defend-colony
Über
Diese Fähigkeit bietet einen Rahmen zur Implementierung einer kollektiven, mehrschichtigen Verteidigung in verteilten Systemen, inspiriert von Immunreaktionsmustern. Sie ermöglicht Bedrohungserkennung, Alarmweitergabe und eine proportionale Reaktion, die mit dem Schweregrad eskaliert, um Über- oder Unterreaktionen zu vermeiden. Nutzen Sie sie, um skalierbare Incident-Response- und Defense-in-Depth-Strategien zu entwerfen, bei denen keine einzelne Komponente alle Bedrohungen bewältigen kann.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/defend-colonyKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Defend Colony
Layered collective defense: alarm signal + role mobilize + proportional response + immune memory. Inspired by social insect + biological immune sys.
Use When
- Defense-in-depth, no single guardian covers all
- Incident response scales w/ severity
- Components can't defend alone
- Defense over-reactive (every alert = full mob) / under-reactive (threats unnoticed)
- Org resilience: teams self-org on incident
- Complement
coordinate-swarmw/ threat-response patterns
In
- Required: Colony desc (sys, org, team)
- Required: Threat cats (attacks, failures, competitors, env)
- Optional: Current defenses + fail modes
- Optional: Defender types + caps
- Optional: Latency per tier
- Optional: Recovery reqs
Do
Step 1: Threat Landscape + Perimeter
ID what to defend, from what, where perimeter.
- Critical assets:
- Protect all cost (core data, prod sys, key ppl)
- Can sustain temp damage (staging, non-crit svcs)
- Expendable under extreme (caches, replicas, non-essential)
- Classify threats:
- Probes: low-level recon (port scans, failed logins)
- Incursions: active boundary violations (unauth access, injection)
- Infestations: persistent inside (compromised nodes, insider)
- Existential: survival threats (corruption, catastrophic fail, DDoS)
- Perimeter:
- Outer: first detection (firewalls, rate limits, monitoring)
- Inner: critical asset boundaries (access ctrl, encryption, isolation)
- Core: last-resort (backups, kill switches, circuit breakers)
Got: Map: assets prioritized + threats classified + perimeters layered.
If err: Overwhelming → top 3 critical assets + top 3 threat types. Coverage of what matters > perfect. Unclear boundaries → default zero-trust + define from actual traffic.
Step 2: Alarm Network
Detection + alert propagation.
- Sentinels per layer:
- Outer: light, high-sens (may false+)
- Inner: heavy, high-spec (fewer false+, slower)
- Core: critical monitors (zero missed tolerance)
- Graduated alarms:
- Yellow: anomaly, increased monitor, no mob
- Orange: confirmed pattern, local defenders mob, scouts investigate
- Red: active breach / severe, full mob, non-essential paused
- Black: existential, all → defense, sacrifice expendable if needed
- Propagation:
- Local: sentinels alert nearby directly
- Regional: clusters aggregate + escalate if threshold met
- Colony-wide: regional escalation → broadcast
- Each step adds confirmation — single sentinel can't trigger colony-wide
- Fatigue prevention:
- Auto-suppress repeated identical (dedup w/ time window)
- Req escalation confirmed by indep sentinels
- Track alarm-to-threat ratio — FP >50% → recalibrate
Alarm Propagation:
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Sentinel detects anomaly ──→ Yellow alert (local) │
│ │ │
│ ↓ (confirmed by 2nd sentinel) │
│ Orange alert ──→ Local defenders mobilize │
│ │ │
│ ↓ (pattern matches known threat + 3rd sentinel) │
│ Red alert ──→ Full defense mobilization │
│ │ │
│ ↓ (critical asset under active attack) │
│ Black alert ──→ All resources to defense, circuit break │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Got: Graduated alarm, severity → response intensity. Multi-sentinel confirms prevent single FPs. Fatigue managed via dedup + calibration.
If err: Too many FPs → raise thresh / more confirms. Threats slip → add sentinels at breach layer / lower thresh. Too slow → reduce confirm reqs (accept higher FP).
Step 3: Role-Based Defenders
Assign roles + mob protocols proportional to threat.
- Roles:
- Sentinels: detection (always active, low cost)
- Guards: first responders (idle until mob, fast)
- Soldiers: heavy (expensive mob, high cap)
- Healers: repair + recovery (see
repair-damage) - Messengers: coord across regions
- Roles → alerts:
- Yellow: sentinels ↑ monitor freq, guards standby
- Orange: guards mob → threat loc, soldiers standby
- Red: soldiers mob, non-essential → defense
- Black: all → defense, colony activities suspended
- Proportional:
- Never soldiers for probe (waste + reveals caps)
- Never only sentinels vs incursion (insufficient)
- Match tier — escalate if fails, de-escalate when recedes
- Role transitions:
- Workers → guards (temp upskill emergency)
- Guards → soldiers (sustained threat)
- Post-threat → reverse transitions restore normal
Got: Force scales w/ severity. Normal = min defense. Under threat = rapid proportional mob, no over/under.
If err: Mob too slow → pre-position guards near known vectors. Too expensive → reduce permanent guards, rely on worker-to-guard. Role confusion → simplify to 3 (detect/respond/recover).
Step 4: Immune Memory + Adaptation
Learn each encounter.
- Per incident, threat signature:
- Attack pattern (how detected)
- Vector (where entered)
- Effective response (what stopped)
- Failed response (what didn't)
- Store in immune memory:
- Fast-lookup pattern lib for sentinels
- Updated playbooks w/ known-effective
- Flagged FP patterns → reduce future fatigue
- Adaptive immunity:
- New signatures → all sentinels (colony-wide learning)
- Detecting sentinels get priority updates (local)
- Periodic review culls outdated
- Stress test:
- Re-sim past threats → verify defenses still work
- Red team → novel threats test adaptation
- Measure detection: known vs unknown
Got: Defense gets stronger per encounter. Known = faster detect + better response. Novel = graduated alarm, resolution → memory.
If err: Memory too large → prioritize by freq + severity, archive rare/minor. Too specialized, misses novel → keep "general patrol" (anomaly detection, no pattern match).
Step 5: Post-Incident Recovery
Defense → normal w/ repair + resilience.
- Threat elim verify:
- Confirm neutralized (not just suppressed)
- Scan secondaries during primary
- Verify no compromised agents remain
- Damage assess:
- Catalog damaged/degraded/lost
- Priority by criticality (core first)
- Estimate recovery time + resources
- Recovery:
- Healers → damaged (see
repair-damage) - Restore svcs in priority
- Elevated sentinel during recovery (vulnerable period)
- Healers → damaged (see
- De-escalate:
- Step down (Red → Orange → Yellow → Normal)
- Reassigned workers → primary roles
- Stand down soldiers, guards → patrol
- Post-incident review <24h (fresh memory)
Got: Smooth defense → recovery → normal. Elevated monitor catches secondaries. Review feeds memory.
If err: Slow recovery → pre-build playbooks for likely damage. Secondaries during recovery → de-esc too aggressive, keep higher alert longer. Review skipped (time pressure) → schedule non-negotiable.
Check
- Critical assets ID'd + prioritized
- Threats classified (type + severity)
- Perimeter layered + sentinels per layer
- Alarm graduated + multi-sentinel confirm
- Roles defined + mob → alerts
- Proportional prevents over/under
- Memory captures + applies lessons
- Recovery restores safely
Traps
- Maginot Line: Over-invest 1 layer, others unprotected. Layered — any single can breach.
- Alert fatigue: Many alarms, few real → degrades attention. Calibrate ruthless; missed FP cheaper than missed real.
- Symmetric response: Same intensity always → wastes + reveals caps. Match — escalate only when needed.
- No immune memory: Repeated same threat, no learning → expensive + fragile. Every incident → update knowledge.
- Permanent war footing: Sustained high-alert → exhausts + degrades normal. De-esc deliberate when threat passes.
→
coordinate-swarm— foundational coord patterns supporting alarm + mobbuild-consensus— rapid consensus for collective defense under pressurescale-colony— defense scales w/ growthrepair-damage— morphic regenerative recoveryconfigure-alerting-rules— practical alerting implconduct-post-mortem— structured analysis → feeds memory
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
content-collections
MetaDiese Skill bietet eine produktionsgetestete Einrichtung für Content Collections – ein TypeScript-first-Tool, das Markdown/MDX-Dateien in typsichere Datensammlungen mit Zod-Validierung umwandelt. Verwenden Sie ihn beim Erstellen von Blogs, Dokumentationsseiten oder inhaltsstarken Vite + React-Anwendungen, um Typsicherheit und automatische Inhaltsvalidierung zu gewährleisten. Er behandelt alles von der Vite-Plugin-Konfiguration und MDX-Kompilierung bis hin zur Deployment-Optimierung und Schema-Validierung.
polymarket
MetaDiese Fähigkeit ermöglicht es Entwicklern, Anwendungen mit der Polymarket-Prognosemärkte-Plattform zu erstellen, einschließlich API-Integration für Handel und Marktdaten. Sie bietet außerdem Echtzeit-Datenstreaming über WebSocket, um Live-Trades und Marktaktivitäten zu überwachen. Nutzen Sie sie zur Implementierung von Handelsstrategien oder zur Erstellung von Tools, die Live-Marktaktualisierungen verarbeiten.
creating-opencode-plugins
MetaDiese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, OpenCode-Plugins zu erstellen, die in über 25 Ereignistypen wie Befehle, Dateien und LSP-Operationen eingreifen. Sie bietet die Plugin-Struktur, Event-API-Spezifikationen und Implementierungsmuster für JavaScript/TypeScript-Module. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie den Lebenszyklus des OpenCode KI-Assistenten mit benutzerdefinierter ereignisgesteuerter Logik abfangen, überwachen oder erweitern müssen.
sglang
MetaSGLang ist ein hochperformantes LLM-Serving-Framework, das sich auf schnelle, strukturierte Generierung für JSON, Regex und agentenbasierte Workflows unter Verwendung seines RadixAttention-Prefix-Cachings spezialisiert. Es bietet deutlich schnellere Inferenz, insbesondere für Aufgaben mit wiederholten Präfixen, was es ideal für komplexe, strukturierte Ausgaben und Mehrfachdialoge macht. Wählen Sie SGLang gegenüber Alternativen wie vLLM, wenn Sie constrained decoding benötigen oder Anwendungen mit umfangreicher Präfix-Weitergabe entwickeln.
