MCP HubMCP Hub
Volver a habilidades

formulate-maxwell-equations

pjt222
Actualizado 2 days ago
5 vistas
17
2
17
Ver en GitHub
Otrogeneral

Acerca de

Esta habilidad de Claude proporciona herramientas para trabajar con las ecuaciones de Maxwell tanto en forma integral como diferencial. Permite a los desarrolladores analizar campos electromagnéticos, resolver problemas de valores en la frontera, derivar ecuaciones de onda y calcular el transporte de energía mediante el vector de Poynting. Úsala para tareas avanzadas de electromagnetismo que involucren interfaces de materiales, radiación y la conexión de campos estáticos con el marco dinámico completo.

Instalación rápida

Claude Code

Recomendado
Principal
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Comando PluginAlternativo
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativo
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/formulate-maxwell-equations

Copia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad

Documentación

Formulate Maxwell Equations

EM phenomenon → state Maxwell eqs (int/diff) → apply BCs + symmetry → solve PDE → derive Poynting/pressure/impedance → verify limits.

Use When

  • BVP for E, B w/ sources + interfaces
  • Derive EM wave eq from first principles
  • Compute Poynting vector + momentum density
  • BCs at interfaces (dielectrics, conductors, magnetic)
  • Displacement current role in Ampere-Maxwell
  • Static limits (Coulomb, Biot-Savart) → unified time-dep

In

  • Required: config (geometry, sources, material props)
  • Required: target quantity (E, B, wave, flux, boundary value)
  • Optional: symmetry (planar/cyl/sph/none)
  • Optional: time-dep (static/harmonic omega/general)
  • Optional: BCs at interfaces/conductors

Do

Step 1: State 4 eqs + select subset

  1. Gauss E: div(E)=rho/epsilon_0 (diff) or ∮E·dA=Q_enc/epsilon_0 (int). Use w/ symmetry for E from charges.

  2. Gauss B: div(B)=0 (diff) or ∮B·dA=0 (int). No monopoles. Consistency check.

  3. Faraday: curl(E)=-dB/dt (diff) or ∮E·dl=-dPhi_B/dt (int). Changing B → curling E. Induction + waves.

  4. Ampere-Maxwell: curl(B)=mu_0 J + mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt (diff) or ∮B·dl=mu_0 I_enc + mu_0 epsilon_0 dPhi_E/dt (int). Displacement current mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt → essential for waves + continuity.

  5. Form: diff for local/wave/PDE; int for symmetry problems.

  6. Active subset: electrostatics → Gauss E + curl(E)=0. Magnetostatics → Gauss B + Ampere (no displacement).

## Maxwell Equations for This Problem
- **Form**: [differential / integral / both]
- **Active equations**: [list which of the four are non-trivial constraints]
- **Source terms**: rho = [charge density], J = [current density]
- **Time dependence**: [static / harmonic / general]
- **Displacement current**: [negligible / essential -- with justification]

→ 4 eqs stated, subset ID'd w/ justify, displacement current included/argued negligible.

If err: unclear displacement current → estimate |epsilon_0 dE/dt|/|J|. ≥1 → keep. Vacuum + no free charges → always essential.

Step 2: BCs + symmetry

  1. BCs at interfaces (media 1,2, surface charge sigma_f, surface current K_f):

    • Normal E: epsilon_1 E_1n - epsilon_2 E_2n = sigma_f
    • Tangential E: E_1t = E_2t
    • Normal B: B_1n = B_2n
    • Tangential H: n_hat × (H_1-H_2) = K_f (n_hat: 2→1)
  2. Conductor BCs (perfect):

    • E_tan=0 (inside E=0)
    • B_normal=0 (time-varying)
    • sigma = epsilon_0 E_normal
    • K = (1/mu_0) n_hat × B
  3. Symmetry:

    • Planar: fields depend on 1 coord → ODE
    • Cylindrical: (rho,z) or rho
    • Spherical: r only
    • Translational invariance → Fourier transform
  4. Gauge (potentials phi, A):

    • Coulomb: div(A)=0 (separates static + radiation)
    • Lorenz: div(A) + mu_0 epsilon_0 d(phi)/dt=0 (Lorentz-covariant, decouples wave eqs)
## Boundary Conditions and Symmetry
- **Interfaces**: [list with media properties on each side]
- **Boundary conditions applied**: [normal E, tangential E, normal B, tangential H]
- **Symmetry**: [planar / cylindrical / spherical / none]
- **Reduced coordinates**: [independent variables after symmetry reduction]
- **Gauge** (if using potentials): [Coulomb / Lorenz / other]

→ BCs at every interface, symmetry applied, ready for PDE.

If err: over-determined → check components vs conditions. Under-determined → missed BC (often tangential H or radiation at ∞).

Step 3: Solve PDE

  1. Wave eq derivation (source-free, linear, homogeneous):

    • curl(curl(E)) = -d/dt(curl(B)) = -mu epsilon d²E/dt²
    • Identity: curl(curl(E)) = grad(div(E)) - nabla²(E)
    • div(E)=0 → nabla²(E) = mu epsilon d²E/dt²
    • v=1/sqrt(mu epsilon); vacuum c=1/sqrt(mu_0 epsilon_0)
    • Same for B
  2. Plane wave (z-prop):

    • E(z,t)=E_0 exp[i(kz - omega t)], k=omega/v=omega*sqrt(mu epsilon)
    • B=(1/v) k_hat × E
    • |B|=|E|/v
    • Polarization: linear/circular/elliptical
  3. Laplace/Poisson (static):

    • nabla²(phi)=-rho/epsilon_0 (Poisson) or nabla²(phi)=0 (Laplace)
    • Separation of variables → match BCs
  4. Guided waves/cavities:

    • TE/TM decomposition
    • Conducting-wall BCs
    • Eigenvalue → propagation const / resonance
    • Cutoff: omega_c = vpisqrt((m/a)²+(n/b)²) rect guide a×b
  5. Skin depth:

    • delta = sqrt(2/(omega mu sigma_c))
    • Decay exp(-z/delta)
    • 60 Hz Cu: ~8.5 mm; 1 GHz: ~2 micrometers
## Field Solution
- **Equation solved**: [wave equation / Laplace / Poisson / eigenvalue]
- **Solution method**: [separation of variables / Fourier transform / Green's function / numerical]
- **Result**: E(r, t) = [expression], B(r, t) = [expression]
- **Dispersion relation**: omega(k) = [if wave solution]
- **Characteristic scales**: [wavelength, skin depth, decay length]

→ Explicit E, B satisfying all eqs + BCs, dispersion/eigenvalues if applicable.

If err: can't separate → try new coord or numerics (FD/FE). Back-sub fails Maxwell → algebra err in curl/div.

Step 4: Derived quantities

  1. Poynting: S = (1/mu_0) E × B (W/m²)

    • Plane wave: S = (1/mu_0) |E|²/v in prop dir
    • Time-avg: <S> = (1/2) Re(E × H*) harmonic
    • Intensity: I = |<S>|
  2. Energy density:

    • u = (1/2)(epsilon_0 |E|² + |B|²/mu_0) vacuum
    • u = (1/2)(E·D + B·H) linear media
    • Conservation: du/dt + div(S) = -J·E (Poynting's thm)
  3. Radiation pressure:

    • Absorber: P_rad = I/c = <S>/c
    • Reflector: P_rad = 2I/c = 2<S>/c
  4. Wave impedance:

    • Medium: eta = sqrt(mu/epsilon) = mu*v
    • Vacuum: eta_0 = sqrt(mu_0/epsilon_0) ≈ 377 Ω
    • |E| = eta |H|
    • Reflection normal: r = (eta_2 - eta_1)/(eta_2 + eta_1)
  5. Power + Q:

    • Ohmic loss/vol: p_loss = sigma |E|²/2
    • Q = omega * (stored energy)/(power dissipated/cycle)
    • Bandwidth: Delta_omega = omega/Q
## Derived Quantities
- **Poynting vector**: S = [expression], <S> = [time-averaged]
- **Energy density**: u = [expression]
- **Radiation pressure**: P_rad = [value]
- **Wave impedance**: eta = [value]
- **Reflection/transmission**: r = [value], t = [value]
- **Q-factor** (if resonant): Q = [value]

→ All quantities w/ correct units, energy conservation via Poynting, reasonable magnitudes.

If err: Poynting thm not balanced → E/B inconsistent. Re-verify all 4 eqs. Common: E, B from different approx not mutually consistent.

Step 5: Verify limits

  1. Static (omega→0):

    • E → Coulomb / Laplace-Poisson
    • B → Biot-Savart / Ampere (no displacement)
    • Displacement → 0
  2. Plane wave: v=1/sqrt(mu epsilon), correct polarization.

  3. Perfect conductor (sigma→∞):

    • delta → 0
    • E_tan → 0 at surface
    • r → -1 (phase inversion)
  4. Vacuum (epsilon_r=1, mu_r=1): v=c, eta=eta_0 ≈ 377 Ω.

  5. Energy conservation: integrate Poynting thm over closed vol → total field energy rate + outflow = -power from currents. Imbalance = err.

## Limiting Case Verification
| Limit | Condition | Expected | Obtained | Match |
|-------|-----------|----------|----------|-------|
| Static | omega -> 0 | Coulomb / Biot-Savart | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Plane wave | unbounded medium | v = c/n, eta = eta_0/n | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Perfect conductor | sigma -> inf | delta -> 0, r -> -1 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Vacuum | epsilon_r = mu_r = 1 | c, eta_0 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Energy conservation | Poynting's theorem | balanced | [check] | [Yes/No] |

→ All limits match. Energy conserved to numerical precision.

If err: Static fail → source/BC err. Plane wave fail → wave eq derivation err. Energy conservation fail → E/B inconsistent. Trace + fix before accepting.

Check

  • 4 eqs stated, subset ID'd
  • Displacement current included or justified negligible
  • BCs applied at every interface
  • Symmetry reduces PDE dim
  • Wave eq / Laplace / Poisson correctly derived
  • Solutions back-sub satisfy all 4 eqs
  • Poynting + energy density correct units (W/m², J/m³)
  • Poynting thm verified
  • Impedance + r, t reasonable
  • Static limit = Coulomb + Biot-Savart
  • Plane wave limit: v=1/sqrt(mu epsilon), E⊥B⊥k
  • Solution reproducible

Traps

  • Drop displacement: div(curl B)=0 → div(J)=0 contradicts charge conservation → mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt essential. Never drop w/o checking dE/dt vs J/epsilon_0.
  • Inconsistent E, B: solving independently can violate Faraday + Gauss B. Always verify all 4.
  • Wrong n_hat dir: n_hat × (H_1-H_2)=K_f requires 2→1. Reverse flips sign.
  • D/E/B/H confusion: vacuum D=epsilon_0 E, B=mu_0 H. Media D=epsilon E, B=mu H. Maxwell uses D,H for free sources, E,B for force. Mixing → epsilon_r/mu_r errors.
  • Phase vs group v: v=omega/k phase. Energy/info → v_g=d(omega)/dk. Dispersive media: differ.
  • Forget radiation condition: scattering in unbounded → Sommerfeld (outgoing at ∞). Missing → non-unique + unphysical incoming.

  • analyze-magnetic-field — static B (magnetostatic limit)
  • solve-electromagnetic-induction — Faraday + RL circuits
  • formulate-quantum-problem — quantize EM (QED)
  • derive-theoretical-result — rigorous wave/Green's/dispersion
  • analyze-diffusion-dynamics — diffusion eq from Maxwell (skin effect)

Repositorio GitHub

pjt222/agent-almanac
Ruta: i18n/caveman-ultra/skills/formulate-maxwell-equations
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Habilidades relacionadas

llamaguard

Otro

LlamaGuard es el modelo de Meta de 7-8B parámetros para moderar las entradas y salidas de LLM en seis categorías de seguridad como violencia y discurso de odio. Ofrece una precisión del 94-95% y puede implementarse usando vLLM, Hugging Face o Amazon SageMaker. Utiliza esta skill para integrar fácilmente filtrado de contenido y barreras de seguridad en tus aplicaciones de IA.

Ver habilidad

cost-optimization

Otro

Esta Skill de Claude ayuda a los desarrolladores a optimizar los costes en la nube mediante el ajuste de tamaño de recursos, estrategias de etiquetado y análisis de gastos. Proporciona un marco para reducir los gastos en la nube e implementar una gobernanza de costes en AWS, Azure y GCP. Úsala cuando necesites analizar los costes de infraestructura, ajustar el tamaño de los recursos o cumplir con restricciones presupuestarias.

Ver habilidad

quantizing-models-bitsandbytes

Otro

Esta habilidad cuantiza LLMs a precisión de 8 o 4 bits utilizando bitsandbytes, logrando una reducción de memoria del 50-75% con pérdida mínima de precisión. Es ideal para ejecutar modelos más grandes en memoria GPU limitada o para acelerar la inferencia, admitiendo formatos como INT8, NF4 y FP4. La habilidad se integra con HuggingFace Transformers y permite entrenamiento QLoRA y optimizadores de 8 bits.

Ver habilidad

dispatching-parallel-agents

Otro

Esta Skill de Claude despliega múltiples agentes para investigar y solucionar 3 o más problemas independientes de forma concurrente. Está diseñada para escenarios que involucran fallos no relacionados que pueden resolverse sin estado compartido o dependencias. Su capacidad principal es la resolución paralela de problemas, asignando un agente por cada dominio problemático independiente para maximizar la eficiencia.

Ver habilidad