Zurück zu Fähigkeiten

instrument-distributed-tracing

pjt222
Aktualisiert 2 days ago
8 Ansichten
17
2
17
Auf GitHub ansehen
Testengeneral

Über

Diese Fähigkeit bietet OpenTelemetry Distributed Tracing zur Instrumentierung von Microservices, um Latenz zu debuggen und Anfrageflüsse nachzuverfolgen. Sie unterstützt sowohl automatische als auch manuelle Instrumentierung mit Kontextweitergabe, Sampling und Jaeger/Tempo-Integration. Nutzen Sie sie, um Traces mit Logs/Metriken zu korrelieren, Leistungsengpässe zu identifizieren oder von Legacy-Tracing-Systemen zu OpenTelemetry zu migrieren.

Schnellinstallation

Claude Code

Empfohlen
Primär
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Plugin-BefehlAlternativ
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativ
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/instrument-distributed-tracing

Kopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren

Dokumentation

Instrument Distributed Tracing

OTel tracing → track req across microservices → find perf bottleneck.

Use When

  • Latency debug → multi-service distributed sys
  • Req flow + deps between microservices
  • Slow DB query / external API in txn
  • Correlate traces w/ logs+metrics → root cause
  • E2E latency (user req → res)
  • Legacy tracing (Zipkin, Jaeger) → OTel migration
  • SLO compliance → latency percentile

In

  • Req: Svc list (lang + framework)
  • Req: Backend (Jaeger, Tempo, Zipkin, SaaS)
  • Opt: Existing lib (OpenTracing, Zipkin)
  • Opt: Sampling strat (%, rate limit)
  • Opt: Custom span attrs → biz metadata

Do

See Extended Examples for complete config files.

Step 1: Backend

Deploy Jaeger / Grafana Tempo → receive+store traces.

Opt A: Jaeger all-in-one (dev/test):

# docker-compose.yml
version: '3.8'
services:
  jaeger:
    image: jaegertracing/all-in-one:1.51
    ports:
      - "5775:5775/udp"   # Zipkin compact thrift
      - "6831:6831/udp"   # Jaeger compact thrift
      - "6832:6832/udp"   # Jaeger binary thrift
      - "5778:5778"       # Serve configs
      - "16686:16686"     # Jaeger UI
      - "14268:14268"     # Jaeger HTTP thrift
      - "14250:14250"     # Jaeger GRPC
      - "9411:9411"       # Zipkin compatible endpoint
    environment:
      - COLLECTOR_ZIPKIN_HOST_PORT=:9411
      - COLLECTOR_OTLP_ENABLED=true
    restart: unless-stopped

Opt B: Grafana Tempo (prod, scalable):

# docker-compose.yml
version: '3.8'
services:
  tempo:
    image: grafana/tempo:2.3.0
    command: ["-config.file=/etc/tempo.yaml"]
    volumes:
      - ./tempo.yaml:/etc/tempo.yaml
      - tempo-data:/tmp/tempo
    ports:
      - "3200:3200"   # Tempo HTTP
      - "4317:4317"   # OTLP gRPC
      - "4318:4318"   # OTLP HTTP
      - "9411:9411"   # Zipkin
    restart: unless-stopped

volumes:
  tempo-data:

Tempo config (tempo.yaml):

server:
  http_listen_port: 3200

distributor:
  receivers:
    jaeger:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)

Prod w/ S3 storage:

storage:
  trace:
    backend: s3
    s3:
      bucket: tempo-traces
      endpoint: s3.amazonaws.com
      region: us-east-1
    wal:
      path: /tmp/tempo/wal
    pool:
      max_workers: 100
      queue_depth: 10000

→ Backend up, OTLP ready, Jaeger UI / Grafana → "no traces" initially.

If err:

  • Ports busy? netstat -tulpn | grep -E '(4317|16686|3200)'
  • Container logs: docker logs jaeger / docker logs tempo
  • Test OTLP: curl http://localhost:4318/v1/traces -v
  • Tempo: tempo -config.file=/etc/tempo.yaml -verify-config

Step 2: Instrument Apps (Auto)

OTel auto-instrument → common frameworks → min code change.

Python w/ Flask:

pip install opentelemetry-distro opentelemetry-exporter-otlp
opentelemetry-bootstrap -a install
# app.py
from flask import Flask
from opentelemetry import trace
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace import TracerProvider
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.export import BatchSpanProcessor
from opentelemetry.exporter.otlp.proto.grpc.trace_exporter import OTLPSpanExporter
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)

Go w/ Gin:

go get go.opentelemetry.io/otel
go get go.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracegrpc
go get go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/trace
go get go.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/github.com/gin-gonic/gin/otelgin
package main

import (
    "context"
    "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)

Node.js w/ Express:

npm install @opentelemetry/api \
            @opentelemetry/sdk-node \
            @opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node \
            @opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc
// tracing.js
const { NodeSDK } = require('@opentelemetry/sdk-node');
const { OTLPTraceExporter } = require('@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-grpc');
const { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } = require('@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node');
const { Resource } = require('@opentelemetry/resources');
const { SemanticResourceAttributes } = require('@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions');
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)

→ Traces from svcs appear in Jaeger UI / Grafana. HTTP req → spans auto.

If err:

  • Exporter endpoint reachable from app?
  • Env vars: OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT=http://tempo:4317
  • Debug log: OTEL_LOG_LEVEL=debug (Py), OTEL_LOG_LEVEL=DEBUG (Node)
  • Test w/ simple span → verify export pipeline
  • Ver conflicts between OTel pkgs?

Step 3: Manual Instrument

Custom spans → biz logic, DB query, external call.

Py manual spans:

from opentelemetry import trace

tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__)

def process_order(order_id):
    # Create a span for the entire operation
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)

Go manual spans:

import (
    "context"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/attribute"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/codes"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace"
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)

Span attrs best practice:

  • Semantic conv: http.method, http.status_code, db.system, db.statement
  • Biz ctx: user.id, order.id, product.category
  • Resource id: instance.id, region, availability_zone
  • Errs: span.RecordError(err) + span.SetStatus(codes.Error, message)
  • Events: span.AddEvent("cache_miss")

→ Custom spans in trace view. Parent-child correct. Attrs visible. Errs highlighted.

If err:

  • Ctx propagation → parent span ctx → child?
  • Span names descriptive + naming conv?
  • Spans ended (defer span.End() Go, with Py)?
  • Attr types: str, int, bool, float only
  • Semantic conv: standard attr names

Step 4: Ctx Propagation

Trace ctx flows across svc boundary + async ops.

HTTP headers propagation (W3C Trace Context):

# Client side (Python with requests)
import requests
from opentelemetry import trace
from opentelemetry.propagate import inject

tracer = trace.get_tracer(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)
// Server side (Go with Gin)
import (
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel"
    "go.opentelemetry.io/otel/propagation"
)

# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)

Msg queue propagation (Kafka):

# Producer
from opentelemetry.propagate import inject
from kafka import KafkaProducer

producer = KafkaProducer(bootstrap_servers=['kafka:9092'])

# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)
# Consumer
from opentelemetry.propagate import extract

def process_message(msg):
    # Extract trace context from Kafka headers
    headers = {k: v.decode('utf-8') for k, v in msg.headers}
    ctx = extract(headers)

    # Continue the trace
    with tracer.start_as_current_span("process_order_event", context=ctx):
        order_id = json.loads(msg.value)['order_id']
        handle_order(order_id)

Async ops (Py asyncio):

import asyncio
from opentelemetry import trace, context

async def async_operation():
    # Capture current context
    token = context.attach(context.get_current())
    try:
        with tracer.start_as_current_span("async_database_query"):
            await asyncio.sleep(0.1)  # Simulated async work
            return "result"
    finally:
        context.detach(token)

→ Traces span multi svcs. Trace IDs consistent. Parent-child preserved.

If err:

  • W3C propagator set: otel.propagation.set_global_textmap(TraceContextTextMapPropagator())
  • Headers passed in HTTP req?
  • Kafka: header support v0.11+
  • Debug → log traceparent value
  • Viz → find broken trace links

Step 5: Sampling

Sampling → reduce trace vol + cost, keep visibility.

Sampling strats:

from opentelemetry.sdk.trace import TracerProvider
from opentelemetry.sdk.trace.sampling import (
    ParentBased,
    TraceIdRatioBased,
    StaticSampler,
    Decision
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)

Tail-based sampling w/ Tempo:

tempo.yaml:

overrides:
  defaults:
    metrics_generator:
      processors: [service-graphs, span-metrics]
      storage:
        path: /tmp/tempo/generator/wal
        remote_write:
          - url: http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/write
            send_exemplars: true

    # Tail sampling (requires tempo-query)
    ingestion_rate_limit_bytes: 5000000
    ingestion_burst_size_bytes: 10000000

Grafana Tempo TraceQL → dynamic sampling:

# Sample traces with errors
{ status = error }

# Sample slow traces (>1s)
{ duration > 1s }

# Sample specific services
{ resource.service.name = "checkout-service" }

→ Trace vol → target %. Err traces always sampled. Sampling in span metadata.

If err:

  • Sampler applied before tracer provider init
  • Sampling decision attr in exported spans?
  • Tail sampling: ingestion_burst_size_bytes sufficient buffering
  • Dropped traces: otel_traces_dropped_total
  • Test synth high-vol traffic → validate rate

Step 6: Correlate Traces w/ Metrics+Logs

Link traces → metrics+logs → unified obs.

Add trace IDs → logs (Py):

import logging
from opentelemetry import trace

# Custom log formatter with trace context
class TraceFormatter(logging.Formatter):
    def format(self, record):
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)

Gen metrics from traces (Tempo):

# tempo.yaml
metrics_generator:
  registry:
    external_labels:
      cluster: production
  storage:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md)

Prometheus metrics produced:

  • traces_service_graph_request_total — req count between svcs
  • traces_span_metrics_duration_seconds — span duration histogram
  • traces_spanmetrics_calls_total — span call counts

Query traces from metrics (Grafana):

Exemplar support → Prometheus datasource:

datasources:
  - name: Prometheus
    type: prometheus
    url: http://prometheus:9090
    jsonData:
      exemplarTraceIdDestinations:
        - name: trace_id
          datasourceName: Tempo

Enable exemplars in dashboard:

{
  "fieldConfig": {
    "defaults": {
      "custom": {
        "showExemplars": true
      }
    }
  }
}

→ Click metric exemplar → trace opens. Logs → trace IDs. Traces → logs. Unified debug.

If err:

  • Exemplar support enabled Prometheus (v2.26+)
  • Trace ID format match (32-char hex)
  • Metrics gen enabled Tempo config
  • Remote write reachable from Tempo
  • Test: histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])) and on() exemplar

Check

  • Backend receives spans from all svcs
  • Traces → parent-child correct across svcs
  • Span attrs → semantic conv + biz ctx
  • Ctx propagates across HTTP+MQ
  • Sampling → target %
  • Err traces always sampled
  • Trace IDs in logs (correct format)
  • Grafana → traces via exemplars
  • Log panels → trace viewer links
  • Retention matches storage policy

Traps

  • Ctx not propagated: Forget pass context → broken trace. Pass explicit.
  • Spans never ended: Miss defer span.End() / with → mem leak
  • Over-instrument: Span per fn → trace bloat. Focus svc boundary, DB, external API.
  • Miss err record: No span.RecordError() → lose debug info. Always record errs.
  • High-card attrs: Unbounded vals (user ID, bodies) → storage issues. Sample / aggregate.
  • Wrong span kind: CLIENT vs SERVER vs INTERNAL → svc graph wrong. Follow semantic conv.
  • Sample before ctx: Sampling respects parent. Use ParentBased → honor upstream.

  • correlate-observability-signals — unified debug w/ metrics+logs+traces
  • setup-prometheus-monitoring — gen metrics from traces (Tempo gen)
  • configure-log-aggregation — trace IDs in logs
  • build-grafana-dashboards — viz trace-derived metrics + exemplar links

GitHub Repository

pjt222/agent-almanac
Pfad: i18n/caveman-ultra/skills/instrument-distributed-tracing
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Verwandte Skills

evaluating-llms-harness

Testen

Diese Claude Skill führt den lm-evaluation-harness aus, um LLMs über 60+ standardisierte akademische Aufgaben wie MMLU und GSM8K zu benchmarken. Sie wurde für Entwickler entwickelt, um Modellqualität zu vergleichen, Trainingsfortschritt zu verfolgen oder akademische Ergebnisse zu berichten. Das Tool unterstützt verschiedene Backends, einschließlich HuggingFace- und vLLM-Modelle.

Skill ansehen

cloudflare-cron-triggers

Testen

Diese Fähigkeit bietet umfassendes Wissen zur Implementierung von Cloudflare Cron Triggers, um Workers mithilfe von Cron-Ausdrücken zu planen. Sie behandelt das Einrichten periodischer Aufgaben, Wartungsjobs und automatisierter Workflows, während häufige Probleme wie ungültige Cron-Ausdrücke und Zeitzonenprobleme behandelt werden. Entwickler können sie zum Konfigurieren geplanter Handler, zum Testen von Cron-Triggers und zur Integration mit Workflows und Green Compute verwenden.

Skill ansehen

webapp-testing

Testen

Diese Claude Skill bietet ein Playwright-basiertes Toolkit zum Testen lokaler Webanwendungen durch Python-Skripte. Es ermöglicht Frontend-Verifizierung, UI-Debugging, Screenshot-Aufnahme und Log-Einblick bei gleichzeitiger Verwaltung von Server-Lebenszyklen. Nutzen Sie es für Browser-Automatisierungsaufgaben, führen Sie Skripte jedoch direkt aus, anstatt deren Quellcode zu lesen, um Kontextverschmutzung zu vermeiden.

Skill ansehen

finishing-a-development-branch

Testen

Diese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler dabei, abgeschlossene Arbeiten zu finalisieren, indem sie testet, ob Tests bestehen, und dann strukturierte Integrationsoptionen präsentiert. Sie leitet den Workflow für das Zusammenführen von Code, das Erstellen von PRs oder das Bereinigen von Branches nach Abschluss der Implementierung. Nutzen Sie sie, wenn Ihr Code bereit und getestet ist, um den Entwicklungsprozess systematisch abzuschließen.

Skill ansehen