SKILL·9B66DC

provider-resources

hashicorp
Aktualisiert 19 days ago
8 Ansichten
855
125
855
Auf GitHub ansehen
Testenaitestingapidesigndata

Über

Diese Fähigkeit leitet Entwickler bei der Implementierung von Terraform Provider-Ressourcen und Datenquellen mithilfe des Plugin-Frameworks an. Sie behandelt CRUD-Operationen, Schema-Design, Validatoren, Import-Unterstützung und den Umgang mit Eventual Consistency. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie eine Ressource hinzufügen oder ändern, entscheiden müssen, ob ein API-Konzept eine Ressource sein sollte, oder eine Implementierung vor der Einreichung überprüfen.

Schnellinstallation

Claude Code

Empfohlen
Primär
npx skills add hashicorp/agent-skills -a claude-code
Plugin-BefehlAlternativ
/plugin add https://github.com/hashicorp/agent-skills
Git CloneAlternativ
git clone https://github.com/hashicorp/agent-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/provider-resources

Kopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren

Dokumentation

Terraform Provider Resources Implementation Guide

Overview

This guide covers developing Terraform Provider resources and data sources. Resources represent infrastructure objects that Terraform manages through Create, Read, Update, and Delete (CRUD) operations.

Use the Plugin Framework for all net-new resources and data sources. Plugin SDKv2 is for maintaining resources that already exist on it; do not write new code against it. A provider can serve both during migration by muxing (terraform-plugin-mux), so adopting the Framework never requires a big-bang rewrite. To tell which mode an existing provider is in, check go.mod: terraform-plugin-mux present means it serves both SDKv2 and Framework code; only terraform-plugin-sdk/v2 means SDKv2-only; only terraform-plugin-framework means Framework-only. Be cautious about migrating existing SDKv2 resources: the Framework distinguishes null from zero values, so naive migrations change behavior for existing users (use the provider-framework-migration skill, if available).

References (load when needed):

  • references/design-principles.md — what should (and should not) become a resource; data source semantics; relationship and async-task modeling
  • references/retries-and-waiters.md — eventual consistency, retry patterns, and status/wait function structure

File Structure

Most providers keep every resource in a single package:

internal/provider/
├── provider.go                  # Provider schema + Configure
├── widget_resource.go           # Resource implementation
├── widget_resource_test.go      # Acceptance tests
├── widget_data_source.go        # Data source (if applicable)
└── widget_data_source_test.go

Large multi-service providers (e.g. terraform-provider-aws) split into internal/service/<service>/ packages instead, with an idiomatic file taxonomy worth adopting once a package grows: consts.go, find.go (finders), status.go (status functions), wait.go (waiters), sweep.go (test sweepers), exports_test.go.

Documentation lives in docs/ and is generated with tfplugindocs:

docs/
├── resources/<name>.md          # generated; optional <name>.md.tmpl template
└── data-sources/<name>.md

(Hand-written website/docs/r/*.html.markdown trees exist in some older, large providers — follow the target repo's convention when editing one.)

Resource Structure

A Framework resource is a struct holding the API client, with interface assertions making the implemented behaviors explicit:

var (
    _ resource.Resource                = &widgetResource{}
    _ resource.ResourceWithConfigure   = &widgetResource{}
    _ resource.ResourceWithImportState = &widgetResource{}
)

func NewWidgetResource() resource.Resource {
    return &widgetResource{}
}

type widgetResource struct {
    client *examplecloud.Client
}

func (r *widgetResource) Metadata(_ context.Context, req resource.MetadataRequest, resp *resource.MetadataResponse) {
    resp.TypeName = req.ProviderTypeName + "_widget"
}

// Configure receives the client the provider built in its own Configure.
func (r *widgetResource) Configure(_ context.Context, req resource.ConfigureRequest, resp *resource.ConfigureResponse) {
    if req.ProviderData == nil {
        return // provider not yet configured (e.g. validation phase)
    }
    client, ok := req.ProviderData.(*examplecloud.Client)
    if !ok {
        resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
            "Unexpected Resource Configure Type",
            fmt.Sprintf("Expected *examplecloud.Client, got: %T.", req.ProviderData),
        )
        return
    }
    r.client = client
}

func (r *widgetResource) Schema(ctx context.Context, req resource.SchemaRequest, resp *resource.SchemaResponse) {
    resp.Schema = schema.Schema{
        Attributes: map[string]schema.Attribute{
            "name": schema.StringAttribute{
                Required: true,
                PlanModifiers: []planmodifier.String{
                    stringplanmodifier.RequiresReplace(),
                },
                Validators: []validator.String{
                    stringvalidator.LengthBetween(1, 255),
                },
            },
            "id": schema.StringAttribute{
                Computed: true,
                PlanModifiers: []planmodifier.String{
                    stringplanmodifier.UseStateForUnknown(),
                },
            },
        },
    }
}

How the provider's Configure produces that client — schema, credential resolution, validation — is covered by the provider-configuration skill (if available).

On id: SDKv2 required a magic id attribute; the Framework does not. If the API has its own identifier, expose it under its real meaning and do not add a second, redundant id. Only keep id when it is the API's identifier (as above).

CRUD Operations

Create

func (r *widgetResource) Create(ctx context.Context, req resource.CreateRequest, resp *resource.CreateResponse) {
    var data widgetResourceModel
    resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.Plan.Get(ctx, &data)...)
    if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
        return
    }

    input := &examplecloud.CreateWidgetInput{
        Name: data.Name.ValueStringPointer(),
    }

    output, err := r.client.CreateWidget(ctx, input)
    if err != nil {
        resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
            "Error creating Widget",
            fmt.Sprintf("creating Widget (%s): %s", data.Name.ValueString(), err),
        )
        return
    }

    data.ID = types.StringPointerValue(output.ID)

    // For eventually consistent APIs, wait for the resource to be usable
    // before returning — see references/retries-and-waiters.md.

    resp.Diagnostics.Append(resp.State.Set(ctx, &data)...)
}

Read

Read must handle out-of-band deletion by removing the resource from state so the next plan recreates it, rather than erroring forever:

func (r *widgetResource) Read(ctx context.Context, req resource.ReadRequest, resp *resource.ReadResponse) {
    var data widgetResourceModel
    resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.State.Get(ctx, &data)...)
    if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
        return
    }

    output, err := findWidgetByID(ctx, r.client, data.ID.ValueString())
    if isNotFound(err) {
        tflog.Warn(ctx, "Widget not found, removing from state", map[string]any{"id": data.ID.ValueString()})
        resp.State.RemoveResource(ctx)
        return
    }
    if err != nil {
        resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
            "Error reading Widget",
            fmt.Sprintf("reading Widget (%s): %s", data.ID.ValueString(), err),
        )
        return
    }

    data.Name = types.StringPointerValue(output.Name)

    resp.Diagnostics.Append(resp.State.Set(ctx, &data)...)
}

Update

Only call the API for attributes that actually changed; compare plan against state:

func (r *widgetResource) Update(ctx context.Context, req resource.UpdateRequest, resp *resource.UpdateResponse) {
    var plan, state widgetResourceModel
    resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.Plan.Get(ctx, &plan)...)
    resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.State.Get(ctx, &state)...)
    if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
        return
    }

    if !plan.Description.Equal(state.Description) {
        input := &examplecloud.UpdateWidgetInput{
            ID:          plan.ID.ValueStringPointer(),
            Description: plan.Description.ValueStringPointer(),
        }
        if _, err := r.client.UpdateWidget(ctx, input); err != nil {
            resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
                "Error updating Widget",
                fmt.Sprintf("updating Widget (%s): %s", plan.ID.ValueString(), err),
            )
            return
        }
    }

    resp.Diagnostics.Append(resp.State.Set(ctx, &plan)...)
}

Delete

Treat "already gone" as success — the desired end state is reached:

func (r *widgetResource) Delete(ctx context.Context, req resource.DeleteRequest, resp *resource.DeleteResponse) {
    var data widgetResourceModel
    resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.State.Get(ctx, &data)...)
    if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
        return
    }

    _, err := r.client.DeleteWidget(ctx, &examplecloud.DeleteWidgetInput{
        ID: data.ID.ValueStringPointer(),
    })
    if isNotFound(err) {
        return
    }
    if err != nil {
        resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
            "Error deleting Widget",
            fmt.Sprintf("deleting Widget (%s): %s", data.ID.ValueString(), err),
        )
        return
    }
}

Import

With ResourceWithImportState asserted, passthrough of the identifier is one line:

func (r *widgetResource) ImportState(ctx context.Context, req resource.ImportStateRequest, resp *resource.ImportStateResponse) {
    resource.ImportStatePassthroughID(ctx, path.Root("id"), req, resp)
}

For multi-part identifiers, parse a delimited import ID (commonly comma-separated) and set each attribute explicitly.

Resource Design Principles

Before implementing, check the shape of the thing being modeled (full treatment in references/design-principles.md):

  • A resource is the smallest useful building block; if the API offers CRUD for it, it likely deserves its own resource.
  • A resource should talk to one API/service only — cross-service resources break permissions, auditing, and endpoint configuration.
  • Data sources are read-only and side-effect free. A singular data source errors on zero or multiple matches; a plural data source (plural noun name) returns zero-or-more as a collection and errors on neither.
  • Attached policies/rules, long-running task invocations, and versioned artifacts usually deserve their own resources rather than attributes on the parent.
  • Start/stop or enable/disable state belongs as an attribute in the resource, not as a separate resource.

Schema Design

Attribute Types

Terraform TypeFramework TypeUse Case
stringschema.StringAttributeNames, identifiers
numberschema.Int64Attribute, schema.Float64AttributeCounts, sizes
boolschema.BoolAttributeFeature flags
listschema.ListAttributeOrdered collections
setschema.SetAttributeUnordered unique items
mapschema.MapAttributeKey-value pairs
objectschema.SingleNestedAttributeComplex nested config

Give every attribute a MarkdownDescriptiontfplugindocs publishes it, and it is the primary user-facing documentation.

Plan Modifiers

// Force replacement when value changes
stringplanmodifier.RequiresReplace()

// Keep a known value during plan instead of (known after apply)
stringplanmodifier.UseStateForUnknown()

Validators

stringvalidator.LengthBetween(1, 255)
stringvalidator.RegexMatches(regexp.MustCompile(`^[a-z0-9-]+$`), "must be lowercase alphanumeric with hyphens")
stringvalidator.OneOf("small", "medium", "large")
int64validator.Between(1, 100)
listvalidator.SizeAtLeast(1)

Sensitive Attributes

"password": schema.StringAttribute{
    Required:  true,
    Sensitive: true,
},

State Management

Finders

Centralize "get one thing or a typed not-found" in a finder so Read, Delete, waiters, and tests all share identical not-found semantics:

func findWidgetByID(ctx context.Context, client *examplecloud.Client, id string) (*examplecloud.Widget, error) {
    output, err := client.GetWidget(ctx, &examplecloud.GetWidgetInput{ID: &id})
    if err != nil {
        var apiErr *examplecloud.NotFoundError
        if errors.As(err, &apiErr) {
            return nil, &retry.NotFoundError{LastError: err}
        }
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("getting Widget (%s): %w", id, err)
    }
    if output == nil || output.Widget == nil {
        return nil, &retry.NotFoundError{Message: "empty result"}
    }
    return output.Widget, nil
}

func isNotFound(err error) bool {
    var nfe *retry.NotFoundError
    return errors.As(err, &nfe)
}

Waiting for Resource States

Many APIs return from Create/Delete before the resource is usable/gone. Use retry.StateChangeConf (from github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2/helper/retry — usable from Framework providers), with a status function built on the finder and timeouts in named constants:

stateConf := &retry.StateChangeConf{
    Pending: []string{"CREATING", "PENDING"},
    Target:  []string{"ACTIVE"},
    Refresh: statusWidget(ctx, r.client, id), // one poll of the finder: (obj, status, err)
    Timeout: widgetCreatedTimeout,
}
outputRaw, err := stateConf.WaitForStateContext(ctx)

The full status/wait function pairs (create and delete waiters, failure-state handling, post-create not-found retries, eventual-consistency patterns) are in references/retries-and-waiters.md — read it whenever the API is asynchronous or eventually consistent.

Testing

Every resource ships with, at minimum:

  • _basic — create with minimal config, assert attributes, then an import step (ImportState: true, ImportStateVerify: true)
  • _disappears — delete the object out-of-band mid-test; the next plan must propose recreation, not error
  • Per-attribute tests — exercise updates for each non-trivial argument

Naming grammar: tests TestAcc{Resource}_{group?}_{description}, helpers testAccCheck{Resource}Exists / testAccCheck{Resource}Destroy, config functions testAcc{Resource}Config_{description}. Keep configs self-contained, randomize real resource names, and never hardcode environment-specific values (account IDs, zones, versions).

func TestAccWidget_basic(t *testing.T) {
    rName := acctest.RandStringFromCharSet(10, acctest.CharSetAlphaNum)
    resourceName := "examplecloud_widget.test"

    resource.ParallelTest(t, resource.TestCase{
        PreCheck:                 func() { testAccPreCheck(t) },
        ProtoV6ProviderFactories: testAccProtoV6ProviderFactories,
        CheckDestroy:             testAccCheckWidgetDestroy,
        Steps: []resource.TestStep{
            {
                Config: testAccWidgetConfig_basic(rName),
                ConfigStateChecks: []statecheck.StateCheck{
                    statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName, tfjsonpath.New("name"), knownvalue.StringExact(rName)),
                    statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName, tfjsonpath.New("id"), knownvalue.NotNull()),
                },
            },
            {
                ResourceName:      resourceName,
                ImportState:       true,
                ImportStateVerify: true,
            },
        },
    })
}

func testAccWidgetConfig_basic(rName string) string {
    return fmt.Sprintf(`
resource "examplecloud_widget" "test" {
  name = %[1]q
}
`, rName)
}

Use the provider-test-patterns skill (if available) for the full testing treatment: config helper style (%[1]q indexed verbs), statecheck/plancheck, CompareValue, custom StateCheck implementations for exists/disappears helpers, sweepers, and ephemeral resource testing. Use the run-acceptance-tests skill for executing and debugging test runs.

Error Handling

Match API errors by type, not message text, and wrap with context:

var notFound *examplecloud.NotFoundError
if errors.As(err, &notFound) {
    // resource doesn't exist
}

// Wrapping inside helpers: preserve the cause with %w
return fmt.Errorf("creating Widget (%s): %w", name, err)

Diagnostics follow a consistent grammar — summary names the operation and type, detail carries identifier and cause:

resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
    "Error creating Widget",
    fmt.Sprintf("creating Widget (%s): %s", name, err),
)

resp.Diagnostics.AddAttributeError(
    path.Root("name"),
    "Invalid name",
    "Name must be lowercase alphanumeric",
)

Documentation

Write attribute MarkdownDescriptions first — they are the source of truth. Then generate Registry documentation with tfplugindocs (go generate ./... where wired up), adding docs/**/*.md.tmpl templates only for prose and examples the generator cannot derive. Use the provider-docs skill (if available) for the full documentation workflow and Registry publication rules.

Pre-Submission Checklist

  • Plugin Framework used (no new SDKv2 code)
  • Resource has all CRUD operations implemented
  • Read removes missing resources from state; Delete tolerates already-deleted
  • No redundant id attribute (real API identifier exposed instead)
  • Import implemented and covered by an ImportStateVerify step
  • _basic, _disappears, and per-attribute tests present
  • Waiters used where the API is eventually consistent
  • Error messages name the operation, type, and identifier
  • Sensitive attributes marked; every attribute has a description
  • Docs generated with tfplugindocs
  • Changelog entry added, if the repo tracks release notes (check CONTRIBUTING)

References

GitHub Repository

hashicorp/agent-skills
Pfad: plugins/terraform/skills/provider-resources
0
doormat-managed
FAQ

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Was ist der Skill provider-resources?

provider-resources ist ein Claude Skill von hashicorp. Skills bündeln Anweisungen und Ressourcen, die Claude bei Bedarf lädt, um Aufgaben rund um provider-resources ohne zusätzliche Eingaben auszuführen.

Wie installiere ich provider-resources?

Verwende die Installationsbefehle auf dieser Seite: Füge provider-resources als Plugin zu Claude Code hinzu oder klone das Repository in dein Skills-Verzeichnis. Starte Claude danach neu, damit der Skill geladen wird.

Zu welcher Kategorie gehört provider-resources?

provider-resources gehört zur Kategorie Testen.

Kann ich provider-resources kostenlos nutzen?

Ja. provider-resources ist auf AIMCP gelistet und kann kostenlos installiert werden.

Verwandte Skills

evaluating-llms-harness
Testen

Diese Claude Skill führt den lm-evaluation-harness aus, um LLMs über 60+ standardisierte akademische Aufgaben wie MMLU und GSM8K zu benchmarken. Sie wurde für Entwickler entwickelt, um Modellqualität zu vergleichen, Trainingsfortschritt zu verfolgen oder akademische Ergebnisse zu berichten. Das Tool unterstützt verschiedene Backends, einschließlich HuggingFace- und vLLM-Modelle.

Skill ansehen
cloudflare-cron-triggers
Testen

Diese Fähigkeit bietet umfassendes Wissen zur Implementierung von Cloudflare Cron Triggers, um Workers mithilfe von Cron-Ausdrücken zu planen. Sie behandelt das Einrichten periodischer Aufgaben, Wartungsjobs und automatisierter Workflows, während häufige Probleme wie ungültige Cron-Ausdrücke und Zeitzonenprobleme behandelt werden. Entwickler können sie zum Konfigurieren geplanter Handler, zum Testen von Cron-Triggers und zur Integration mit Workflows und Green Compute verwenden.

Skill ansehen
webapp-testing
Testen

Diese Claude Skill bietet ein Playwright-basiertes Toolkit zum Testen lokaler Webanwendungen durch Python-Skripte. Es ermöglicht Frontend-Verifizierung, UI-Debugging, Screenshot-Aufnahme und Log-Einblick bei gleichzeitiger Verwaltung von Server-Lebenszyklen. Nutzen Sie es für Browser-Automatisierungsaufgaben, führen Sie Skripte jedoch direkt aus, anstatt deren Quellcode zu lesen, um Kontextverschmutzung zu vermeiden.

Skill ansehen
finishing-a-development-branch
Testen

Diese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, abgeschlossene Arbeiten zu finalisieren, indem sie testet, ob Tests bestehen, und dann strukturierte Integrationsoptionen präsentiert. Sie leitet den Workflow für das Zusammenführen von Code, das Erstellen von PRs oder das Bereinigen von Branches nach Abschluss der Implementierung. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Ihr Code bereit und getestet ist, um den Entwicklungsprozess systematisch abzuschließen.

Skill ansehen