decommission-validated-system
Acerca de
Esta habilidad proporciona un proceso estructurado para la desactivación de un sistema computarizado validado al final de su vida útil. Gestiona tareas críticas de cumplimiento, incluyendo la evaluación regulatoria de retención de datos, la migración validada de datos, la estrategia de archivado y la revocación de acceso. Úsela al reemplazar un sistema, consolidar múltiples sistemas, o cuando termine el soporte del proveedor o ocurran cambios regulatorios.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/decommission-validated-systemCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
驗證系統退役
計畫並執一已驗證之電腦化系統於生命末之控制退役,保資料完整性並合法規保留要求。
適用時機
- 已驗證系統為新系統所替
- 系統達生命末而無替代(業務程序除)
- 供應商停對已驗證產品之支援
- 多系統併入單一平台
- 法規或業務改令系統過時
輸入
- 必要:待退役之系統(名、版、驗證狀態)
- 必要:按法規(21 CFR Part 11、GLP、GCP)之資料保留要求
- 必要:替代系統(若適用)與遷移範圍
- 選擇性:當前驗證文件包
- 選擇性:資料量與格式清單
- 選擇性:業務擁有者與相關者清單
步驟
步驟一:評資料保留要求
定資料須保留多久及以何形式:
# Data Retention Assessment
## Document ID: DRA-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Regulatory Retention Requirements
| Regulation | Data Type | Retention Period | Format Requirements |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------|
| 21 CFR 211 (GMP) | Batch records, test results | 1 year past product expiry or 3 years after distribution | Readable, retrievable |
| 21 CFR 58 (GLP) | Study data and records | Duration of study + retention agreement | Original or certified copy |
| ICH E6 (GCP) | Clinical trial records | 2 years after last marketing approval or formal discontinuation | Accessible for inspection |
| 21 CFR Part 11 | Electronic records | Per predicate rule | Original format or validated migration |
| EU Annex 11 | Computerized system records | Per applicable GxP | Readable and available |
| Tax/financial | Financial records | 7-10 years (jurisdiction-dependent) | Readable |
### System Data Inventory
| Data Category | Volume | Format | Retention Required Until | Disposition |
|---------------|--------|--------|------------------------|-------------|
| [e.g., Batch records] | [e.g., 50,000 records] | [e.g., Database + PDF reports] | [Date] | Migrate / Archive / Destroy |
| [e.g., Audit trail] | [e.g., 2M entries] | [e.g., Database] | [Same as parent records] | Archive |
| [e.g., User data] | [e.g., 200 profiles] | [e.g., LDAP/Database] | [Employment + 2 years] | Anonymise and archive |
預期: 各資料類皆有定之保留期、格式要求、計畫處置。 失敗時: 若保留要求不清,諮法規事務與法務。預設為最長適用保留期。
步驟二:計畫資料遷移(若適用)
若資料遷至替代系統:
# Data Migration Plan
## Document ID: DMP-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Migration Scope
| Source | Target | Data Category | Records | Migration Method |
|--------|--------|---------------|---------|-----------------|
| [Old system] | [New system] | [Category] | [Count] | ETL / Manual / API |
### Data Mapping
| Source Field | Source Format | Target Field | Target Format | Transformation |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|---------------|---------------|
| [e.g., test_result] | FLOAT(8,2) | [e.g., result_value] | DECIMAL(10,3) | Precision conversion |
| [e.g., operator_id] | VARCHAR(20) | [e.g., user_id] | UUID | Lookup table mapping |
### Validation Approach
| Check | Method | Acceptance Criteria |
|-------|--------|-------------------|
| Record count reconciliation | Source count vs target count | 100% match |
| Field-level comparison | Sample 5% of records, all fields | 100% match after transformation |
| Checksum verification | Hash source vs target for key fields | Checksums match |
| Business rule validation | Verify key calculations in target | Results match source |
| Audit trail continuity | Verify historical audit trail migrated | All entries present with original timestamps |
預期: 遷移計畫含映射、轉換規則、證資料完整性已保之驗證檢查。 失敗時: 若遷移驗證敗,勿進至退役。修遷移問題並重驗。
步驟三:定歸檔策略
將歸檔而非遷移之資料:
# Archival Strategy
### Archive Format
| Consideration | Decision | Rationale |
|--------------|----------|-----------|
| Format | [PDF/A, CSV, XML, database backup] | [Why this format survives the retention period] |
| Medium | [Network storage, cloud archive, tape, optical] | [Durability and accessibility] |
| Encryption | [Yes/No — method if yes] | [Security vs long-term accessibility trade-off] |
| Integrity verification | [SHA-256 checksums, periodic verification schedule] | [Prove archive is uncorrupted] |
### Archive Verification
- [ ] Archived data is readable without the source system
- [ ] All required data categories are included in the archive
- [ ] Checksums recorded at time of archival
- [ ] Archive can be searched and retrieved within [defined SLA, e.g., 5 business days]
- [ ] Periodic integrity checks scheduled (annually)
### Archive Access
| Role | Access Level | Authorisation |
|------|-------------|--------------|
| QA Director | Read access to all archived data | Standing authorisation |
| Regulatory Affairs | Read access for inspection support | Standing authorisation |
| System Owner (former) | Read access for business queries | Request-based |
| External auditors | Read access, supervised | Per audit plan |
預期: 歸檔資料可讀、可搜、可驗而無需原始系統。 失敗時: 若資料不能獨於源系統讀,歸檔不合規。退役前考慮匯出為開放、標準格式(PDF/A、CSV)。
步驟四:執退役
# Decommission Checklist
## Document ID: DC-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Pre-Decommission
- [ ] All stakeholders notified of decommission date and data disposition
- [ ] Data migration completed and validated (if applicable)
- [ ] Data archive created and verified (if applicable)
- [ ] Final backup of complete system taken and stored separately
- [ ] All open change requests resolved or transferred
- [ ] All open CAPAs resolved or transferred to successor system
- [ ] All active users informed and redirected to replacement system (if applicable)
### Decommission Execution
- [ ] User access revoked for all accounts
- [ ] System removed from production environment
- [ ] Network connections disconnected
- [ ] Licenses returned or terminated
- [ ] System entry removed from active system inventory
- [ ] System moved to "Decommissioned" status in compliance architecture
### Post-Decommission
- [ ] Validation documentation archived (URS, VP, IQ/OQ/PQ, TM, VSR)
- [ ] SOPs retired or updated to remove references to decommissioned system
- [ ] Training records archived
- [ ] Change control records archived
- [ ] Audit trail archived
- [ ] Decommission report completed and approved
### Decommission Report
| Section | Content |
|---------|---------|
| System description | Name, version, purpose, GxP classification |
| Decommission rationale | Why the system is being retired |
| Data disposition summary | What data went where (migrated, archived, destroyed) |
| Validation evidence | Migration validation results, archive verification |
| Residual risk | Any ongoing data retention obligations |
| Approval | System owner, QA, IT signatures |
預期: 退役為控制、有錄、已核——非單「關之」。 失敗時: 若任何清單項不能完,記例外並得 QA 核方續。
驗證
- 所有資料類皆已評保留要求
- 資料遷移以記錄計數、取樣、校驗和驗證(若適用)
- 歸檔造於無需源系統可讀之格式
- 歸檔完整性以校驗和驗
- 所有用戶存取已撤
- 驗證文件已歸檔,含定之保留期
- SOP 已更以除對退役系統之引
- 退役報告為系統擁有者、QA、IT 所核
常見陷阱
- 早退役:資料遷移驗證前關系統險永資料失。拔插前完所有驗證
- 不可讀之歸檔:存於需原系統方讀之專屬格式違歸檔之意。用開放格式
- 忘之審計軌:歸檔資料而非審計軌令資料溯源不能示。恒與父記錄歸檔審計軌
- 孤立之 SOP:仍引退役系統之 SOP 令用戶惑並生合規缺。更或退所有受影響之 SOP
- 無週期性歸檔驗證:歸檔降。無週期性完整性察,資料失或不察直至檢查需資料
相關技能
design-compliance-architecture—— 退役後更系統清單與合規架構manage-change-control—— 退役為需變更控制之大改write-validation-documentation—— 遷移驗證循同 IQ/OQ 方法論write-standard-operating-procedure—— 退或更引退役系統之 SOPprepare-inspection-readiness—— 歸檔資料須續可為法規檢查所用
Repositorio GitHub
Habilidades relacionadas
evaluating-llms-harness
PruebasEsta Skill de Claude ejecuta el benchmark lm-evaluation-harness para evaluar modelos de lenguaje en más de 60 tareas académicas estandarizadas como MMLU y GSM8K. Está diseñada para que los desarrolladores comparen la calidad de los modelos, realicen seguimiento del progreso del entrenamiento o reporten resultados académicos. La herramienta admite varios backends, incluidos modelos de HuggingFace y vLLM.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
PruebasEsta habilidad proporciona conocimiento integral para implementar Cron Triggers de Cloudflare y programar Workers mediante expresiones cron. Cubre la configuración de tareas periódicas, trabajos de mantenimiento y flujos de trabajo automatizados, manejando problemas comunes como expresiones cron inválidas y inconvenientes de zonas horarias. Los desarrolladores pueden utilizarla para configurar manejadores programados, probar activadores cron e integrar con Workflows y Green Compute.
webapp-testing
PruebasEsta habilidad de Claude proporciona un kit de herramientas basado en Playwright para probar aplicaciones web locales mediante scripts de Python. Permite verificación de frontend, depuración de interfaz de usuario, captura de pantallas y visualización de registros, mientras gestiona los ciclos de vida del servidor. Úsela para tareas de automatización de navegadores, pero ejecute los scripts directamente en lugar de leer su código fuente para evitar contaminación del contexto.
finishing-a-development-branch
PruebasEsta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a completar el trabajo terminado verificando que las pruebas pasen y luego presentando opciones estructuradas de integración. Guía el flujo de trabajo para fusionar, crear PRs o limpiar ramas después de que se completa la implementación. Úsala cuando tu código esté listo y probado para finalizar sistemáticamente el proceso de desarrollo.
