formulate-maxwell-equations
Über
Diese Claude-Fähigkeit bietet Werkzeuge für die Arbeit mit den Maxwellschen Gleichungen in integraler und differentieller Form. Sie ermöglicht Entwicklern, elektromagnetische Felder zu analysieren, Randwertprobleme zu lösen, Wellengleichungen abzuleiten und den Energietransport über den Poynting-Vektor zu berechnen. Nutzen Sie sie für fortgeschrittene Aufgaben der Elektrodynamik, die Materialgrenzflächen, Strahlung und die Verbindung statischer Felder mit dem vollständigen dynamischen Rahmenwerk betreffen.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/formulate-maxwell-equationsKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Formulate Maxwell Equations
EM phenomenon → state Maxwell eqs (int/diff) → apply BCs + symmetry → solve PDE → derive Poynting/pressure/impedance → verify limits.
Use When
- BVP for E, B w/ sources + interfaces
- Derive EM wave eq from first principles
- Compute Poynting vector + momentum density
- BCs at interfaces (dielectrics, conductors, magnetic)
- Displacement current role in Ampere-Maxwell
- Static limits (Coulomb, Biot-Savart) → unified time-dep
In
- Required: config (geometry, sources, material props)
- Required: target quantity (E, B, wave, flux, boundary value)
- Optional: symmetry (planar/cyl/sph/none)
- Optional: time-dep (static/harmonic omega/general)
- Optional: BCs at interfaces/conductors
Do
Step 1: State 4 eqs + select subset
-
Gauss E: div(E)=rho/epsilon_0 (diff) or ∮E·dA=Q_enc/epsilon_0 (int). Use w/ symmetry for E from charges.
-
Gauss B: div(B)=0 (diff) or ∮B·dA=0 (int). No monopoles. Consistency check.
-
Faraday: curl(E)=-dB/dt (diff) or ∮E·dl=-dPhi_B/dt (int). Changing B → curling E. Induction + waves.
-
Ampere-Maxwell: curl(B)=mu_0 J + mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt (diff) or ∮B·dl=mu_0 I_enc + mu_0 epsilon_0 dPhi_E/dt (int). Displacement current mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt → essential for waves + continuity.
-
Form: diff for local/wave/PDE; int for symmetry problems.
-
Active subset: electrostatics → Gauss E + curl(E)=0. Magnetostatics → Gauss B + Ampere (no displacement).
## Maxwell Equations for This Problem
- **Form**: [differential / integral / both]
- **Active equations**: [list which of the four are non-trivial constraints]
- **Source terms**: rho = [charge density], J = [current density]
- **Time dependence**: [static / harmonic / general]
- **Displacement current**: [negligible / essential -- with justification]
→ 4 eqs stated, subset ID'd w/ justify, displacement current included/argued negligible.
If err: unclear displacement current → estimate |epsilon_0 dE/dt|/|J|. ≥1 → keep. Vacuum + no free charges → always essential.
Step 2: BCs + symmetry
-
BCs at interfaces (media 1,2, surface charge sigma_f, surface current K_f):
- Normal E: epsilon_1 E_1n - epsilon_2 E_2n = sigma_f
- Tangential E: E_1t = E_2t
- Normal B: B_1n = B_2n
- Tangential H: n_hat × (H_1-H_2) = K_f (n_hat: 2→1)
-
Conductor BCs (perfect):
- E_tan=0 (inside E=0)
- B_normal=0 (time-varying)
- sigma = epsilon_0 E_normal
- K = (1/mu_0) n_hat × B
-
Symmetry:
- Planar: fields depend on 1 coord → ODE
- Cylindrical: (rho,z) or rho
- Spherical: r only
- Translational invariance → Fourier transform
-
Gauge (potentials phi, A):
- Coulomb: div(A)=0 (separates static + radiation)
- Lorenz: div(A) + mu_0 epsilon_0 d(phi)/dt=0 (Lorentz-covariant, decouples wave eqs)
## Boundary Conditions and Symmetry
- **Interfaces**: [list with media properties on each side]
- **Boundary conditions applied**: [normal E, tangential E, normal B, tangential H]
- **Symmetry**: [planar / cylindrical / spherical / none]
- **Reduced coordinates**: [independent variables after symmetry reduction]
- **Gauge** (if using potentials): [Coulomb / Lorenz / other]
→ BCs at every interface, symmetry applied, ready for PDE.
If err: over-determined → check components vs conditions. Under-determined → missed BC (often tangential H or radiation at ∞).
Step 3: Solve PDE
-
Wave eq derivation (source-free, linear, homogeneous):
- curl(curl(E)) = -d/dt(curl(B)) = -mu epsilon d²E/dt²
- Identity: curl(curl(E)) = grad(div(E)) - nabla²(E)
- div(E)=0 → nabla²(E) = mu epsilon d²E/dt²
- v=1/sqrt(mu epsilon); vacuum c=1/sqrt(mu_0 epsilon_0)
- Same for B
-
Plane wave (z-prop):
- E(z,t)=E_0 exp[i(kz - omega t)], k=omega/v=omega*sqrt(mu epsilon)
- B=(1/v) k_hat × E
- |B|=|E|/v
- Polarization: linear/circular/elliptical
-
Laplace/Poisson (static):
- nabla²(phi)=-rho/epsilon_0 (Poisson) or nabla²(phi)=0 (Laplace)
- Separation of variables → match BCs
-
Guided waves/cavities:
- TE/TM decomposition
- Conducting-wall BCs
- Eigenvalue → propagation const / resonance
- Cutoff: omega_c = vpisqrt((m/a)²+(n/b)²) rect guide a×b
-
Skin depth:
- delta = sqrt(2/(omega mu sigma_c))
- Decay exp(-z/delta)
- 60 Hz Cu: ~8.5 mm; 1 GHz: ~2 micrometers
## Field Solution
- **Equation solved**: [wave equation / Laplace / Poisson / eigenvalue]
- **Solution method**: [separation of variables / Fourier transform / Green's function / numerical]
- **Result**: E(r, t) = [expression], B(r, t) = [expression]
- **Dispersion relation**: omega(k) = [if wave solution]
- **Characteristic scales**: [wavelength, skin depth, decay length]
→ Explicit E, B satisfying all eqs + BCs, dispersion/eigenvalues if applicable.
If err: can't separate → try new coord or numerics (FD/FE). Back-sub fails Maxwell → algebra err in curl/div.
Step 4: Derived quantities
-
Poynting: S = (1/mu_0) E × B (W/m²)
- Plane wave: S = (1/mu_0) |E|²/v in prop dir
- Time-avg: <S> = (1/2) Re(E × H*) harmonic
- Intensity: I = |<S>|
-
Energy density:
- u = (1/2)(epsilon_0 |E|² + |B|²/mu_0) vacuum
- u = (1/2)(E·D + B·H) linear media
- Conservation: du/dt + div(S) = -J·E (Poynting's thm)
-
Radiation pressure:
- Absorber: P_rad = I/c = <S>/c
- Reflector: P_rad = 2I/c = 2<S>/c
-
Wave impedance:
- Medium: eta = sqrt(mu/epsilon) = mu*v
- Vacuum: eta_0 = sqrt(mu_0/epsilon_0) ≈ 377 Ω
- |E| = eta |H|
- Reflection normal: r = (eta_2 - eta_1)/(eta_2 + eta_1)
-
Power + Q:
- Ohmic loss/vol: p_loss = sigma |E|²/2
- Q = omega * (stored energy)/(power dissipated/cycle)
- Bandwidth: Delta_omega = omega/Q
## Derived Quantities
- **Poynting vector**: S = [expression], <S> = [time-averaged]
- **Energy density**: u = [expression]
- **Radiation pressure**: P_rad = [value]
- **Wave impedance**: eta = [value]
- **Reflection/transmission**: r = [value], t = [value]
- **Q-factor** (if resonant): Q = [value]
→ All quantities w/ correct units, energy conservation via Poynting, reasonable magnitudes.
If err: Poynting thm not balanced → E/B inconsistent. Re-verify all 4 eqs. Common: E, B from different approx not mutually consistent.
Step 5: Verify limits
-
Static (omega→0):
- E → Coulomb / Laplace-Poisson
- B → Biot-Savart / Ampere (no displacement)
- Displacement → 0
-
Plane wave: v=1/sqrt(mu epsilon), correct polarization.
-
Perfect conductor (sigma→∞):
- delta → 0
- E_tan → 0 at surface
- r → -1 (phase inversion)
-
Vacuum (epsilon_r=1, mu_r=1): v=c, eta=eta_0 ≈ 377 Ω.
-
Energy conservation: integrate Poynting thm over closed vol → total field energy rate + outflow = -power from currents. Imbalance = err.
## Limiting Case Verification
| Limit | Condition | Expected | Obtained | Match |
|-------|-----------|----------|----------|-------|
| Static | omega -> 0 | Coulomb / Biot-Savart | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Plane wave | unbounded medium | v = c/n, eta = eta_0/n | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Perfect conductor | sigma -> inf | delta -> 0, r -> -1 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Vacuum | epsilon_r = mu_r = 1 | c, eta_0 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Energy conservation | Poynting's theorem | balanced | [check] | [Yes/No] |
→ All limits match. Energy conserved to numerical precision.
If err: Static fail → source/BC err. Plane wave fail → wave eq derivation err. Energy conservation fail → E/B inconsistent. Trace + fix before accepting.
Check
- 4 eqs stated, subset ID'd
- Displacement current included or justified negligible
- BCs applied at every interface
- Symmetry reduces PDE dim
- Wave eq / Laplace / Poisson correctly derived
- Solutions back-sub satisfy all 4 eqs
- Poynting + energy density correct units (W/m², J/m³)
- Poynting thm verified
- Impedance + r, t reasonable
- Static limit = Coulomb + Biot-Savart
- Plane wave limit: v=1/sqrt(mu epsilon), E⊥B⊥k
- Solution reproducible
Traps
- Drop displacement: div(curl B)=0 → div(J)=0 contradicts charge conservation → mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt essential. Never drop w/o checking dE/dt vs J/epsilon_0.
- Inconsistent E, B: solving independently can violate Faraday + Gauss B. Always verify all 4.
- Wrong n_hat dir: n_hat × (H_1-H_2)=K_f requires 2→1. Reverse flips sign.
- D/E/B/H confusion: vacuum D=epsilon_0 E, B=mu_0 H. Media D=epsilon E, B=mu H. Maxwell uses D,H for free sources, E,B for force. Mixing → epsilon_r/mu_r errors.
- Phase vs group v: v=omega/k phase. Energy/info → v_g=d(omega)/dk. Dispersive media: differ.
- Forget radiation condition: scattering in unbounded → Sommerfeld (outgoing at ∞). Missing → non-unique + unphysical incoming.
→
analyze-magnetic-field— static B (magnetostatic limit)solve-electromagnetic-induction— Faraday + RL circuitsformulate-quantum-problem— quantize EM (QED)derive-theoretical-result— rigorous wave/Green's/dispersionanalyze-diffusion-dynamics— diffusion eq from Maxwell (skin effect)
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
llamaguard
AndereLlamaGuard ist Metas 7-8B-Parameter-Modell zur Moderation von LLM-Eingaben und -Ausgaben in sechs Sicherheitskategorien wie Gewalt und Hassrede. Es bietet eine Genauigkeit von 94-95 % und kann mit vLLM, Hugging Face oder Amazon SageMaker eingesetzt werden. Nutzen Sie diese Skill, um Inhaltsfilterung und Sicherheitsguardrails einfach in Ihre KI-Anwendungen zu integrieren.
cost-optimization
AndereDiese Claude Skill unterstützt Entwickler bei der Optimierung von Cloud-Kosten durch Ressourcen-Dimensionierung, Tagging-Strategien und Ausgabenanalysen. Sie bietet einen Rahmen zur Senkung von Cloud-Ausgaben und zur Implementierung von Kosten-Governance für AWS, Azure und GCP. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie Infrastrukturkosten analysieren, Ressourcen richtig dimensionieren oder Budgetvorgaben einhalten müssen.
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
AndereDiese Fähigkeit quantisiert LLMs auf 8-Bit- oder 4-Bit-Präzision mittels bitsandbytes und erreicht dabei eine Speicherreduzierung von 50–75 % bei minimalem Genauigkeitsverlust. Sie ist ideal für den Betrieb größerer Modelle mit begrenztem GPU-Speicher oder zur Beschleunigung von Inferenzvorgängen und unterstützt Formate wie INT8, NF4 und FP4. Die Fähigkeit integriert sich in HuggingFace Transformers und ermöglicht QLoRA-Training sowie 8-Bit-Optimierer.
dispatching-parallel-agents
AndereDiese Claude-Fähigkeit verteilt mehrere Agenten, um drei oder mehr unabhängige Probleme gleichzeitig zu untersuchen und zu beheben. Sie ist für Szenarien konzipiert, die unabhängige Fehler umfassen, die ohne gemeinsamen Zustand oder Abhängigkeiten gelöst werden können. Die Kernfähigkeit ist die parallele Problemlösung, bei der pro unabhängigem Problembereich ein Agent zugewiesen wird, um die Effizienz zu maximieren.
