shiva-bhaga
Acerca de
La habilidad Shiva Bhaga ayuda a los desarrolladores a limpiar el contexto identificando y desmantelando intencionalmente patrones obsoletos, suposiciones desactualizadas y ruido de código muerto. Está diseñada para usarse cuando el contexto acumulado se ha vuelto desordenado o cuando un cambio importante requiere comenzar desde cero. Esta disolución controlada crea espacio para enfoques nuevos y más efectivos.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/shiva-bhagaCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Shiva Bhaga
Controlled destruction + dissolution → stale patterns, outdated assumptions, accumulated noise. Clears ground for new growth.
Use When
- Ctx accumulated stale assumptions silently distorting reasoning
- Prev approach failed → temptation = patch not discard
- Conv long → earlier decisions don't serve current goal
- Dead code, abandoned plans, zombie tasks → noise + confusion
- Before major pivot → clearing precedes creation
- Attachment to approach blocks alternatives
In
- Required: Current conv state | proj ctx (implicit)
- Optional: Specific dissolution target (e.g., "this approach not working", "clear all DB layer assumptions")
- Optional: Scope boundary — what survives destruction
Do
Step 1: ID What Must End
Survey current state, mark stale, broken, no longer serving.
Dissolution Triage:
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Category | Symptoms | Action |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Stale Assumptions | Decisions made early that | List and re-evaluate |
| | no longer match current | each against current |
| | understanding | reality |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Failed Approaches | Approaches attempted and | Acknowledge failure |
| | abandoned but still | explicitly; release |
| | influencing thinking | the sunk cost |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Accumulated Noise | Context, variables, or | Identify and mark for |
| | plans that are no longer | removal |
| | referenced or relevant | |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Attachment Points | "We already decided..." | Question whether the |
| | beliefs that resist | decision still holds |
| | re-examination | |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Zombie Artifacts | Code, tasks, or plans | Delete or archive; |
| | that exist but serve no | do not leave in limbo |
| | current purpose | |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
- Scan each category honest — resistance to examining = signal
- Each item: "If starting fresh now, would I create this?"
- No → mark for dissolution
Got: Clear inventory of release targets, specific items per category.
If err: Nothing stale → assess too shallow. Pick oldest decision, justify from scratch — forced justification = dissolution candidate.
Step 2: Preservation Boundary
Not everything destroyed. ID what survives.
- Core reqs: What user actually asked → survives.
- Verified knowledge: Facts confirmed via tools (file reads, test results) → survives.
- User prefs: Explicit prefs + constraints → survive.
- Working components: Demonstrably functioning code/approaches → survive.
Draw boundary: inside = preserved, outside = subject to dissolution.
Got: Clear distinction kept vs released.
If err: Boundary unclear → "What would I need to reconstruct if starting from scratch?" → answer = boundary.
Step 3: Dissolve w/ Intention
Execute dissolution → not abandonment, intentional clearing.
- Each marked item, release explicit:
- Stale assumption: "I assumed X, current evidence shows Y. Releasing X."
- Failed approach: "Approach A attempted, didn't work because Z. Releasing attachment to A."
- Noise: "Variable/plan/ctx Q no longer relevant. Removing."
- Don't justify/defend dissolved → point = release, not analysis
- Large body dissolved → summarize what + why in one sentence
- Clear workspace: close abandoned files, reset mental model, acknowledge clean slate
Got: Lighter, cleaner ctx, stale removed. Remaining feels accurate + current.
If err: Incomplete (released items still influence) → name explicit again. "I notice I'm still reasoning as if X true. X dissolved. Proceeding without X."
Step 4: Sit in Void
After destruction, resist immediate rebuild. Space between destruction + creation has value.
- Acknowledge cleared space: "Following dissolved: [list]"
- Note remains: "Surviving: [list]"
- Resist premature reconstruction → don't immediately propose replacement
- Let cleared space inform what comes next
- Void ≠ emptiness → potential. Next step (creation via
brahma-bhaga| preservation viavishnu-bhaga) emerges.
Got: Moment of clarity old → new. Next direction apparent from what remains, not forced.
If err: Void uncomfortable, strong pull to rebuild → urgency = signal of attachment to dissolved. Sit longer. Right next step emerges.
Check
- Stale assumptions ID'd + explicit released
- Failed approaches acknowledged no defensiveness
- Accumulated noise cleared
- Preservation boundary set before dissolution
- Core reqs + user prefs preserved
- Cleared space acknowledged before creation
Traps
- Destroy too much: No boundary → destroys working w/ stale. Boundary first.
- Destroy too little: Polite "release" while still influencing reasoning. True dissolution = actual letting go.
- Skip void: Rush destruction → creation w/o sitting → recreation of old w/ superficial changes.
- Performing destruction: Going through motions w/o updating internal model. Same assumptions next response = performative.
- Destruction as avoidance: Escape difficulty vs clear staleness. Problem persists after clearing → wasn't stale ctx, was problem itself.
→
brahma-bhaga— creation follows destructionvishnu-bhaga— preservation complements; what survives dissolution sustainedheal— subsystem assess may reveal dissolution needed before healingmeditate— clear ctx noise before → prevents reactive over-destructiondissolve-form— morphic equivalent for architectural dismantling w/ imaginal disc preservation
Repositorio GitHub
Habilidades relacionadas
content-collections
MetaEsta habilidad proporciona una configuración probada en producción para Content Collections, una herramienta centrada en TypeScript que transforma archivos Markdown/MDX en colecciones de datos con tipado seguro mediante validación Zod. Úsala al construir blogs, sitios de documentación o aplicaciones Vite + React con mucho contenido para garantizar seguridad de tipos y validación automática de contenido. Abarca todo, desde la configuración del plugin de Vite y compilación MDX hasta la optimización de despliegue y validación de esquemas.
polymarket
MetaEsta habilidad permite a los desarrolladores crear aplicaciones con la plataforma de mercados de predicción Polymarket, incluyendo la integración de API para operaciones y datos de mercado. También proporciona transmisión de datos en tiempo real a través de WebSocket para monitorear operaciones en vivo y actividad del mercado. Úsela para implementar estrategias de trading o crear herramientas que procesen actualizaciones de mercado en tiempo real.
creating-opencode-plugins
MetaEsta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a crear complementos de OpenCode que se conectan a más de 25 tipos de eventos, como comandos, archivos y operaciones LSP. Proporciona la estructura del complemento, las especificaciones de la API de eventos y los patrones de implementación para módulos en JavaScript/TypeScript. Úsala cuando necesites interceptar, monitorear o extender el ciclo de vida del asistente de IA de OpenCode con lógica personalizada basada en eventos.
sglang
MetaSGLang es un framework de alto rendimiento para el servicio de LLM que se especializa en generación rápida y estructurada para JSON, expresiones regulares y flujos de trabajo de agentes utilizando su caché de prefijos RadixAttention. Ofrece una inferencia significativamente más rápida, especialmente para tareas con prefijos repetidos, lo que lo hace ideal para salidas complejas y estructuradas, y conversaciones multiturno. Elige SGLang sobre alternativas como vLLM cuando necesites decodificación restringida o estés construyendo aplicaciones con uso extensivo de prefijos compartidos.
