develop-gc-method
Acerca de
Esta habilidad de Claude ayuda a los desarrolladores a crear un método de cromatografía de gases desde cero, guiándolos a través de la selección de columna, programación de temperatura y configuración del detector. Está diseñada para configurar nuevos análisis o adaptar métodos existentes a diferentes instrumentos o matrices de muestra. La habilidad realiza una validación inicial del rendimiento para compuestos objetivo volátiles y semivolátiles.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/develop-gc-methodCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Develop a GC Method
Systematic GC method dev: column pick + temp program + carrier + detector + initial perf check for volatile/semi-volatile analytes.
Use When
- New GC for volatile/semi-volatile compounds
- Adapt published method → different instrument/matrix
- Replace existing method failing perf
- Method for compounds w/ known bp + polarity
- Packed → capillary transition
In
Required
- Target analytes: Compounds + CAS + MW + bp
- Sample matrix: Sample type (air, water extract, solvent, bio fluid)
- Detection limits: LOD/LOQ per analyte
Optional
- Reference method: Published (EPA, ASTM, pharmacopeial) → start
- Available columns: On-hand inventory
- Instrument config: GC model, detectors, autosampler
- Throughput: Max run time/sample
- Regulatory: GLP, GMP, EPA, etc
Do
Step 1: Analytical Objectives
- List analytes + props (bp, polarity, MW).
- ID matrix + expected interferents/co-extractives.
- Specify LOD/LOQ, quant range, Rs for critical pairs.
- Method must meet regulatory (EPA 8260, USP, etc)?
- Doc throughput: max run time, inj vol, prep constraints.
→ Written spec: analytes + matrix + limits + Rs + regulatory/throughput.
If err: volatility data missing → estimate bp from structural analogs or scout run on mid-polarity col for elution order.
Step 2: Pick Column
Dimensions + phase via analyte polarity + separation diff.
| Column Type | Stationary Phase | Polarity | Typical Use Cases |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB-1 / HP-1 | 100% dimethylpolysiloxane | Non-polar | Hydrocarbons, solvents, general screening |
| DB-5 / HP-5 | 5% phenyl-methylpolysiloxane | Low polarity | Semi-volatiles, EPA 8270, drugs of abuse |
| DB-1701 | 14% cyanopropylphenyl | Mid polarity | Pesticides, herbicides |
| DB-WAX / HP-INNOWax | Polyethylene glycol | Polar | Alcohols, fatty acids, flavors, essential oils |
| DB-624 | 6% cyanopropylphenyl | Mid polarity | Volatile organics, EPA 624/8260 |
| DB-FFAP | Modified PEG (nitroterephthalic acid) | Highly polar | Organic acids, free fatty acids |
| DB-35 | 35% phenyl-methylpolysiloxane | Mid-low polarity | Polychlorinated biphenyls, confirmatory column |
- Analyte polarity ↔ phase: like dissolves like.
- Length (15-60 m): longer → more plates, longer runs.
- ID (0.25-0.53 mm): narrower → better eff, wider → more capacity.
- Film (0.25-5.0 um): thicker → retain volatiles longer.
- Complex matrices → guard col or retention gap.
→ Col spec (phase + L + ID + film) justified by analyte + Rs reqs.
If err: no single col resolves all → confirm col w/ orthogonal selectivity (DB-1 primary, DB-WAX confirm).
Step 3: Optimize Temp Program
- Initial oven ≤ bp of most volatile (hold 1-2 min → solvent focus).
- Linear ramp starts:
- Simple: 10-20 C/min
- Complex: 3-8 C/min (better Rs)
- Ultra-fast: 25-40 C/min on short thin-film
- Final temp 10-20 C above bp of least volatile.
- Final hold 2-5 min → full elution + bake-out.
- Co-eluting critical pairs → isothermal hold before elution, or slower ramp there.
- Verify total run time meets throughput.
→ Temp program (init + hold + ramp + final + hold) separates all targets in acceptable time.
If err: critical pairs still unresolved after ramp → revisit col (Step 2) or multi-ramp w/ slower rates in problem region.
Step 4: Pick Carrier Gas
| Property | Helium (He) | Hydrogen (H2) | Nitrogen (N2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimal linear velocity | 20-40 cm/s | 30-60 cm/s | 10-20 cm/s |
| Efficiency at high flow | Good | Best (flat van Deemter) | Poor |
| Speed advantage | Baseline | 1.5-2x faster than He | Slowest |
| Safety | Inert | Flammable (needs leak detection) | Inert |
| Cost / availability | Expensive, supply concerns | Low cost, generator option | Very low cost |
| Detector compatibility | All detectors | Not with ECD; caution with some MS | All detectors |
- Default He for general + regulatory methods specifying He.
- H2 for faster or when He supply constrained; install H2 leak detection + interlocks.
- N2 only for simple separations or when cost primary.
- Flow → optimal linear velocity for gas + col ID.
- Measure actual velocity via unretained (e.g., methane on FID).
→ Carrier picked + flow at optimal velocity, verified by unretained peak.
If err: eff lower than expected → van Deemter curve (plate height vs velocity) over 5-7 flows for true optimum.
Step 5: Pick Detector
| Detector | Selectivity | Sensitivity (approx.) | Linear Range | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FID | C-H bonds (universal organic) | Low pg C/s | 10^7 | Hydrocarbons, general organics, quantitation |
| TCD | Universal (all compounds) | Low ng | 10^5 | Permanent gases, bulk analysis |
| ECD | Electronegative groups (halogens, nitro) | Low fg (Cl compounds) | 10^4 | Pesticides, PCBs, halogenated solvents |
| NPD/FPD | N, P (NPD); S, P (FPD) | Low pg | 10^4-10^5 | Organophosphorus pesticides, sulfur compounds |
| MS (EI) | Structural identification | Low pg (scan), fg (SIM) | 10^5-10^6 | Unknowns, confirmation, trace analysis |
| MS/MS | Highest selectivity | fg range | 10^5 | Complex matrices, ultra-trace, forensic |
- Match detector to analyte chem + sensitivity.
- Quant in simple matrices → FID default (robust + linear + low maint).
- Trace in complex matrices → MS SIM or MS/MS MRM.
- Halogenated at trace → ECD best sensitivity.
- Detector temp 20-50 C above max oven → prevent condensation.
- Optimize detector gas flows per mfr.
→ Detector picked + config w/ temps + flows for targets.
If err: sensitivity insufficient → concentrate sample (bigger inj, solvent evap) or more sensitive/selective detector.
Step 6: Validate Initial Perf
- System suitability std: all targets at mid-range conc.
- Inject std 6× consec.
- Evaluate:
- RT RSD: < 1.0%
- Peak area RSD: < 2.0% (< 5.0% trace)
- Rs critical pairs: ≥ 1.5 (baseline) or ≥ 2.0 regulated
- Tailing factor: 0.8-1.5 (USP T ≤ 2.0)
- Theoretical plates N: vs col mfr spec
- Blank inj → no carryover/ghost peaks.
- Matrix blank → ID interferents at target RT.
- Doc all in method summary.
→ Suitability met across replicates, no carryover/matrix interference at target windows.
If err: tailing → check active sites (recondition, trim 0.5 m inlet, replace liner). RSD high → autosampler precision + inj technique. Rs low → Step 3 temp refinement.
Check
- All targets Rs ≥ 1.5 critical pairs
- RT RSD < 1.0% over 6 reps
- Peak area RSD < 2.0% over 6 reps
- Tailing 0.8-1.5 all analytes
- Blank no carryover >0.1% working conc
- Matrix blank no interference at targets
- Run time meets throughput
- All params documented (col, temps, flows, detector)
Traps
- Column bleed temp limit: Above max isothermal → elevated baseline + ghost peaks + col degradation. Check spec sheet.
- Oversized inj: Too much solvent → fronting + poor Rs early. Match inj vol to col capacity (0.5-2 uL for 0.25 mm ID split).
- Wrong liner: Splitless → single/double-taper deactivated; split → w/ glass wool. Mismatch → poor repro.
- Septum/liner maint: Coring + contamination = top sources of ghost peaks + tailing. Septa every 50-100 inj, liners scheduled.
- Skip van Deemter: Mfr default flow not measured optimum → wasted eff, esp carrier gas swaps.
- Insufficient conditioning: New cols → condition (ramp to max temp under carrier, no detector) to clear mfr residues.
→
develop-hplc-method— LC method dev for non-volatile/thermally labileinterpret-chromatogram— reading GC + HPLC chromatogramstroubleshoot-separation— diagnose peak shape/RT/Rs problemsvalidate-analytical-method— formal ICH Q2 valid. of GC method
Repositorio GitHub
Habilidades relacionadas
qmd
Desarrolloqmd es una herramienta CLI de búsqueda e indexación local que permite a los desarrolladores indexar y buscar en archivos locales mediante búsqueda híbrida que combina BM25, embeddings vectoriales y reranking. Es compatible tanto con uso desde la línea de comandos como con modo MCP (Model Context Protocol) para integración con Claude. La herramienta utiliza Ollama para los embeddings y almacena los índices localmente, lo que la hace ideal para buscar documentación o bases de código directamente desde la terminal.
subagent-driven-development
DesarrolloEsta habilidad ejecuta planes de implementación asignando un nuevo subagente para cada tarea independiente, con revisión de código entre tareas. Permite una iteración rápida mientras mantiene controles de calidad a través de este proceso de revisión. Úsala cuando trabajes en tareas mayormente independientes dentro de la misma sesión para garantizar un progreso continuo con verificaciones de calidad integradas.
mcporter
DesarrolloLa habilidad mcporter permite a los desarrolladores gestionar y llamar servidores del Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) directamente desde Claude. Proporciona comandos para listar servidores disponibles, llamar a sus herramientas con argumentos, y manejar la autenticación y el ciclo de vida del daemon. Utiliza esta habilidad para integrar y probar la funcionalidad de servidores MCP en tu flujo de trabajo de desarrollo.
adk-deployment-specialist
DesarrolloEsta habilidad despliega y orquesta agentes Vertex AI ADK utilizando el protocolo A2A, gestionando el descubrimiento de AgentCard, el envío de tareas y soportando herramientas como el Sandbox de Ejecución de Código y el Banco de Memoria. Permite construir sistemas multiagente con patrones de orquestación secuencial, paralela o en bucle en Python, Java o Go. Úsela cuando se le solicite desplegar agentes ADK u orquestar flujos de trabajo de agentes en Google Cloud.
