test-team-coordination
Über
Diese Fähigkeit führt Testszenarien gegen ein Team aus, um dessen Koordinationsmuster zu validieren und zu beobachten und anhand von Akzeptanzkriterien zu bewerten. Sie erstellt einen strukturierten `RESULT.md`-Bericht, um die Leistung bei gleichwertigen Arbeitslasten zu vergleichen und eine Baseline zu etablieren. Nutzen Sie sie, um zu überprüfen, ob die Zusammenarbeit eines Teams bei realistischen Aufgaben die erwarteten Verhaltensweisen hervorbringt.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/test-team-coordinationKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Test Team Coordination
Exec test scenario from tests/scenarios/teams/ vs target team. Observe coordination pattern behaviors, eval acceptance criteria, score rubric, produce RESULT.md in tests/results/.
Use When
- Validate team's coordination produces expected behaviors
- Run structured test after modifying team def | agent
- Compare patterns by running same scenario w/ diff teams
- Establish baseline perf metrics for team composition
- Regression tests after adding agents | changing membership
In
- Required: Path to test scenario file (e.g.
tests/scenarios/teams/test-opaque-team-cartographers-audit.md) - Optional: Run ID override (default:
YYYY-MM-DD-<target>-NNNauto) - Optional: Team size override (default: from scenario frontmatter)
- Optional: Skip scope change (default: false — inject if defined)
Do
Step 1: Load + Validate Scenario
1.1. Read scenario file specified in input.
1.2. Parse YAML frontmatter + extract:
target— team to testcoordination-pattern— expected patternteam-size— # members to spawn- Acceptance criteria table
- Scoring rubric (if present)
- Ground truth data (if present)
1.3. Verify file has all req sections:
- Objective
- Pre-conditions
- Task (w/ Primary Task subsection)
- Expected Behaviors
- Acceptance Criteria
- Observation Protocol
Got: Scenario loads, parses, has all req sections.
If err: Missing | unparseable → abort w/ err msg ID'ing missing/malformed. Optional sections (Rubric, Ground Truth, Variants) absent → note + continue.
Step 2: Verify Pre-conditions
2.1. Walk through each pre-condition checkbox.
2.2. File-existence → use Glob.
2.3. Registry count → parse _registry.yml + cmp total_* vs actual file counts.
2.4. Branch/git → git status --porcelain + git branch --show-current.
Got: All pre-conditions satisfied.
If err: Pre-condition fails → record BLOCKED. Decide: proceed (soft) | abort (hard like missing target team file). Doc decision.
Step 3: Load Coordination Pattern Criteria
3.1. Read tests/_registry.yml + locate coordination_patterns matching scenario's coordination-pattern.
3.2. Extract key_behaviors list.
3.3. Behaviors = observation checklist — each watched during exec + recorded observed/not.
Got: Pattern key behaviors loaded for observation.
If err: Pattern not in registry → use scenario's Expected Behaviors as sole source. Log warning.
Step 4: Execute Task
4.1. Create result dir: tests/results/YYYY-MM-DD-<target>-NNN/.
4.2. Record T0 (task start).
4.3. Read target team def from teams/<target>.md, extract CONFIG block, activate: call TeamCreate w/ team name, spawn teammates per subagent_type, create tasks from CONFIG tasks list. Use team-size from scenario. Pass Primary Task verbatim from scenario's Task section.
4.4. Observe team's exec phases. Record:
- T1: Form assessment / decomposition complete
- T2: Role assignments visible
4.5. Scenario defines Scope Change Trigger + skip-scope-change false:
- Wait until Phase 2 (role assignment) visible
- T3 (scope change injection)
- Send scope change prompt via SendMessage
- T4 (scope change absorbed — role adjustment visible)
4.6. Continue observing until output:
- T5 (integration begins)
- T6 (final report delivered)
4.7. Capture team's complete output.
Got: Team executes through coordination phases. Timestamps for all transitions. Scope change (if applicable) injected + absorbed.
If err: Team fails to produce output → record fail point + err msgs. Stalls → note last phase + timeout. Proceed to eval w/ partial.
Step 5: Evaluate Pattern Behaviors
5.1. Per key behavior from Step 3, determine observed during exec:
- Observed: Clear evidence in output | coordination
- Partial: Some evidence but incomplete | ambiguous
- Not observed: No evidence
5.2. Per task-specific behavior from scenario's Expected Behaviors, same eval.
5.3. Record findings in observation log.
Got: All/most pattern + task behaviors observed.
If err: Unobserved = findings, not test fails. Record accurate — pattern didn't fully manifest.
Step 6: Evaluate Acceptance Criteria
6.1. Walk each acceptance criterion.
6.2. Per criterion, determination:
- PASS: Clearly met w/ observable evidence
- PARTIAL: Partially met (counts toward threshold at 0.5 weight)
- FAIL: Not met despite opportunity
- BLOCKED: Couldn't eval (pre-condition fail, timeout)
6.3. Scenario has Ground Truth → verify findings vs:
- Calc accuracy % per category
- Flag false +/false -
6.4. Scenario has Scoring Rubric → score each dim 1-5 w/ brief justification.
6.5. Calc summary metrics:
- Acceptance: X/N criteria passed (PARTIAL = 0.5)
- Threshold: PASS if ≥ scenario threshold
- Rubric total: X/Y points (if applicable)
Got: All criteria have determination. Summary metrics calc'd.
If err: < half criteria evaluable (too many BLOCKED) → inconclusive. Doc why + recommend re-run after fixing pre-conditions.
Step 7: Generate RESULT.md
7.1. Create tests/results/YYYY-MM-DD-<target>-NNN/RESULT.md using Recording Template from scenario's Observation Protocol.
7.2. Populate all sections:
- Run metadata (observer, timestamps, duration)
- Phase log w/ all timestamps
- Role emergence log (adaptive/team tests)
- Acceptance criteria results table
- Rubric scores table (if applicable)
- Ground truth verification table (if applicable)
- Key observations (narrative)
- Lessons learned
7.3. Include team's raw output as appendix | separate file (team-output.md) in same dir.
7.4. Add summary verdict at top:
**Verdict**: PASS | FAIL | INCONCLUSIVE
**Score**: X/N criteria (Y/Z rubric points)
**Duration**: Xm
Got: Complete RESULT.md w/ all sections + clear verdict.
If err: Result file can't be written → output to stdout fallback. Eval data never lost.
Check
- Scenario loaded + all req sections present
- Pre-conditions verified (or BLOCKED)
- Pattern key behaviors loaded from registry
- Team spawned + task delivered
- Scope change injected at right time (if applicable)
- All pattern behaviors evaluated (observed/partial/not)
- All criteria have determination (PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL/BLOCKED)
- Ground truth verified (if applicable)
- RESULT.md generated w/ all sections
- Summary verdict calc'd + recorded
Traps
- Eval output quality vs coordination: Tests how team coordinates, not whether output perfect. Team coordinating well but finding 7/9 broken refs still demonstrates pattern.
- Inject scope change too early: Wait until role assignment clearly visible. Too early → team hasn't differentiated, nothing to adapt.
- Conflate member output w/ team output: Opaque team should present unified output. Individual member reports = finding about opacity, not test infra problem.
- Exact ground truth matching: Ground truth counts approximate. Eval right ballpark, not exact match.
- Forget timestamps: Essential for phase durations + adaptation speed. Set as events happen, not retroactively.
→
review-codebase— deep codebase review complementing team-level testingreview-skill-format— validates individual skill format (this validates team coordination)create-team— creates defs this testsevolve-team— evolves defs based on test findingstest-a2a-interop— similar testing pattern for A2A protocol conformanceassess-form— morphic assessment opaque team lead uses internally
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
evaluating-llms-harness
TestenDiese Claude Skill führt den lm-evaluation-harness aus, um LLMs über 60+ standardisierte akademische Aufgaben wie MMLU und GSM8K zu benchmarken. Sie wurde für Entwickler entwickelt, um Modellqualität zu vergleichen, Trainingsfortschritt zu verfolgen oder akademische Ergebnisse zu berichten. Das Tool unterstützt verschiedene Backends, einschließlich HuggingFace- und vLLM-Modelle.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
TestenDiese Fähigkeit bietet umfassendes Wissen zur Implementierung von Cloudflare Cron Triggers, um Workers mithilfe von Cron-Ausdrücken zu planen. Sie behandelt das Einrichten periodischer Aufgaben, Wartungsjobs und automatisierter Workflows, während häufige Probleme wie ungültige Cron-Ausdrücke und Zeitzonenprobleme behandelt werden. Entwickler können sie zum Konfigurieren geplanter Handler, zum Testen von Cron-Triggers und zur Integration mit Workflows und Green Compute verwenden.
webapp-testing
TestenDiese Claude Skill bietet ein Playwright-basiertes Toolkit zum Testen lokaler Webanwendungen durch Python-Skripte. Es ermöglicht Frontend-Verifizierung, UI-Debugging, Screenshot-Aufnahme und Log-Einblick bei gleichzeitiger Verwaltung von Server-Lebenszyklen. Nutzen Sie es für Browser-Automatisierungsaufgaben, führen Sie Skripte jedoch direkt aus, anstatt deren Quellcode zu lesen, um Kontextverschmutzung zu vermeiden.
finishing-a-development-branch
TestenDiese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, abgeschlossene Arbeiten zu finalisieren, indem sie testet, ob Tests bestehen, und dann strukturierte Integrationsoptionen präsentiert. Sie leitet den Workflow für das Zusammenführen von Code, das Erstellen von PRs oder das Bereinigen von Branches nach Abschluss der Implementierung. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Ihr Code bereit und getestet ist, um den Entwicklungsprozess systematisch abzuschließen.
