Zurück zu Fähigkeiten

analyze-prime-numbers

pjt222
Aktualisiert 2 days ago
6 Ansichten
17
2
17
Auf GitHub ansehen
Testentesting

Über

Diese Fähigkeit bietet Algorithmen zur Primzahlanalyse, einschließlich Primzahltests, Faktorisierung und Verteilungsberechnungen. Sie implementiert Methoden wie Miller-Rabin, Probedivision und das Sieb des Eratosthenes für aufgaben der computergestützten Zahlentheorie. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie Primzahlen verifizieren, Primfaktoren finden oder Primzahllisten für Beweise oder Anwendungen generieren müssen.

Schnellinstallation

Claude Code

Empfohlen
Primär
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Plugin-BefehlAlternativ
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativ
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/analyze-prime-numbers

Kopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren

Dokumentation

Analyze Prime Numbers

Select + apply right algo: primality, factorization, distribution. Verify computationally + relate to Prime Number Theorem.

Use When

  • Int prime or composite?
  • Complete prime factorization
  • Count/list primes up to bound
  • Verify PNT approx for range
  • Investigate prime props in number-theoretic proof/compute

In

  • Required: Int(s) to analyze, or bound for distribution
  • Required: Task — primality, factorization, distribution
  • Optional: Preferred algo (trial div, Miller-Rabin, Sieve Eratosthenes, Pollard's rho)
  • Optional: Formal proof or computational verdict
  • Optional: Out format (factor tree, prime list, count, table)

Do

Step 1: Determine Task

Classify → 1 of 3 + select algo path:

  1. Primality: Int n, prime?
  2. Factorization: Composite n, complete prime factorization
  3. Distribution: Bound N, analyze primes ≤ N (count, list, gaps, density)

Record task + in values.

Clear classification + in values recorded.

If err: Ambiguous ("analyze 60") → ask clarify primality vs factorization vs distribution. Default factorization for composites + primality confirm suspected primes.

Step 2: Primality Testing (if task = primality)

Test n prime, algo matched to size:

  1. Trivial: n < 2 not prime. n = 2 or 3 prime. n even + n > 2 → composite.

  2. Small n (<10^6): Trial division.

    • Test div all primes p ≤ floor(sqrt(n)).
    • Opt: test 2, then odd 3, 5, 7, ... or 6k +/- 1 wheel.
    • No divisor → prime.
  3. Large n (>=10^6): Miller-Rabin probabilistic.

    • n - 1 = 2^s * d, d odd.
    • Per witness a in {2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37}:
      • Compute x = a^d mod n.
      • x = 1 or x = n - 1 → pass.
      • Else square x up to s - 1 times. x = n - 1 ever → pass.
      • No pass → composite (a = witness).
    • n < 3.317 * 10^24 → witnesses give deterministic result.
  4. Record verdict: prime or composite + witness/cert.

Small primes (1st 25):

IndexPrimeIndexPrimeIndexPrime
1210291967
2311312071
3512372173
4713412279
51114432383
61315472489
71716532597
8191759
9231861

Definitive (prime/composite) + algo used + witnesses/divisors.

If err: Miller-Rabin "probably prime" + certainty needed → escalate deterministic (AKS or ECPP). Trial div too slow → Miller-Rabin.

Step 3: Factorization (if task = factorization)

Factor n completely → prime power decomposition:

  1. Extract small factors by trial div:

    • Divide 2 as many times as possible, record exponent.
    • Divide odd primes 3, 5, 7, 11, ... up to cutoff (10^4 or sqrt(n) if small).
    • After each div, update n → cofactor.
  2. Cofactor > 1 + <10^12: Continue trial div ≤ sqrt(cofactor).

  3. Cofactor >= 10^12: Pollard's rho.

    • f(x) = x^2 + c (mod n), random c.
    • Floyd cycle: x = f(x), y = f(f(y)).
    • d = gcd(|x - y|, n) each step.
    • 1 < d < n → non-trivial factor. Recurse d + n/d.
    • d = n → retry diff c.
  4. Verify: Multiply all prime factors + exponents = original n. Test each factor primality.

  5. Present: n = p1^a1 * p2^a2 * ... * pk^ak, p1 < p2 < ... < pk.

Algo complexity:

AlgoComplexityBest for
Trial divisionO(sqrt(n))n < 10^12
Pollard's rhoO(n^{1/4}) expectedn up to ~10^18
Quadratic sieveL(n)^{1+o(1)}n up to ~10^50
GNFSL(n)^{(64/9)^{1/3}+o(1)}n > 10^50

Complete prime factorization canonical form + multiplication verified.

If err: Pollard's rho fails after many iters (cycle w/o non-trivial gcd) → try diff c (≥5 attempts). All fail → cofactor may be prime → confirm primality.

Step 4: Distribution Analysis (if task = distribution)

Distribution of primes up to N:

  1. Generate via Sieve Eratosthenes:

    • Bool array size N + 1, true.
    • Set 0 + 1 false (not prime).
    • Per p from 2 to floor(sqrt(N)):
      • Still true → mark multiples p^2, p^2 + p, p^2 + 2p, ... false.
    • Collect indices still true.
  2. Count: pi(N) = primes up to N.

  3. Compare w/ PNT:

    • PNT approx: pi(N) ~ N / ln(N).
    • Logarithmic integral: Li(N) = integral 2 to N of 1/ln(t) dt.
    • Relative err: |pi(N) - N/ln(N)| / pi(N).
  4. Analyze gaps (optional):

    • Gaps between consecutive primes.
    • Max gap, avg gap, twin primes (gap = 2).
    • Avg gap near N ~ ln(N).
  5. Present summary:

Bound N:       1,000,000
pi(N):         78,498
N/ln(N):       72,382
Li(N):         78,628
Relative error (N/ln(N)):  7.79%
Relative error (Li(N)):    0.17%
Max prime gap:  148 (between 492113 and 492227)
Twin primes:    8,169 pairs

Count + PNT compare + optional gap analysis.

If err: N too large in-mem sieve (N > 10^9) → segmented sieve processes range in blocks. Count only (no list) → Meissel-Lehmer for pi(N) direct.

Step 5: Verify Computationally

Cross-check via independent method:

  1. Primality: Trial div used → verify quick Miller-Rabin (or vice versa). Known primes → check published tables or OEIS.

  2. Factorization: Multiply factors + confirm = original. Independently test each claimed prime.

  3. Distribution: Spot-check 3-5 numbers from sieve out for primality. Compare pi(N) published values (pi(10^k) k = 1, ..., 9).

Published pi(N):

Npi(N)
104
10025
1,000168
10,0001,229
100,0009,592
10^678,498
10^7664,579
10^85,761,455
10^950,847,534
  1. Doc verification + method + outcome.

All results independently verified no discrepancies.

If err: Verification → discrepancy → re-run w/ extra checks (verbose trial div logging). Common: off-by-one sieve bounds, int overflow modular arithmetic, pseudoprime mistaken prime.

Check

  • Task correctly classified (primality, factorization, distribution)
  • Algo appropriate for in size
  • Trivial cases (n < 2, n = 2, even n) handled pre-general
  • Primality verdicts definitive (not "probably prime" unqualified)
  • Factorizations multiply back to original
  • Every claimed prime factor tested primality
  • Sieve bounds include sqrt(N) coverage
  • PNT compare uses correct formula (N/ln(N) or Li(N))
  • Results verified by independent method or published values
  • Edge cases (n = 0, 1, 2, neg) addressed

Traps

  • Forget n = 1 not prime: Convention — 1 neither prime nor composite. Many algos silently misclassify.

  • Int overflow modular exp: Computing a^d mod n for Miller-Rabin, naive exp overflows. Use modular exp (repeated squaring + mod each step).

  • Sieve off-by-one: Mark composites starting p^2, not 2p. 2p wastes time but correct; p+1 wrong.

  • Pollard's rho cycle w/ d = n: gcd(|x - y|, n) = n → algo found trivial factor. Retry diff c not just starting pt.

  • Carmichael nums fooling Fermat: Nums like 561 = 3 * 11 * 17 pass Fermat primality all coprime bases. Always Miller-Rabin, not plain Fermat.

  • Confuse pi(n) w/ constant pi: Prime counting fn pi(n) + circle constant 3.14159 share notation. Ctx unambiguous.

  • solve-modular-arithmetic — underpins Miller-Rabin + factorization
  • explore-diophantine-equations — factorization prereq for solving many
  • formulate-quantum-problem — Shor's algo for factorization connects primes → quantum

GitHub Repository

pjt222/agent-almanac
Pfad: i18n/caveman-ultra/skills/analyze-prime-numbers
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Verwandte Skills

evaluating-llms-harness

Testen

Diese Claude Skill führt den lm-evaluation-harness aus, um LLMs über 60+ standardisierte akademische Aufgaben wie MMLU und GSM8K zu benchmarken. Sie wurde für Entwickler entwickelt, um Modellqualität zu vergleichen, Trainingsfortschritt zu verfolgen oder akademische Ergebnisse zu berichten. Das Tool unterstützt verschiedene Backends, einschließlich HuggingFace- und vLLM-Modelle.

Skill ansehen

cloudflare-cron-triggers

Testen

Diese Fähigkeit bietet umfassendes Wissen zur Implementierung von Cloudflare Cron Triggers, um Workers mithilfe von Cron-Ausdrücken zu planen. Sie behandelt das Einrichten periodischer Aufgaben, Wartungsjobs und automatisierter Workflows, während häufige Probleme wie ungültige Cron-Ausdrücke und Zeitzonenprobleme behandelt werden. Entwickler können sie zum Konfigurieren geplanter Handler, zum Testen von Cron-Triggers und zur Integration mit Workflows und Green Compute verwenden.

Skill ansehen

webapp-testing

Testen

Diese Claude Skill bietet ein Playwright-basiertes Toolkit zum Testen lokaler Webanwendungen durch Python-Skripte. Es ermöglicht Frontend-Verifizierung, UI-Debugging, Screenshot-Aufnahme und Log-Einblick bei gleichzeitiger Verwaltung von Server-Lebenszyklen. Nutzen Sie es für Browser-Automatisierungsaufgaben, führen Sie Skripte jedoch direkt aus, anstatt deren Quellcode zu lesen, um Kontextverschmutzung zu vermeiden.

Skill ansehen

finishing-a-development-branch

Testen

Diese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, abgeschlossene Arbeiten zu finalisieren, indem sie testet, ob Tests bestehen, und dann strukturierte Integrationsoptionen präsentiert. Sie leitet den Workflow für das Zusammenführen von Code, das Erstellen von PRs oder das Bereinigen von Branches nach Abschluss der Implementierung. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Ihr Code bereit und getestet ist, um den Entwicklungsprozess systematisch abzuschließen.

Skill ansehen