Zurück zu Fähigkeiten

pipeline-forecasting

guia-matthieu
Aktualisiert 2 days ago
5 Ansichten
111
20
111
Auf GitHub ansehen
Metageneral

Über

Die Pipeline-Prognose-Funktion erstellt datengestützte Umsatzprognosen mit Konfidenzintervallen und Szenarienmodellierung für die Planung. Sie wird für Pipeline-Überprüfungen, Vorstandsprojektionen und Quotenplanung eingesetzt, indem gewichtete Pipeline-Analysen und historische Konversionsraten angewendet werden. Entwickler können sie nutzen, um Prognosen auf Grundlage von Methodologien wie Clari Revenue Operations und Forrester's B2B Revenue Waterfall zu erstellen.

Schnellinstallation

Claude Code

Empfohlen
Primär
npx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code
Plugin-BefehlAlternativ
/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
Git CloneAlternativ
git clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/pipeline-forecasting

Kopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren

Dokumentation

Pipeline Forecasting

Build accurate, data-driven revenue forecasts using historical conversion rates, deal velocity, and confidence-weighted projections.

When to Use This Skill

  • Weekly/monthly pipeline reviews with leadership
  • Board meeting revenue projections
  • Quota setting and territory planning
  • Identifying gaps between forecast and target
  • Scenario planning for best/worst/likely outcomes

Methodology Foundation

Based on Clari's Revenue Operations methodology and Forrester's B2B Revenue Waterfall, combining:

  • Weighted pipeline (probability × value)
  • Historical stage conversion rates
  • Deal velocity analysis
  • Commit vs. upside categorization

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Calculates weighted pipeline by stageWhich deals to include/exclude
Applies historical conversion ratesOverride factors for specific deals
Generates confidence intervalsFinal commit number to leadership
Identifies forecast risksActions to close gaps
Models best/worst/likely scenariosWhich scenario to plan against

What This Skill Does

  1. Ingests pipeline data - Current opportunities with stage, value, close date
  2. Applies conversion math - Historical win rates by stage, segment, rep
  3. Calculates weighted forecast - Probability-adjusted revenue projection
  4. Generates scenarios - Best case, commit, worst case with confidence bands
  5. Identifies risks - Deals pushing, pipeline gaps, coverage ratios

How to Use

I need a pipeline forecast for Q1. Here's our current pipeline:

[Paste pipeline data: Deal name, Stage, Value, Close Date, Rep]

Historical context:
- Average win rate: 25%
- Stage 3→Close rate: 45%
- Stage 4→Close rate: 70%
- Average sales cycle: 45 days

Target: $2.5M for Q1

Instructions

Step 1: Pipeline Categorization

Segment deals into:

  • Commit - High confidence (Stage 4+, verbal commit)
  • Best Case - Medium confidence (Stage 3, engaged)
  • Upside - Low confidence (Stage 1-2, early)

Step 2: Weighted Calculation

Weighted Value = Deal Value × Stage Probability × Rep Factor

Stage Probabilities (adjust to your data):
- Stage 1 (Discovery): 10%
- Stage 2 (Qualification): 20%
- Stage 3 (Proposal): 40%
- Stage 4 (Negotiation): 70%
- Stage 5 (Verbal): 90%

Step 3: Coverage Analysis

Pipeline Coverage = Total Pipeline ÷ Target
- Healthy: 3-4x coverage
- At Risk: 2-3x coverage
- Critical: <2x coverage

Step 4: Scenario Modeling

  • Worst Case: Commit only (90%+ probability deals)
  • Likely Case: Commit + 50% of Best Case
  • Best Case: Commit + Best Case + 25% of Upside

Step 5: Risk Identification

Flag deals with:

  • Close date in past (needs update)
  • No activity in 14+ days (stalled)
  • Pushing from previous quarter (slip risk)
  • Missing key fields (data quality)

Examples

Example 1: Quarterly Forecast

Input:

Pipeline for Q1:
- Acme Corp: Stage 4, $150K, Jan 30, Rep: Sarah
- Beta Inc: Stage 3, $80K, Feb 15, Rep: Mike
- Gamma Ltd: Stage 2, $200K, Mar 1, Rep: Sarah
- Delta Co: Stage 4, $120K, Feb 28, Rep: Lisa
- Echo Systems: Stage 1, $500K, Mar 15, Rep: Mike

Target: $400K

Output:

## Q1 Pipeline Forecast

### Weighted Pipeline
| Deal | Stage | Value | Probability | Weighted |
|------|-------|-------|-------------|----------|
| Acme Corp | 4 | $150K | 70% | $105K |
| Delta Co | 4 | $120K | 70% | $84K |
| Beta Inc | 3 | $80K | 40% | $32K |
| Gamma Ltd | 2 | $200K | 20% | $40K |
| Echo Systems | 1 | $500K | 10% | $50K |
| **Total** | | **$1.05M** | | **$311K** |

### Scenario Analysis
- **Worst Case (Commit)**: $189K (Acme + Delta at 70%)
- **Likely Case**: $245K (Commit + 50% Best Case)
- **Best Case**: $361K (All weighted)

### Coverage Ratio
- Pipeline: $1.05M
- Target: $400K
- Coverage: 2.6x ⚠️ (At Risk - need 3x+)

### Risks Identified
1. ⚠️ Echo Systems ($500K) is Stage 1 with Mar close - unlikely
2. ⚠️ Gap of $155K between Likely ($245K) and Target ($400K)

### Recommendations
1. Pressure test Acme and Delta for verbal commits
2. Accelerate Beta Inc to Stage 4 this week
3. Add $200K+ new pipeline to reach 3x coverage

Example 2: Monthly Roll-Up

Input:

January pipeline by rep:
Sarah: $450K weighted, $280K commit
Mike: $320K weighted, $150K commit
Lisa: $280K weighted, $200K commit

Team target: $500K

Output:

## January Team Forecast

| Rep | Weighted | Commit | % to Target |
|-----|----------|--------|-------------|
| Sarah | $450K | $280K | 56% |
| Mike | $320K | $150K | 30% |
| Lisa | $280K | $200K | 40% |
| **Team** | **$1.05M** | **$630K** | **126%** |

### Forecast Summary
- **Team Commit**: $630K (126% of $500K target) ✅
- **Confidence**: HIGH - commit exceeds target

### Risk Watch
- Mike at 30% commit coverage - needs deal acceleration
- Sarah carrying most weight - concentration risk

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Mathematical pipeline calculations
  • Scenario modeling with clear assumptions
  • Identifying data quality issues
  • Coverage ratio analysis

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Predict which specific deals will close (human judgment)
  • Account for market changes or competitive moves
  • Replace rep-level deal knowledge
  • Guarantee forecast accuracy

When to Escalate to Human

  • Deals with unusual circumstances (M&A, champion left)
  • Market disruptions affecting close rates
  • Strategic accounts requiring executive judgment
  • Final commit numbers for board/investors

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "What if we lose the top 2 deals? Show me that scenario."
  • "Apply a 20% haircut to all Stage 2 deals and recalculate."
  • "Which deals have the highest impact on our forecast?"
  • "Show me the gap between forecast and target by month."

Refinement Cycle

  1. Generate initial forecast → Review with reps
  2. Update deal probabilities based on rep input
  3. Re-run forecast with adjusted assumptions
  4. Lock commit number, track weekly variance

Checklists & Templates

Weekly Forecast Review Checklist

  • All deals have current close dates
  • Stage progression updated this week
  • Commit deals have next steps scheduled
  • Risks flagged and mitigation assigned
  • Coverage ratio calculated

Forecast Template

## [Period] Revenue Forecast

**Generated:** [Date]
**Pipeline Cutoff:** [Date]

### Summary
- Target: $X
- Commit: $X (X% of target)
- Best Case: $X
- Coverage: Xx

### By Segment
[Table]

### Risks & Mitigations
[List]

### Actions This Week
[List]

References

  • Clari Revenue Operations Playbook
  • Forrester B2B Revenue Waterfall Model
  • MEDDICC Deal Qualification Framework
  • Gartner Sales Forecasting Best Practices

Related Skills

  • deal-risk-scoring - Assess individual deal health
  • lead-scoring - Qualify top-of-funnel
  • account-health - Customer retention signals

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: RevOps
  • Complexity: Intermediate
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 15-30 minutes per forecast
  • Prerequisites: Pipeline data export, historical win rates

GitHub Repository

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
Pfad: skills/revops/pipeline-forecasting
0
ai-skillsanthropicclaude-codeclaude-skillsmarketingmcp-server

Verwandte Skills

content-collections

Meta

Diese Skill bietet eine produktionsgetestete Einrichtung für Content Collections – ein TypeScript-first-Tool, das Markdown/MDX-Dateien in typsichere Datensammlungen mit Zod-Validierung umwandelt. Verwenden Sie ihn beim Erstellen von Blogs, Dokumentationsseiten oder inhaltsstarken Vite + React-Anwendungen, um Typsicherheit und automatische Inhaltsvalidierung zu gewährleisten. Er behandelt alles von der Vite-Plugin-Konfiguration und MDX-Kompilierung bis hin zur Deployment-Optimierung und Schema-Validierung.

Skill ansehen

polymarket

Meta

Diese Fähigkeit ermöglicht es Entwicklern, Anwendungen mit der Polymarket-Prognosemärkte-Plattform zu erstellen, einschließlich API-Integration für Handel und Marktdaten. Sie bietet außerdem Echtzeit-Datenstreaming über WebSocket, um Live-Trades und Marktaktivitäten zu überwachen. Nutzen Sie sie zur Implementierung von Handelsstrategien oder zur Erstellung von Tools, die Live-Marktaktualisierungen verarbeiten.

Skill ansehen

creating-opencode-plugins

Meta

Diese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, OpenCode-Plugins zu erstellen, die in über 25 Ereignistypen wie Befehle, Dateien und LSP-Operationen eingreifen. Sie bietet die Plugin-Struktur, Event-API-Spezifikationen und Implementierungsmuster für JavaScript/TypeScript-Module. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Sie den Lebenszyklus des OpenCode KI-Assistenten mit benutzerdefinierter ereignisgesteuerter Logik abfangen, überwachen oder erweitern müssen.

Skill ansehen

sglang

Meta

SGLang ist ein hochperformantes LLM-Serving-Framework, das sich auf schnelle, strukturierte Generierung für JSON, Regex und agentenbasierte Workflows unter Verwendung seines RadixAttention-Prefix-Cachings spezialisiert. Es bietet deutlich schnellere Inferenz, insbesondere für Aufgaben mit wiederholten Präfixen, was es ideal für komplexe, strukturierte Ausgaben und Mehrfachdialoge macht. Wählen Sie SGLang gegenüber Alternativen wie vLLM, wenn Sie constrained decoding benötigen oder Anwendungen mit umfangreicher Präfix-Weitergabe entwickeln.

Skill ansehen