commands and rollback procedures.

Step-by-step remediation w/ rollback.

5 resolution options (brief):

  1. Rollback Deployment (fastest): For post-deployment errs

    kubectl rollout undo deployment/api-service
    

    Verify → Monitor → Confirm (err rate < 1%, latency normal, no alerts)

  2. Scale Up: High CPU|memory, conn pool exhaustion

    kubectl scale deployment/api-service --replicas=$((current * 3/2))
    
  3. Restart Service: Memory leaks, stuck conns, cache corruption

    kubectl rollout restart deployment/api-service
    
  4. Feature Flag | Circuit Breaker: Specific feature errs|external dep failures

    kubectl set env deployment/api-service FEATURE_NAME=false
    
  5. DB Remediation: Conns, slow queries, pool exhaustion

    -- Kill long-running queries, restart connection pool, increase pool size
    

Universal verify checklist:

  • Err rate < 1%
  • Latency P99 < threshold
  • Throughput at baseline
  • Resource healthy (CPU < 70%, Memory < 80%)
  • Deps healthy
  • User-facing tests pass
  • No active alerts

Rollback: Resolution worsens → pause|cancel → revert → reassess

Got: Resolution clear, verify checks, rollback options per action.

If err:

  • Granular steps for complex
  • Screenshots|diagrams for multi-step
  • Doc cmd outs (expected vs actual)
  • Separate runbook for complex resolution

Step 4: Escalation Paths

See Extended Examples for full escalation levels and contact directory template.

When + how to escalate.

Escalate immediately:

  • Customer-facing outage > 15 min
  • SLO err budget > 10% depleted
  • Data loss|corruption|security breach suspected
  • Can't ID root cause in 20 min
  • Mitigation fails|worsens

5 escalation levels:

  1. Primary On-Call (5 min response): Deploy fixes, rollback, scale (up to 30 min solo)
  2. Secondary On-Call (auto after 15 min): Investigation support
  3. Team Lead (architectural): DB changes, vendor escalation, > 1 hour
  4. Incident Commander (cross-team): Multi teams, customer comms, > 2 hours
  5. Executive (C-level): Major impact (>50% users), SLA breach, media|PR, > 4 hours

Process:

  1. Notify target: status, impact, actions taken, help needed, dashboard link
  2. Handoff: timeline, actions, access, remain available
  3. No silence: update every 15 min, ask questions, feedback

Contact directory: Table w/ role, Slack, phone, PagerDuty for:

  • Platform|DB|Security|Network teams
  • Incident Commander
  • External vendors (AWS, DB vendor, CDN provider)

Got: Clear escalation criteria, contact info accessible, paths align w/ org.

If err:

  • Validate contact current (test quarterly)
  • Decision tree for when to escalate
  • Examples of escalation msgs
  • Doc response time per level

Step 5: Comm Templates

See Extended Examples for all internal and external templates with full formatting.

Pre-written msgs for incident updates.

Internal (Slack #incident-response):

  1. Initial Declaration:

    🚨 INCIDENT: [Title] | Severity: [Critical/High/Medium]
    Impact: [users/services] | Owner: @username | Dashboard: [link]
    Quick Summary: [1-2 sentences] | Next update: 15 min
    
  2. Progress Update (every 15-30 min):

    📊 UPDATE #N | Status: [Investigating/Mitigating/Monitoring]
    Actions: [what we tried and outcomes]
    Theory: [what we think is happening]
    Next: [planned actions]
    
  3. Mitigation Complete:

    ✅ MITIGATION | Metrics: Error [before→after], Latency [before→after]
    Root Cause: [brief or "investigating"] | Monitoring 30min before resolved
    
  4. Resolution:

    🎉 RESOLVED | Duration: [time] | Root Cause + Impact + Follow-up actions
    
  5. False Alarm: No impact, no follow-up

External (status page):

  • Initial: Investigating, started time, next update in 15 min
  • Progress: ID'd cause (customer-friendly), implementing fix, est resolution
  • Resolution: Resolved time, root cause (simple), duration, prevention

Customer email template: Timeline, impact, resolution, prevention, compensation (if applicable)

Got: Templates save time, consistent comm, reduce cognitive load on responders.

If err:

  • Customize to company comm style
  • Pre-fill w/ common incident types
  • Slack workflow|bot to populate auto
  • Review during retrospectives

Step 6: Link Runbook → Monitoring

See Extended Examples for complete Prometheus alert configuration and Grafana dashboard JSON.

Integrate w/ alerts + dashboards.

Add runbook links to Prometheus alerts:

- alert: HighErrorRate
  annotations:
    runbook_url: "https://wiki.example.com/runbooks/high-error-rate"
    dashboard_url: "https://grafana.example.com/d/service-overview"
    incident_channel: "#incident-platform"

Embed quick diagnostic links in runbook:

  • Service Overview Dashboard
  • Error Rate Last 1h (Prometheus direct link)
  • Recent Error Logs (Loki|Grafana Explore)
  • Recent Deployments (GitHub|CI)
  • PagerDuty Incidents

Grafana dashboard panel w/ runbook links (md panel listing all incident runbooks w/ on-call + escalation)

Got: Responders access runbooks direct from alerts|dashboards, diagnostic queries pre-filled, one-click access.

If err:

  • Verify URLs accessible w/o VPN|login
  • URL shorteners for complex Grafana|Prometheus
  • Test links quarterly → no break
  • Browser bookmarks for frequent

Check

  • Runbook follows consistent template
  • Diagnostic procedures w/ specific queries + expected vals
  • Resolution actionable w/ clear cmds
  • Escalation criteria + contacts current
  • Comm templates for internal + external
  • Linked from monitoring alerts + dashboards
  • Tested during incident sim or actual
  • Responder feedback incorporated
  • Revision history tracked w/ dates + authors
  • Accessible w/o auth (or cached offline)

Traps

  • Too generic: Vague "check the logs" w/o specific queries → not actionable. Specific.
  • Outdated: Refs old systems|cmds → useless. Quarterly review.
  • No verify: Resolution w/o verify → false positives. "How to confirm fixed."
  • Missing rollback: Every action → rollback plan. Don't trap responders worse state.
  • Assume knowledge: Expert-only → excludes juniors. Write for least experienced on rotation.
  • No ownership: No owners → stale. Assign team|person responsible.
  • Hidden behind auth: Inaccessible during VPN|SSO issues → useless during crisis. Cache copies or public wiki.

  • configure-alerting-rules — Link runbooks to alert annotations for immediate access
  • build-grafana-dashboards — Embed runbook links in dashboards + diagnostic panels
  • setup-prometheus-monitoring — Diagnostic queries from Prometheus in runbook procedures
  • define-slo-sli-sla — Reference SLO impact in incident severity classification

GitHub Repository

pjt222/agent-almanac
Pfad: i18n/caveman-ultra/skills/write-incident-runbook
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Verwandte Skills

content-collections

Meta

Diese Skill bietet eine produktionsgetestete Einrichtung für Content Collections – ein TypeScript-first-Tool, das Markdown/MDX-Dateien in typsichere Datensammlungen mit Zod-Validierung umwandelt. Verwenden Sie ihn beim Erstellen von Blogs, Dokumentationsseiten oder inhaltsstarken Vite + React-Anwendungen, um Typsicherheit und automatische Inhaltsvalidierung zu gewährleisten. Er behandelt alles von der Vite-Plugin-Konfiguration und MDX-Kompilierung bis hin zur Deployment-Optimierung und Schema-Validierung.

Skill ansehen

polymarket

Meta

Diese Fähigkeit ermöglicht es Entwicklern, Anwendungen mit der Polymarket-Prognosemärkte-Plattform zu erstellen, einschließlich API-Integration für Handel und Marktdaten. Sie bietet außerdem Echtzeit-Datenstreaming über WebSocket, um Live-Trades und Marktaktivitäten zu überwachen. Nutzen Sie sie zur Implementierung von Handelsstrategien oder zur Erstellung von Tools, die Live-Marktaktualisierungen verarbeiten.

Skill ansehen

creating-opencode-plugins

Meta

Diese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, OpenCode-Plugins zu erstellen, die in über 25 Ereignistypen wie Befehle, Dateien und LSP-Operationen eingreifen. Sie bietet die Plugin-Struktur, Event-API-Spezifikationen und Implementierungsmuster für JavaScript/TypeScript-Module. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie den Lebenszyklus des OpenCode KI-Assistenten mit benutzerdefinierter ereignisgesteuerter Logik abfangen, überwachen oder erweitern müssen.

Skill ansehen

sglang

Meta

SGLang ist ein hochperformantes LLM-Serving-Framework, das sich auf schnelle, strukturierte Generierung für JSON, Regex und agentenbasierte Workflows unter Verwendung seines RadixAttention-Prefix-Cachings spezialisiert. Es bietet deutlich schnellere Inferenz, insbesondere für Aufgaben mit wiederholten Präfixen, was es ideal für komplexe, strukturierte Ausgaben und Mehrfachdialoge macht. Wählen Sie SGLang gegenüber Alternativen wie vLLM, wenn Sie constrained decoding benötigen oder Anwendungen mit umfangreicher Präfix-Weitergabe entwickeln.

Skill ansehen