correlate-observability-signals
Über
Diese Fähigkeit vereinheitlicht Metriken, Logs und Traces für kohärentes Debugging und ermöglicht eine schnelle Ursachenanalyse bei komplexen, systemübergreifenden Vorfällen. Sie implementiert Funktionen wie Log-to-Trace-Verknüpfungen über Exemplare und erstellt vereinheitlichte Dashboards mit RED/USE-Methoden. Nutzen Sie sie, um die Lösungszeit zu verkürzen, wenn Sie von isolierten Tools zu einer vereinheitlichten Observability-Plattform wechseln.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/correlate-observability-signalsKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Correlate Observability Signals
Connect metrics, logs, traces. Unified debugging across three pillars of observability.
When Use
- Investigating complex incidents spanning many systems
- Cutting MTTR (mean time to resolution)
- Building unified observability dashboards
- Implementing distributed tracing
- Moving from siloed tools to unified observability
Inputs
- Required: Prometheus (metrics)
- Required: Log aggregation system (Loki, Elasticsearch, CloudWatch)
- Required: Distributed tracing backend (Tempo, Jaeger, Zipkin)
- Optional: Grafana for unified visualization
- Optional: OpenTelemetry instrumentation
Steps
See Extended Examples for complete configuration files and templates.
Step 1: Implement Trace Context Propagation
Add trace IDs to all logs and metrics. Use OpenTelemetry.
// Go example: Propagate trace context to logs
package main
import (
"context"
"log"
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace"
)
func handleRequest(ctx context.Context, userID string) {
// Extract trace context
span := trace.SpanFromContext(ctx)
traceID := span.SpanContext().TraceID().String()
// Include trace ID in structured logs
log.Printf("trace_id=%s user_id=%s action=process_request", traceID, userID)
// Business logic here
processData(ctx, userID)
}
func processData(ctx context.Context, userID string) {
tracer := otel.Tracer("my-service")
ctx, span := tracer.Start(ctx, "processData")
defer span.End()
traceID := span.SpanContext().TraceID().String()
log.Printf("trace_id=%s user_id=%s action=process_data", traceID, userID)
// More work
}
Python example:
# Python: Flask with OpenTelemetry
from flask import Flask, request
from opentelemetry import trace
from opentelemetry.instrumentation.flask import FlaskInstrumentor
import logging
app = Flask(__name__)
FlaskInstrumentor().instrument_app(app)
logging.basicConfig(
format='%(asctime)s trace_id=%(otelTraceID)s span_id=%(otelSpanID)s %(message)s',
level=logging.INFO
)
@app.route('/api/users/<user_id>')
def get_user(user_id):
span = trace.get_current_span()
trace_id = format(span.get_span_context().trace_id, '032x')
logging.info(f"Fetching user {user_id}", extra={
'otelTraceID': trace_id,
'otelSpanID': format(span.get_span_context().span_id, '016x')
})
# Business logic
return {"user_id": user_id}
Got: All logs include trace_id field. Enables log-to-trace correlation.
If fail: Trace IDs missing? Check OpenTelemetry SDK init and context propagation.
Step 2: Configure Exemplars in Prometheus
Exemplars link metrics to traces.
# prometheus.yml
global:
scrape_interval: 15s
# Enable exemplar storage
exemplars:
max_exemplars: 100000 # Per TSDB block
scrape_configs:
- job_name: 'api-service'
static_configs:
- targets: ['api-service:8080']
# Scrape exemplars
metric_relabel_configs:
- source_labels: [__name__]
regex: 'http_request_duration_seconds.*'
action: keep
Instrument app to emit exemplars:
// Go: Emit exemplars with Prometheus histogram
package main
import (
"github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus"
"github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promauto"
"go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace"
)
var httpDuration = promauto.NewHistogramVec(
prometheus.HistogramOpts{
Name: "http_request_duration_seconds",
Help: "HTTP request duration",
Buckets: prometheus.DefBuckets,
},
[]string{"method", "endpoint", "status"},
)
func recordRequest(ctx context.Context, method, endpoint, status string, duration float64) {
// Get trace ID for exemplar
span := trace.SpanFromContext(ctx)
traceID := span.SpanContext().TraceID().String()
// Record metric with exemplar
observer := httpDuration.WithLabelValues(method, endpoint, status)
observer.(prometheus.ExemplarObserver).ObserveWithExemplar(
duration,
prometheus.Labels{"trace_id": traceID},
)
}
Query exemplars in Prometheus:
# Histogram with exemplars
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))
In Grafana, exemplars show as dots on histogram graphs. Link to traces.
Got: Grafana shows exemplars on metric graphs. Click opens matching trace.
If fail: Verify Prometheus version ≥2.26 (exemplar support). Check Grafana data source config enables exemplars.
Step 3: Build Unified Dashboard with RED Method
RED Method: Rate, Errors, Duration (for services)
{
"dashboard": {
"title": "API Service - RED Dashboard",
"panels": [
{
"title": "Request Rate (req/s)",
"type": "graph",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "sum(rate(http_requests_total{job=\"api-service\"}[5m])) by (endpoint)",
"legendFormat": "{{ endpoint }}"
}
],
"exemplars": true
},
{
"title": "Error Rate (%)",
"type": "graph",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "sum(rate(http_requests_total{job=\"api-service\", status=~\"5..\"}[5m])) / sum(rate(http_requests_total{job=\"api-service\"}[5m])) * 100",
"legendFormat": "Error %"
}
],
"exemplars": true
},
{
"title": "Request Duration (p50, p95, p99)",
"type": "graph",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "histogram_quantile(0.50, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job=\"api-service\"}[5m]))",
"legendFormat": "p50"
},
{
"expr": "histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job=\"api-service\"}[5m]))",
"legendFormat": "p95"
},
{
"expr": "histogram_quantile(0.99, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job=\"api-service\"}[5m]))",
"legendFormat": "p99"
}
],
"exemplars": true
},
{
"title": "Correlated Logs",
"type": "logs",
"datasource": "Loki",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "{job=\"api-service\"} |= \"error\""
}
],
"options": {
"showTime": true,
"enableLogDetails": true
}
}
]
}
}
Got: Single dashboard shows rate, errors, duration + correlated logs.
If fail: Panels show "No Data"? Verify metric names match instrumentation.
Step 4: Implement USE Method for Resources
USE Method: Utilization, Saturation, Errors (for resources like CPU, memory, disk)
{
"dashboard": {
"title": "Node Resources - USE Dashboard",
"panels": [
{
"title": "CPU Utilization (%)",
"type": "graph",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "100 - (avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode=\"idle\"}[5m])) * 100)",
"legendFormat": "CPU Usage %"
}
]
},
{
"title": "CPU Saturation (Load Average)",
"type": "graph",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "node_load1",
"legendFormat": "1min load"
},
{
"expr": "node_load5",
"legendFormat": "5min load"
},
{
"expr": "count(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode=\"idle\"})",
"legendFormat": "CPU cores (threshold)"
}
]
},
{
"title": "Memory Utilization (%)",
"type": "graph",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes - node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) / node_memory_MemTotal_bytes * 100",
"legendFormat": "Memory Usage %"
}
]
},
{
"title": "Memory Saturation (Page Faults)",
"type": "graph",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "rate(node_vmstat_pgmajfault[5m])",
"legendFormat": "Major page faults/s"
}
]
},
{
"title": "Disk Utilization (%)",
"type": "graph",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "(node_filesystem_size_bytes - node_filesystem_free_bytes) / node_filesystem_size_bytes * 100",
"legendFormat": "{{ device }}"
}
]
},
{
"title": "Disk Saturation (IO Wait %)",
"type": "graph",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode=\"iowait\"}[5m]) * 100",
"legendFormat": "IO Wait %"
}
]
}
]
}
}
Got: Dashboard shows resource health across all USE dimensions.
If fail: Ensure node_exporter runs and scrapes system metrics.
Step 5: Link Logs to Traces in Loki
Configure Loki to extract trace IDs:
# loki-config.yml
schema_config:
configs:
- from: 2024-01-01
store: boltdb-shipper
object_store: s3
schema: v11
index:
prefix: index_
period: 24h
# Derived fields for trace linking
query_config:
derived_fields:
- name: TraceID
source: trace_id
url: 'https://tempo.company.com/trace/${__value.raw}'
urlDisplayLabel: 'View Trace'
In Grafana, configure Loki data source:
{
"name": "Loki",
"type": "loki",
"url": "http://loki:3100",
"jsonData": {
"derivedFields": [
{
"datasourceUid": "tempo-uid",
"matcherRegex": "trace_id=(\\w+)",
"name": "TraceID",
"url": "$${__value.raw}"
}
]
}
}
Got: Click trace ID in Loki logs → opens matching trace in Tempo.
If fail: Verify regex matches log format. Check Tempo data source UID.
Step 6: Create Unified Incident View
Build dashboard bringing all signals together:
{
"dashboard": {
"title": "Incident Investigation",
"templating": {
"list": [
{
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)
Workflow during incident:
- Alert fires for high error rate
- On-call engineer opens Grafana dashboard
- Spots spike in error rate at specific time
- Clicks exemplar dot on duration histogram → opens trace
- Trace shows slow database query
- Clicks "View Logs" on span → opens logs for that trace
- Logs reveal specific SQL query causing timeout
- Root cause found in <2 minutes
Got: Single pane of glass for debugging. Jump between metrics/logs/traces.
If fail: Links break? Check data source configs and trace ID propagation.
Checks
- Trace IDs present in all app logs
- Prometheus scraping exemplars
- Grafana dashboards show exemplar dots on histograms
- Click exemplar opens matching trace in Tempo/Jaeger
- Loki logs have "View Trace" links that work
- RED dashboard built for key services
- USE dashboard built for infrastructure
- Unified incident dashboard tested during GameDay
Pitfalls
- Inconsistent trace ID format: OpenTelemetry uses 32-char hex, Jaeger uses 16-char. Pick one.
- Missing context propagation: Trace IDs don't flow across services → distributed tracing breaks. Use OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation.
- Exemplar overload: Too many exemplars (>100k) → slow Prometheus. Sample high-volume metrics.
- Clock skew: Traces span many services. Run NTP; clock drift → trace ordering issues.
- Data retention mismatch: Traces expire before metrics → correlation breaks. Align retention policies.
See Also
setup-prometheus-monitoring- metrics foundation for correlationconfigure-log-aggregation- logs foundation for correlationinstrument-distributed-tracing- traces foundation for correlationbuild-grafana-dashboards- unified visualization layer
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
content-collections
MetaDiese Skill bietet eine produktionsgetestete Einrichtung für Content Collections – ein TypeScript-first-Tool, das Markdown/MDX-Dateien in typsichere Datensammlungen mit Zod-Validierung umwandelt. Verwenden Sie ihn beim Erstellen von Blogs, Dokumentationsseiten oder inhaltsstarken Vite + React-Anwendungen, um Typsicherheit und automatische Inhaltsvalidierung zu gewährleisten. Er behandelt alles von der Vite-Plugin-Konfiguration und MDX-Kompilierung bis hin zur Deployment-Optimierung und Schema-Validierung.
polymarket
MetaDiese Fähigkeit ermöglicht es Entwicklern, Anwendungen mit der Polymarket-Prognosemärkte-Plattform zu erstellen, einschließlich API-Integration für Handel und Marktdaten. Sie bietet außerdem Echtzeit-Datenstreaming über WebSocket, um Live-Trades und Marktaktivitäten zu überwachen. Nutzen Sie sie zur Implementierung von Handelsstrategien oder zur Erstellung von Tools, die Live-Marktaktualisierungen verarbeiten.
creating-opencode-plugins
MetaDiese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, OpenCode-Plugins zu erstellen, die in über 25 Ereignistypen wie Befehle, Dateien und LSP-Operationen eingreifen. Sie bietet die Plugin-Struktur, Event-API-Spezifikationen und Implementierungsmuster für JavaScript/TypeScript-Module. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie den Lebenszyklus des OpenCode KI-Assistenten mit benutzerdefinierter ereignisgesteuerter Logik abfangen, überwachen oder erweitern müssen.
sglang
MetaSGLang ist ein hochperformantes LLM-Serving-Framework, das sich auf schnelle, strukturierte Generierung für JSON, Regex und agentenbasierte Workflows unter Verwendung seines RadixAttention-Prefix-Cachings spezialisiert. Es bietet deutlich schnellere Inferenz, insbesondere für Aufgaben mit wiederholten Präfixen, was es ideal für komplexe, strukturierte Ausgaben und Mehrfachdialoge macht. Wählen Sie SGLang gegenüber Alternativen wie vLLM, wenn Sie constrained decoding benötigen oder Anwendungen mit umfangreicher Präfix-Weitergabe entwickeln.
