Zurück zu Fähigkeiten

write-validation-documentation

pjt222
Aktualisiert 2 days ago
3 Ansichten
17
2
17
Auf GitHub ansehen
Metawordtestingautomation

Über

Diese Fähigkeit erstellt umfassende IQ/OQ/PQ-Validierungsdokumentation für computergestützte Systeme in regulierten Umgebungen. Sie erstellt Protokolle, Berichte, Testskripte und bearbeitet Abweichungs-Workflows für Softwarevalidierung und regulatorische Audits. Nutzen Sie sie, um R-Software oder andere Software für GxP-Konformität zu qualifizieren oder Validierungsdokumentation für neue oder neu zu qualifizierende Systeme vorzubereiten.

Schnellinstallation

Claude Code

Empfohlen
Primär
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Plugin-BefehlAlternativ
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativ
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/write-validation-documentation

Kopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren

Dokumentation

Write Validation Documentation

Create complete IQ/OQ/PQ validation documentation for computerized systems.

When Use

  • Validating R or other software for regulated use
  • Preparing for regulatory audit
  • Documenting qualification of computing environments
  • Creating or updating validation protocols and reports

Inputs

  • Required: System/software to validate (name, version, purpose)
  • Required: Validation plan defining scope and strategy
  • Required: User requirements specification
  • Optional: Existing SOP templates
  • Optional: Previous validation documentation (for re-qualification)

Steps

Step 1: Write Installation Qualification (IQ) Protocol

# Installation Qualification Protocol
**System**: R Statistical Computing Environment
**Version**: 4.5.0
**Document ID**: IQ-PROJ-001
**Prepared by**: [Name] | **Date**: [Date]
**Reviewed by**: [Name] | **Date**: [Date]
**Approved by**: [Name] | **Date**: [Date]

## 1. Objective
Verify that R and required packages are correctly installed per specifications.

## 2. Prerequisites
- [ ] Server/workstation meets hardware requirements
- [ ] Operating system qualified
- [ ] Network access available (for package downloads)

## 3. Test Cases

### IQ-001: R Installation
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | R version 4.5.0 correctly installed |
| Procedure | Open R console, execute `R.version.string` |
| Expected Result | "R version 4.5.0 (2025-04-11)" |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |
| Pass/Fail | [ ] |
| Executed by | ____________ Date: ________ |

### IQ-002: Package Inventory
| Package | Required Version | Installed Version | Pass/Fail |
|---------|-----------------|-------------------|-----------|
| dplyr | 1.1.4 | | [ ] |
| ggplot2 | 3.5.0 | | [ ] |
| survival | 3.7-0 | | [ ] |

## 4. Deviations
[Document any deviations from expected results and their resolution]

## 5. Conclusion
[ ] All IQ tests PASSED - system installation verified
[ ] IQ tests FAILED - see deviation section

Got: validation/iq/iq_protocol.md complete with unique document ID, objective, prerequisites checklist, test cases for R installation and every required package, deviation section, approval fields.

If err: Organization requires different document format? Adapt template to match existing SOP. Key fields (requirement, procedure, expected result, actual result, pass/fail) must be preserved regardless of format.

Step 2: Write Operational Qualification (OQ) Protocol

# Operational Qualification Protocol
**Document ID**: OQ-PROJ-001

## 1. Objective
Verify that the system operates correctly under normal conditions.

## 2. Test Cases

### OQ-001: Data Import Functionality
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | System correctly imports CSV files |
| Test Data | validation/test_data/import_test.csv (MD5: abc123) |
| Procedure | Execute `read.csv("import_test.csv")` |
| Expected | Data frame with 100 rows, 5 columns |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |
| Evidence | Screenshot/log file reference |

### OQ-002: Statistical Calculations
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | t-test produces correct results |
| Test Data | Known dataset: x = c(2.1, 2.5, 2.3), y = c(3.1, 3.5, 3.3) |
| Procedure | Execute `t.test(x, y)` |
| Expected | t = -5.000, df = 4, p = 0.00753 |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |
| Tolerance | ±0.001 |

### OQ-003: Error Handling
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | System handles invalid input gracefully |
| Procedure | Execute `analysis_function(invalid_input)` |
| Expected | Informative error message, no crash |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |

Got: validation/oq/oq_protocol.md contains test cases for data import, statistical calculations, error handling. Each with specific test data, expected results (with tolerances where applicable), evidence requirements.

If err: Test data not yet available? Create synthetic test datasets with known properties. Document data generation method so results can be independently verified.

Step 3: Write Performance Qualification (PQ) Protocol

# Performance Qualification Protocol
**Document ID**: PQ-PROJ-001

## 1. Objective
Verify the system performs as intended with real-world data and workflows.

## 2. Test Cases

### PQ-001: End-to-End Primary Analysis
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | Primary endpoint analysis matches reference |
| Test Data | Blinded test dataset (hash: sha256:abc...) |
| Reference | Independent SAS calculation (report ref: SAS-001) |
| Procedure | Execute full analysis pipeline |
| Expected | Estimate within ±0.001 of reference |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |

### PQ-002: Report Generation
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | Generated report contains all required sections |
| Procedure | Execute report generation script |
| Checklist | |
| | [ ] Title page with study information |
| | [ ] Table of contents |
| | [ ] Demographic summary table |
| | [ ] Primary analysis results |
| | [ ] Appendix with session info |

Got: validation/pq/pq_protocol.md contains end-to-end test cases using real-world (or representative) data. Results compared against independent reference calculation (e.g., SAS output). Tolerances explicitly defined.

If err: Independent reference results not available? Document gap. Use dual-programming (two independent R implementations) as alternative verification method. Flag PQ as provisional until independent verification complete.

Step 4: Write Qualification Reports

After executing protocols, document results:

# Installation Qualification Report
**Document ID**: IQ-RPT-001
**Protocol Reference**: IQ-PROJ-001

## 1. Summary
All IQ test cases were executed on [date] by [name].

## 2. Results Summary
| Test ID | Description | Result |
|---------|-------------|--------|
| IQ-001 | R Installation | PASS |
| IQ-002 | Package Inventory | PASS |

## 3. Deviations
None observed.

## 4. Conclusion
The installation of R 4.5.0 and associated packages has been verified
and meets all specified requirements.

## 5. Approvals
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|------|------|-----------|------|
| Executor | | | |
| Reviewer | | | |
| Approver | | | |

Got: Qualification reports (IQ, OQ, PQ) complete with all test results filled in, deviations documented (or "None observed"), conclusions stated, approval signature fields ready for sign-off.

If err: Test failures occurred during execution? Document each failure as deviation with root cause analysis and resolution. Do not leave deviation sections blank when failures observed.

Step 5: Automate Where Possible

Create automated test scripts that generate evidence:

# validation/scripts/run_iq.R
sink("validation/iq/iq_evidence.txt")
cat("IQ Execution Date:", format(Sys.time()), "\n\n")

cat("IQ-001: R Version\n")
cat("Result:", R.version.string, "\n")
cat("Status:", ifelse(R.version$major == "4" && R.version$minor == "5.0",
                      "PASS", "FAIL"), "\n\n")

cat("IQ-002: Package Versions\n")
required <- renv::dependencies()
installed <- installed.packages()
# ... comparison logic
sink()

Got: Automated scripts in validation/scripts/ generate evidence files (e.g., iq_evidence.txt) with timestamped results for each test case. Reduces manual data entry, ensures reproducibility.

If err: Automated scripts fail due to environment differences? Run manually and capture output with sink(). Document any differences between automated and manual execution in qualification report.

Check

  • All protocols have unique document IDs
  • Protocols reference validation plan
  • Test cases have clear pass/fail criteria
  • Reports include all executed test results
  • Deviations documented with resolutions
  • Approval signatures obtained
  • Documents follow organization's SOP templates

Pitfalls

  • Vague acceptance criteria: "System works correctly" not testable. Specify exact expected values.
  • Missing evidence: Every test result needs supporting evidence (screenshots, logs, output files)
  • Incomplete deviation handling: All failures must be documented, investigated, resolved
  • No version control for documents: Validation docs need change control just like code
  • Skip re-qualification: System updates (R version, package updates) need re-qualification assessment

See Also

  • setup-gxp-r-project - project structure for validated environments
  • implement-audit-trail - electronic records tracking
  • validate-statistical-output - output validation methodology

GitHub Repository

pjt222/agent-almanac
Pfad: i18n/caveman/skills/write-validation-documentation
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Verwandte Skills

content-collections

Meta

Diese Skill bietet eine produktionsgetestete Einrichtung für Content Collections – ein TypeScript-first-Tool, das Markdown/MDX-Dateien in typsichere Datensammlungen mit Zod-Validierung umwandelt. Verwenden Sie ihn beim Erstellen von Blogs, Dokumentationsseiten oder inhaltsstarken Vite + React-Anwendungen, um Typsicherheit und automatische Inhaltsvalidierung zu gewährleisten. Er behandelt alles von der Vite-Plugin-Konfiguration und MDX-Kompilierung bis hin zur Deployment-Optimierung und Schema-Validierung.

Skill ansehen

polymarket

Meta

Diese Fähigkeit ermöglicht es Entwicklern, Anwendungen mit der Polymarket-Prognosemärkte-Plattform zu erstellen, einschließlich API-Integration für Handel und Marktdaten. Sie bietet außerdem Echtzeit-Datenstreaming über WebSocket, um Live-Trades und Marktaktivitäten zu überwachen. Nutzen Sie sie zur Implementierung von Handelsstrategien oder zur Erstellung von Tools, die Live-Marktaktualisierungen verarbeiten.

Skill ansehen

creating-opencode-plugins

Meta

Diese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, OpenCode-Plugins zu erstellen, die in über 25 Ereignistypen wie Befehle, Dateien und LSP-Operationen eingreifen. Sie bietet die Plugin-Struktur, Event-API-Spezifikationen und Implementierungsmuster für JavaScript/TypeScript-Module. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie den Lebenszyklus des OpenCode KI-Assistenten mit benutzerdefinierter ereignisgesteuerter Logik abfangen, überwachen oder erweitern müssen.

Skill ansehen

sglang

Meta

SGLang ist ein hochperformantes LLM-Serving-Framework, das sich auf schnelle, strukturierte Generierung für JSON, Regex und agentenbasierte Workflows unter Verwendung seines RadixAttention-Prefix-Cachings spezialisiert. Es bietet deutlich schnellere Inferenz, insbesondere für Aufgaben mit wiederholten Präfixen, was es ideal für komplexe, strukturierte Ausgaben und Mehrfachdialoge macht. Wählen Sie SGLang gegenüber Alternativen wie vLLM, wenn Sie constrained decoding benötigen oder Anwendungen mit umfangreicher Präfix-Weitergabe entwickeln.

Skill ansehen