crisis-detector
Über
Diese Fähigkeit hilft Entwicklern, durch Mustererkennung und Risikobewertung frühe Warnsignale potenzieller PR-Krisen zu identifizieren. Sie ist nützlich für den Aufbau von Frühwarnsystemen, die Einschätzung der Krisenwahrscheinlichkeit und die Festlegung von Eskalationskriterien. Das Tool basiert auf etablierten Krisenmanagement-Frameworks, um Signale zu überwachen und Eskalationsauslöser zu bewerten.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsgit clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/crisis-detectorKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Crisis Detector
Identify early warning signs of potential crises before they escalate through pattern recognition, signal monitoring, and risk assessment.
When to Use This Skill
- Setting up early warning systems
- Assessing crisis probability
- Training teams on signals
- Building escalation criteria
- Post-crisis prevention planning
Methodology Foundation
Based on Institute for Crisis Management research and Burson crisis frameworks, combining:
- Signal identification
- Pattern recognition
- Risk assessment matrices
- Escalation protocols
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Identifies warning signals | Risk tolerance |
| Assesses crisis probability | Response resources |
| Creates detection criteria | Escalation authority |
| Designs monitoring systems | Communication strategy |
| Suggests response triggers | Final action calls |
Instructions
Step 1: Map Crisis Types
Crisis Categories:
| Category | Examples | Warning Time |
|---|---|---|
| Operational | Outage, product failure | Hours to days |
| Reputational | Executive scandal, viral complaint | Minutes to hours |
| Legal/Regulatory | Lawsuit, investigation | Days to weeks |
| Financial | Earnings miss, fraud | Hours to days |
| Human | Workplace incident, harassment | Hours to days |
| External | Natural disaster, market crash | Variable |
Step 2: Identify Early Signals
Signal Types:
| Signal Type | Examples | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|
| Internal | Employee complaints, support tickets | HR, Support data |
| Customer | Review patterns, churn spikes | CX metrics |
| Social | Mention volume, sentiment shift | Social tools |
| Media | Press inquiries, journalist interest | PR inbox |
| Regulatory | Compliance notices, audit findings | Legal |
| Financial | Payment disputes, refund requests | Finance |
Step 3: Build Detection Matrix
Signal Strength Assessment:
| Signal | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Critical |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume spike | +25% | +50% | +100% | +300% |
| Sentiment shift | -10% | -20% | -30% | -50% |
| Media inquiries | 1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 6+ |
| Support tickets | +10% | +25% | +50% | +100% |
| Social influencer | 10K | 50K | 100K | 500K+ |
Step 4: Create Escalation Triggers
Trigger Framework:
| Level | Signals Present | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Watch | 1 moderate signal | Monitor closely |
| Alert | 2+ moderate or 1 strong | Notify team |
| Warning | Multiple strong signals | Assemble team |
| Crisis | Any critical signal | Activate protocol |
Step 5: Document and Improve
Post-Detection Review:
- How early did we detect?
- What signals did we miss?
- How accurate was assessment?
- What should we add to monitoring?
Examples
Example 1: Crisis Detection System Design
Input:
Design a crisis detection system for:
- E-commerce company (clothing)
- 500K customers
- Active on Instagram, TikTok, Twitter
- Past issue: Shipping delays during holiday
Output:
## Crisis Detection System: E-Commerce Fashion
### Crisis Risk Map
| Crisis Type | Probability | Impact | Priority |
|-------------|-------------|--------|----------|
| Shipping delays | High | High | P1 |
| Product quality issue | Medium | High | P1 |
| Social media backlash | Medium | High | P1 |
| Data breach | Low | Critical | P1 |
| Influencer controversy | Medium | Medium | P2 |
| Supply chain disruption | Medium | High | P2 |
| Payment fraud | Low | Medium | P3 |
---
### Early Warning Signals
#### P1: Shipping Delays
**Leading Indicators (3-5 days before crisis):**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Carrier delay reports | Logistics API | >10% delayed |
| Warehouse backlog | WMS data | >24hr processing |
| Weather events | News/weather | Storm in hub |
| "Where's my order" tickets | Support | +50% daily |
**Lagging Indicators (crisis starting):**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Social mentions | Social listening | "shipping" +100% |
| Review mentions | Trustpilot/G2 | Shipping 3/5 stars |
| Refund requests | Payment system | +30% |
| Chargeback rate | Payment processor | >1% |
---
#### P1: Product Quality Issue
**Leading Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Return rate spike | Returns data | >10% on SKU |
| Quality complaints | Support tickets | 3+ same issue |
| Photo complaints | Social | "damaged", "wrong color" |
| Batch-specific issues | QC data | Same lot number |
**Lagging Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Viral unboxing | TikTok/Instagram | >10K views negative |
| Review bomb | Product pages | Multiple 1-stars |
| Media inquiry | PR inbox | Journalist question |
---
#### P1: Social Media Backlash
**Leading Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Sentiment shift | Social tools | -20% in 24hr |
| Controversial post | Your social | Negative comments >10% |
| Influencer complaint | Social | >50K follower post |
| Screenshot spreading | Twitter/Reddit | Same image 5+ times |
**Lagging Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Viral negative | Any platform | >50K engagements |
| Hashtag trending | Twitter | Brand + negative |
| Media pickup | News sites | Article published |
| Competitor amplification | Social | Competitor sharing |
---
### Detection Dashboard
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CRISIS DETECTION DASHBOARD 🟢 NORMAL │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ │ SHIPPING STATUS 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Carrier delays: 3% (threshold: 10%) │ │ ├─ Backlog: 4 hours (threshold: 24hr) │ │ └─ "Where's my order": 45 (baseline: 50) │ │ │ │ PRODUCT QUALITY 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Return rate: 5.2% (threshold: 10%) │ │ ├─ Quality tickets: 2 (threshold: 3+ same) │ │ └─ Photo complaints: 1 (threshold: 5) │ │ │ │ SOCIAL SENTIMENT 🟡 Watch │ │ ├─ Sentiment: -15% (threshold: -20%) │ │ ├─ Volume: +40% (threshold: +50%) │ │ └─ Influencer: None flagged │ │ │ │ SECURITY 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Login anomalies: Normal │ │ └─ Payment fraud: 0.3% │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
---
### Escalation Matrix
| Level | Criteria | Notification | Response |
|-------|----------|--------------|----------|
| 🟢 Normal | All metrics in range | None | Standard ops |
| 🟡 Watch | 1 metric at threshold | Slack alert | Increased monitoring |
| 🟠 Alert | 2+ metrics or 1 exceeded | Team notification | Standby team |
| 🔴 Crisis | Critical threshold breached | All-hands alert | Activate protocol |
---
### Alert Routing
| Signal Type | Primary | Backup | Escalation |
|-------------|---------|--------|------------|
| Shipping | Operations | COO | CEO |
| Product quality | Product | VP Ops | CEO |
| Social media | Marketing | CMO | CEO |
| Security | IT | CTO | CEO + Legal |
| Legal/PR | Legal | CEO | Board |
---
### Holiday Season Adjustments
During high-volume periods (Nov 15 - Dec 31):
| Metric | Normal Threshold | Holiday Threshold |
|--------|------------------|-------------------|
| Carrier delays | 10% | 15% |
| Support volume | +50% | +100% |
| Social volume | +50% | +75% |
| Response time | 4 hours | 8 hours |
**Rationale:** Higher baseline expected; adjust to avoid false alerts
while maintaining genuine crisis detection.
Example 2: Real-Time Crisis Assessment
Input:
Assess this situation:
- Support tickets up 80% in 2 hours
- Twitter mentions up 150%
- Hashtag #[Brand]Scam trending locally
- 3 refund requests mentioning "charged twice"
- No known system issues
Output:
## Crisis Assessment: Potential Payment Issue
### Alert Level: 🔴 CRISIS
---
### Signal Analysis
| Signal | Value | Normal | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|--------|
| Support spike | +80% | <25% | CRITICAL |
| Social spike | +150% | <50% | CRITICAL |
| Trending hashtag | Yes | No | CRITICAL |
| Duplicate charge reports | 3 | 0 | CONCERNING |
---
### Probable Cause
**Most likely: Payment processing error**
Evidence:
1. Multiple "charged twice" complaints
2. No known system issues rules out outage
3. Sudden spike suggests batch problem
4. #Scam hashtag = customers think fraud
---
### Immediate Actions
| Priority | Action | Owner | Timeline |
|----------|--------|-------|----------|
| 1 | Check payment processor logs | Engineering | NOW |
| 2 | Identify affected transactions | Finance | 30 min |
| 3 | Prepare holding statement | Comms | 15 min |
| 4 | Alert customer service team | CX Lead | NOW |
| 5 | Monitor hashtag spread | Social | Ongoing |
---
### Holding Statement (Draft)
We're aware some customers may have experienced duplicate charges. Our team is investigating urgently. If you've been affected, please DM us or email [support] - we'll make this right immediately.
Updates to follow shortly.
---
### Escalation Path
**Now:** CTO + CFO + CMO notified
**+30 min:** CEO briefing if not resolved
**+1 hour:** External statement if ongoing
---
### Crisis Trajectory
**If unaddressed (next 2-4 hours):**
- Hashtag goes national
- Media inquiries begin
- Trust pilot review bomb
- Social influencers amplify
**If addressed quickly (next 1-2 hours):**
- Contain to affected customers
- Flip narrative to "responsive company"
- Prevent media escalation
- Build goodwill through fast resolution
---
### Resolution Checklist
- [ ] Root cause identified
- [ ] Affected customers identified
- [ ] Refunds initiated
- [ ] Proactive communication sent
- [ ] Social response deployed
- [ ] Hashtag monitoring active
- [ ] Post-incident review scheduled
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Identifying early warning signals
- Creating detection frameworks
- Assessing crisis probability
- Designing escalation systems
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Access your actual systems
- Monitor in real-time
- Make response decisions
- Know your specific thresholds
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts:
- "Design detection for [specific crisis type]"
- "Create escalation protocol for [scenario]"
- "What signals should we add for [risk]?"
- "How do we prevent [past crisis] from recurring?"
References
- Institute for Crisis Management
- Burson Crisis Playbook
- Harvard Business Review Crisis Research
- Edelman Trust Barometer
Related Skills
social-listening- Monitoring systemsresponse-coordinator- Crisis responsereputation-recovery- Post-crisis rebuild
Skill Metadata
- Domain: Crisis
- Complexity: Intermediate-Advanced
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 2-4 hours for system design
- Prerequisites: Access to metrics, stakeholder alignment
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
llamaguard
AndereLlamaGuard ist Metas 7-8B-Parameter-Modell zur Moderation von LLM-Eingaben und -Ausgaben in sechs Sicherheitskategorien wie Gewalt und Hassrede. Es bietet eine Genauigkeit von 94-95 % und kann mit vLLM, Hugging Face oder Amazon SageMaker eingesetzt werden. Nutzen Sie diese Skill, um Inhaltsfilterung und Sicherheitsguardrails einfach in Ihre KI-Anwendungen zu integrieren.
cost-optimization
AndereDiese Claude Skill unterstützt Entwickler bei der Optimierung von Cloud-Kosten durch Ressourcen-Dimensionierung, Tagging-Strategien und Ausgabenanalysen. Sie bietet einen Rahmen zur Senkung von Cloud-Ausgaben und zur Implementierung von Kosten-Governance für AWS, Azure und GCP. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie Infrastrukturkosten analysieren, Ressourcen richtig dimensionieren oder Budgetvorgaben einhalten müssen.
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
AndereDiese Fähigkeit quantisiert LLMs auf 8-Bit- oder 4-Bit-Präzision mittels bitsandbytes und erreicht dabei eine Speicherreduzierung von 50–75 % bei minimalem Genauigkeitsverlust. Sie ist ideal für den Betrieb größerer Modelle mit begrenztem GPU-Speicher oder zur Beschleunigung von Inferenzvorgängen und unterstützt Formate wie INT8, NF4 und FP4. Die Fähigkeit integriert sich in HuggingFace Transformers und ermöglicht QLoRA-Training sowie 8-Bit-Optimierer.
dispatching-parallel-agents
AndereDiese Claude-Fähigkeit verteilt mehrere Agenten, um drei oder mehr unabhängige Probleme gleichzeitig zu untersuchen und zu beheben. Sie ist für Szenarien konzipiert, die unabhängige Fehler umfassen, die ohne gemeinsamen Zustand oder Abhängigkeiten gelöst werden können. Die Kernfähigkeit ist die parallele Problemlösung, bei der pro unabhängigem Problembereich ein Agent zugewiesen wird, um die Effizienz zu maximieren.
