resolve-git-conflicts
Acerca de
Esta habilidad de Claude ayuda a los desarrolladores a resolver conflictos de fusión (merge), reorganización (rebase) y selección de cambios (cherry-pick) en Git, identificando las fuentes de los conflictos, leyendo los marcadores y eligiendo estrategias de resolución. Proporciona métodos de recuperación seguros para continuar o abortar operaciones cuando surgen conflictos de comandos como merge, pull o stash pop. Úsala para manejar sistemáticamente y recuperarte de operaciones fallidas en Git.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/resolve-git-conflictsCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Resolve Git Conflicts
Identify, resolve, and recover from merge and rebase conflicts.
When to Use
- A
git mergeorgit rebasereports conflicts - A
git cherry-pickcannot apply cleanly - A
git pullresults in conflicting changes - A
git stash popconflicts with current working tree
Inputs
- Required: Repository with active conflicts
- Optional: Preferred resolution strategy (ours, theirs, manual)
- Optional: Context about which changes should take priority
Procedure
Step 1: Identify the Conflict Source
Determine what operation caused the conflict:
# Check current status
git status
# Look for indicators:
# "You have unmerged paths" — merge conflict
# "rebase in progress" — rebase conflict
# "cherry-pick in progress" — cherry-pick conflict
The status output tells you which files have conflicts and what operation is in progress.
Got: git status shows files listed under "Unmerged paths" and indicates the active operation.
If fail: If git status shows a clean tree but you expected conflicts, the operation may have already been completed or aborted. Check git log for recent activity.
Step 2: Read Conflict Markers
Open each conflicting file and locate the conflict markers:
<<<<<<< HEAD
// Your current branch's version
const result = calculateWeightedMean(data, weights);
=======
// Incoming branch's version
const result = computeWeightedAverage(data, weights);
>>>>>>> feature/rename-functions
<<<<<<< HEADto=======: Your current branch (or the branch you're rebasing onto)=======to>>>>>>>: The incoming changes (the branch being merged or the commit being applied)
Got: Each conflicting file contains one or more blocks with <<<<<<<, =======, and >>>>>>> markers.
If fail: If no markers are found but files show as conflicting, the conflict may be a binary file or a deleted-vs-modified conflict. Check git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U for the full list.
Step 3: Choose a Resolution Strategy
Manual merge (most common): Edit the file to combine both changes logically, then remove all conflict markers.
Accept ours (keep current branch's version):
# For a single file
git checkout --ours path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R
# For all conflicts
git checkout --ours .
git add -A
Accept theirs (keep incoming branch's version):
# For a single file
git checkout --theirs path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R
# For all conflicts
git checkout --theirs .
git add -A
Got: After resolution, the file contains the correct merged content with no remaining conflict markers.
If fail: If you chose the wrong side, re-read the conflicting version from the merge base. During a merge, git checkout -m path/to/file re-creates the conflict markers so you can try again.
Step 4: Mark Files as Resolved
After editing each conflicting file:
# Stage the resolved file
git add path/to/resolved-file.R
# Check remaining conflicts
git status
Repeat for every file listed under "Unmerged paths".
Got: All files move from "Unmerged paths" to "Changes to be committed". No conflict markers remain in any file.
If fail: If git add fails or markers remain, re-open the file and ensure all <<<<<<<, =======, and >>>>>>> lines are removed.
Step 5: Continue the Operation
Once all conflicts are resolved:
For merge:
git commit
# Git auto-populates the merge commit message
For rebase:
git rebase --continue
# May encounter more conflicts on subsequent commits — repeat steps 2-4
For cherry-pick:
git cherry-pick --continue
For stash pop:
# Stash pop conflicts don't need a continue — just commit or reset
git add .
git commit -m "Apply stashed changes with conflict resolution"
Got: The operation completes. git status shows a clean working tree (or moves to the next commit during rebase).
If fail: If the continue command fails, check git status for remaining unresolved files. All conflicts must be resolved before continuing.
Step 6: Abort if Needed
If resolution is too complex or you chose the wrong approach, abort safely:
# Abort merge
git merge --abort
# Abort rebase
git rebase --abort
# Abort cherry-pick
git cherry-pick --abort
Got: Repository returns to the state before the operation started. No data loss.
If fail: If abort fails (rare), check git reflog to find the commit before the operation and git reset --hard <commit> to restore it. Use with caution — this discards uncommitted changes.
Step 7: Verify Resolution
After the operation completes:
# Verify clean working tree
git status
# Check that the merge/rebase result is correct
git log --oneline -5
git diff HEAD~1
# Run tests to confirm nothing is broken
# (language-specific: devtools::test(), npm test, cargo test, etc.)
Got: Clean working tree, correct merge history, tests pass.
If fail: If tests fail after resolution, the merge may have introduced logical errors even though syntax conflicts are resolved. Review the diff carefully and fix.
Validation
- No conflict markers (
<<<<<<<,=======,>>>>>>>) remain in any file -
git statusshows a clean working tree - The merge/rebase history is correct in
git log - Tests pass after conflict resolution
- No unintended changes were introduced
Pitfalls
- Blindly accepting one side:
--oursor--theirsdiscards the other side entirely. Only use when you are certain one version is completely correct. - Leaving conflict markers in code: Always search the entire file for remaining markers after editing. A partial resolution breaks the code.
- Amending during rebase: During an interactive rebase, do not
--amendunless the rebase step specifically calls for it. Usegit rebase --continueinstead. - Losing work on abort:
git rebase --abortandgit merge --abortdiscard all resolution work. Only abort if you want to start over. - Not testing after resolution: A syntactically clean merge can still be logically wrong. Always run tests.
- Force-pushing after rebase: After rebasing a shared branch, coordinate with collaborators before force-pushing, as it rewrites history.
Related Skills
commit-changes- committing after conflict resolutionmanage-git-branches- branch workflows that lead to conflictsconfigure-git-repository- repository setup and merge strategies
Repositorio GitHub
Frequently asked questions
What is the resolve-git-conflicts skill?
resolve-git-conflicts is a Claude Skill by pjt222. Skills package instructions and resources that Claude loads on demand, so Claude can perform resolve-git-conflicts-related tasks without extra prompting.
How do I install resolve-git-conflicts?
Use the install commands on this page: add resolve-git-conflicts to Claude Code as a plugin, or clone its repository into your skills directory, then restart Claude so it picks up the skill.
What category does resolve-git-conflicts belong to?
resolve-git-conflicts is in the Design category, tagged ai, api and design.
Is resolve-git-conflicts free to use?
Yes. resolve-git-conflicts is listed on AIMCP and free to install. It runs inside Claude, so no separate service account is required to use the skill itself.
Habilidades relacionadas
Utilice la habilidad executing-plans cuando tenga un plan de implementación completo para ejecutar en lotes controlados con puntos de revisión. Esta habilidad carga y revisa críticamente el plan, luego ejecuta tareas en pequeños lotes (por defecto 3 tareas) mientras reporta el progreso entre cada lote para la revisión del arquitecto. Esto asegura una implementación sistemática con puntos de control de calidad integrados.
Esta habilidad despacha un subagente revisor de código para analizar los cambios en el código frente a los requisitos antes de proceder. Debe usarse después de completar tareas, implementar funciones principales o antes de fusionar con la rama principal. La revisión ayuda a detectar problemas de forma temprana al comparar la implementación actual con el plan original.
Esta habilidad proporciona una guía integral para que los desarrolladores conecten servidores MCP a Claude Code mediante transportes HTTP, stdio o SSE. Cubre la instalación, configuración, autenticación y seguridad para integrar servicios externos como GitHub, Notion y APIs personalizadas. Úsala al configurar integraciones MCP, al configurar herramientas externas o al trabajar con el Protocolo de Contexto del Modelo de Claude.
Esta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a elegir entre las interfaces web y CLI de Claude Code mediante el análisis de tareas, y luego permite la teletransportación fluida de sesiones entre estos entornos. Optimiza el flujo de trabajo gestionando el estado y el contexto de la sesión al cambiar entre web, CLI o móvil. Úsala para proyectos complejos que requieren diferentes herramientas en varias etapas.
