← Back to Skills

excel-variance-analyzer

jeremylongshore
Updated Today
31 views
409
51
409
View on GitHub
Documentationexcelautomation

About

This skill automates budget versus actual variance analysis in Excel for financial reporting and FP&A teams. It generates a comprehensive report with variance flagging, commentary, and executive summaries. It activates when a user requests variance analysis, such as comparing actuals to a forecast or creating a variance report.

Documentation

Excel Variance Analyzer

Automates variance analysis for monthly/quarterly financial reporting and budget reviews.

When to Invoke This Skill

Automatically load this Skill when the user asks to:

  • "Analyze budget variance"
  • "Compare actual vs forecast"
  • "Create variance report"
  • "Explain budget differences"
  • "Why are we over/under budget?"
  • "Variance analysis for [period]"
  • "Budget vs actual"

Report Structure

Creates a comprehensive variance report with 3 sheets:

Sheet 1: Variance Summary

| Line Item       | Budget  | Actual  | Variance | % Var | Flag | Commentary |
|-----------------|---------|---------|----------|-------|------|------------|
| Revenue         | $1,000K | $950K   | $(50K)   | -5.0% | ⚠️   | Below plan |
| COGS            | $600K   | $580K   | $(20K)   | -3.3% | βœ…   | Favorable  |
| Gross Profit    | $400K   | $370K   | $(30K)   | -7.5% | πŸ”΄   | Investigate|
| Operating Exp   | $250K   | $280K   | $30K     | 12.0% | πŸ”΄   | Over budget|
| EBITDA          | $150K   | $90K    | $(60K)   | -40.0%| πŸ”΄   | Miss       |

Sheet 2: Executive Summary

πŸ“Š Performance Highlights
- Total Revenue: $950K (5.0% below budget)
- EBITDA: $90K (40.0% below budget)
- Key Driver: Operating expenses 12% over budget

πŸ”΄ Top 5 Unfavorable Variances:
1. EBITDA: $(60K) / -40.0%
2. Revenue: $(50K) / -5.0%
3. Operating Expenses: $30K / 12.0%
4. Gross Profit: $(30K) / -7.5%
5. Marketing: $25K / 25.0%

βœ… Top 5 Favorable Variances:
1. COGS: $(20K) / -3.3%
2. Rent: $(5K) / -10.0%
3. Utilities: $(2K) / -8.0%

Sheet 3: Trend Analysis (if multiple periods)

| Line Item | Jan Var% | Feb Var% | Mar Var% | Q1 Var% | Trend |
|-----------|----------|----------|----------|---------|-------|
| Revenue   | -3%      | -5%      | -7%      | -5%     | ⬇️    |
| COGS      | -2%      | -4%      | -3%      | -3%     | ➑️    |

Step-by-Step Workflow

1. Load Data

Ask the user for:

  • Budget data: Can be Excel file, CSV, or pasted table
  • Actual data: Same format as budget
  • Period: Month, quarter, YTD
  • Threshold settings (or use defaults):
    • Percentage threshold: 10% (flag items >10% variance)
    • Dollar threshold: $50K (flag items >$50K absolute variance)
    • Categories to exclude: (e.g., non-cash items like depreciation)

2. Validate Data

Before analysis, check:

  • Budget and actual have matching line items
  • All values are numeric
  • No missing data for key categories (revenue, expenses, profit)
  • Budget data is reasonable (no zeros where there should be values)

3. Calculate Variances

For each line item:

Absolute Variance = Actual - Budget
Percentage Variance = (Actual - Budget) / Budget Γ— 100%

Sign Convention:
- Positive variance for revenue/profit = Favorable (βœ…)
- Negative variance for revenue/profit = Unfavorable (πŸ”΄)
- Positive variance for expenses = Unfavorable (πŸ”΄)
- Negative variance for expenses = Favorable (βœ…)

4. Flag Material Items

Apply flagging rules:

πŸ”΄ Red Flag (Critical):
- Revenue/profit >10% below budget
- Expenses >10% over budget
- Absolute variance >$100K

⚠️ Yellow Flag (Warning):
- Revenue/profit 5-10% below budget
- Expenses 5-10% over budget
- Absolute variance $50K-$100K

βœ… Green (On Track):
- Variance within Β±5%
- Absolute variance <$50K

5. Generate Commentary

For each flagged item, provide automated commentary:

Revenue Below Budget:

Revenue is $50K (5%) below budget. Possible drivers:
- Lower than expected sales volume
- Pricing pressure
- Delayed revenue recognition
- Seasonal factors
Recommend: Review sales pipeline and backlog

Expenses Over Budget:

Operating expenses are $30K (12%) over budget. Breakdown:
- Marketing: $25K over (new campaign)
- Travel: $8K over
- Utilities: $2K under
Recommend: Review Q2 marketing spend and ROI

Favorable Variances:

COGS is $20K (3.3%) under budget. Drivers:
- Lower raw material costs
- Improved operational efficiency
- Volume discounts from suppliers

6. Create Executive Summary

Summarize for leadership:

πŸ“Š [Period] Financial Performance

Bottom Line:
- Revenue: [X%] vs budget ([favorable/unfavorable])
- EBITDA: [X%] vs budget ([favorable/unfavorable])
- Net Variance Impact: $[XXX]K

Key Takeaways:
1. [Primary driver of miss/beat]
2. [Secondary factor]
3. [Outlook for next period]

Action Items:
1. [Specific action needed]
2. [Follow-up required]

Example Interaction

User: "Analyze Q1 budget vs actual"

Skill Response:

I'll analyze your Q1 variance. Let me load the data.

Do you have budget and actual data files, or would you like to paste them?

User: *pastes Excel data*

Perfect! I see data for Q1 2025. Setting analysis parameters:
- Period: Q1 2025 (Jan-Mar)
- Line items: 15 categories detected
- Materiality threshold: Β±10% or Β±$50K

Running variance analysis...

βœ… Variance Analysis Complete!

πŸ“Š Q1 2025 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

🎯 Overall Results:
- Revenue: $2,850K vs budget $3,000K (-5.0%) πŸ”΄
- Gross Profit: $1,110K vs budget $1,200K (-7.5%) πŸ”΄
- EBITDA: $270K vs budget $450K (-40.0%) πŸ”΄

πŸ“‰ Key Drivers of Underperformance:
1. Revenue Miss: $(150K) - 5% below plan
   β†’ Slower than expected customer acquisition
   β†’ Delayed Q1 enterprise deals to Q2

2. Operating Expenses Over: $90K - 12% above plan
   β†’ Marketing campaign: $75K incremental spend
   β†’ Headcount additions brought forward to Q1

πŸ” Detailed Findings:

πŸ”΄ CRITICAL VARIANCES (>10%):
- Operating Expenses: $840K vs $750K (+12.0%) - $90K over
- EBITDA: $270K vs $450K (-40.0%) - $180K under
- Marketing: $325K vs $260K (+25.0%) - $65K over

⚠️ WARNING VARIANCES (5-10%):
- Revenue: $2,850K vs $3,000K (-5.0%) - $150K under
- Gross Profit: $1,110K vs $1,200K (-7.5%) - $90K under

βœ… FAVORABLE VARIANCES:
- COGS: $1,740K vs $1,800K (-3.3%) - $60K favorable
- Facilities: $45K vs $50K (-10.0%) - $5K favorable

πŸ’‘ RECOMMENDATIONS:

Immediate Actions:
1. Review Q2 sales pipeline - need $150K catch-up + Q2 plan
2. Evaluate marketing campaign ROI (Q1 spend +$65K)
3. Assess if Q1 revenue timing shift impacts full-year plan

Strategic Questions:
1. Is Q1 revenue miss timing (shifts to Q2) or lost?
2. Will marketing investment drive Q2-Q4 revenue?
3. Should we adjust full-year budget guidance?

πŸ“ Report saved to: Q1_2025_Variance_Analysis.xlsx

Would you like me to:
- Add trend analysis vs Q4 2024?
- Create forecast scenarios for Q2?
- Drill into specific expense categories?

Common Variations

Request: "Why is marketing over budget?"

Response:

Let me drill into marketing expenses.

Marketing Variance Detail:
Budget: $260K
Actual: $325K
Variance: $65K (25% over)

Breakdown by subcategory:
- Digital Ads: $180K vs $150K (+$30K)
  β†’ Google Ads campaign expanded
- Events: $75K vs $60K (+$15K)
  β†’ Added trade show booth
- Content: $45K vs $40K (+$5K)
  β†’ Video production
- Agencies: $25K vs $10K (+$15K)
  β†’ New creative agency retainer

Primary driver: Digital ads campaign expansion (+$30K)

Was this spend planned but not budgeted, or truly incremental?
Would you like me to analyze marketing ROI?

Request: "Compare last 3 months"

Response:

I'll create a 3-month trend analysis.

Revenue Trend (Budget vs Actual):
| Month | Budget | Actual | Variance | Var% | Trend |
|-------|--------|--------|----------|------|-------|
| Jan   | $1,000K| $970K  | $(30K)   | -3%  | ⬇️    |
| Feb   | $1,000K| $950K  | $(50K)   | -5%  | ⬇️    |
| Mar   | $1,000K| $930K  | $(70K)   | -7%  | ⬇️    |
| Q1    | $3,000K| $2,850K| $(150K)  | -5%  | ⬇️    |

⚠️ ALERT: Revenue variance is worsening month-over-month

This suggests a structural issue, not timing:
- Jan: 97% of budget
- Feb: 95% of budget
- Mar: 93% of budget

Recommendation: Immediate deep-dive on sales execution

Formatting Rules

The Skill applies professional formatting:

Conditional Formatting

- Green cells: Favorable variances (>5% better than budget)
- Yellow cells: Variances within Β±5%
- Red cells: Unfavorable variances (>5% worse than budget)

Number Formatting

- Currency: $1,000K or $1.0M (use K for thousands, M for millions)
- Percentages: 1 decimal place (5.0%)
- Variance: Show sign ($(50K) or $50K)

Icons

βœ… = On track / Favorable
⚠️ = Warning / Needs attention
πŸ”΄ = Critical / Unfavorable
⬆️ = Improving trend
⬇️ = Worsening trend
➑️ = Flat trend

Best Practices Embedded

  1. Materiality Thresholds: Don't flag every small variance
  2. Commentary Not Just Numbers: Explain "why", not just "what"
  3. Action-Oriented: Recommend next steps
  4. Executive Summary: Leadership wants top 5-10 items
  5. Trend Analysis: Show if variance is new or ongoing
  6. Sign Conventions: Consistent favorable/unfavorable labeling
  7. Audit Trail: Show calculations and formulas

Resources

See resources folder for:

  • REFERENCE.md: Variance analysis best practices
  • templates/: Sample variance reports

Limitations

This Skill provides automated variance analysis for:

  • Standard income statement formats
  • Monthly/quarterly reporting
  • Budget vs actual comparisons

For more complex analysis, you may need:

  • Statistical variance analysis (standard deviations)
  • Multi-year trend analysis
  • Driver-based variance decomposition
  • Forecast vs forecast comparisons

Version History

  • v1.0.0 (2025-10-27): Initial release with core variance analysis functionality

Quick Install

/plugin add https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus/tree/main/excel-variance-analyzer

Copy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill

GitHub δ»“εΊ“

jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus
Path: plugins/business-tools/excel-analyst-pro/skills/excel-variance-analyzer
aiautomationclaude-codedevopsmarketplacemcp

Related Skills

sglang

Meta

SGLang is a high-performance LLM serving framework that specializes in fast, structured generation for JSON, regex, and agentic workflows using its RadixAttention prefix caching. It delivers significantly faster inference, especially for tasks with repeated prefixes, making it ideal for complex, structured outputs and multi-turn conversations. Choose SGLang over alternatives like vLLM when you need constrained decoding or are building applications with extensive prefix sharing.

View skill

business-rule-documentation

Meta

This skill provides standardized templates for systematically documenting business logic and domain knowledge following Domain-Driven Design principles. It helps developers capture business rules, process flows, decision trees, and terminology glossaries to maintain consistency between requirements and implementation. Use it when documenting domain models, creating business rule repositories, or bridging communication between business and technical teams.

View skill

Algorithmic Art Generation

Meta

This skill helps developers create algorithmic art using p5.js, focusing on generative art, computational aesthetics, and interactive visualizations. It automatically activates for topics like "generative art" or "p5.js visualization" and guides you through creating unique algorithms with features like seeded randomness, flow fields, and particle systems. Use it when you need to build reproducible, code-driven artistic patterns.

View skill

Excel Analysis

Meta

This skill enables developers to analyze Excel files and perform data operations using pandas. It can read spreadsheets, create pivot tables, generate charts, and conduct data analysis on .xlsx files and tabular data. Use it when working with Excel files, spreadsheets, or any structured tabular data within Claude Code.

View skill