create-agent
Acerca de
La habilidad `create-agent` genera nuevos archivos de definición de agentes que siguen la plantilla `agent-almanac` y los estándares del registro. Guía a los desarrolladores a través del diseño de la persona, la selección de herramientas/habilidades y la integración adecuada para agentes especializados o subagentes de Claude Code. Úsala cuando añadas un asistente específico de dominio con capacidades curadas a tu biblioteca.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/create-agentCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Create a New Agent
Define Claude Code subagent persona. Focused purpose, curated tools, assigned skills, complete docs. Follow agent template and registry rules.
When Use
- Adding new specialist agent to library for new domain
- Converting recurring workflow or prompt pattern into reusable agent persona
- Creating domain-specific assistant with curated skills and constrained tools
- Splitting too-broad agent into focused single-responsibility agents
- Designing new team member before composing multi-agent team
Inputs
- Required: Agent name (lowercase kebab-case, e.g.,
data-engineer) - Required: One-line description of agent's primary purpose
- Required: Purpose statement explaining problem agent solves
- Optional: Model choice (default:
sonnet; alternatives:opus,haiku) - Optional: Priority level (default:
normal; alternatives:high,low) - Optional: List of skills from
skills/_registry.ymlto assign - Optional: MCP servers agent needs (e.g.,
r-mcptools,hf-mcp-server)
Steps
Step 1: Design the Agent Persona
Pick clear, focused identity for agent:
- Name: lowercase kebab-case, describes role. Start with noun or domain qualifier:
security-analyst,r-developer,tour-planner. Dodge generic names likehelperorassistant. - Purpose: one paragraph explaining specific problem this agent solves. Ask: "What does this agent do that no existing agent covers?"
- Communication style: think domain. Technical agents precise, citation-heavy. Creative agents can explore more. Compliance agents formal, audit-oriented.
Before moving on, check for overlap with existing 53 agents:
grep -i "description:" agents/_registry.yml | grep -i "<your-domain-keywords>"
Got: No existing agent covers same niche. Existing agent partially overlaps? Consider extending it instead of creating new one.
If fail: Agent with big overlap exists? Either extend that agent's skills list or narrow your new agent's scope to complement, not duplicate.
Step 2: Select Tools
Pick minimal tools agent needs. Principle of least privilege:
| Tool Set | When to Use | Example Agents |
|---|---|---|
[Read, Grep, Glob] | Read-only analysis, review, auditing | code-reviewer, security-analyst, auditor |
[Read, Grep, Glob, WebFetch] | Analysis plus external lookups | senior-researcher |
[Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob] | Full development — creating/modifying code | r-developer, web-developer, devops-engineer |
[Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, WebFetch, WebSearch] | Development plus external research | polymath, shapeshifter |
Do not include Bash for agents only analyzing code. Do not include WebFetch or WebSearch unless agent truly needs external lookups.
Got: Tool list has only tools agent will actually use in primary workflows.
If fail: Check agent's capabilities list — capability does not need tool? Remove tool.
Step 3: Choose Model
Pick model based on task complexity:
sonnet(default): Most agents. Good balance of reasoning and speed. Use for development, review, analysis, standard workflows.opus: Complex reasoning, multi-step planning, nuanced judgment. Use for senior-level agents, architectural decisions, tasks needing deep domain expertise.haiku: Simple, fast responses. Use for agents doing lookups, formatting, template-filling.
Got: Model matches cognitive demands of agent's primary use cases.
If fail: In doubt? Use sonnet. Upgrade to opus only if testing shows weak reasoning.
Step 4: Assign Skills
Browse skills registry. Pick skills fitting agent's domain:
# List all skills in a domain
grep -A3 "domain-name:" skills/_registry.yml
# Search for skills by keyword
grep -i "keyword" skills/_registry.yml
Build skills list for frontmatter:
skills:
- skill-id-one
- skill-id-two
- skill-id-three
Important: All agents auto-inherit default skills (meditate, heal) from registry-level default_skills field. Do NOT list these in agent's frontmatter unless core to agent's methodology (e.g., mystic agent lists meditate because meditation facilitation is primary purpose).
Got: Skills list has 3-15 skill IDs existing in skills/_registry.yml.
If fail: Verify each skill ID exists: grep "id: skill-name" skills/_registry.yml. Drop any that do not match.
Step 5: Write the Agent File
Copy template. Fill in frontmatter:
cp agents/_template.md agents/<agent-name>.md
Fill in YAML frontmatter:
---
name: agent-name
description: One to two sentences describing primary capability and domain
tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob]
model: sonnet
version: "1.0.0"
author: Philipp Thoss
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
tags: [domain, specialty, relevant-keywords]
priority: normal
max_context_tokens: 200000
skills:
- assigned-skill-one
- assigned-skill-two
# Note: All agents inherit default skills (meditate, heal) from the registry.
# Only list them here if they are core to this agent's methodology.
# mcp_servers: [] # Uncomment and populate if MCP servers are needed
---
Got: YAML frontmatter parses without errors. All required fields (name, description, tools, model, version, author) present.
If fail: Validate YAML syntax. Common issues: missing quotes around version strings, wrong indentation, unclosed brackets in tool lists.
Step 6: Write Purpose and Capabilities
Replace template placeholder sections:
Purpose: One paragraph explaining specific problem this agent solves and value it gives. Be concrete — name domain, workflow, outcome.
Capabilities: Bulleted list with bold lead-ins. Group by category if agent has many:
## Capabilities
- **Primary Capability**: What the agent does best
- **Secondary Capability**: Additional functionality
- **Tool Integration**: How it leverages its tools
Available Skills: List each assigned skill with brief description. Use bare skill IDs (slash-command names):
## Available Skills
- `skill-id` - Brief description of what the skill does
Got: Purpose is specific (not "helps with development"), capabilities are concrete and verifiable, skills list matches frontmatter.
If fail: Purpose feels vague? Answer: "What specific task would user ask this agent to do?" Use that as purpose.
Step 7: Write Usage Scenarios and Examples
Give 2-3 usage scenarios showing how to spawn agent:
### Scenario 1: Primary Use Case
Brief description of the main scenario.
> "Use the agent-name agent to [specific task]."
### Scenario 2: Alternative Use Case
Description of another common use case.
> "Spawn the agent-name to [different task]."
Add 1-2 concrete examples showing user request and expected agent behavior:
### Example 1: Basic Usage
**User**: [Specific request]
**Agent**: [Expected response pattern and actions taken]
Got: Scenarios are realistic, examples show real value, invocation patterns match Claude Code conventions.
If fail: Test examples in head — would agent actually fulfill request with its assigned tools and skills?
Step 8: Write Limitations and See Also
Limitations: 3-5 honest constraints. What agent cannot do, should not be used for, or where results poor:
## Limitations
- Cannot execute code in language X (no runtime available)
- Not suitable for tasks requiring Y — use Z agent instead
- Requires MCP server ABC to be running for full functionality
See Also: Cross-reference complementary agents, relevant guides, related teams:
## See Also
- [complementary-agent](complementary-agent.md) - handles the X side of this workflow
- [relevant-guide](../guides/guide-name.md) - background knowledge for this domain
- [relevant-team](../teams/team-name.md) - team that includes this agent
Got: Limitations honest and specific. See Also references existing files.
If fail: Check referenced files exist: ls agents/complementary-agent.md.
Step 9: Add to Registry
Edit agents/_registry.yml. Add new agent entry in alphabetical position:
- id: agent-name
path: agents/agent-name.md
description: Same one-line description from frontmatter
tags: [domain, specialty]
priority: normal
tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob]
skills:
- skill-id-one
- skill-id-two
Bump total_agents count at top of file.
Got: Registry entry matches agent file frontmatter. total_agents equals actual number of agent entries.
If fail: Count entries with grep -c "^ - id:" agents/_registry.yml. Verify matches total_agents.
Step 10: Verify Discovery
Claude Code discovers agents from .claude/agents/ directory. In this repo, that dir is symlink to agents/:
# Verify the symlink exists and resolves
ls -la .claude/agents/
readlink -f .claude/agents/<agent-name>.md
If .claude/agents/ symlink intact, no extra action needed — new agent file auto-discoverable.
Run README automation to update agents README:
npm run update-readmes
Got: .claude/agents/<agent-name>.md resolves to new agent file. agents/README.md includes new agent.
If fail: Symlink broken? Recreate: ln -sf ../agents .claude/agents. npm run update-readmes fails? Check scripts/generate-readmes.js exists and js-yaml installed.
Step 11: Scaffold Translations
Required for all agents. This step applies to both human authors and AI agents following this procedure. Do not skip — missing translations pile into stale backlog.
Scaffold translation files for all 4 supported locales right after committing new agent:
for locale in de zh-CN ja es; do
npm run translate:scaffold -- agents <agent-name> "$locale"
done
Then translate scaffolded prose in each file (code blocks and IDs stay English). Finally regenerate status files:
npm run translation:status
Got: 4 files created at i18n/{de,zh-CN,ja,es}/agents/<agent-name>.md, all with source_commit matching current HEAD. npm run validate:translations shows 0 stale warnings for new agent.
If fail: Scaffold fails? Verify agent exists in agents/_registry.yml. Status files don't update? Run npm run translation:status explicitly — CI does not trigger it automatically.
Checks
- Agent file exists at
agents/<agent-name>.md - YAML frontmatter parses without errors
- All required fields present:
name,description,tools,model,version,author -
namefield matches filename (no.md) - All sections present: Purpose, Capabilities, Available Skills, Usage Scenarios, Examples, Limitations, See Also
- Skills in frontmatter exist in
skills/_registry.yml - Default skills (
meditate,heal) NOT listed unless core to agent methodology - Tools list follows least-privilege
- Agent listed in
agents/_registry.ymlwith correct path and matching metadata -
total_agentscount in registry updated -
.claude/agents/symlink resolves to new agent file - No big overlap with existing agents
Pitfalls
- Tool over-provisioning: Giving
Bash,Write, orWebFetchwhen agent only needs to read and analyze. Breaks least-privilege, can cause unintended side effects. Start minimal, add tools only when capability needs them. - Missing or wrong skill assignments: Listing skill IDs not in registry, or forgetting skills entirely. Always verify each skill ID with
grep "id: skill-name" skills/_registry.ymlbefore adding. - Listing default skills unnecessarily: Adding
meditateorhealto frontmatter when already inherited from registry. Only list if core to agent's methodology (e.g.,mystic,alchemist,gardener,shaman). - Scope overlap with existing agents: Making new agent duplicating existing 53 agents. Search registry first. Consider extending existing agent's skills instead.
- Vague purpose and capabilities: Writing "helps with development" instead of "scaffolds R packages with complete structure, documentation, CI/CD config." Specificity makes agent useful and discoverable.
See Also
create-skill- parallel procedure for creating SKILL.md files instead of agent filescreate-team- compose many agents into coordinated team (planned)commit-changes- commit new agent file and registry update
Repositorio GitHub
Habilidades relacionadas
content-collections
MetaEsta habilidad proporciona una configuración probada en producción para Content Collections, una herramienta centrada en TypeScript que transforma archivos Markdown/MDX en colecciones de datos con tipado seguro mediante validación Zod. Úsala al construir blogs, sitios de documentación o aplicaciones Vite + React con mucho contenido para garantizar seguridad de tipos y validación automática de contenido. Abarca todo, desde la configuración del plugin de Vite y compilación MDX hasta la optimización de despliegue y validación de esquemas.
polymarket
MetaEsta habilidad permite a los desarrolladores crear aplicaciones con la plataforma de mercados de predicción Polymarket, incluyendo la integración de API para operaciones y datos de mercado. También proporciona transmisión de datos en tiempo real a través de WebSocket para monitorear operaciones en vivo y actividad del mercado. Úsela para implementar estrategias de trading o crear herramientas que procesen actualizaciones de mercado en tiempo real.
creating-opencode-plugins
MetaEsta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a crear complementos de OpenCode que se conectan a más de 25 tipos de eventos, como comandos, archivos y operaciones LSP. Proporciona la estructura del complemento, las especificaciones de la API de eventos y los patrones de implementación para módulos en JavaScript/TypeScript. Úsala cuando necesites interceptar, monitorear o extender el ciclo de vida del asistente de IA de OpenCode con lógica personalizada basada en eventos.
sglang
MetaSGLang es un framework de alto rendimiento para el servicio de LLM que se especializa en generación rápida y estructurada para JSON, expresiones regulares y flujos de trabajo de agentes utilizando su caché de prefijos RadixAttention. Ofrece una inferencia significativamente más rápida, especialmente para tareas con prefijos repetidos, lo que lo hace ideal para salidas complejas y estructuradas, y conversaciones multiturno. Elige SGLang sobre alternativas como vLLM cuando necesites decodificación restringida o estés construyendo aplicaciones con uso extensivo de prefijos compartidos.
