formulate-quantum-problem
Acerca de
Esta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a formular problemas de mecánica cuántica o química definiendo el marco matemático, incluyendo el espacio de Hilbert, operadores y condiciones de contorno. Asiste en traducir escenarios físicos a formalismos como la ecuación de Schrödinger y en seleccionar métodos de solución apropiados, como la teoría de perturbaciones o DFT. Úsala al configurar un problema cuántico para su solución analítica o numérica.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/formulate-quantum-problemCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Formulate Quantum Problem
Physical system → well-posed QM problem: ID DOFs → build H + Hilbert space → BCs → pick approx method → validate vs known limits.
Use When
- Set up QM problem for analytic/numerical solution
- QChem calc (MOs, electronic structure)
- Physical scenario → Dirac/Schrödinger
- Choose perturbation / variational / DFT / exact diag
- Theoretical model for spectroscopic/scattering comparison
In
- Required: system desc (atom, molecule, solid, field)
- Required: target observable (spectrum, rates, ground state)
- Optional: experimental constraints
- Optional: accuracy / compute budget
- Optional: formalism (wave mech, matrix mech, 2nd quant, path int)
Do
Step 1: ID system + DOFs
- Particles: list (electrons, nuclei, photons, phonons) + quantum nums (spin, charge, mass)
- Symmetries: spatial (sph/cyl/trans/crystal), internal (spin/gauge), discrete (P, T)
- Energy scales: which DOFs active vs frozen/adiabatic
- Reduction: Born-Oppenheimer if nuclear/electronic timescales separate; collective coords for many-body
## System Characterization
- **Particles**: [list with quantum numbers]
- **Active degrees of freedom**: [coordinates, spins, fields]
- **Frozen degrees of freedom**: [and justification for freezing]
- **Symmetry group**: [continuous and discrete]
- **Energy scale hierarchy**: [e.g., electronic >> vibrational >> rotational]
→ Complete inventory: particles, QNs, symmetries, active vs frozen justified.
If err: hierarchy unclear → keep all DOFs, flag for scale analysis. Premature truncation → wrong physics.
Step 2: Build H + Hilbert space
- Hilbert space: finite-dim → basis (|↑>, |↓>). Infinite → function space (L²(R³) for 3D single particle).
- Kinetic: each particle. Position rep: T = -ℏ²/(2m) nabla².
- Potential: all interactions (Coulomb, harmonic, spin-orbit, external). Explicit form + coupling.
- Composite H: H = T + V, group by type. Multi-particle: exchange/correlation or note via approx.
- Operator algebra: H Hermitian? Constants of motion ([H,O]=0) → block-diagonalize.
## Hamiltonian Structure
- **Hilbert space**: [definition and basis]
- **H = T + V decomposition**:
- T = [kinetic terms]
- V = [potential terms, grouped by type]
- **Constants of motion**: [operators commuting with H]
- **Symmetry-adapted basis**: [if block diagonalization is possible]
→ Complete Hermitian H w/ all terms, Hilbert space defined, constants of motion ID'd.
If err: not Hermitian → missing conjugate / gauge phase. Ambiguous Hilbert space (relativistic) → specify formalism.
Step 3: BCs + initial conditions
- BCs: bound → normalizability (psi→0 at ∞). Scattering → incoming wave. Periodic → Bloch / Born-von Karman.
- Domain: spatial. Box walls. H atom: radial + angular. Lattice + topology.
- Initial state (time-dep): t=0 expansion in eigenbasis or wave packet w/ center + width.
- Constraints: indistinguishable → sym (bosons) / antisym (fermions). Gauge → gauge-fixing.
## Boundary and Initial Conditions
- **Spatial domain**: [definition]
- **Boundary type**: [Dirichlet / Neumann / periodic / scattering]
- **Normalization**: [condition]
- **Particle statistics**: [bosonic / fermionic / distinguishable]
- **Initial state** (if time-dependent): [specification]
→ BCs physically motivated, consistent w/ H domain, unique solution (or scattering matrix).
If err: over/under-determined → check self-adjointness on domain. Non-self-adjoint → handle deficiency indices.
Step 4: Pick approx method
-
Exact solvable: matches known model (HO, H atom, Ising)? → exact + perturbation corrections.
-
Perturbation (weak coupling):
- H = H0 + lambda V, H0 solvable
- lambda V small vs H0 level spacing
- Degeneracy? → degenerate perturbation
- Fits: weak interaction, few-body, analytic needed
-
Variational (ground state):
- Trial wf w/ params
- Satisfies BCs + symmetry
- Fits: ground state energy primary, many-body
-
DFT (many-electron):
- XC functional (LDA, GGA, hybrid)
- Basis (plane waves, Gaussian, NAOs)
- Fits: many-electron, ground state density + energy
-
Numerical exact (small/benchmark):
- Exact diag for small Hilbert
- QMC for ground state sampling
- DMRG for 1D/quasi-1D
- Fits: high accuracy, small system
## Approximation Method Selection
- **Method chosen**: [name]
- **Justification**: [why this method fits the problem structure]
- **Expected accuracy**: [order of perturbation, variational bound quality, DFT functional accuracy]
- **Computational cost**: [scaling with system size]
- **Alternatives considered**: [and why they were rejected]
→ Justified method + expected accuracy + compute cost + alternatives.
If err: no single method fits → formulate for 2 + compare. Disagreement reveals difficulty.
Step 5: Validate vs limits
- Classical (ℏ→0 or large QNs): H reduces to classical mech.
- Non-interacting: couplings → 0 → product of single-particle states.
- Symmetry: respects all symmetries. H transforms correctly under group.
- Dimensional: every H term = energy. Length/energy/time scales reasonable.
- Known exact: special cases (H atom Z=1, HO quadratic) → reproduced.
## Validation Checks
| Check | Expected Result | Status |
|-------|----------------|--------|
| Classical limit (hbar -> 0) | [classical Hamiltonian] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Non-interacting limit | [product states] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Symmetry transformation | [correct representation] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Dimensional analysis | [all terms in energy units] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Known exact case | [reproduced result] | [Pass/Fail] |
→ All pass. Self-consistent, ready to solve.
If err: fail → err in H construction or BCs. Trace to specific term/condition, fix before solving.
Check
- Particles + QNs listed
- Hilbert space + basis
- H Hermitian + correct units
- Constants of motion used
- BCs physically + mathematically sufficient
- Statistics (bos/ferm) enforced
- Method justified + accuracy stated
- Classical, non-interacting, symmetry limits checked
- Known exact reproduced
- Reproducible
Traps
- Premature DOF drop: freeze w/o energy scale arg → wrong physics. Justify every reduction.
- Non-Hermitian H: missing conjugate in spin-orbit / complex V. Verify H=H† explicitly.
- Wrong scattering BCs: bound-state BCs for scattering → discards continuum. Match to question.
- Degeneracy in perturbation: non-deg perturbation on deg level → divergent. Check first.
- Single-method reliance: variational → upper bound but misses excited; perturbation diverges at strong coupling. Cross-validate.
- Unit inconsistency: mixing natural (ℏ=1) + SI. Pick consistent system, state explicitly.
→
derive-theoretical-result— analytic from formulated problemsurvey-theoretical-literature— prior work on similar QM systems
Repositorio GitHub
Frequently asked questions
What is the formulate-quantum-problem skill?
formulate-quantum-problem is a Claude Skill by pjt222. Skills package instructions and resources that Claude loads on demand, so Claude can perform formulate-quantum-problem-related tasks without extra prompting.
How do I install formulate-quantum-problem?
Use the install commands on this page: add formulate-quantum-problem to Claude Code as a plugin, or clone its repository into your skills directory, then restart Claude so it picks up the skill.
What category does formulate-quantum-problem belong to?
formulate-quantum-problem is in the Other category, tagged general.
Is formulate-quantum-problem free to use?
Yes. formulate-quantum-problem is listed on AIMCP and free to install. It runs inside Claude, so no separate service account is required to use the skill itself.
Habilidades relacionadas
LlamaGuard es el modelo de Meta de 7-8B parámetros para moderar las entradas y salidas de LLM en seis categorías de seguridad como violencia y discurso de odio. Ofrece una precisión del 94-95% y puede implementarse usando vLLM, Hugging Face o Amazon SageMaker. Utiliza esta skill para integrar fácilmente filtrado de contenido y barreras de seguridad en tus aplicaciones de IA.
Esta Skill de Claude ayuda a los desarrolladores a optimizar los costes en la nube mediante el ajuste de tamaño de recursos, estrategias de etiquetado y análisis de gastos. Proporciona un marco para reducir los gastos en la nube e implementar una gobernanza de costes en AWS, Azure y GCP. Úsala cuando necesites analizar los costes de infraestructura, ajustar el tamaño de los recursos o cumplir con restricciones presupuestarias.
Esta habilidad de Claude analiza los mercados de apuestas deportivas, incluyendo spreads, over/unders y apuestas de propuestas, mediante el examen de tendencias históricas y estadísticas situacionales para identificar apuestas de valor. Proporciona una salida en markdown estructurado con recomendaciones accionables con fines educativos. Los desarrolladores deben utilizar esto para herramientas de análisis de apuestas deportivas, teniendo en cuenta que está diseñado únicamente para entretenimiento/educación.
Esta habilidad cuantiza LLMs a precisión de 8 o 4 bits utilizando bitsandbytes, logrando una reducción de memoria del 50-75% con pérdida mínima de precisión. Es ideal para ejecutar modelos más grandes en memoria GPU limitada o para acelerar la inferencia, admitiendo formatos como INT8, NF4 y FP4. La habilidad se integra con HuggingFace Transformers y permite entrenamiento QLoRA y optimizadores de 8 bits.
