decommission-validated-system
Acerca de
Esta habilidad proporciona un proceso estructurado para la descomisionamiento de un sistema informatizado validado en un entorno regulado. Maneja tareas críticas de cumplimiento como la evaluación de retención de datos, validación de migración, archivado y notificación a las partes interesadas. Úsela al reemplazar o retirar un sistema debido al fin de vida útil, soporte discontinuado, consolidación o cambios regulatorios.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/decommission-validated-systemCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Decommission Validated System
Plan and execute controlled retirement of validated computerized system. Preserve data integrity and meet regulatory retention requirements.
When Use
- Validated system being replaced by new system
- System reaching end-of-life with no replacement (business process eliminated)
- Vendor discontinues support for validated product
- Consolidation of many systems into single platform
- Regulatory or business changes make system obsolete
Inputs
- Required: System to be decommissioned (name, version, validation status)
- Required: Data retention requirements by regulation (21 CFR Part 11, GLP, GCP)
- Required: Replacement system (if applicable) and migration scope
- Optional: Current validation documentation package
- Optional: Data volume and format inventory
- Optional: Business owner and stakeholder list
Steps
Step 1: Assess Data Retention Requirements
Determine how long data must be retained and in what form:
# Data Retention Assessment
## Document ID: DRA-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Regulatory Retention Requirements
| Regulation | Data Type | Retention Period | Format Requirements |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------|
| 21 CFR 211 (GMP) | Batch records, test results | 1 year past product expiry or 3 years after distribution | Readable, retrievable |
| 21 CFR 58 (GLP) | Study data and records | Duration of study + retention agreement | Original or certified copy |
| ICH E6 (GCP) | Clinical trial records | 2 years after last marketing approval or formal discontinuation | Accessible for inspection |
| 21 CFR Part 11 | Electronic records | Per predicate rule | Original format or validated migration |
| EU Annex 11 | Computerized system records | Per applicable GxP | Readable and available |
| Tax/financial | Financial records | 7-10 years (jurisdiction-dependent) | Readable |
### System Data Inventory
| Data Category | Volume | Format | Retention Required Until | Disposition |
|---------------|--------|--------|------------------------|-------------|
| [e.g., Batch records] | [e.g., 50,000 records] | [e.g., Database + PDF reports] | [Date] | Migrate / Archive / Destroy |
| [e.g., Audit trail] | [e.g., 2M entries] | [e.g., Database] | [Same as parent records] | Archive |
| [e.g., User data] | [e.g., 200 profiles] | [e.g., LDAP/Database] | [Employment + 2 years] | Anonymise and archive |
Got: Every data category has defined retention period, format requirement, planned disposition. If fail: Retention requirements unclear? Consult regulatory affairs and legal. Default to longest applicable retention period.
Step 2: Plan Data Migration (If Applicable)
If data migrating to replacement system:
# Data Migration Plan
## Document ID: DMP-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Migration Scope
| Source | Target | Data Category | Records | Migration Method |
|--------|--------|---------------|---------|-----------------|
| [Old system] | [New system] | [Category] | [Count] | ETL / Manual / API |
### Data Mapping
| Source Field | Source Format | Target Field | Target Format | Transformation |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|---------------|---------------|
| [e.g., test_result] | FLOAT(8,2) | [e.g., result_value] | DECIMAL(10,3) | Precision conversion |
| [e.g., operator_id] | VARCHAR(20) | [e.g., user_id] | UUID | Lookup table mapping |
### Validation Approach
| Check | Method | Acceptance Criteria |
|-------|--------|-------------------|
| Record count reconciliation | Source count vs target count | 100% match |
| Field-level comparison | Sample 5% of records, all fields | 100% match after transformation |
| Checksum verification | Hash source vs target for key fields | Checksums match |
| Business rule validation | Verify key calculations in target | Results match source |
| Audit trail continuity | Verify historical audit trail migrated | All entries present with original timestamps |
Got: Migration plan has mapping, transformation rules, validation checks proving data integrity maintained. If fail: Migration validation fails? Do not proceed to decommission. Fix migration issues and re-validate.
Step 3: Define Archival Strategy
For data that will be archived rather than migrated:
# Archival Strategy
### Archive Format
| Consideration | Decision | Rationale |
|--------------|----------|-----------|
| Format | [PDF/A, CSV, XML, database backup] | [Why this format survives the retention period] |
| Medium | [Network storage, cloud archive, tape, optical] | [Durability and accessibility] |
| Encryption | [Yes/No — method if yes] | [Security vs long-term accessibility trade-off] |
| Integrity verification | [SHA-256 checksums, periodic verification schedule] | [Prove archive is uncorrupted] |
### Archive Verification
- [ ] Archived data is readable without the source system
- [ ] All required data categories are included in the archive
- [ ] Checksums recorded at time of archival
- [ ] Archive can be searched and retrieved within [defined SLA, e.g., 5 business days]
- [ ] Periodic integrity checks scheduled (annually)
### Archive Access
| Role | Access Level | Authorisation |
|------|-------------|--------------|
| QA Director | Read access to all archived data | Standing authorisation |
| Regulatory Affairs | Read access for inspection support | Standing authorisation |
| System Owner (former) | Read access for business queries | Request-based |
| External auditors | Read access, supervised | Per audit plan |
Got: Archived data readable, searchable, verifiable without original system. If fail: Data cannot be read independently of source system? Archive not compliant. Consider exporting to open, standard format (PDF/A, CSV) before decommission.
Step 4: Execute Decommissioning
# Decommission Checklist
## Document ID: DC-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Pre-Decommission
- [ ] All stakeholders notified of decommission date and data disposition
- [ ] Data migration completed and validated (if applicable)
- [ ] Data archive created and verified (if applicable)
- [ ] Final backup of complete system taken and stored separately
- [ ] All open change requests resolved or transferred
- [ ] All open CAPAs resolved or transferred to successor system
- [ ] All active users informed and redirected to replacement system (if applicable)
### Decommission Execution
- [ ] User access revoked for all accounts
- [ ] System removed from production environment
- [ ] Network connections disconnected
- [ ] Licenses returned or terminated
- [ ] System entry removed from active system inventory
- [ ] System moved to "Decommissioned" status in compliance architecture
### Post-Decommission
- [ ] Validation documentation archived (URS, VP, IQ/OQ/PQ, TM, VSR)
- [ ] SOPs retired or updated to remove references to decommissioned system
- [ ] Training records archived
- [ ] Change control records archived
- [ ] Audit trail archived
- [ ] Decommission report completed and approved
### Decommission Report
| Section | Content |
|---------|---------|
| System description | Name, version, purpose, GxP classification |
| Decommission rationale | Why the system is being retired |
| Data disposition summary | What data went where (migrated, archived, destroyed) |
| Validation evidence | Migration validation results, archive verification |
| Residual risk | Any ongoing data retention obligations |
| Approval | System owner, QA, IT signatures |
Got: Decommissioning controlled, documented, approved — not just "turn it off." If fail: Any checklist item cannot be completed? Document exception and get QA approval before proceeding.
Checks
- Data retention requirements assessed for all data categories
- Data migration validated with record counts, sampling, checksums (if applicable)
- Archive created in format readable without source system
- Archive integrity verified with checksums
- All user access revoked
- Validation documentation archived with defined retention period
- SOPs updated to remove references to decommissioned system
- Decommission report approved by system owner, QA, IT
Pitfalls
- Premature decommission: Turning off system before data migration validated → permanent data loss risk. Complete all validation before pulling plug.
- Unreadable archives: Storing data in proprietary format needing original system to read defeats purpose of archival. Use open formats.
- Forgotten audit trails: Archiving data but not audit trail → data provenance cannot be shown. Always archive audit trails with their parent records.
- Orphaned SOPs: SOPs still referencing decommissioned system confuse users and make compliance gaps. Update or retire all affected SOPs.
- No periodic archive verification: Archives degrade. Without periodic integrity checks, data loss may go undetected until data is needed for inspection.
See Also
design-compliance-architecture— update system inventory and compliance architecture after decommissionmanage-change-control— decommissioning is major change requiring change controlwrite-validation-documentation— migration validation follows same IQ/OQ methodologywrite-standard-operating-procedure— retire or update SOPs referencing decommissioned systemprepare-inspection-readiness— archived data must stay accessible for regulatory inspections
Repositorio GitHub
Habilidades relacionadas
evaluating-llms-harness
PruebasEsta Skill de Claude ejecuta el benchmark lm-evaluation-harness para evaluar modelos de lenguaje en más de 60 tareas académicas estandarizadas como MMLU y GSM8K. Está diseñada para que los desarrolladores comparen la calidad de los modelos, realicen seguimiento del progreso del entrenamiento o reporten resultados académicos. La herramienta admite varios backends, incluidos modelos de HuggingFace y vLLM.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
PruebasEsta habilidad proporciona conocimiento integral para implementar Cron Triggers de Cloudflare y programar Workers mediante expresiones cron. Cubre la configuración de tareas periódicas, trabajos de mantenimiento y flujos de trabajo automatizados, manejando problemas comunes como expresiones cron inválidas y inconvenientes de zonas horarias. Los desarrolladores pueden utilizarla para configurar manejadores programados, probar activadores cron e integrar con Workflows y Green Compute.
webapp-testing
PruebasEsta habilidad de Claude proporciona un kit de herramientas basado en Playwright para probar aplicaciones web locales mediante scripts de Python. Permite verificación de frontend, depuración de interfaz de usuario, captura de pantallas y visualización de registros, mientras gestiona los ciclos de vida del servidor. Úsela para tareas de automatización de navegadores, pero ejecute los scripts directamente en lugar de leer su código fuente para evitar contaminación del contexto.
finishing-a-development-branch
PruebasEsta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a completar el trabajo terminado verificando que las pruebas pasen y luego presentando opciones estructuradas de integración. Guía el flujo de trabajo para fusionar, crear PRs o limpiar ramas después de que se completa la implementación. Úsala cuando tu código esté listo y probado para finalizar sistemáticamente el proceso de desarrollo.
