test-a2a-interop
Über
Diese Fähigkeit testet die Interoperabilität von A2A-Agenten durch die Validierung der Protokollkonformität, die Ausführung von Aufgaben-Lebenszyklen und die Überprüfung von Streaming- und Fehlerbehandlung. Nutzen Sie sie, um neue A2A-Server-Implementierungen zu validieren, Multi-Agenten-Workflows zu debuggen oder Konformitätstests in CI/CD-Pipelines auszuführen.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/test-a2a-interopKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Test A2A Interoperability
Validate A2A agent implementation conforms to protocol specification. Test Agent Card discovery, task lifecycle management, SSE streaming, error handling, multi-agent communication patterns.
When Use
- Verify new A2A server implementation before deployment
- Validate interoperability between two or more A2A agents
- Run conformance tests as part of CI/CD for A2A services
- Debug failures in multi-agent A2A workflows
- Certify agent meets A2A protocol requirements for registry
Inputs
- Required: Base URL of A2A agent under test
- Required: Authentication credentials (if agent requires them)
- Optional: Second agent URL for bidirectional interop testing
- Optional: Specific skills to test (default: all skills in Agent Card)
- Optional: Test timeout per task (default: 60 seconds)
- Optional: Output format for conformance report (
json,markdown,junit)
Steps
Step 1: Fetch and Validate Agent Cards
1.1. Retrieve the Agent Card from the well-known endpoint:
curl -s https://agent.example.com/.well-known/agent.json -o agent-card.json
1.2. Validate required top-level fields:
const requiredFields = ["name", "description", "url", "skills"];
for (const field of requiredFields) {
assert(agentCard[field] !== undefined, `Missing required field: ${field}`);
}
1.3. Validate each skill entry:
for (const skill of agentCard.skills) {
assert(skill.id, "Skill missing id");
assert(skill.name, "Skill missing name");
assert(skill.description, "Skill missing description");
assert(
Array.isArray(skill.inputModes) && skill.inputModes.length > 0,
`Skill ${skill.id} missing inputModes`
);
assert(
Array.isArray(skill.outputModes) && skill.outputModes.length > 0,
`Skill ${skill.id} missing outputModes`
);
}
1.4. Validate authentication configuration:
- If
authentication.schemesincludesoauth2, verifycredentials.oauth2hastokenUrl - If
authentication.schemesincludesapiKey, verifycredentials.apiKeyhasheaderName
1.5. Validate capability flags are boolean values.
1.6. Record validation results in the conformance report:
interface ConformanceResult {
test: string;
category: "agent-card" | "lifecycle" | "streaming" | "error-handling" | "interop";
status: "pass" | "fail" | "skip";
message?: string;
duration_ms?: number;
}
Got: Agent Card passes all structural validation checks.
If fail: Record each validation failure with specific field and reason. Never abort; continue testing other aspects. Invalid Agent Card itself a test result.
Step 2: Send Test Tasks Covering All Lifecycle States
2.1. Test: Task submission (submitted -> working -> completed)
Send a task that the agent should be able to handle based on its declared skills:
const submitResult = await sendJsonRpc(agentUrl, {
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: 1,
method: "tasks/send",
params: {
id: `test-${uuid()}`,
sessionId: `session-${uuid()}`,
message: {
role: "user",
parts: [{ type: "text", text: skillExamples[0] }],
},
},
});
assert(submitResult.result, "tasks/send should return a result");
assert(submitResult.result.id, "Result should include task ID");
assert(
["submitted", "working", "completed"].includes(submitResult.result.status.state),
`Unexpected initial state: ${submitResult.result.status.state}`
);
2.2. Test: Task polling (tasks/get)
Poll until the task reaches a terminal state:
let task = submitResult.result;
const startTime = Date.now();
while (!["completed", "failed", "canceled"].includes(task.status.state)) {
if (Date.now() - startTime > TEST_TIMEOUT_MS) {
fail(`Task ${task.id} did not complete within ${TEST_TIMEOUT_MS}ms`);
break;
}
await sleep(1000);
const getResult = await sendJsonRpc(agentUrl, {
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: 2,
method: "tasks/get",
params: { id: task.id },
});
task = getResult.result;
}
assert(task.status.state === "completed", `Task should complete, got: ${task.status.state}`);
2.3. Test: Task cancellation
Submit a task and immediately cancel it:
const cancelTask = await sendJsonRpc(agentUrl, {
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: 3,
method: "tasks/send",
params: { id: `test-cancel-${uuid()}`, sessionId: `session-${uuid()}`, message: { ... } },
});
const cancelResult = await sendJsonRpc(agentUrl, {
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: 4,
method: "tasks/cancel",
params: { id: cancelTask.result.id },
});
assert(
cancelResult.result.status.state === "canceled",
"Canceled task should be in canceled state"
);
2.4. Test: Input-required state (multi-turn)
If any skill supports multi-turn interaction, send an ambiguous request that should trigger input-required, then provide the follow-up:
// Send ambiguous request
const multiTurnTask = await sendJsonRpc(agentUrl, { ... });
// Poll until input-required or completed
// If input-required, send follow-up
if (task.status.state === "input-required") {
const followUp = await sendJsonRpc(agentUrl, {
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: 6,
method: "tasks/send",
params: {
id: task.id,
sessionId: task.sessionId,
message: { role: "user", parts: [{ type: "text", text: "Column A and Column B" }] },
},
});
assert(
["working", "completed"].includes(followUp.result.status.state),
"Follow-up should resume task"
);
}
2.5. Test: State transition history
If the Agent Card declares stateTransitionHistory: true:
const getWithHistory = await sendJsonRpc(agentUrl, {
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: 7,
method: "tasks/get",
params: { id: completedTaskId, historyLength: 100 },
});
assert(
Array.isArray(getWithHistory.result.history),
"Task should include history array"
);
assert(
getWithHistory.result.history.length >= 2,
"History should have at least 2 entries (submitted and completed)"
);
Got: All lifecycle state transitions work correct. Tasks complete success, cancel clean, multi-turn interaction functions when supported.
If fail: Record specific state transition that failed, expected state, actual state. Include full JSON-RPC response in report for debugging.
Step 3: Validate SSE Streaming Responses
3.1. Skip this step if the Agent Card declares streaming: false.
3.2. Send a tasks/sendSubscribe request and validate the SSE stream:
const response = await fetch(`${agentUrl}/subscribe`, {
method: "POST",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: 10,
method: "tasks/sendSubscribe",
params: {
id: `test-stream-${uuid()}`,
sessionId: `session-${uuid()}`,
message: { role: "user", parts: [{ type: "text", text: "Stream test task" }] },
},
}),
});
assert(
response.headers.get("content-type")?.includes("text/event-stream"),
"Response must be text/event-stream"
);
3.3. Parse SSE events and validate structure:
const events: SSEEvent[] = [];
const reader = response.body.getReader();
const decoder = new TextDecoder();
let buffer = "";
while (true) {
const { done, value } = await reader.read();
if (done) break;
buffer += decoder.decode(value, { stream: true });
// Parse SSE events from buffer
const lines = buffer.split("\n");
for (const line of lines) {
if (line.startsWith("event: ")) {
currentEvent.type = line.slice(7);
} else if (line.startsWith("data: ")) {
currentEvent.data = JSON.parse(line.slice(6));
events.push(currentEvent);
}
}
}
3.4. Validate the event sequence:
- First event should be a
statusevent with statesubmittedorworking - Intermediate events may include
statusupdates andartifactdeliveries - Final event should have
final: truewith a terminal state - No events should arrive after the final event
3.5. Validate that SSE connection cleanup works:
- Close the connection mid-stream
- Verify the task can still be retrieved via
tasks/get - Verify no server errors from the premature disconnect
Got: SSE stream delivers correct formatted events in right sequence, ending with final terminal event.
If fail: SSE advertised but endpoint returns non-SSE response? Record as conformance failure. Events arrive out of order? Record sequence. Stream never terminates? Record timeout.
Step 4: Test Error Handling and Edge Cases
4.1. Test: Unknown method
const unknownMethod = await sendJsonRpc(agentUrl, {
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: 20,
method: "tasks/nonexistent",
params: {},
});
assert(unknownMethod.error?.code === -32601, "Should return method not found");
4.2. Test: Malformed JSON-RPC request
const malformed = await fetch(agentUrl, {
method: "POST",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
body: '{"not": "valid jsonrpc"}',
});
const response = await malformed.json();
assert(response.error?.code === -32600, "Should return invalid request");
4.3. Test: Get nonexistent task
const notFound = await sendJsonRpc(agentUrl, {
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: 22,
method: "tasks/get",
params: { id: "nonexistent-task-id" },
});
assert(notFound.error, "Should return error for nonexistent task");
4.4. Test: Cancel already completed task
const cancelCompleted = await sendJsonRpc(agentUrl, {
jsonrpc: "2.0",
id: 23,
method: "tasks/cancel",
params: { id: completedTaskId },
});
assert(cancelCompleted.error, "Should error when canceling completed task");
4.5. Test: Authentication enforcement
If authentication is configured, send a request without credentials:
const unauthResponse = await fetch(agentUrl, {
method: "POST",
headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({ jsonrpc: "2.0", id: 24, method: "tasks/get", params: { id: "x" } }),
});
assert(unauthResponse.status === 401, "Should reject unauthenticated requests");
4.6. Test: Agent Card is publicly accessible without auth
const publicCard = await fetch(`${agentUrl}/.well-known/agent.json`);
assert(publicCard.status === 200, "Agent Card should be publicly accessible");
Got: All error conditions return appropriate JSON-RPC error codes without crashing server.
If fail: Record each error handling test that fails. Server crashes during error testing critical failures must be fixed before deployment.
Step 5: Generate Interoperability Conformance Report
5.1. Aggregate all test results into a structured report:
interface ConformanceReport {
agentUrl: string;
agentName: string;
agentVersion: string;
testDate: string;
summary: {
total: number;
passed: number;
failed: number;
skipped: number;
};
categories: {
agentCard: ConformanceResult[];
lifecycle: ConformanceResult[];
streaming: ConformanceResult[];
errorHandling: ConformanceResult[];
interop: ConformanceResult[];
};
conformanceLevel: "full" | "partial" | "minimal" | "non-conformant";
}
5.2. Calculate the conformance level:
- full: All tests pass, including streaming and push notifications
- partial: Core lifecycle tests pass, some optional features fail
- minimal: Agent Card valid and basic task send/get works
- non-conformant: Agent Card invalid or basic lifecycle broken
5.3. Generate the report in the requested format:
- json: Machine-readable for CI/CD integration
- markdown: Human-readable with pass/fail tables
- junit: XML format for test framework integration
5.4. Include recommendations for fixing failures:
## Failed Tests
| Test | Category | Message | Recommendation |
|------|----------|---------|----------------|
| cancel-completed-task | error-handling | Server returned 500 | Add guard for terminal state transitions |
| sse-final-event | streaming | No final event received | Ensure SSE sends event with final:true |
5.5. If bidirectional testing was requested (two agents), validate:
- Agent A can discover Agent B's Agent Card
- Agent A can send a task to Agent B
- Agent B can send a task to Agent A
- Both agents handle concurrent tasks without interference
Got: Complete conformance report with pass/fail results, conformance level, actionable recommendations.
If fail: Report generation itself fails? Output raw test results to stdout as fallback. Test data should never be lost due to reporting error.
Checks
- Agent Card fetched and structural validated
- At least one task completes full lifecycle (submitted -> working -> completed)
- Task cancellation works correct
- Error responses use correct JSON-RPC error codes
- SSE streaming tested if advertised in capabilities
- Authentication enforced on task endpoints but not on Agent Card
- Conformance report generated in requested format
- Failed tests include actionable remediation guidance
- Test suite can run in CI/CD without manual intervention
Pitfalls
- Test against cold server: Some agents take time to initialize. Add health check or warmup request before running tests.
- Hardcoded test data: Use dynamic task and session IDs (UUIDs) to avoid collisions when running tests repeated. Never assume specific task ID available.
- Ignore timing: Task transitions asynchronous. Always poll with backoff rather than asserting immediate state changes.
- SSE parsing complexity: SSE events may span multiple chunks. Buffer incoming data, parse complete events, not raw chunks.
- Test only happy path: Error handling tests as important as success tests. Malformed requests, invalid transitions, auth failures must all be covered.
- Network dependency: Tests should be runnable against localhost for development and remote URLs for production. Parameterize agent URL.
- Assume skill behavior: Test suite validates protocol conformance, not skill correctness. Use example phrases from Agent Card to trigger skills, never assert specific output content.
See Also
design-a2a-agent-card- design Agent Card being testedimplement-a2a-server- implement server being testedbuild-ci-cd-pipeline- integrate conformance tests into CI/CDtroubleshoot-mcp-connection- debugging patterns applicable to A2A connectivityreview-software-architecture- architecture review for multi-agent systems
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
evaluating-llms-harness
TestenDiese Claude Skill führt den lm-evaluation-harness aus, um LLMs über 60+ standardisierte akademische Aufgaben wie MMLU und GSM8K zu benchmarken. Sie wurde für Entwickler entwickelt, um Modellqualität zu vergleichen, Trainingsfortschritt zu verfolgen oder akademische Ergebnisse zu berichten. Das Tool unterstützt verschiedene Backends, einschließlich HuggingFace- und vLLM-Modelle.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
TestenDiese Fähigkeit bietet umfassendes Wissen zur Implementierung von Cloudflare Cron Triggers, um Workers mithilfe von Cron-Ausdrücken zu planen. Sie behandelt das Einrichten periodischer Aufgaben, Wartungsjobs und automatisierter Workflows, während häufige Probleme wie ungültige Cron-Ausdrücke und Zeitzonenprobleme behandelt werden. Entwickler können sie zum Konfigurieren geplanter Handler, zum Testen von Cron-Triggers und zur Integration mit Workflows und Green Compute verwenden.
webapp-testing
TestenDiese Claude Skill bietet ein Playwright-basiertes Toolkit zum Testen lokaler Webanwendungen durch Python-Skripte. Es ermöglicht Frontend-Verifizierung, UI-Debugging, Screenshot-Aufnahme und Log-Einblick bei gleichzeitiger Verwaltung von Server-Lebenszyklen. Nutzen Sie es für Browser-Automatisierungsaufgaben, führen Sie Skripte jedoch direkt aus, anstatt deren Quellcode zu lesen, um Kontextverschmutzung zu vermeiden.
finishing-a-development-branch
TestenDiese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, abgeschlossene Arbeiten zu finalisieren, indem sie testet, ob Tests bestehen, und dann strukturierte Integrationsoptionen präsentiert. Sie leitet den Workflow für das Zusammenführen von Code, das Erstellen von PRs oder das Bereinigen von Branches nach Abschluss der Implementierung. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Ihr Code bereit und getestet ist, um den Entwicklungsprozess systematisch abzuschließen.
