optimize-shiny-performance
Über
Diese Fähigkeit hilft Entwicklern dabei, langsame oder nicht reagierende Shiny-Anwendungen zu profilieren und zu optimieren. Sie bietet Techniken wie Caching mit bindCache/memoise, asynchrone Operationen mit Promises/ExtendedTask und reaktive Ablaufsteuerung mit debounce/throttle. Nutzen Sie sie, um Engpässe zu diagnostizieren, gleichzeitige Last zu bewältigen oder Apps für den Produktiveinsatz vorzubereiten.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/optimize-shiny-performanceKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Optimize Shiny Performance
Profile, diagnose, optimize Shiny app performance through caching, async operations, reactive graph optimization.
When Use
- Shiny app feels slow or unresponsive during user interaction
- Server resources exhausted under concurrent user load
- Specific operations (data loading, plotting, computation) create bottlenecks
- Preparing app for production deployment with many users
Inputs
- Required: Path to Shiny application
- Required: Description of performance problem (slow load, laggy interaction, high memory)
- Optional: Number of expected concurrent users
- Optional: Available server resources (RAM, CPU cores)
- Optional: Whether app uses database or external API
Steps
Step 1: Profile the Application
# Profile with profvis
profvis::profvis({
shiny::runApp("path/to/app", display.mode = "normal")
})
# Or profile specific operations
profvis::profvis({
result <- expensive_computation(data)
})
Identify top bottlenecks:
- Data loading: How long does initial data fetch take?
- Reactive recalculation: Which reactives fire most often?
- Rendering: Which outputs take longest to render?
- External calls: Database queries, API requests, file I/O?
Use reactive log for graph analysis:
# Enable reactive logging
options(shiny.reactlog = TRUE)
shiny::runApp("path/to/app")
# Press Ctrl+F3 in the browser to view the reactive graph
Got: Clear identification of 2-3 biggest bottlenecks.
If fail: profvis doesn't show useful detail? Wrap specific sections with profvis::profvis(). Reactlog overwhelming? Focus on one interaction at a time.
Step 2: Optimize Reactive Graph
Reduce unnecessary reactive invalidations:
# BAD: Recomputes on ANY input change
output$plot <- renderPlot({
data <- load_data() # Runs every time
filtered <- data[data$category == input$category, ]
plot(filtered)
})
# GOOD: Isolate data loading from filtering
raw_data <- reactive({
load_data()
}) |> bindCache() # Cache the expensive part
filtered_data <- reactive({
raw_data()[raw_data()$category == input$category, ]
})
output$plot <- renderPlot({
plot(filtered_data())
})
Use isolate() to prevent unnecessary invalidations:
# Only recompute when the button is clicked, not on every input change
output$result <- renderText({
input$compute # Take dependency on button
isolate({
paste("N =", input$n, "Mean =", mean(rnorm(input$n)))
})
})
Use debounce() and throttle() for high-frequency inputs:
# Debounce text input — wait 500ms after user stops typing
search_text <- reactive(input$search) |> debounce(500)
# Throttle slider — update at most every 250ms
slider_value <- reactive(input$slider) |> throttle(250)
Got: Reactive graph fires only necessary recalculations.
If fail: Removing dependency breaks functionality? Use req() to add explicit guards instead of relying on implicit reactive dependencies.
Step 3: Implement Caching
bindCache for Shiny Outputs
output$plot <- renderPlot({
create_expensive_plot(filtered_data())
}) |> bindCache(input$category, input$date_range)
output$table <- renderDT({
expensive_query(input$filters)
}) |> bindCache(input$filters)
bindCache uses input values as cache keys. Same inputs occur again? Cached result returned immediately.
memoise for Functions
# Cache expensive function results
load_reference_data <- memoise::memoise(
function(dataset_name) {
readr::read_csv(paste0("data/", dataset_name, ".csv"))
},
cache = cachem::cache_disk("cache/", max_age = 3600)
)
App-level Data Pre-computation
# In global.R or outside server function — computed once at app startup
reference_data <- readr::read_csv("data/reference.csv")
model <- readRDS("models/trained_model.rds")
server <- function(input, output, session) {
# reference_data and model are available to all sessions
# without reloading
}
Got: Repeated operations use cached results; response time drops significantly.
If fail: Cache grows too large? Set max_age or max_size limits. Cached values stale? Reduce max_age or add cache-clear button. bindCache causes errors? Ensure cache key inputs serializable.
Step 4: Add Async for Long Operations
Use ExtendedTask (Shiny >= 1.8.1) for long-running computations:
server <- function(input, output, session) {
# Define the extended task
analysis_task <- ExtendedTask$new(function(data, params) {
promises::future_promise({
# This runs in a background process
run_heavy_analysis(data, params)
})
}) |> bind_task_button("run_analysis")
# Trigger the task
observeEvent(input$run_analysis, {
analysis_task$invoke(dataset(), input$params)
})
# Use the result
output$result <- renderTable({
analysis_task$result()
})
}
For apps on Shiny < 1.8.1, use promises directly:
library(promises)
library(future)
plan(multisession, workers = 4)
server <- function(input, output, session) {
result <- eventReactive(input$compute, {
future_promise({
Sys.sleep(5) # Simulate long computation
expensive_analysis(isolate(input$params))
})
})
output$table <- renderTable({
result()
})
}
Got: Long operations don't block UI; other users can interact while computation runs.
If fail: future_promise errors? Check plan(multisession) is set. Variables not available in future? Pass explicitly — futures run in separate R processes.
Step 5: Optimize Rendering
Reduce rendering overhead:
# Use plotly for interactive plots instead of re-rendering
output$plot <- plotly::renderPlotly({
plotly::plot_ly(filtered_data(), x = ~x, y = ~y, type = "scatter")
})
# Use server-side DT for large tables
output$table <- DT::renderDataTable({
DT::datatable(large_data(), server = TRUE, options = list(
pageLength = 25,
processing = TRUE
))
})
# Conditional UI to avoid rendering hidden elements
output$details <- renderUI({
req(input$show_details)
expensive_details_ui()
})
Got: Rendering operations faster, don't block UI.
If fail: plotly slow with large datasets? Use toWebGL() for WebGL rendering or downsample data before plotting.
Step 6: Validate Performance Improvements
# Before/after benchmarking
system.time({
shiny::testServer(myModuleServer, args = list(...), {
session$setInputs(category = "A")
session$flushReact()
})
})
# Load testing with shinyloadtest
shinyloadtest::record_session("http://localhost:3838")
shinyloadtest::shinycannon(
"recording.log",
"http://localhost:3838",
workers = 10,
loaded_duration_minutes = 5
)
shinyloadtest::shinyloadtest_report("recording.log")
Got: Measurable improvement in response times and/or concurrent user capacity.
If fail: Performance didn't improve? Re-profile to find next bottleneck. Optimization iterative — fix biggest bottleneck first, re-measure.
Checks
- Profiling identifies specific bottlenecks (not guessing)
- Reactive graph has no unnecessary invalidation chains
- Expensive operations use caching (bindCache or memoise)
- Long-running computations use async (ExtendedTask or promises)
- High-frequency inputs use debounce/throttle
- Large datasets use server-side processing
- Performance improvement measurable (before/after timing)
Pitfalls
- Premature optimization: Profile first. Bottleneck rarely where you think it is.
- Cache invalidation bugs: Users see stale data? Cache key doesn't include all relevant inputs. Add missing dependencies to
bindCache(). - Future variable scoping:
future_promiseruns in separate process. Global variables, database connections, reactive values must be captured explicitly. - Reactive spaghetti: Reactive graph too complex to understand? App needs architectural refactoring (modules), not just caching.
- Over-caching: Caching everything wastes memory. Only cache operations expensive AND with repeated input patterns.
See Also
build-shiny-module— modular architecture for maintainable reactive codescaffold-shiny-app— choose right app framework from startdeploy-shiny-app— deploy optimized apps with appropriate server resourcestest-shiny-app— performance regression tests
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
content-collections
MetaDiese Skill bietet eine produktionsgetestete Einrichtung für Content Collections – ein TypeScript-first-Tool, das Markdown/MDX-Dateien in typsichere Datensammlungen mit Zod-Validierung umwandelt. Verwenden Sie ihn beim Erstellen von Blogs, Dokumentationsseiten oder inhaltsstarken Vite + React-Anwendungen, um Typsicherheit und automatische Inhaltsvalidierung zu gewährleisten. Er behandelt alles von der Vite-Plugin-Konfiguration und MDX-Kompilierung bis hin zur Deployment-Optimierung und Schema-Validierung.
polymarket
MetaDiese Fähigkeit ermöglicht es Entwicklern, Anwendungen mit der Polymarket-Prognosemärkte-Plattform zu erstellen, einschließlich API-Integration für Handel und Marktdaten. Sie bietet außerdem Echtzeit-Datenstreaming über WebSocket, um Live-Trades und Marktaktivitäten zu überwachen. Nutzen Sie sie zur Implementierung von Handelsstrategien oder zur Erstellung von Tools, die Live-Marktaktualisierungen verarbeiten.
creating-opencode-plugins
MetaDiese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, OpenCode-Plugins zu erstellen, die in über 25 Ereignistypen wie Befehle, Dateien und LSP-Operationen eingreifen. Sie bietet die Plugin-Struktur, Event-API-Spezifikationen und Implementierungsmuster für JavaScript/TypeScript-Module. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie den Lebenszyklus des OpenCode KI-Assistenten mit benutzerdefinierter ereignisgesteuerter Logik abfangen, überwachen oder erweitern müssen.
sglang
MetaSGLang ist ein hochperformantes LLM-Serving-Framework, das sich auf schnelle, strukturierte Generierung für JSON, Regex und agentenbasierte Workflows unter Verwendung seines RadixAttention-Prefix-Cachings spezialisiert. Es bietet deutlich schnellere Inferenz, insbesondere für Aufgaben mit wiederholten Präfixen, was es ideal für komplexe, strukturierte Ausgaben und Mehrfachdialoge macht. Wählen Sie SGLang gegenüber Alternativen wie vLLM, wenn Sie constrained decoding benötigen oder Anwendungen mit umfangreicher Präfix-Weitergabe entwickeln.
