solve-electromagnetic-induction
Über
Diese Fähigkeit löst Probleme der elektromagnetischen Induktion durch Anwendung des Faradayschen Gesetzes, der Lenzschen Regel und der Schaltungsanalyse für RL-Einschwingvorgänge. Sie behandelt induzierte EMK aus sich ändernden Magnetfeldern oder bewegten Leitern, bestimmt die Stromrichtung und berechnet die Induktivität mit magnetischer Energiespeicherung. Verwenden Sie sie bei der Analyse von Induktion in Schleifen/Spulen, Szenarien mit Bewegungs-EMK oder dem Schaltverhalten von RL-Schaltkreisen.
Schnellinstallation
Claude Code
Empfohlennpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/solve-electromagnetic-inductionKopieren Sie diesen Befehl und fügen Sie ihn in Claude Code ein, um diese Fähigkeit zu installieren
Dokumentation
Solve EM Induction
ID flux source → compute flux through surface → Faraday → EMF → Lenz → current direction → solve circuit eqns (RL transients + mag field energy).
Use When
- Induced EMF in loop/coil from time-varying B
- Motional EMF from conductor moving in static B
- Current direction via Lenz
- Mutual M (coupled coils) | self-L (single coil)
- RL transients (energize, de-energize, switch)
- Mag field energy | inductor energy
In
- Required: Source of changing flux (time-varying B, moving conductor, changing area)
- Required: Geometry of circuit/loop
- Required: Phys params (B mag, vel, R, L, geometry)
- Optional: Other circuit elements (R, additional L, sources)
- Optional: Initial conditions (I_0, U_0)
- Optional: Time interval
Do
Step 1: ID Flux Source
Classify mechanism producing time-varying flux:
- Changing B: B(t) varies. Loop static. (AC magnet, approaching magnet, current ramp in nearby coil)
- Changing area: A(t) varies. B may be static. (expanding/contracting loop, rotating coil in static field)
- Motional EMF: Straight conductor through static B. Flux change = conductor sweeping area.
- Combined: Both field + geometry change. Separate contributions for clarity.
Per mechanism, ID surface S bounded by loop C:
## Flux Change Classification
- **Mechanism**: [changing B / changing area / motional / combined]
- **Surface S**: [description of the surface bounded by the loop]
- **Time dependence**: [which quantities vary: B(t), A(t), v(t), theta(t)]
- **Relevant parameters**: [B magnitude, loop dimensions, velocity, angular frequency]
Got: Clear ID of why flux changes, surface to integrate, which quantities carry time dep.
If err: Ambiguous (deforming loop in non-uniform field) → decompose: field change at fixed geom + geom change in instantaneous field. Always valid.
Step 2: Calculate Magnetic Flux
Compute Phi_B = ∫ B·dA over S:
-
Uniform field, flat loop: Phi_B = B·A·cos(theta), theta = angle B vs n_hat. Most common.
-
Non-uniform: Parameterize S, eval integral:
- Coords aligned w/ surface (polar for circular loop)
- Express B(r) at each point
- Dot product B·dA = B·n_hat dA
- Integrate
-
Coupled coils (mutual M): Coil 2 linked to 1:
- B_1 (from coil 1) at coil 2 location
- Integrate B_1 over each turn of coil 2
- × N_2 → flux linkage Lambda_21 = N_2·Phi_21
- M = Lambda_21 / I_1
-
Self-L: Single coil w/ I:
- B inside from own current
- Integrate over one turn × N
- L = N·Phi/I = Lambda/I
- Known: solenoid L = mu_0·n²·A·l; toroid L = mu_0·N²·A/(2π·R)
-
Time dep: Express Phi_B(t) via time-varying quantities from Step 1.
## Flux Calculation
- **Flux expression**: Phi_B(t) = [formula]
- **Evaluation**: [analytic / numeric]
- **Flux linkage** (if multi-turn): Lambda = N * Phi_B = [formula]
- **Inductance** (if applicable): L = [value with units] or M = [value with units]
Got: Explicit Phi_B(t), correct units (Wb = T·m²), inductance in H.
If err: Integral can't be analytical (non-uniform B over non-trivial S) → numerical quadrature. Mutual M for complex geom → Neumann formula: M = (mu_0/4π)·∮∮(dl_1·dl_2)/|r_1 - r_2|.
Step 3: Faraday → EMF
Compute induced EMF from time deriv of flux:
-
Faraday: EMF = -dLambda/dt = -N·dPhi_B/dt. Negative sign = Lenz.
-
Differentiate Phi_B(t):
- B = B(t), A + theta const → EMF = -N·A·cos(theta)·dB/dt
- theta = omega·t (rotating in static B) → EMF = N·B·A·omega·sin(omega·t)
- Area changes (sliding rail) → EMF = -B·l·v (motional EMF)
- General → Leibniz integral rule
-
Motional EMF (alt): Conductor length l, vel v in B:
- Lorentz on charges: F = q(v × B)
- EMF = ∫(v × B)·dl along conductor
- Equiv to Faraday, more intuitive for moving conductors
-
Sign + magnitude check: Lab setups: mV-V. Power gen: V-kV.
## Induced EMF
- **EMF expression**: EMF(t) = [formula]
- **Peak EMF** (if AC): EMF_0 = [value with units]
- **RMS EMF** (if AC): EMF_rms = EMF_0 / sqrt(2) = [value]
- **Derivation method**: [Faraday's law / motional EMF / Leibniz rule]
Got: Explicit EMF(t), correct units (V), reasonable magnitude.
If err: Wrong units → trace flux calc; missing area factor | mixing CGS/SI. Wrong sign → re-examine surface normal vs loop direction (right-hand rule).
Step 4: Lenz → Current Direction
ID induced current direction + phys consequences:
-
Lenz: Induced current opposes the flux change that produced it. = Energy conservation.
-
Apply:
- Flux ↑ → induced current → B opposes ↑ (opposite external B through loop)
- Flux ↓ → induced current → B supports ↓ (same direction as external B)
- Right-hand rule → B direction → current direction
-
Force consequences: Induced current in external B → force:
- Eddy current braking: opposes relative motion (always decel)
- Mag levitation: repulsive supports weight (right geom)
- Lenz at mechanical level
-
Qual verify: Effects always resist change. Falling magnet through conductor tube falls slower than free fall. Generator needs mech work in → elec energy.
## Current Direction
- **Flux change**: [increasing / decreasing]
- **Induced B direction**: [opposing increase / supporting decrease]
- **Current direction**: [CW / CCW as viewed from specified direction]
- **Mechanical consequence**: [braking force / levitation / energy transfer]
Got: Clear current direction consistent w/ Lenz, phys consequence ID'd.
If err: Current amplifies flux change → surface normal | RH rule reversed. Re-examine loop convention. Current reinforcing change → violates energy conservation.
Step 5: Solve Circuit Eqn
Formulate + solve circuit eqn w/ inductance:
-
RL formation: Induced EMF drives I through R + L, KVL gives:
- Energize (switch → DC V_0): V_0 = L·dI/dt + R·I
- De-energize (source removed, loop closed): 0 = L·dI/dt + R·I
- General (time-varying EMF): EMF(t) = L·dI/dt + R·I
-
Solve 1st-order ODE:
- Energize: I(t) = (V_0/R)·[1 - exp(-t/tau)], tau = L/R
- De-energize: I(t) = I_0·exp(-t/tau)
- AC EMF = EMF_0·sin(omega·t) → phasor methods | particular + homogeneous
- Transient: ~63% final after 1·tau, ~95% after 3·tau, ~99.3% after 5·tau
-
Energy:
- Inductor: U_L = (1/2)·L·I²
- Mag field per vol: u_B = B²/(2·mu_0) vacuum, (1/2)·B·H mag materials
- R dissipation: P_R = I²·R
- Conservation: rate energy in = rate stored + rate dissipated
-
Mutual M coupling: Two coupled coils:
- V_1 = L_1·dI_1/dt + M·dI_2/dt + R_1·I_1
- V_2 = M·dI_1/dt + L_2·dI_2/dt + R_2·I_2
- Coupling k = M/sqrt(L_1·L_2), 0 ≤ k ≤ 1
- Solve coupled ODEs (matrix exp | Laplace)
-
Steady-state vs transient: AC drive → decompose transient (decaying exp) + steady-state (sinusoidal at drive freq). Report Z_L = j·omega·L + phase angle.
## Circuit Solution
- **Circuit type**: [RL energizing / de-energizing / AC driven / coupled coils]
- **Time constant**: tau = L/R = [value with units]
- **Current solution**: I(t) = [expression]
- **Energy stored**: U_L = [value at specified time]
- **Energy dissipated**: [total or rate]
- **Steady-state impedance** (if AC): Z_L = [value]
Got: Complete time-domain I solution, correct exp time constants, energy balance verified, reasonable magnitudes.
If err: Current grows unbounded → sign err in ODE (L term must oppose dI). Tau unreasonable → recheck L (Step 2) + R. Lab RL tau: μs to s.
Check
- Source of flux change clearly ID'd
- Flux integral over correct S w/ proper orientation
- Flux units Wb = T·m²
- L (self/mutual) units H, reasonable mag
- EMF units V, reasonable mag
- EMF sign consistent w/ Lenz
- Current dir via Lenz + RH rule
- RL ODE correct setup, proper signs
- tau = L/R units s, reasonable mag
- Energy balance: in = stored + dissipated
- Limits checked (t→0 init, t→∞ steady)
Traps
- Wrong sign Faraday: EMF = -dLambda/dt, NOT +. Negative = Lenz + energy conservation. Omit → current amplifies flux change → violates thermo.
- Flux vs flux linkage: Single-turn: Phi_B = Lambda. N-turn: Lambda = N·Phi_B. L = Lambda/I, NOT Phi_B/I. Missing N factor → L is N× too small.
- Surface normal inconsistency: n_hat must be RH-rule related to loop circulation. Independent → sign errs in flux + EMF.
- Ignore back-EMF (RL): Current changes in L → back-EMF opposes change. Omit from KVL → algebraic not differential → miss transient entirely.
- Instant current change: Current through ideal L can't change instant (needs ∞ V). Initial conds for RL transients must satisfy continuity across switches.
- Eddy currents bulk conductors: Faraday applies to ANY closed path in conductor, not just wire loops. Time-varying fields in bulk → distributed eddy currents → heating + shielding. Critical in transformer cores → minimize w/ lamination.
→
analyze-magnetic-field— compute B from current distributions = flux sourceformulate-maxwell-equations— generalize induction → full Maxwell + displacement currentdesign-electromagnetic-device— apply to motors, generators, transformersderive-theoretical-result— derive analytic L, EMF, transient solutions from first principles
GitHub Repository
Verwandte Skills
executing-plans
DesignVerwenden Sie die Fähigkeit "executing-plans", wenn Sie einen vollständigen Implementierungsplan zur Ausführung in kontrollierten Batches mit Überprüfungspunkten vorliegen haben. Sie lädt den Plan und überprüft ihn kritisch, führt dann Aufgaben in kleinen Batches (standardmäßig 3 Aufgaben) aus und meldet den Fortschritt zwischen jedem Batch zur Überprüfung durch den Architekten. Dies gewährleistet eine systematische Implementierung mit integrierten Qualitätskontrollpunkten.
requesting-code-review
DesignDiese Fähigkeit sendet einen Unteragenten für Code-Review, um Codeänderungen anhand der Anforderungen zu analysieren, bevor fortgefahren wird. Sie sollte nach dem Abschließen von Aufgaben, der Implementierung größerer Funktionen oder vor dem Zusammenführen in den Hauptzweig verwendet werden. Die Überprüfung hilft dabei, Probleme frühzeitig zu erkennen, indem die aktuelle Implementierung mit dem ursprünglichen Plan verglichen wird.
connect-mcp-server
DesignDiese Fähigkeit bietet Entwicklern eine umfassende Anleitung, um MCP-Server über HTTP-, stdio- oder SSE-Transports mit Claude Code zu verbinden. Sie behandelt Installation, Konfiguration, Authentifizierung und Sicherheit für die Integration externer Dienste wie GitHub, Notion und benutzerdefinierter APIs. Nutzen Sie sie beim Einrichten von MCP-Integrationen, bei der Konfiguration externer Tools oder bei der Arbeit mit Claude's Model Context Protocol.
web-cli-teleport
DesignDiese Fähigkeit unterstützt Entwickler bei der Wahl zwischen Claude Code Web- und CLI-Schnittstellen basierend auf Aufgabenanalysen und ermöglicht nahtloses Session-Teleporting zwischen diesen Umgebungen. Sie optimiert den Workflow, indem sie den Sitzungsstatus und Kontext beim Wechsel zwischen Web, CLI oder Mobilgeräten verwaltet. Nutzen Sie sie für komplexe Projekte, die in verschiedenen Phasen unterschiedliche Werkzeuge erfordern.
