run-chaos-experiment
Über
Diese Fähigkeit ermöglicht es Entwicklern, Chaos-Experimente mit Litmus oder Chaos Mesh zu entwerfen und durchzuführen, um die Systemresilienz durch kontrollierte Fehlerinjektion zu testen. Sie hilft dabei, hypothesengetriebene Tests zu validieren und Fehlerbehebungsprozesse zu verbessern. Nutzen Sie sie vor größeren Veröffentlichungen, nach Architekturänderungen oder während Resilienzübungen, um Fehlerannahmen zu überprüfen.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/run-chaos-experimentKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Run Chaos Experiment
Inject controlled failures to test and improve system resilience.
When to Use
- Before major product launches (load testing)
- After architecture changes (validate resilience)
- GameDays or disaster recovery drills
- Validate assumptions about failure modes
- Part of an SRE maturity program
Inputs
- Required: Kubernetes cluster (for Litmus or Chaos Mesh)
- Required: Steady-state definition (what "normal" looks like)
- Required: Hypothesis to test (e.g., "API stays available if one pod crashes")
- Optional: Observability stack (Prometheus, Grafana) to measure impact
- Optional: Rollback plan
Procedure
Step 1: Define Steady State and Hypothesis
Document normal system behavior:
## Steady State Definition
### Service: API Gateway
- **Availability**: 99.9% (< 0.1% error rate)
- **Latency**: p95 < 200ms
- **Throughput**: 1000 req/s
- **Dependencies**: Database (Postgres), Cache (Redis), Auth Service
### Metrics
- `rate(http_requests_total{job="api"}[5m])`
- `histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))`
- `rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m])`
## Hypothesis
**"If one API pod is killed, the remaining pods will handle the load with <5s
disruption and no increase in error rate."**
### Validation Criteria
- Error rate remains <1%
- p95 latency stays <300ms (50ms grace)
- Service recovers within 5 seconds
- No cascading failures to downstream services
Got: Clear, measurable definition of normal behavior and success criteria.
If fail: Without a steady state, observability is insufficient. Add metrics first.
Step 2: Set Blast Radius Limits
Scope the experiment to minimize risk:
# chaos-config.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
name: chaos-testing
---
# Label pods participating in chaos experiments
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
labels:
chaos-enabled: "true"
environment: staging # NEVER production for first run
Set safeguards:
## Blast Radius Controls
### Environment
- **Scope**: Staging only (first 5 runs)
- **Production**: Only after 5 successful staging runs
- **Timing**: Business hours (09:00-17:00 local), never weekends/holidays
### Target Selection
- **Limit**: Max 1 pod per service
- **Percentage**: Max 25% of replicas
- **Exclusions**: Database, payment service, auth service (critical path)
### Auto-Abort Conditions
- Error rate >10% for >30 seconds
- Customer-facing alerts fire
- Manual abort signal from on-call engineer
### Rollback Plan
- Kubernetes will auto-restart killed pods
- Manual rollback: `kubectl rollout undo deployment/api`
- Incident declared if recovery takes >5 minutes
Got: Experiment has clear boundaries, won't take down entire system.
If fail: With too-large blast radius, narrow scope. Start with one non-critical service.
Step 3: Install Chaos Mesh
Deploy Chaos Mesh (Kubernetes-native):
# Add Chaos Mesh Helm repo
helm repo add chaos-mesh https://charts.chaos-mesh.org
helm repo update
# Install Chaos Mesh in isolated namespace
helm install chaos-mesh chaos-mesh/chaos-mesh \
--namespace chaos-mesh \
--create-namespace \
--set dashboard.create=true \
--set controllerManager.replicaCount=1
# Verify installation
kubectl get pods -n chaos-mesh
# Access dashboard
kubectl port-forward -n chaos-mesh svc/chaos-dashboard 2333:2333
# Open http://localhost:2333
Alternative: Litmus (vendor-neutral):
# Install Litmus
kubectl apply -f https://litmuschaos.github.io/litmus/litmus-operator-v2.14.0.yaml
# Wait for Litmus pods
kubectl get pods -n litmus
# Install Litmus CRDs
kubectl apply -f https://hub.litmuschaos.io/api/chaos/master?file=charts/generic/experiments.yaml
Got: Chaos Mesh or Litmus running, dashboard accessible.
If fail: Check RBAC permissions. Chaos tools need cluster-wide access.
Step 4: Create and Execute Experiment
Example: Pod Kill Experiment (Chaos Mesh):
# pod-kill-experiment.yaml
apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: PodChaos
metadata:
name: api-pod-kill-test
namespace: chaos-testing
spec:
action: pod-kill
mode: one # Kill one pod only
selector:
namespaces:
- production
labelSelectors:
app: api-gateway
chaos-enabled: "true"
duration: "30s"
scheduler:
cron: "@every 5m" # Repeat every 5 minutes (for sustained testing)
Apply the experiment:
# Apply experiment
kubectl apply -f pod-kill-experiment.yaml
# Watch experiment status
kubectl get podchaos -n chaos-testing -w
# View detailed status
kubectl describe podchaos api-pod-kill-test -n chaos-testing
# Check which pods were affected
kubectl get events -n production --sort-by=.metadata.creationTimestamp | grep api-gateway
Monitor impact in Grafana:
# Error rate during experiment
rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5..", job="api"}[1m])
# Latency spike
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job="api"}[1m]))
# Pod restarts
rate(kube_pod_container_status_restarts_total{pod=~"api-.*"}[5m])
Got: Pod is killed, Kubernetes restarts it, service continues with minor blip.
If fail: If error rate spikes or service degrades significantly, abort and investigate.
Step 5: Analyze Results and Iterate
Create experiment report:
# Chaos Experiment Report: API Pod Kill
**Date**: 2025-02-09
**Hypothesis**: API stays available if one pod crashes
**Tool**: Chaos Mesh
**Environment**: Staging
**Duration**: 30 seconds (pod kill + recovery)
## Results
### Metrics During Experiment
- **Error Rate**: Increased from 0.1% to 2.3% (spike lasted 8 seconds)
- **p95 Latency**: Increased from 180ms to 450ms (spike lasted 12 seconds)
- **Recovery Time**: 8 seconds (pod restart + load balancer update)
### Hypothesis Outcome
**FAILED**: Error rate exceeded 1% threshold, latency spike >300ms
## Root Cause Analysis
- Load balancer continued routing to killed pod for 8 seconds (stale endpoint)
- Readiness probe set to 10s interval (too slow)
- No pre-stop hook to drain connections gracefully
## Improvements Made
1. **Reduced readiness probe interval**: 10s → 2s
2. **Added pre-stop hook**: 5-second sleep for connection draining
3. **Tuned load balancer**: Enabled faster endpoint updates
## Follow-Up Experiment
- Re-run with same parameters in 1 week
- Expected: Error rate <1%, recovery <5s
Track experiments in a log:
# chaos-experiment-log.csv
date,experiment,environment,status,error_rate_peak,recovery_time_s,outcome
2025-02-09,pod-kill-api,staging,complete,2.3%,8,failed
2025-02-16,pod-kill-api,staging,complete,0.8%,4,passed
2025-02-23,network-delay-db,staging,aborted,15%,N/A,failed
Got: Learnings captured, fixes implemented, follow-up scheduled.
If fail: Without action post-experiment, chaos engineering becomes theater. Prioritize fixes.
Step 6: Graduate to Production (Carefully)
Once staging experiments pass consistently:
# Production pod-kill experiment (more conservative)
apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: PodChaos
metadata:
name: api-pod-kill-prod
namespace: chaos-testing
spec:
action: pod-kill
mode: one
selector:
namespaces:
- production
labelSelectors:
app: api-gateway
chaos-enabled: "true"
duration: "10s" # Shorter than staging
scheduler:
cron: "0 10 * * 2" # Tuesdays at 10 AM only (predictable, low-risk time)
Production safeguards:
# Create a kill switch for production chaos
kubectl create configmap chaos-killswitch \
-n chaos-testing \
--from-literal=enabled=true
# Update experiments to check kill switch
# (implementation depends on chaos tool)
Got: Production experiments run during low-risk windows, with kill switch ready.
If fail: If a production experiment causes an incident, disable immediately and post-mortem.
Validation
- Steady state and hypothesis clearly defined
- Blast radius limited (environment, scope, timing)
- Chaos tool (Chaos Mesh or Litmus) installed and tested
- Experiment runs successfully in staging
- Results documented with metrics and analysis
- Improvements implemented based on findings
- Follow-up experiment validates fixes
- Production experiments run only after 5+ staging successes
Pitfalls
- No hypothesis: Running chaos "to see what happens" wastes time. Always have a hypothesis.
- Too broad scope: Killing all pods at once tests disaster recovery, not resilience. Start small.
- Production-first: Never run first experiment in production. Staging first, always.
- Ignoring results: Chaos without action is theater. Fix what you learn.
- Alert fatigue: Chaos experiments trigger alerts. Annotate Grafana or silence expected alerts.
- No abort plan: If experiment goes wrong, you need a kill switch. Have it ready.
Related Skills
setup-prometheus-monitoring- metrics to measure experiment impactconfigure-alerting-rules- alerts that fire during chaos (expected)define-slo-sli-sla- steady state tied to SLOs
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
evaluating-llms-harness
TestenDiese Claude Skill führt den lm-evaluation-harness aus, um LLMs über 60+ standardisierte akademische Aufgaben wie MMLU und GSM8K zu benchmarken. Sie wurde für Entwickler entwickelt, um Modellqualität zu vergleichen, Trainingsfortschritt zu verfolgen oder akademische Ergebnisse zu berichten. Das Tool unterstützt verschiedene Backends, einschließlich HuggingFace- und vLLM-Modelle.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
TestenDiese Fähigkeit bietet umfassendes Wissen zur Implementierung von Cloudflare Cron Triggers, um Workers mithilfe von Cron-Ausdrücken zu planen. Sie behandelt das Einrichten periodischer Aufgaben, Wartungsjobs und automatisierter Workflows, während häufige Probleme wie ungültige Cron-Ausdrücke und Zeitzonenprobleme behandelt werden. Entwickler können sie zum Konfigurieren geplanter Handler, zum Testen von Cron-Triggers und zur Integration mit Workflows und Green Compute verwenden.
webapp-testing
TestenDiese Claude Skill bietet ein Playwright-basiertes Toolkit zum Testen lokaler Webanwendungen durch Python-Skripte. Es ermöglicht Frontend-Verifizierung, UI-Debugging, Screenshot-Aufnahme und Log-Einblick bei gleichzeitiger Verwaltung von Server-Lebenszyklen. Nutzen Sie es für Browser-Automatisierungsaufgaben, führen Sie Skripte jedoch direkt aus, anstatt deren Quellcode zu lesen, um Kontextverschmutzung zu vermeiden.
finishing-a-development-branch
TestenDiese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, abgeschlossene Arbeiten zu finalisieren, indem sie testet, ob Tests bestehen, und dann strukturierte Integrationsoptionen präsentiert. Sie leitet den Workflow für das Zusammenführen von Code, das Erstellen von PRs oder das Bereinigen von Branches nach Abschluss der Implementierung. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Ihr Code bereit und getestet ist, um den Entwicklungsprozess systematisch abzuschließen.
