resolve-git-conflicts
Acerca de
Esta Skill de Claude ayuda a los desarrolladores a resolver conflictos de fusión (merge), reorganización (rebase) y selección (cherry-pick) en Git, identificando las fuentes de conflicto, leyendo los marcadores y eligiendo estrategias de resolución. Ofrece opciones de recuperación seguras, como continuar las operaciones o abortar fusiones/reorganizaciones fallidas. Úsala cuando los comandos de Git reporten conflictos o cuando necesites reiniciar de manera segura operaciones fallidas de control de versiones.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/resolve-git-conflictsCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Resolve Git Conflicts
Identify, resolve, recover from merge and rebase conflicts.
When Use
git mergeorgit rebasereports conflictsgit cherry-pickcannot apply cleanlygit pullresults in conflicting changesgit stash popconflicts with current working tree
Inputs
- Required: Repository with active conflicts
- Optional: Preferred resolution strategy (ours, theirs, manual)
- Optional: Context about which changes should take priority
Steps
Step 1: Identify Conflict Source
Determine what operation caused conflict:
# Check current status
git status
# Look for indicators:
# "You have unmerged paths" — merge conflict
# "rebase in progress" — rebase conflict
# "cherry-pick in progress" — cherry-pick conflict
Status output tells you which files have conflicts and what operation in progress.
Got: git status shows files listed under "Unmerged paths" and indicates active operation.
If fail: git status shows clean tree but you expected conflicts? Operation may have already been completed or aborted. Check git log for recent activity.
Step 2: Read Conflict Markers
Open each conflicting file. Locate conflict markers:
<<<<<<< HEAD
// Your current branch's version
const result = calculateWeightedMean(data, weights);
=======
// Incoming branch's version
const result = computeWeightedAverage(data, weights);
>>>>>>> feature/rename-functions
<<<<<<< HEADto=======: Your current branch (or branch you are rebasing onto)=======to>>>>>>>: Incoming changes (branch being merged or commit being applied)
Got: Each conflicting file contains one or more blocks with <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> markers.
If fail: No markers found but files show as conflicting? Conflict may be binary file or deleted-vs-modified conflict. Check git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U for full list.
Step 3: Choose Resolution Strategy
Manual merge (most common): Edit file to combine both changes logically. Then remove all conflict markers.
Accept ours (keep current branch version):
# For a single file
git checkout --ours path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R
# For all conflicts
git checkout --ours .
git add -A
Accept theirs (keep incoming branch version):
# For a single file
git checkout --theirs path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R
# For all conflicts
git checkout --theirs .
git add -A
Got: After resolution, file contains correct merged content with no remaining conflict markers.
If fail: Chose wrong side? Re-read conflicting version from merge base. During merge, git checkout -m path/to/file re-creates conflict markers so you can try again.
Step 4: Mark Files as Resolved
After editing each conflicting file:
# Stage the resolved file
git add path/to/resolved-file.R
# Check remaining conflicts
git status
Repeat for every file listed under "Unmerged paths".
Got: All files move from "Unmerged paths" to "Changes to be committed". No conflict markers remain in any file.
If fail: git add fails or markers remain? Re-open file and ensure all <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> lines removed.
Step 5: Continue the Operation
Once all conflicts resolved:
For merge:
git commit
# Git auto-populates the merge commit message
For rebase:
git rebase --continue
# May encounter more conflicts on subsequent commits — repeat steps 2-4
For cherry-pick:
git cherry-pick --continue
For stash pop:
# Stash pop conflicts don't need a continue — just commit or reset
git add .
git commit -m "Apply stashed changes with conflict resolution"
Got: Operation completes. git status shows clean working tree (or moves to next commit during rebase).
If fail: Continue command fails? Check git status for remaining unresolved files. All conflicts must be resolved before continue.
Step 6: Abort if Needed
Resolution too complex or chose wrong approach? Abort safely:
# Abort merge
git merge --abort
# Abort rebase
git rebase --abort
# Abort cherry-pick
git cherry-pick --abort
Got: Repository returns to state before operation started. No data loss.
If fail: Abort fails (rare)? Check git reflog to find commit before operation. Then git reset --hard <commit> to restore it. Use with caution — discards uncommitted changes.
Step 7: Verify Resolution
After operation completes:
# Verify clean working tree
git status
# Check that the merge/rebase result is correct
git log --oneline -5
git diff HEAD~1
# Run tests to confirm nothing is broken
# (language-specific: devtools::test(), npm test, cargo test, etc.)
Got: Clean working tree, correct merge history, tests pass.
If fail: Tests fail after resolution? Merge may have introduced logical errors even though syntax conflicts resolved. Review diff careful and fix.
Checks
- No conflict markers (
<<<<<<<,=======,>>>>>>>) remain in any file -
git statusshows clean working tree - Merge/rebase history correct in
git log - Tests pass after conflict resolution
- No unintended changes introduced
Pitfalls
- Blindly accept one side:
--oursor--theirsdiscards other side entirely. Only use when certain one version completely correct. - Leave conflict markers in code: Always search entire file for remaining markers after editing. Partial resolution breaks the code.
- Amend during rebase: During interactive rebase, do not
--amendunless rebase step specifically calls for it. Usegit rebase --continueinstead. - Lose work on abort:
git rebase --abortandgit merge --abortdiscard all resolution work. Only abort if want to start over. - No test after resolution: Syntactically clean merge can still be logically wrong. Always run tests.
- Force-push after rebase: After rebasing shared branch, coordinate with collaborators before force-pushing — it rewrites history.
See Also
commit-changes- committing after conflict resolutionmanage-git-branches- branch workflows that lead to conflictsconfigure-git-repository- repository setup and merge strategies
Repositorio GitHub
Habilidades relacionadas
executing-plans
DiseñoUtilice la habilidad executing-plans cuando tenga un plan de implementación completo para ejecutar en lotes controlados con puntos de revisión. Esta habilidad carga y revisa críticamente el plan, luego ejecuta tareas en pequeños lotes (por defecto 3 tareas) mientras reporta el progreso entre cada lote para la revisión del arquitecto. Esto asegura una implementación sistemática con puntos de control de calidad integrados.
requesting-code-review
DiseñoEsta habilidad despacha un subagente revisor de código para analizar los cambios en el código frente a los requisitos antes de proceder. Debe usarse después de completar tareas, implementar funciones principales o antes de fusionar con la rama principal. La revisión ayuda a detectar problemas de forma temprana al comparar la implementación actual con el plan original.
connect-mcp-server
DiseñoEsta habilidad proporciona una guía integral para que los desarrolladores conecten servidores MCP a Claude Code mediante transportes HTTP, stdio o SSE. Cubre la instalación, configuración, autenticación y seguridad para integrar servicios externos como GitHub, Notion y APIs personalizadas. Úsala al configurar integraciones MCP, al configurar herramientas externas o al trabajar con el Protocolo de Contexto del Modelo de Claude.
web-cli-teleport
DiseñoEsta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a elegir entre las interfaces web y CLI de Claude Code mediante el análisis de tareas, y luego permite la teletransportación fluida de sesiones entre estos entornos. Optimiza el flujo de trabajo gestionando el estado y el contexto de la sesión al cambiar entre web, CLI o móvil. Úsala para proyectos complejos que requieren diferentes herramientas en varias etapas.
