MCP HubMCP Hub
Volver a habilidades

generate-status-report

pjt222
Actualizado 2 days ago
10 vistas
17
2
17
Ver en GitHub
Metadata

Acerca de

Esta Skill de Claude genera informes exhaustivos del estado de los proyectos analizando artefactos existentes, como cartas de constitución y backlogs, para calcular métricas e identificar bloqueos. Resume el progreso utilizando indicadores RAG para cronograma, alcance, presupuesto y calidad. Úsela al final de los sprints, antes de las reuniones de gobierno o cuando surjan nuevos riesgos para proporcionar actualizaciones a las partes interesadas.

Instalación rápida

Claude Code

Recomendado
Principal
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Comando PluginAlternativo
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativo
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/generate-status-report

Copia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad

Documentación

Generate a Project Status Report

Produce a periodic status report by analyzing project artifacts, calculating progress metrics, and summarizing accomplishments, blockers, and upcoming work with RAG (Red/Amber/Green) health indicators.

When to Use

  • End of sprint or reporting period (weekly, biweekly, monthly)
  • Stakeholder requests for project health update
  • Before steering committee or governance meetings
  • When project health indicators change (e.g., new blocker or risk materializes)
  • Periodic checkpoint against charter milestones

Inputs

  • Required: Reporting period (start date, end date)
  • Required: At least one project artifact (BACKLOG.md, SPRINT-PLAN.md, WBS.md, or PROJECT-CHARTER.md)
  • Optional: Previous status reports (for trend comparison)
  • Optional: Budget or resource tracking data
  • Optional: Risk register updates

Procedure

Step 1: Read Existing Artifacts

Scan the project directory for PM artifacts:

  • PROJECT-CHARTER.md — milestones, success criteria
  • BACKLOG.md — item counts by status, burn-down data
  • SPRINT-PLAN.md — sprint goal, committed items, task completion
  • WBS.md — work package completion percentages
  • Previous STATUS-REPORT-*.md files — trend data

Read available files. Not all will exist — adapt the report to available data.

Got: At least one artifact read successfully, key metrics extracted.

If fail: If no artifacts exist, report cannot be generated. Create a charter or backlog first using the draft-project-charter or manage-backlog skills.

Step 2: Calculate Progress Metrics

Compute metrics from available data:

Agile metrics (from BACKLOG.md / SPRINT-PLAN.md):

  • Velocity: story points completed this sprint
  • Sprint completion: items done / items committed
  • Backlog burn-down: total remaining points vs previous period
  • Cycle time: average days from In Progress to Done

Classic metrics (from WBS.md):

  • % complete: work packages done / total work packages
  • Schedule variance: planned milestone dates vs actual
  • Effort variance: estimated effort vs actual effort consumed
## Metrics
| Metric | Value | Previous | Trend |
|--------|-------|----------|-------|
| Velocity | [N] pts | [N] pts | ↑/↓/→ |
| Sprint Completion | [N]% | [N]% | ↑/↓/→ |
| Backlog Remaining | [N] pts | [N] pts | ↓ (good) |
| Schedule Variance | [+/-N days] | [+/-N days] | |

Got: 3-5 metrics calculated with previous period comparison.

If fail: If no historical data exists (first report), omit Previous and Trend columns. If data is incomplete, note gaps in report footer with action items to establish tracking.

Step 3: Identify Blockers, Risks, and Issues

List active blockers and risks:

## Blockers & Risks
| ID | Type | Description | Severity | Owner | Status | Action Required |
|----|------|------------|----------|-------|--------|----------------|
| R-001 | Risk | [Description] | High | [Name] | Open | [Action] |
| B-001 | Blocker | [Description] | Critical | [Name] | Active | [Action by date] |
| I-001 | Issue | [Description] | Medium | [Name] | Investigating | [Action] |

Cross-reference against the charter risk register. Flag any new risks not previously identified.

Got: All active blockers and top risks documented with owners and actions.

If fail: If no blockers exist, explicitly state "No active blockers" — don't leave the section empty. If a blocker lacks an owner, escalate to project manager for assignment.

Step 4: Summarize Accomplishments and Next Period Plan

Write two sections:

## Accomplishments (This Period)
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]

## Planned (Next Period)
- [Planned item/milestone with target]
- [Planned item/milestone with target]
- [Planned item/milestone with target]

Got: 3-5 accomplishments with concrete evidence, 3-5 planned items for next period.

If fail: If no accomplishments exist, report the reason (blocked, re-planning, team unavailable). If next period plan is unclear, list "Planning session scheduled for [date]" as the primary item.

Step 5: Assign RAG Indicators and Write Report

Assess project health across four dimensions:

DimensionGreenAmberRed
ScheduleOn track or ahead1-2 weeks behind>2 weeks behind or milestone missed
ScopeNo uncontrolled changesMinor scope adjustmentsScope creep affecting deliverables
BudgetWithin 5% of plan5-15% over plan>15% over plan or untracked
QualityTests pass, criteria metMinor quality issuesCritical defects or acceptance failures

Write the complete report:

# Status Report: [Project Name]
## Report Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
## Reporting Period: [Start] to [End]
## Document ID: SR-[PROJECT]-[YYYY-MM-DD]

### Overall Health
| Dimension | Status | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Schedule | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Scope | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Budget | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Quality | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |

### Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences: overall status, key achievement, biggest risk]

### Metrics
[From Step 2]

### Accomplishments
[From Step 4]

### Blockers & Risks
[From Step 3]

### Planned Next Period
[From Step 4]

### Decisions Needed
- [Decision 1 — needed by date, from whom]

---
*Report prepared by: [Name/Agent]*

Save as STATUS-REPORT-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.

Got: Complete status report saved with RAG indicators, metrics, and narrative.

If fail: If data is insufficient for RAG assessment, use ⚪ (Grey) indicating "insufficient data" and list what data needs to be collected for next report.

Validation

  • Status report file created with correct date-stamped filename
  • RAG indicators assigned for all four dimensions with justification
  • At least 3 metrics calculated from project artifacts
  • Blockers section present (even if "No active blockers")
  • Accomplishments listed with evidence
  • Next period plan included
  • Executive summary is 2-3 sentences, not a paragraph
  • Every blocker and risk has an owner and action with deadline

Pitfalls

  • Report without data: Status reports must be evidence-based. Every claim should reference an artifact or metric.
  • All green, all the time: Persistent green RAG without evidence suggests the report isn't honest. Challenge green assessments.
  • Blocker without owner: Every blocker needs an owner and an action. Unowned blockers don't get resolved.
  • Metric without context: "Velocity = 18" means nothing without comparison. Include previous period or target.
  • Too long: A status report should be scannable in 2 minutes. Keep it to 1-2 pages.
  • Missing decisions section: If the project needs stakeholder decisions, make them explicit with deadlines.
  • Stale data: Using outdated artifacts leads to misleading reports. Verify artifact dates match reporting period.
  • Missing trend data: First-time reports can't show trends, but subsequent reports must compare to previous periods.

Related Skills

  • draft-project-charter — charter provides milestones and success criteria for status tracking
  • manage-backlog — backlog metrics feed the status report
  • plan-sprint — sprint results provide velocity and completion data
  • create-work-breakdown-structure — WBS completion drives classic progress metrics
  • conduct-retrospective — status report data feeds the retrospective

Repositorio GitHub

pjt222/agent-almanac
Ruta: i18n/caveman-lite/skills/generate-status-report
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Habilidades relacionadas

content-collections

Meta

Esta habilidad proporciona una configuración probada en producción para Content Collections, una herramienta centrada en TypeScript que transforma archivos Markdown/MDX en colecciones de datos con tipado seguro mediante validación Zod. Úsala al construir blogs, sitios de documentación o aplicaciones Vite + React con mucho contenido para garantizar seguridad de tipos y validación automática de contenido. Abarca todo, desde la configuración del plugin de Vite y compilación MDX hasta la optimización de despliegue y validación de esquemas.

Ver habilidad

polymarket

Meta

Esta habilidad permite a los desarrolladores crear aplicaciones con la plataforma de mercados de predicción Polymarket, incluyendo la integración de API para operaciones y datos de mercado. También proporciona transmisión de datos en tiempo real a través de WebSocket para monitorear operaciones en vivo y actividad del mercado. Úsela para implementar estrategias de trading o crear herramientas que procesen actualizaciones de mercado en tiempo real.

Ver habilidad

creating-opencode-plugins

Meta

Esta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a crear complementos de OpenCode que se conectan a más de 25 tipos de eventos, como comandos, archivos y operaciones LSP. Proporciona la estructura del complemento, las especificaciones de la API de eventos y los patrones de implementación para módulos en JavaScript/TypeScript. Úsala cuando necesites interceptar, monitorear o extender el ciclo de vida del asistente de IA de OpenCode con lógica personalizada basada en eventos.

Ver habilidad

sglang

Meta

SGLang es un framework de alto rendimiento para el servicio de LLM que se especializa en generación rápida y estructurada para JSON, expresiones regulares y flujos de trabajo de agentes utilizando su caché de prefijos RadixAttention. Ofrece una inferencia significativamente más rápida, especialmente para tareas con prefijos repetidos, lo que lo hace ideal para salidas complejas y estructuradas, y conversaciones multiturno. Elige SGLang sobre alternativas como vLLM cuando necesites decodificación restringida o estés construyendo aplicaciones con uso extensivo de prefijos compartidos.

Ver habilidad