Zurück zu Fähigkeiten

instrument-distributed-tracing

pjt222
Aktualisiert 2 days ago
2 Ansichten
17
2
17
Auf GitHub ansehen
Testengeneral

Über

Diese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, Anwendungen mit OpenTelemetry für verteilte Ablaufverfolgung zu instrumentieren. Sie behandelt sowohl automatische als auch manuelle Instrumentierung, Kontextweitergabe und Integration mit Backends wie Jaeger oder Tempo. Nutzen Sie sie, um Latenzprobleme zu debuggen, Anfrageflüsse über Microservices hinweg zu verstehen und Traces mit Logs und Metriken zu korrelieren.

Schnellinstallation

Claude Code

Empfohlen
Primär
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Plugin-BefehlAlternativ
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativ
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/instrument-distributed-tracing

Kopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren

Dokumentation

Instrument Distributed Tracing

Wire OpenTelemetry. Track requests cross microservices. Find slow spots.

When Use

  • Debug latency cross many services
  • Follow request flow, see service deps
  • Spot slow DB queries, slow API calls inside transaction
  • Tie traces to logs and metrics for root cause
  • Measure end-to-end latency: user req to response
  • Migrate old tracing (Zipkin, Jaeger) to OpenTelemetry
  • Prove SLO compliance via latency percentiles

Inputs

  • Required: List of services to instrument (languages, frameworks)
  • Required: Backend choice (Jaeger, Tempo, Zipkin, vendor SaaS)
  • Optional: Existing instrumentation libs (OpenTracing, Zipkin)
  • Optional: Sampling strategy (percent, rate limit)
  • Optional: Custom span attrs for business metadata

Steps

See Extended Examples for complete configuration files and templates.

Step 1: Stand Up Backend

Deploy Jaeger or Grafana Tempo. Receive, store traces.

Option A: Jaeger all-in-one (dev/test):

# docker-compose.yml
version: '3.8'
services:
  jaeger:
    image: jaegertracing/all-in-one:1.51
    ports:
      - "5775:5775/udp"   # Zipkin compact thrift
      - "6831:6831/udp"   # Jaeger compact thrift
      - "6832:6832/udp"   # Jaeger binary thrift
      - "5778:5778"       # Serve configs
      - "16686:16686"     # Jaeger UI
      - "14268:14268"     # Jaeger HTTP thrift
      - "14250:14250"     # Jaeger GRPC
      - "9411:9411"       # Zipkin compatible endpoint
    environment:
      - COLLECTOR_ZIPKIN_HOST_PORT=:9411
      - COLLECTOR_OTLP_ENABLED=true
    restart: unless-stopped

Option B: Grafana Tempo (prod, scales):

# docker-compose.yml
version: '3.8'
services:
  tempo:
    image: grafana/tempo:2.3.0
    command: ["-config.file=/etc/tempo.yaml"]
    volumes:
      - ./tempo.yaml:/etc/tempo.yaml
      - tempo-data:/tmp/tempo
    ports:
      - "3200:3200"   # Tempo HTTP
      - "4317:4317"   # OTLP gRPC
      - "4318:4318"   # OTLP HTTP
      - "9411:9411"   # Zipkin
    restart: unless-stopped

volumes:
  tempo-data:

Tempo config (tempo.yaml):

server:
  http_listen_port: 3200

distributor:
  receivers:
    jaeger:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

For prod with S3 storage:

storage:
  trace:
    backend: s3
    s3:
      bucket: tempo-traces
      endpoint: s3.amazonaws.com
      region: us-east-1
    wal:
      path: /tmp/tempo/wal
    pool:
      max_workers: 100
      queue_depth: 10000

Got: Backend live. Ready for traces over OTLP. Jaeger UI or Grafana shows "no traces" first.

If fail:

  • Ports in use? netstat -tulpn | grep -E '(4317|16686|3200)'
  • Container logs: docker logs jaeger or docker logs tempo
  • Test OTLP endpoint: curl http://localhost:4318/v1/traces -v
  • For Tempo: check config syntax with tempo -config.file=/etc/tempo.yaml -verify-config

Step 2: Instrument Apps (Auto)

Use OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation. Common frameworks. Minimal code change.

Python with Flask:

pip install opentelemetry-distro opentelemetry-exporter-otlp
opentelemetry-bootstrap -a install
# app.py
from flask import Flask
from opentelemetry import trace
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace import TracerProvider
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.export import BatchSpanProcessor
from opentelemetry.exporter.otlp.proto.grpc.trace_exporter import OTLPSpanExporter
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Go with Gin framework:

go get go.opentelemetry.io/otel
go get go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc
go get go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/trace
go get go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/gin-gonic/gin/otelgin
package main

import (
    "context"
    "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Node.js with Express:

npm install @opentelemetry/api \
            @opentelemetry/sdk-node \
            @opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node \
            @opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc
// tracing.js
const { NodeSDK } = require('@opentelemetry/sdk-node');
const { OTLPTraceExporter } = require('@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc');
const { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } = require('@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node');
const { Resource } = require('@opentelemetry/resources');
const { SemanticResourceAttributes } = require('@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions');
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Got: Traces from instrumented services show in Jaeger UI or Grafana. HTTP requests auto-create spans.

If fail:

  • Exporter endpoint reachable from app?
  • Env vars set: OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://tempo:4317
  • Turn on debug logs: OTEL_LOG_LEVEL=debug (Python), OTEL_LOG_LEVEL=DEBUG (Node.js)
  • Test with simple span — verify export pipe
  • Check for version conflicts across OTel packages

Step 3: Add Manual Instrumentation

Custom spans for business logic, DB queries, external calls.

Python manual spans:

from opentelemetry import trace

tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__)

def process_order(order_id):
    # Create a span for the entire operation
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Go manual spans:

import (
    "context"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/attribute"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/codes"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace"
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Span attrs best practice:

  • Use semantic conventions: http.method, http.status_code, db.system, db.statement
  • Business context: user.id, order.id, product.category
  • Resource IDs: instance.id, region, availability_zone
  • Record errors: span.RecordError(err) + span.SetStatus(codes.Error, message)
  • Events for milestones: span.AddEvent("cache_miss")

Got: Custom spans in trace view. Parent-child right. Attrs visible in span details. Errors highlighted.

If fail:

  • Context propagation: parent span context passed to child?
  • Span names descriptive, follow naming conventions?
  • Spans ended? (defer span.End() in Go, with blocks in Python)
  • Attr types: strings, ints, bools, floats only
  • Semantic conventions: use standard attr names where applicable

Step 4: Wire Context Propagation

Trace context must flow cross service boundaries, async ops.

HTTP headers propagation (W3C Trace Context):

# Client side (Python with requests)
import requests
from opentelemetry import trace
from opentelemetry.propagate import inject

tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
// Server side (Go with Gin)
import (
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/propagation"
)

# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Message queue propagation (Kafka):

# Producer
from opentelemetry.propagate import inject
from kafka import KafkaProducer

producer = KafkaProducer(bootstrap_servers=['kafka:9092'])

# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
# Consumer
from opentelemetry.propagate import extract

def process_message(msg):
    # Extract trace context from Kafka headers
    headers = {k: v.decode('utf-8') for k, v in msg.headers}
    ctx = extract(headers)

    # Continue the trace
    with tracer.start_as_current_span("process_order_event", context=ctx):
        order_id = json.loads(msg.value)['order_id']
        handle_order(order_id)

Async ops (Python asyncio):

import asyncio
from opentelemetry import trace, context

async def async_operation():
    # Capture current context
    token = context.attach(context.get_current())
    try:
        with tracer.start_as_current_span("async_database_query"):
            await asyncio.sleep(0.1)  # Simulated async work
            return "result"
    finally:
        context.detach(token)

Got: Traces span many services. Trace IDs consistent cross boundaries. Parent-child preserved.

If fail:

  • W3C Trace Context propagator configured? otel.propagation.set_global_textmap(TraceContextTextMapPropagator())
  • Headers passed in HTTP requests?
  • Kafka: headers supported by broker version (v0.11+)?
  • Debug: log traceparent header value
  • Use trace viz to spot broken links

Step 5: Set Sampling Strategy

Sample to cut volume and cost. Keep visibility.

Sampling strategies:

from opentelemetry.sdk.trace import TracerProvider
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.sampling import (
    ParentBased,
    TraceIdRatioBased,
    StaticSampler,
    Decision
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Tail-based sampling with Tempo:

In tempo.yaml:

overrides:
  defaults:
    metrics_generator:
      processors: [service-graphs, span-metrics]
      storage:
        path: /tmp/tempo/generator/wal
        remote_write:
          - url: http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/write
            send_exemplars: true

    # Tail sampling (requires tempo-query)
    ingestion_rate_limit_bytes: 5000000
    ingestion_burst_size_bytes: 10000000

Use Grafana Tempo's TraceQL for dynamic sampling:

# Sample traces with errors
{ status = error }

# Sample slow traces (>1s)
{ duration > 1s }

# Sample specific services
{ resource.service.name = "checkout-service" }

Got: Trace volume cut to target percent. Error traces always sampled. Sampling decision in trace metadata.

If fail:

  • Sampler applied before tracer provider init?
  • Sampling decision attr in exported spans?
  • Tail sampling: enough buffering? (ingestion_burst_size_bytes)
  • Watch dropped traces: otel_traces_dropped_total metric
  • Test with synthetic high-volume traffic to validate rate

Step 6: Tie Traces to Metrics and Logs

Link traces, metrics, logs. Unified observability.

Add trace IDs to logs (Python):

import logging
from opentelemetry import trace

# Custom log formatter with trace context
class TraceFormatter(logging.Formatter):
    def format(self, record):
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Generate metrics from traces (Tempo):

# tempo.yaml
metrics_generator:
  registry:
    external_labels:
      cluster: production
  storage:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Makes Prometheus metrics:

  • traces_service_graph_request_total - request count between services
  • traces_span_metrics_duration_seconds - span duration histogram
  • traces_spanmetrics_calls_total - span call counts

Query traces from metrics (Grafana):

Add exemplar support to Prometheus datasource in Grafana:

datasources:
  - name: Prometheus
    type: prometheus
    url: http://prometheus:9090
    jsonData:
      exemplarTraceIdDestinations:
        - name: trace_id
          datasourceName: Tempo

In Grafana dashboard, turn on exemplars:

{
  "fieldConfig": {
    "defaults": {
      "custom": {
        "showExemplars": true
      }
    }
  }
}

Got: Click metric exemplar opens trace. Logs show trace IDs. Traces link to logs. Unified debugging cross signals.

If fail:

  • Exemplar support on in Prometheus (v2.26+)?
  • Trace ID format matches (32-char hex)?
  • Metrics generator on in Tempo config?
  • Remote write endpoint reachable from Tempo?
  • Test exemplar queries: histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])) and on() exemplar

Checks

  • Backend receives spans from all instrumented services
  • Traces show right parent-child cross services
  • Span attrs include semantic conventions + business context
  • Context propagates cross HTTP and message queues
  • Sampling cuts volume to target percent
  • Error traces always sampled (if error-aware sampling)
  • Trace IDs in app logs, right format
  • Grafana shows traces linked from metrics via exemplars
  • Log panels have data links to trace viewer
  • Trace retention matches storage policy

Pitfalls

  • Context not propagated: Forgot to pass context downstream → broken traces. Pass context explicit.
  • Spans never ended: Missing defer span.End() (Go) or with blocks (Python) → open spans, memory leaks.
  • Over-instrumentation: Span for every function bloats traces. Focus on service boundaries, DB calls, external APIs.
  • Missing error recording: Skip span.RecordError() → lose debug info. Always record errors in spans.
  • High cardinality attrs: Unbounded values (user IDs, request bodies) as span attrs → storage pain. Sample or aggregate.
  • Wrong span kind: CLIENT vs SERVER vs INTERNAL mixed up → wrong service graph. Follow semantic conventions.
  • Sampling before context: Sampling must respect parent context. Use ParentBased sampler.

See Also

  • correlate-observability-signals - Unified debugging across metrics, logs, traces by trace ID
  • setup-prometheus-monitoring - Metrics from traces via Tempo generator
  • configure-log-aggregation - Trace IDs in logs for correlation
  • build-grafana-dashboards - Viz trace-derived metrics and exemplars

GitHub Repository

pjt222/agent-almanac
Pfad: i18n/caveman/skills/instrument-distributed-tracing
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Verwandte Skills

evaluating-llms-harness

Testen

Diese Claude Skill führt den lm-evaluation-harness aus, um LLMs über 60+ standardisierte akademische Aufgaben wie MMLU und GSM8K zu benchmarken. Sie wurde für Entwickler entwickelt, um Modellqualität zu vergleichen, Trainingsfortschritt zu verfolgen oder akademische Ergebnisse zu berichten. Das Tool unterstützt verschiedene Backends, einschließlich HuggingFace- und vLLM-Modelle.

Skill ansehen

cloudflare-cron-triggers

Testen

Diese Fähigkeit bietet umfassendes Wissen zur Implementierung von Cloudflare Cron Triggers, um Workers mithilfe von Cron-Ausdrücken zu planen. Sie behandelt das Einrichten periodischer Aufgaben, Wartungsjobs und automatisierter Workflows, während häufige Probleme wie ungültige Cron-Ausdrücke und Zeitzonenprobleme behandelt werden. Entwickler können sie zum Konfigurieren geplanter Handler, zum Testen von Cron-Triggers und zur Integration mit Workflows und Green Compute verwenden.

Skill ansehen

webapp-testing

Testen

Diese Claude Skill bietet ein Playwright-basiertes Toolkit zum Testen lokaler Webanwendungen durch Python-Skripte. Es ermöglicht Frontend-Verifizierung, UI-Debugging, Screenshot-Aufnahme und Log-Einblick bei gleichzeitiger Verwaltung von Server-Lebenszyklen. Nutzen Sie es für Browser-Automatisierungsaufgaben, führen Sie Skripte jedoch direkt aus, anstatt deren Quellcode zu lesen, um Kontextverschmutzung zu vermeiden.

Skill ansehen

finishing-a-development-branch

Testen

Diese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, abgeschlossene Arbeiten zu finalisieren, indem sie testet, ob Tests bestehen, und dann strukturierte Integrationsoptionen präsentiert. Sie leitet den Workflow für das Zusammenführen von Code, das Erstellen von PRs oder das Bereinigen von Branches nach Abschluss der Implementierung. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Ihr Code bereit und getestet ist, um den Entwicklungsprozess systematisch abzuschließen.

Skill ansehen