lead-scoring
Acerca de
Esta habilidad permite a los desarrolladores construir modelos de puntuación de leads que priorizan oportunidades de venta mediante la combinación de adecuación firmográfica, señales conductuales y datos de intención. Está diseñada para priorizar leads entrantes, establecer umbrales de calificación y analizar la calidad de los leads. La metodología se basa en marcos establecidos como la Puntuación de Leads de HubSpot y la investigación del Viaje del Comprador B2B de Forrester.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsgit clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/lead-scoringCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Lead Scoring
Prioritize leads using a systematic scoring model that combines ICP fit, engagement behavior, and buying intent signals.
When to Use This Skill
- Designing a new lead scoring model
- Prioritizing inbound leads for SDR follow-up
- Setting MQL thresholds for sales handoff
- Analyzing lead quality by source
- Optimizing marketing spend by lead score
Methodology Foundation
Based on HubSpot's Lead Scoring methodology and Forrester's B2B Buyer Journey research, combining:
- Firmographic/demographic fit (who they are)
- Behavioral scoring (what they do)
- Intent signals (buying readiness)
- Negative scoring (disqualification)
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Designs scoring model structure | Point values for your business |
| Calculates lead scores | MQL threshold for handoff |
| Identifies high-intent behaviors | Which behaviors matter most |
| Segments leads by score | Sales follow-up priorities |
| Suggests model improvements | Model weight adjustments |
What This Skill Does
- Model design - Create scoring framework with fit + behavior + intent
- Score calculation - Apply model to lead data
- Threshold setting - Define MQL/SQL qualification levels
- Segmentation - Group leads by score for routing
- Optimization - Analyze score-to-conversion correlation
How to Use
For Model Design:
Help me create a lead scoring model for [Business Type].
Our ICP:
- Company size: [Range]
- Industries: [List]
- Titles: [Target titles]
- Geography: [Regions]
Key buying signals we track:
- [List website pages, content, actions]
Current conversion rates:
- Lead to MQL: X%
- MQL to SQL: X%
- SQL to Won: X%
For Lead Scoring:
Score this lead:
Company: [Name]
Size: [Employees]
Industry: [Industry]
Title: [Contact title]
Location: [Geography]
Behavior (last 30 days):
- [List pages visited, content downloaded, emails opened]
Instructions
Step 1: Define Fit Score (0-40 points)
Company Firmographics:
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Company size matches ICP | +10 |
| Industry in target list | +10 |
| Geography in target regions | +5 |
| Revenue in target range | +5 |
| Company size too small | -10 |
| Industry excluded | -20 |
Contact Demographics:
| Criteria | Points |
|---|---|
| Title is decision maker | +10 |
| Title is influencer | +5 |
| Title is end user | +3 |
| Student/Personal email | -15 |
| Competitor domain | -40 |
Step 2: Define Behavior Score (0-40 points)
Content Engagement:
| Action | Points |
|---|---|
| Pricing page visit | +15 |
| Case study download | +10 |
| Product demo video watched | +10 |
| Blog post read | +2 |
| 5+ pages in session | +5 |
| Return visit within 7 days | +5 |
Direct Engagement:
| Action | Points |
|---|---|
| Demo request form | +30 |
| Contact sales form | +25 |
| Free trial signup | +20 |
| Webinar registration | +10 |
| Newsletter signup | +3 |
| Email opened | +1 |
| Email clicked | +3 |
Step 3: Define Intent Score (0-20 points)
Third-Party Intent:
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| Researching your category (Bombora/G2) | +15 |
| Competitor comparison searches | +10 |
| Job posting for related role | +5 |
| Funding announcement | +5 |
| Technology install matches | +5 |
Step 4: Apply Negative Scoring
| Signal | Points |
|---|---|
| Unsubscribed from email | -10 |
| Bounced email | -20 |
| No engagement 90+ days | -15 |
| Marked as spam | -30 |
| Competitor | -100 |
Step 5: Set Thresholds
| Score Range | Qualification | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | Hot MQL | Immediate sales call |
| 60-79 | Warm MQL | SDR outreach 24hr |
| 40-59 | Marketing Qualified | Nurture sequence |
| 20-39 | Early Stage | Educational content |
| 0-19 | Not Qualified | Monitor only |
| Negative | Disqualified | Suppress |
Examples
Example 1: Scoring Model Design
Input:
Help me create a lead scoring model for B2B SaaS (marketing automation).
Our ICP:
- Company size: 50-500 employees
- Industries: Tech, E-commerce, SaaS
- Titles: VP Marketing, Director Marketing, CMO
- Geography: US, Canada, UK
Key buying signals:
- Pricing page, demo request, case studies
- Marketing automation category on G2
Output:
## Lead Scoring Model: Marketing Automation SaaS
### Fit Score (Max 40 points)
**Company Fit (20 points)**
| Criteria | Points |
|----------|--------|
| 50-500 employees | +10 |
| 500-1000 employees | +5 |
| <50 or >1000 employees | +0 |
| Tech/E-commerce/SaaS industry | +10 |
| Adjacent industry (Retail, Media) | +5 |
| Non-target industry | +0 |
**Contact Fit (20 points)**
| Criteria | Points |
|----------|--------|
| VP/Director Marketing, CMO | +15 |
| Marketing Manager | +10 |
| Marketing Coordinator | +5 |
| Non-marketing title | +0 |
| US/Canada/UK | +5 |
| Other geography | +0 |
| Personal email (@gmail) | -15 |
| Competitor domain | -40 |
### Behavior Score (Max 40 points)
**High-Intent Actions**
| Action | Points |
|--------|--------|
| Demo request submitted | +25 |
| Pricing page visit | +15 |
| Case study download | +10 |
| Product tour completed | +10 |
**Engagement Actions**
| Action | Points |
|--------|--------|
| 3+ pages in session | +5 |
| Return visit (7 days) | +5 |
| Webinar registered | +8 |
| Blog post read | +2 |
| Email clicked | +3 |
| Email opened | +1 |
### Intent Score (Max 20 points)
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
| G2 category research | +10 |
| Competitor comparison | +8 |
| Marketing hire posting | +5 |
| Series A/B funding | +5 |
### Negative Scoring
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
| Unsubscribed | -10 |
| No activity 90 days | -15 |
| Email bounced | -20 |
| Competitor | -100 |
### Thresholds
| Score | Status | SLA |
|-------|--------|-----|
| 70+ | 🔥 Hot MQL | Call within 5 min |
| 50-69 | 🟢 MQL | SDR contact 24hr |
| 30-49 | 🟡 Nurture | Email sequence |
| <30 | Monitor | No outreach |
Example 2: Individual Lead Scoring
Input:
Score this lead using the model above:
Company: GrowthTech Inc
Size: 180 employees
Industry: SaaS
Title: VP of Marketing
Location: San Francisco, US
Behavior (last 30 days):
- Visited pricing page (2x)
- Downloaded "Email Automation Guide"
- Attended webinar "Marketing Automation 101"
- Opened 4 emails, clicked 2
- Visited 8 pages total
Intent: Showing on G2 for marketing automation research
Output:
## Lead Score: GrowthTech Inc
### Overall Score: 83/100 🔥 HOT MQL
### Score Breakdown
**Fit Score: 35/40**
| Factor | Points | Notes |
|--------|--------|-------|
| Company size (180) | +10 | Perfect ICP |
| Industry (SaaS) | +10 | Target industry |
| Title (VP Marketing) | +15 | Decision maker |
| Location (US) | +5 | Target geography |
| **Subtotal** | **35** | |
**Behavior Score: 38/40**
| Action | Points | Notes |
|--------|--------|-------|
| Pricing page (2x) | +15 | High intent signal |
| Content download | +5 | Educational engagement |
| Webinar attended | +8 | Active learning |
| 8 pages visited | +5 | Deep exploration |
| 4 emails opened | +4 | Engaged with nurture |
| 2 emails clicked | +6 | Taking action |
| **Subtotal** | **38** | |
**Intent Score: 10/20**
| Signal | Points | Notes |
|--------|--------|-------|
| G2 category research | +10 | Active buyer research |
| **Subtotal** | **10** | |
### Qualification: HOT MQL
- **Action Required**: Immediate SDR call (within 5 minutes)
- **Talking Points**: Reference webinar attendance, pricing interest
- **Ask**: "What prompted your marketing automation research?"
### Next Best Actions
1. Call within 5 minutes (hot lead SLA)
2. Reference webinar + pricing page visits
3. Offer personalized demo with VP Marketing use cases
4. Connect on LinkedIn (warm outreach)
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Structuring scoring models systematically
- Calculating scores from provided data
- Recommending thresholds based on best practices
- Identifying model gaps
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Access your CRM data directly
- Know your actual conversion rates
- Predict individual lead outcomes
- Account for offline interactions
When to Escalate to Human
- Setting final MQL thresholds (needs sales alignment)
- Weighting decisions (requires business judgment)
- Model validation (needs historical data analysis)
- Edge cases (unusual company profiles)
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts
- "Adjust the model for enterprise (1000+ employees) leads."
- "What score would trigger an immediate call for us?"
- "Compare scores for these 5 leads and rank them."
- "What behaviors should we add to increase accuracy?"
Model Refinement Cycle
- Build initial model → Deploy
- Track score vs. conversion rate
- Adjust weights based on data
- Add new signals quarterly
- Remove low-correlation factors
Checklists & Templates
Lead Scoring Model Template
## [Company] Lead Scoring Model v[X]
### Fit Score (Max X points)
| Criteria | Points |
|----------|--------|
### Behavior Score (Max X points)
| Action | Points |
|--------|--------|
### Intent Score (Max X points)
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
### Negative Scoring
| Signal | Points |
|--------|--------|
### Thresholds
| Score | Status | Action |
|-------|--------|--------|
### Review Schedule
- Quarterly weight review
- Monthly threshold check
Model Audit Checklist
- All ICP criteria have point values
- High-intent behaviors weighted appropriately
- Negative scoring prevents bad leads
- Thresholds align with sales capacity
- Model reviewed in last 90 days
References
- HubSpot Lead Scoring Guide
- Forrester B2B Buyer Journey Research
- Marketo Definitive Guide to Lead Scoring
- SiriusDecisions Demand Waterfall
Related Skills
icp-matching- Deep ICP definitionpipeline-forecasting- Score aggregation to forecastdeal-risk-scoring- Post-MQL deal health
Skill Metadata
- Domain: RevOps
- Complexity: Intermediate
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 30-60 min for model design, 2 min per lead
- Prerequisites: ICP definition, behavior tracking capability
Repositorio GitHub
Habilidades relacionadas
content-collections
MetaEsta habilidad proporciona una configuración probada en producción para Content Collections, una herramienta centrada en TypeScript que transforma archivos Markdown/MDX en colecciones de datos con tipado seguro mediante validación Zod. Úsala al construir blogs, sitios de documentación o aplicaciones Vite + React con mucho contenido para garantizar seguridad de tipos y validación automática de contenido. Abarca todo, desde la configuración del plugin de Vite y compilación MDX hasta la optimización de despliegue y validación de esquemas.
polymarket
MetaEsta habilidad permite a los desarrolladores crear aplicaciones con la plataforma de mercados de predicción Polymarket, incluyendo la integración de API para operaciones y datos de mercado. También proporciona transmisión de datos en tiempo real a través de WebSocket para monitorear operaciones en vivo y actividad del mercado. Úsela para implementar estrategias de trading o crear herramientas que procesen actualizaciones de mercado en tiempo real.
creating-opencode-plugins
MetaEsta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a crear complementos de OpenCode que se conectan a más de 25 tipos de eventos, como comandos, archivos y operaciones LSP. Proporciona la estructura del complemento, las especificaciones de la API de eventos y los patrones de implementación para módulos en JavaScript/TypeScript. Úsala cuando necesites interceptar, monitorear o extender el ciclo de vida del asistente de IA de OpenCode con lógica personalizada basada en eventos.
sglang
MetaSGLang es un framework de alto rendimiento para el servicio de LLM que se especializa en generación rápida y estructurada para JSON, expresiones regulares y flujos de trabajo de agentes utilizando su caché de prefijos RadixAttention. Ofrece una inferencia significativamente más rápida, especialmente para tareas con prefijos repetidos, lo que lo hace ideal para salidas complejas y estructuradas, y conversaciones multiturno. Elige SGLang sobre alternativas como vLLM cuando necesites decodificación restringida o estés construyendo aplicaciones con uso extensivo de prefijos compartidos.
