run-ab-test-models
Über
Diese Fähigkeit ermöglicht A/B-Tests für ML-Modelle in der Produktion durch Traffic-Aufteilung und statistische Signifikanztests. Sie unterstützt Canary- und Shadow-Deployments, um Modellversionen zu vergleichen und Geschäftsauswirkungen zu messen. Nutzen Sie sie, um neue Modelle vor der vollständigen Ausrollung zu validieren oder datengesteuerte Bereitstellungsentscheidungen zu treffen.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/run-ab-test-modelsKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Run A/B Test for Models
See Extended Examples for complete configuration files and templates.
Run controlled experiments comparing model versions with traffic split + statistical analysis.
When Use
- Deploy new model version, want validate before full rollout
- Compare multiple candidate models (different algorithms, features)
- Test impact of hyperparameter changes on business metrics
- Measure model performance in prod without risk full traffic
- Regulatory needs gradual rollout (medical ML)
- Judge cost-performance tradeoffs between model sizes
Inputs
- Required: Champion model (current prod)
- Required: Challenger model(s) (new version to test)
- Required: Traffic allocation % (e.g., 5% to challenger)
- Required: Success metrics (business + ML)
- Required: Min sample size or test duration
- Optional: Guardrail metrics (latency, error rate thresholds)
- Optional: User segments for stratified testing
Steps
Step 1: Design Experiment
Define test parameters, success criteria, statistical needs.
# ab_test/experiment_config.py
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List, Dict
import numpy as np
from scipy.stats import norm
@dataclass
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Experiment config with stat-sound sample size calc, typical 5-10k samples per variant for 5-10% MDE.
If fail: Sample too large? Up traffic allocation, extend duration, or accept larger MDE; verify baseline metric estimate; consider sequential testing.
Step 2: Implement Traffic Splitting
Set up routing — randomly assign requests to models.
# ab_test/traffic_router.py
import hashlib
import random
from typing import Dict, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Consistent user-to-variant assignment, accurate traffic split matches configured %, all assignments logged.
If fail: Verify hash uniform (test 10k user IDs), check user_id stable across requests (not session_id), logs capture all predictions, validate split in first 1000 requests.
Step 3: Implement Shadow Deployment (Optional)
Run challenger in parallel without affecting users (shadow mode).
# ab_test/shadow_deployment.py
import asyncio
from typing import Dict, Any
import logging
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
import time
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Champion served at normal latency, challenger logged async without blocking, prediction diffs captured.
If fail: Set challenger timeout < champion SLA, handle challenger errors gracefully, monitor memory (two models loaded), consider sampling (log 10% of shadow predictions).
Step 4: Collect and Analyze Metrics
Gather data, run statistical tests.
# ab_test/analysis.py
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
from typing import Dict, Tuple
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Stat test results with p-values, CIs, clear decision (rollout/keep/inconclusive), typical after 7-14 days or sample size.
If fail: Verify ground truth labels available (delayed analysis maybe), check sample ratio mismatch (SRM = assignment bugs), enough sample size, look for novelty/primacy effects in early data, consider sequential testing if fixed-horizon too slow.
Step 5: Monitor Guardrail Metrics
Continuous check challenger does not violate safety thresholds.
# ab_test/guardrails.py
import pandas as pd
import logging
from typing import Dict, List
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Guardrail violations detected within 5-15 min, auto stop if critical thresholds breached (latency, errors), alerts to team.
If fail: Verify thresholds realistic (not too tight), monitoring loop runs continuous, check stop_experiment() updates routing, test alert delivery.
Step 6: Make Rollout Decision
From results, decide rollout challenger.
# ab_test/rollout_decision.py
import logging
from typing import Dict
from dataclasses import dataclass
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Clear decision (full/gradual rollout, keep champion, extend test) with justification + action items.
If fail: Decision unclear? Subgroup analysis (segment, time, device), check interaction effects, review business context (2% lift worth eng cost?), consult stakeholders.
Checks
- Traffic split matches configured % (within 1%)
- Same user always to same variant
- Sample size calc reasonable (5-50k per variant)
- Stat tests produce p-values consistent with manual calc
- Guardrail violations trigger alerts within 5 min
- Shadow deployment shows <5% prediction divergence
- Reports include CIs
- Rollout decision documented
Pitfalls
- Sample ratio mismatch (SRM): Observed split differs from configured (95/5 becomes 92/8) = assignment bug; check hash uniformity
- Peeking: Check results before sample size inflates Type I error; use sequential testing or wait for pre-set end date
- Novelty effect: Users respond different to new model at first; run 2+ weeks for steady state
- Carryover effects: Prev variant exposure affects current; use new users or washout
- Multiple testing: Many metrics = false positive risk; correct with Bonferroni or single primary metric
- Insufficient power: Small allocation = months to detect; balance power with risk
- Ignore segments: Aggregate lift hides negative on important segments; subgroup analysis
- Attribution errors: Outcome metrics attributed to predictions (not other system changes)
See Also
deploy-ml-model-serving- Model deployment infra, versioningmonitor-model-drift- Post-rollout monitoring
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
evaluating-llms-harness
TestenDiese Claude Skill führt den lm-evaluation-harness aus, um LLMs über 60+ standardisierte akademische Aufgaben wie MMLU und GSM8K zu benchmarken. Sie wurde für Entwickler entwickelt, um Modellqualität zu vergleichen, Trainingsfortschritt zu verfolgen oder akademische Ergebnisse zu berichten. Das Tool unterstützt verschiedene Backends, einschließlich HuggingFace- und vLLM-Modelle.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
TestenDiese Fähigkeit bietet umfassendes Wissen zur Implementierung von Cloudflare Cron Triggers, um Workers mithilfe von Cron-Ausdrücken zu planen. Sie behandelt das Einrichten periodischer Aufgaben, Wartungsjobs und automatisierter Workflows, während häufige Probleme wie ungültige Cron-Ausdrücke und Zeitzonenprobleme behandelt werden. Entwickler können sie zum Konfigurieren geplanter Handler, zum Testen von Cron-Triggers und zur Integration mit Workflows und Green Compute verwenden.
webapp-testing
TestenDiese Claude Skill bietet ein Playwright-basiertes Toolkit zum Testen lokaler Webanwendungen durch Python-Skripte. Es ermöglicht Frontend-Verifizierung, UI-Debugging, Screenshot-Aufnahme und Log-Einblick bei gleichzeitiger Verwaltung von Server-Lebenszyklen. Nutzen Sie es für Browser-Automatisierungsaufgaben, führen Sie Skripte jedoch direkt aus, anstatt deren Quellcode zu lesen, um Kontextverschmutzung zu vermeiden.
finishing-a-development-branch
TestenDiese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, abgeschlossene Arbeiten zu finalisieren, indem sie testet, ob Tests bestehen, und dann strukturierte Integrationsoptionen präsentiert. Sie leitet den Workflow für das Zusammenführen von Code, das Erstellen von PRs oder das Bereinigen von Branches nach Abschluss der Implementierung. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Ihr Code bereit und getestet ist, um den Entwicklungsprozess systematisch abzuschließen.
