Back to Skills

brutal-honesty-review

proffesor-for-testing
Updated 28 days ago
274 views
267
56
267
View on GitHub
Othercode-reviewhonestycritical-thinkingtechnical-criticismquality

About

This skill provides direct, unfiltered technical criticism for code reviews, testing strategies, or technical decisions that require a harsh reality check. It operates in three distinct modes—Linus (precision), Ramsay (standards), and Bach (BS detection)—to surgically identify flaws without sugar-coating. Use it when you need a brutally honest assessment of what's broken and why.

Quick Install

Claude Code

Recommended
Primary
npx skills add proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe -a claude-code
Plugin CommandAlternative
/plugin add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Git CloneAlternative
git clone https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe.git ~/.claude/skills/brutal-honesty-review

Copy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill

GitHub Repository

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Path: .claude/skills/brutal-honesty-review
0
agenticqeagenticsfoundationagentsquality-engineering

Related Skills

sherlock-review

Other

Sherlock Review performs evidence-based code investigation using deductive reasoning to verify implementation claims and find root causes. It systematically analyzes code, tests, and history to determine what actually happened versus what was reported. Use this skill for validating fixes, investigating bugs, or conducting rigorous code reviews.

View skill

brutal-honesty-review

Other

This skill provides direct, unfiltered technical criticism for code reviews, testing, or architectural decisions by channeling distinct analytical modes. It surgically identifies flaws and their root causes without sugar-coating, aimed at situations requiring harsh reality checks. Developers should use it when they need rigorous, no-nonsense feedback to expose broken logic or insufficient rigor.

View skill

brutal-honesty-review

Other

This skill provides direct, unfiltered technical criticism for code reviews, testing, or architectural decisions, modeled after the precision of expert critics. It operates in three distinct modes—technical accuracy, quality standards, and logic validation—to deliver surgical feedback without sugar-coating. Use it when you need a harsh reality check to identify exactly what is broken and why.

View skill

sherlock-review

Other

Sherlock-review is an evidence-based code review skill that uses deductive reasoning to verify implementation claims, investigate bugs, and perform root cause analysis. It systematically compares observed evidence against stated claims through a process of observation, deduction, and elimination. This skill is ideal for developers needing to validate fixes or conduct objective technical investigations.

View skill