MCP HubMCP Hub
Volver a habilidades

write-validation-documentation

pjt222
Actualizado 2 days ago
7 vistas
17
2
17
Ver en GitHub
Metawordtestingautomation

Acerca de

Esta habilidad genera documentación integral de validación IQ/OQ/PQ para sistemas informatizados en entornos regulados. Crea protocolos, informes, scripts de prueba y gestiona flujos de trabajo de desviaciones para la validación de software y auditorías regulatorias. Úsela al calificar software R u otro para cumplimiento GxP, o al preparar documentación de validación para sistemas nuevos o recalificados.

Instalación rápida

Claude Code

Recomendado
Principal
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Comando PluginAlternativo
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativo
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/write-validation-documentation

Copia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad

Documentación

Write Validation Documentation

Create complete IQ/OQ/PQ validation documentation for computerized systems.

When Use

  • Validating R or other software for regulated use
  • Preparing for regulatory audit
  • Documenting qualification of computing environments
  • Creating or updating validation protocols and reports

Inputs

  • Required: System/software to validate (name, version, purpose)
  • Required: Validation plan defining scope and strategy
  • Required: User requirements specification
  • Optional: Existing SOP templates
  • Optional: Previous validation documentation (for re-qualification)

Steps

Step 1: Write Installation Qualification (IQ) Protocol

# Installation Qualification Protocol
**System**: R Statistical Computing Environment
**Version**: 4.5.0
**Document ID**: IQ-PROJ-001
**Prepared by**: [Name] | **Date**: [Date]
**Reviewed by**: [Name] | **Date**: [Date]
**Approved by**: [Name] | **Date**: [Date]

## 1. Objective
Verify that R and required packages are correctly installed per specifications.

## 2. Prerequisites
- [ ] Server/workstation meets hardware requirements
- [ ] Operating system qualified
- [ ] Network access available (for package downloads)

## 3. Test Cases

### IQ-001: R Installation
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | R version 4.5.0 correctly installed |
| Procedure | Open R console, execute `R.version.string` |
| Expected Result | "R version 4.5.0 (2025-04-11)" |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |
| Pass/Fail | [ ] |
| Executed by | ____________ Date: ________ |

### IQ-002: Package Inventory
| Package | Required Version | Installed Version | Pass/Fail |
|---------|-----------------|-------------------|-----------|
| dplyr | 1.1.4 | | [ ] |
| ggplot2 | 3.5.0 | | [ ] |
| survival | 3.7-0 | | [ ] |

## 4. Deviations
[Document any deviations from expected results and their resolution]

## 5. Conclusion
[ ] All IQ tests PASSED - system installation verified
[ ] IQ tests FAILED - see deviation section

Got: validation/iq/iq_protocol.md complete with unique document ID, objective, prerequisites checklist, test cases for R installation and every required package, deviation section, approval fields.

If err: Organization requires different document format? Adapt template to match existing SOP. Key fields (requirement, procedure, expected result, actual result, pass/fail) must be preserved regardless of format.

Step 2: Write Operational Qualification (OQ) Protocol

# Operational Qualification Protocol
**Document ID**: OQ-PROJ-001

## 1. Objective
Verify that the system operates correctly under normal conditions.

## 2. Test Cases

### OQ-001: Data Import Functionality
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | System correctly imports CSV files |
| Test Data | validation/test_data/import_test.csv (MD5: abc123) |
| Procedure | Execute `read.csv("import_test.csv")` |
| Expected | Data frame with 100 rows, 5 columns |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |
| Evidence | Screenshot/log file reference |

### OQ-002: Statistical Calculations
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | t-test produces correct results |
| Test Data | Known dataset: x = c(2.1, 2.5, 2.3), y = c(3.1, 3.5, 3.3) |
| Procedure | Execute `t.test(x, y)` |
| Expected | t = -5.000, df = 4, p = 0.00753 |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |
| Tolerance | ±0.001 |

### OQ-003: Error Handling
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | System handles invalid input gracefully |
| Procedure | Execute `analysis_function(invalid_input)` |
| Expected | Informative error message, no crash |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |

Got: validation/oq/oq_protocol.md contains test cases for data import, statistical calculations, error handling. Each with specific test data, expected results (with tolerances where applicable), evidence requirements.

If err: Test data not yet available? Create synthetic test datasets with known properties. Document data generation method so results can be independently verified.

Step 3: Write Performance Qualification (PQ) Protocol

# Performance Qualification Protocol
**Document ID**: PQ-PROJ-001

## 1. Objective
Verify the system performs as intended with real-world data and workflows.

## 2. Test Cases

### PQ-001: End-to-End Primary Analysis
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | Primary endpoint analysis matches reference |
| Test Data | Blinded test dataset (hash: sha256:abc...) |
| Reference | Independent SAS calculation (report ref: SAS-001) |
| Procedure | Execute full analysis pipeline |
| Expected | Estimate within ±0.001 of reference |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |

### PQ-002: Report Generation
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | Generated report contains all required sections |
| Procedure | Execute report generation script |
| Checklist | |
| | [ ] Title page with study information |
| | [ ] Table of contents |
| | [ ] Demographic summary table |
| | [ ] Primary analysis results |
| | [ ] Appendix with session info |

Got: validation/pq/pq_protocol.md contains end-to-end test cases using real-world (or representative) data. Results compared against independent reference calculation (e.g., SAS output). Tolerances explicitly defined.

If err: Independent reference results not available? Document gap. Use dual-programming (two independent R implementations) as alternative verification method. Flag PQ as provisional until independent verification complete.

Step 4: Write Qualification Reports

After executing protocols, document results:

# Installation Qualification Report
**Document ID**: IQ-RPT-001
**Protocol Reference**: IQ-PROJ-001

## 1. Summary
All IQ test cases were executed on [date] by [name].

## 2. Results Summary
| Test ID | Description | Result |
|---------|-------------|--------|
| IQ-001 | R Installation | PASS |
| IQ-002 | Package Inventory | PASS |

## 3. Deviations
None observed.

## 4. Conclusion
The installation of R 4.5.0 and associated packages has been verified
and meets all specified requirements.

## 5. Approvals
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|------|------|-----------|------|
| Executor | | | |
| Reviewer | | | |
| Approver | | | |

Got: Qualification reports (IQ, OQ, PQ) complete with all test results filled in, deviations documented (or "None observed"), conclusions stated, approval signature fields ready for sign-off.

If err: Test failures occurred during execution? Document each failure as deviation with root cause analysis and resolution. Do not leave deviation sections blank when failures observed.

Step 5: Automate Where Possible

Create automated test scripts that generate evidence:

# validation/scripts/run_iq.R
sink("validation/iq/iq_evidence.txt")
cat("IQ Execution Date:", format(Sys.time()), "\n\n")

cat("IQ-001: R Version\n")
cat("Result:", R.version.string, "\n")
cat("Status:", ifelse(R.version$major == "4" && R.version$minor == "5.0",
                      "PASS", "FAIL"), "\n\n")

cat("IQ-002: Package Versions\n")
required <- renv::dependencies()
installed <- installed.packages()
# ... comparison logic
sink()

Got: Automated scripts in validation/scripts/ generate evidence files (e.g., iq_evidence.txt) with timestamped results for each test case. Reduces manual data entry, ensures reproducibility.

If err: Automated scripts fail due to environment differences? Run manually and capture output with sink(). Document any differences between automated and manual execution in qualification report.

Check

  • All protocols have unique document IDs
  • Protocols reference validation plan
  • Test cases have clear pass/fail criteria
  • Reports include all executed test results
  • Deviations documented with resolutions
  • Approval signatures obtained
  • Documents follow organization's SOP templates

Pitfalls

  • Vague acceptance criteria: "System works correctly" not testable. Specify exact expected values.
  • Missing evidence: Every test result needs supporting evidence (screenshots, logs, output files)
  • Incomplete deviation handling: All failures must be documented, investigated, resolved
  • No version control for documents: Validation docs need change control just like code
  • Skip re-qualification: System updates (R version, package updates) need re-qualification assessment

See Also

  • setup-gxp-r-project - project structure for validated environments
  • implement-audit-trail - electronic records tracking
  • validate-statistical-output - output validation methodology

Repositorio GitHub

pjt222/agent-almanac
Ruta: i18n/caveman/skills/write-validation-documentation
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Habilidades relacionadas

content-collections

Meta

Esta habilidad proporciona una configuración probada en producción para Content Collections, una herramienta centrada en TypeScript que transforma archivos Markdown/MDX en colecciones de datos con tipado seguro mediante validación Zod. Úsala al construir blogs, sitios de documentación o aplicaciones Vite + React con mucho contenido para garantizar seguridad de tipos y validación automática de contenido. Abarca todo, desde la configuración del plugin de Vite y compilación MDX hasta la optimización de despliegue y validación de esquemas.

Ver habilidad

polymarket

Meta

Esta habilidad permite a los desarrolladores crear aplicaciones con la plataforma de mercados de predicción Polymarket, incluyendo la integración de API para operaciones y datos de mercado. También proporciona transmisión de datos en tiempo real a través de WebSocket para monitorear operaciones en vivo y actividad del mercado. Úsela para implementar estrategias de trading o crear herramientas que procesen actualizaciones de mercado en tiempo real.

Ver habilidad

creating-opencode-plugins

Meta

Esta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a crear complementos de OpenCode que se conectan a más de 25 tipos de eventos, como comandos, archivos y operaciones LSP. Proporciona la estructura del complemento, las especificaciones de la API de eventos y los patrones de implementación para módulos en JavaScript/TypeScript. Úsala cuando necesites interceptar, monitorear o extender el ciclo de vida del asistente de IA de OpenCode con lógica personalizada basada en eventos.

Ver habilidad

sglang

Meta

SGLang es un framework de alto rendimiento para el servicio de LLM que se especializa en generación rápida y estructurada para JSON, expresiones regulares y flujos de trabajo de agentes utilizando su caché de prefijos RadixAttention. Ofrece una inferencia significativamente más rápida, especialmente para tareas con prefijos repetidos, lo que lo hace ideal para salidas complejas y estructuradas, y conversaciones multiturno. Elige SGLang sobre alternativas como vLLM cuando necesites decodificación restringida o estés construyendo aplicaciones con uso extensivo de prefijos compartidos.

Ver habilidad