tool-design-sprint-map-and-target
Acerca de
Esta Habilidad de Claude facilita el crucial primer día (lunes) de un Design Sprint, guiando a los equipos para definir un objetivo a largo plazo, mapear un recorrido del cliente e identificar riesgos y oportunidades clave. Consolida las aportaciones de expertos en un artefacto estructurado, culminando en un momento objetivo elegido por el Decider para el sprint. Este resultado establece directamente el enfoque de diseño para las fases posteriores de bosquejo y creación de storyboards.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skillsgit clone https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/tool-design-sprint-map-and-targetCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Design Sprint Map and Target (Monday)
Produce Monday's bundled artifact: the long-term goal that names success in 1-5 years; 3-7 sprint questions converting team fears into testable risks; a 5-15 step customer or system map from key player to outcome; expert interview notes from cameo experts run in parallel; HMW (How Might We) clusters synthesized from the team; and the Decider's chosen target moment. Monday's output becomes Tuesday's design target.
Family contract: docs/reference/skill-families/design-sprint-skills-contract.md. This skill is a member of design-sprint-skills.
When to Use
- It is Day 1 of the Design Sprint and the brief is locked (via
tool-design-sprint-brief). - The team is together (in-person, remote, or hybrid) for the full Monday workshop.
- Expert interviews are scheduled for Monday afternoon (cameo role; 15-30 minutes each).
- The team needs to converge from "five days of work ahead" to "this specific target moment is what we're prototyping."
When NOT to Use
- The brief is not locked. Return to
tool-design-sprint-brief; without sprint questions, this skill has nothing to converge toward. - The challenge is so broad that "long-term goal" would be longer than 5 years. Return to problem framing.
- The team is missing the Decider. The target-moment selection at the end of Monday is the Decider's call; without that call the team disperses Tuesday with no agreed direction.
- The team has already pre-decided the target moment. Monday's value is in the convergence; if it's been pre-decided, Monday becomes ratification theater.
What This Skill Produces
A single bundled artifact with six sections:
- Long-term goal: one sentence naming success in 1-5 years. Aspirational; cannot be hit in this sprint, but should be visible from the target moment.
- Sprint questions: 3-7 questions converting team fears into testable risks. Phrased as "Can we... ?" or "Will... ?" or "How... ?"; NOT phrased as solutions.
- Customer or system map: 5-15 step flow from key player(s) at the left to outcome (long-term goal) at the right. Includes major actors, decision points, and current alternatives.
- Expert interview notes: synthesized observations from 2-4 cameo experts interviewed Monday afternoon. Surfaced as HMW candidates for the cluster board.
- HMW cluster board: 30-100+ How Might We notes from the team, clustered into 4-8 themes; voted with
tool-note-and-voteheat-map mechanic to surface top clusters. - Target moment: the single point on the map (or a tight cluster of points) the Decider picks as the prototyping target. Wednesday's storyboard begins from here.
See references/TEMPLATE.md for the canonical structure and references/EXAMPLE.md for the Brainshelf book-catalog Monday artifact.
Inference Inputs
| Input | What the skill does with it |
|---|---|
Sprint brief (from tool-design-sprint-brief) | Pulls the locked sprint questions as seed for refinement; pulls the challenge statement as the long-term goal seed; pulls the team roster for role assignments in note-and-vote |
| Existing research | Used to draft the customer or system map; researcher walks the team through key findings during the map step |
| Analytics | Quantitative grounding for the map's decision-point branch points and abandonment moments |
| Customer examples | Concrete stories used to validate the map's key player and surface map-step gaps |
| Expert interview transcripts (run during Monday) | Synthesized into HMW candidates by the moderator (typically PM or researcher) during the afternoon |
Monday Time Structure
The full Monday workshop is approximately 7 hours (09:00-12:30 + 13:30-17:00). The skill's bundled artifact emerges across the day:
- 09:00-09:30: Welcome + brief recap + introductions (does not produce artifact content)
- 09:30-10:30: Long-term goal (one sentence) + draft sprint questions (3-7)
- 10:30-12:30: Customer or system map draft (continuous-flow whiteboard work; team builds together)
- 12:30-13:30: Lunch + first expert interview slot (cameo)
- 13:30-15:30: Remaining expert interviews (3 slots; 25 min each); team captures HMWs continuously during interviews
- 15:30-16:30: HMW cluster board synthesis; team adds final HMWs; Facilitator clusters; team heat-map votes via
tool-note-and-vote - 16:30-17:00: Decider picks target moment; signs off; team disperses for Tuesday sketches
This skill's 105-minute timebox covers the facilitated synthesis sections (long-term goal + sprint questions + map draft + HMW clustering + target selection). Expert interviews and silent map-extension work happen in parallel and are not counted in the timebox.
Common Pitfalls
- Long-term goal too short. "Ship Brainshelf MVP by Q3" is a roadmap goal, not a long-term goal. The long-term goal is 1-5 years out and aspirational ("Become the default way 25+/year readers remember and recall books").
- Sprint questions phrased as solutions. "Build the camera-capture flow" is a solution; "Can we get sub-3-second capture without abandonment?" is a sprint question. The team must convert fears into questions, not predetermined answers.
- Map too detailed. 5-15 steps, not 50. The map is for Decider orientation, not engineering documentation. If the map balloons, the Facilitator forces compression.
- Skipping HMW because "we already know the opportunities." HMW's value is divergent surfacing followed by convergent voting. Pre-deciding the opportunities skips both halves.
- Decider absent at target-moment selection. The whole point of Monday is the Decider's target choice. If the Decider must leave early, target selection must happen before they leave, even if HMW clustering compresses.
- Expert interviews skipped or run by the wrong person. Experts bring outside context the team can't generate internally. Skipping them produces an inward-looking Monday. Running them as group calls (instead of small cameo conversations) wastes expert time and produces less useful HMW input.
Cross-Skill Usage
Prerequisites: tool-design-sprint-brief. Map-and-Target consumes the locked sprint brief and refines the sprint questions during the morning. Without a brief, this skill has no convergence target.
This skill invokes tool-note-and-vote twice during the day: once for HMW cluster heat-map voting (anonymous dot-voting to surface top 4-8 clusters) and optionally once for target-moment supervote when the Decider wants team input before deciding. The Decider's call is final regardless of team vote distribution.
Next invocation in the sprint: tool-design-sprint-sketch Tuesday morning.
Canonical Sources
- Knapp, J., Zeratsky, J., and Kowitz, B. Sprint. Simon and Schuster, 2016. Monday chapter (Chapters 4-7).
- GV Design Sprint Guide. "Sprint Week Monday." https://www.gv.com/sprint/
- Character Capital. "Design Sprint Day 1." https://www.character.vc
- Google Design Sprint Kit. "Monday agenda template." https://designsprintkit.withgoogle.com/
Decider Checkpoint
This skill ends with a Decider Checkpoint in references/TEMPLATE.md. The Decider's call at the end of Monday is target-moment selection: a single point (or tight cluster of points) on the customer or system map that becomes Tuesday's design target. Without that selection, Tuesday's sketches diverge with no shared direction. The Decider also confirms the long-term goal, the sprint questions, and the top HMW clusters; these become Wednesday's heat-map orientation.
Repositorio GitHub
Habilidades relacionadas
evaluating-llms-harness
PruebasEsta Skill de Claude ejecuta el benchmark lm-evaluation-harness para evaluar modelos de lenguaje en más de 60 tareas académicas estandarizadas como MMLU y GSM8K. Está diseñada para que los desarrolladores comparen la calidad de los modelos, realicen seguimiento del progreso del entrenamiento o reporten resultados académicos. La herramienta admite varios backends, incluidos modelos de HuggingFace y vLLM.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
PruebasEsta habilidad proporciona conocimiento integral para implementar Cron Triggers de Cloudflare y programar Workers mediante expresiones cron. Cubre la configuración de tareas periódicas, trabajos de mantenimiento y flujos de trabajo automatizados, manejando problemas comunes como expresiones cron inválidas y inconvenientes de zonas horarias. Los desarrolladores pueden utilizarla para configurar manejadores programados, probar activadores cron e integrar con Workflows y Green Compute.
webapp-testing
PruebasEsta habilidad de Claude proporciona un kit de herramientas basado en Playwright para probar aplicaciones web locales mediante scripts de Python. Permite verificación de frontend, depuración de interfaz de usuario, captura de pantallas y visualización de registros, mientras gestiona los ciclos de vida del servidor. Úsela para tareas de automatización de navegadores, pero ejecute los scripts directamente en lugar de leer su código fuente para evitar contaminación del contexto.
finishing-a-development-branch
PruebasEsta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a completar el trabajo terminado verificando que las pruebas pasen y luego presentando opciones estructuradas de integración. Guía el flujo de trabajo para fusionar, crear PRs o limpiar ramas después de que se completa la implementación. Úsala cuando tu código esté listo y probado para finalizar sistemáticamente el proceso de desarrollo.
