MCP HubMCP Hub
Volver a habilidades

monitor-binary-version-baselines

pjt222
Actualizado 2 days ago
7 vistas
17
2
17
Ver en GitHub
Desarrolloaiapi

Acerca de

Esta habilidad rastrea cambios en binarios CLI entre versiones mediante la detección de marcadores categorizados como APIs y banderas, utilizando puntuación ponderada para establecer líneas base. Ayuda a desarrolladores a monitorear ciclos de vida de funciones, descubrir capacidades ocultas y validar herramientas de escaneo contra binarios históricos. Úsela para análisis longitudinal de la evolución del contenido binario entre versiones.

Instalación rápida

Claude Code

Recomendado
Principal
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Comando PluginAlternativo
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativo
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/monitor-binary-version-baselines

Copia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad

Documentación

Monitor Binary Version Baselines

Build + maintain comparable, version-keyed records of feature-system markers in CLI harness binary → additions/removals/dark-launched detected mechanically across releases.

Use When

  • Track feature lifecycle across releases of closed-source CLI harness
  • Probe dark-launched (shipped but gated off) or quietly-removed
  • Verify scanner still detects known-good markers on old binaries (regression-test scanner)
  • Phase 1 substrate consumed by later phases (flag discovery, dark-launch detection, wire capture)
  • Ad-hoc grep answers "X present today" but you need "how has system X+Y+Z moved across versions"

In

  • Required: ≥1 installed binary versions of same CLI harness (or extracted bundles)
  • Required: Working catalog file for marker defs (created on first run, extended)
  • Optional: Prior baseline file (extended in place, never rewritten)
  • Optional: List of never-published versions (skipped, withdrawn)
  • Optional: List of feature-systems already tracked, to extend not re-discover

Do

Step 1: Markers by Category

Pick stable semantically meaningful identifiers — not minified names bundler will rename next release.

Six categories:

  • API — endpoint paths, method names exposed in network surface
  • Identity — internal product names, codenames, version sentinels
  • Config — recognized keys in user-facing config files
  • Telemetry — event names emitted to analytics pipeline
  • Flag — feature-gate keys consumed by gate predicates
  • Function — well-known string constants in handlers (err msgs, log labels)

Avoid: short minified-looking (_a1, bX, two-letter+digits), inline literals that change w/ text revision, anything matching bundler's internal naming.

→ Each candidate has category tag + short justification ("appears in user-facing docs," "stable across N prior releases"). Typical first pass: 20-50 markers per system.

If err: markers vanish across consecutive minor versions → catalog captured rebuild-volatile not stable. Drop entries, broaden to longer semantically anchored substrings.

Step 2: Group by Feature-System

Bundle markers per system table for independently-evolving capability. "System" = coherent marker set whose presence/absence moves together (shared lifecycle).

Why: per-system scoring prevents cross-contamination. Absence of one system's markers must not suppress detection of another. Aggregate counts across unrelated systems = uninformative.

Working catalog shape (pseudocode):

catalog:
  acme_widget_v3:
    markers:
      - { id: "acme_widget_v3_init",         category: function, weight: 10 }
      - { id: "acme.widget.v3.dialog.open",  category: telemetry, weight: 5 }
      - { id: "ACME_WIDGET_V3_DISABLE",      category: flag,     weight: 10 }
  acme_other_system:
    markers:
      - ...

→ Each system has own marker list; no marker in two systems. New system = new top-level entry, never move retroactively.

If err: hard to assign (overlap, ambiguity) → defs too coarse. Split system or accept "shared substrate", exclude from per-system scoring.

Step 3: Weight by Signal Strength

Per marker:

  • 10 = diagnostic-alone — unique enough alone confirms (long, system-specific, no other code path emits)
  • 3-5 = corroborating only — too generic alone, contributes to aggregate (short telemetry suffix reused)

Convention not specific numbers. Spread "diagnostic" vs. "corroborating" matters more than exact integers. Thresholds Step 5 must distinguish "one strong signal" from "many weak signals."

→ Each marker weighted. Distribution skews toward corroborating (3-5), small number diagnostic-alone (10) per system.

If err: every marker = 10 → scoring loses resolution, partial-presence impossible. Demote markers recurring across systems or in unrelated handlers.

Step 4: Per-Version Baselines

Per scanned version, record both present + absent keyed by version. Both = evidence: absent in N is informative when N+1 reintroduces.

Shape:

baselines:
  "1.4.0":
    acme_widget_v3:
      present: ["acme_widget_v3_init", "ACME_WIDGET_V3_DISABLE"]
      absent:  ["acme.widget.v3.dialog.open"]
      score:   20
  "1.5.0":
    acme_widget_v3:
      present: ["acme_widget_v3_init", "ACME_WIDGET_V3_DISABLE", "acme.widget.v3.dialog.open"]
      absent:  []
      score:   25
  "1.4.1":
    _annotation: "never-published; skipped from upstream release timeline"

Never-published get explicit annotation, not silent omission. Silent skips look like data loss to next reader.

→ Every version has one record per tracked system: present, absent, score populated, or explicit _annotation if never-published.

If err: scan yields zero markers for previously-present system → don't assume removal until you confirm binary path correct, strings cmd produced output, marker IDs match catalog exactly. False zeroes corrupt longitudinal record.

Step 5: Thresholds for Full + Partial Detection

Two gates per system on aggregate score:

  • full — score above which system = present-and-active in this version
  • partial — score above which system = shipped-but-incomplete (some markers, below full)

Below partial = absent (or not-yet-present, depending on direction).

thresholds:
  acme_widget_v3:
    full:    25
    partial: 10

Choose: full = sum of weights healthy install would emit; partial = one diagnostic + corroborating signal. Re-tune w/ several versions evidence.

→ Each scan: per-system finding full | partial | absent. partial warrants investigation — dark-launch + removal candidates.

If err: every system reports partial across every version → thresholds too sensitive (set higher than markers can sum). Recalibrate vs. known-good version where system verifiably live.

Step 6: Scan w/ strings -n 8

strings w/ min length filter as extraction primitive. -n 8 floor filters most noise (short fragments, padding, address-table junk) w/o losing meaningful identifiers (almost always >8 chars).

strings -n 8 path/to/binary > /tmp/binary-strings.txt

Then catalog match vs. /tmp/binary-strings.txt (any line-oriented matcher: grep -F -f markers.txt, ripgrep, small script).

Caveats:

  • Lower (-n 4, -n 6) → flood w/ binary garbage + minified-symbol noise; diagnostic/corroborating collapses
  • Higher (-n 12+) → miss short flag identifiers + config keys
  • Some bundlers compress/encode → near-empty output → may need bundle-extraction first (out of scope)

→ Line-per-string out 1k-100k lines depending on binary size. Manual inspection reveals recognizable identifiers in first 100 lines.

If err: empty/unrecognizable → binary likely packed, encrypted, or bytecode format strings can't read. Stop, resolve at extraction layer. Don't record baseline from unreadable scan.

Step 7: Extend Forward, Don't Rewrite Past Records

New system or marker added to catalog → only forward versions scanned. Past records remain as originally written.

Why: prior baselines = empirical evidence of what was scanned at the time, not current model of what past version contained. Retroactive rewriting conflates "what we know now" w/ "what we observed then." Both useful, only one in baseline file.

Retroactive scan genuinely needed (test if new marker was in N-3) → record as separate addendum:

addenda:
  "1.4.0":
    scan_date: "2026-04-15"
    catalog_revision: "v7"
    findings:
      acme_new_system:
        present: ["..."]

Original baselines["1.4.0"] untouched. Reader sees both original + later retroactive, w/ respective catalog revisions.

→ Baseline grows monotonically forward; past records append-only w/ optional addenda. Catalog revisions versioned so each scan tied back to catalog state used.

If err: urge to edit past version's present list directly → stop. Add addendum. Mutating past records loses ability to detect scanner regressions (later scanner-validation relies on historical record being immutable).

Check

  • Catalog has explicit category tags every marker (API/identity/config/telemetry/flag/function)
  • Every marker assigned to exactly one system; no duplicates
  • Weights span real range (some 10s, some 3-5); not all identical
  • Each scanned version: present + absent + score per tracked system
  • Never-published explicitly annotated, not silent omission
  • Each system: full + partial thresholds; findings labeled
  • strings -n 8 extraction primitive (or documented equivalent for non-text binaries)
  • Past version records unchanged by latest scan; new findings in addenda if retroactive

Traps

  • Recording specific findings as catalog: Catalog should describe marker categories + shapes, not enumerate version-pinned literals. Finding-shaped entries decay fast + highest leak risk if published.
  • Capturing minified identifiers: _p3a, q9X rename every rebuild. Match today = noise tomorrow. Stay w/ semantically meaningful.
  • Conflating telemetry vs. flags: Share naming conventions in many harnesses but different roles. Tag by category (Step 1) so per-category analysis stays clean.
  • Silent skip never-published: Gap w/ no annotation looks like missed scan. Annotate: _annotation: "never-published".
  • Thresholds before baseline data: First scan establishes empirical weight totals; tune vs. that, not in advance.
  • Rewriting prior records when catalog grows: Past records = evidence; addenda = supported pattern for retroactive.
  • Trust empty scan output: Zero found ≠ "absent." Confirm binary readable + catalog IDs match exactly before declaring removal.
  • strings -n 4 more thorough than -n 8: Lower mins add noise faster than signal. Diagnostic markers essentially always 8+ chars.

  • security-audit-codebase — shared discipline; both treat marker presence as finding, different downstream consumers
  • audit-dependency-versions — extends same version-tracking rigor to external dep manifests; this applies to binary artifacts
  • probe-feature-flag-state — Phase 2-3 follow-up; consumes baselines to classify flag rollout state (live/opt-in/dark/removed)
  • conduct-empirical-wire-capture — Phase 4 follow-up; validates inferred behavior vs. actual harness traffic
  • redact-for-public-disclosure — Phase 5 follow-up; governs which findings can leave private workspace

Repositorio GitHub

pjt222/agent-almanac
Ruta: i18n/caveman-ultra/skills/monitor-binary-version-baselines
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Habilidades relacionadas

qmd

Desarrollo

qmd es una herramienta CLI de búsqueda e indexación local que permite a los desarrolladores indexar y buscar en archivos locales mediante búsqueda híbrida que combina BM25, embeddings vectoriales y reranking. Es compatible tanto con uso desde la línea de comandos como con modo MCP (Model Context Protocol) para integración con Claude. La herramienta utiliza Ollama para los embeddings y almacena los índices localmente, lo que la hace ideal para buscar documentación o bases de código directamente desde la terminal.

Ver habilidad

subagent-driven-development

Desarrollo

Esta habilidad ejecuta planes de implementación asignando un nuevo subagente para cada tarea independiente, con revisión de código entre tareas. Permite una iteración rápida mientras mantiene controles de calidad a través de este proceso de revisión. Úsala cuando trabajes en tareas mayormente independientes dentro de la misma sesión para garantizar un progreso continuo con verificaciones de calidad integradas.

Ver habilidad

mcporter

Desarrollo

La habilidad mcporter permite a los desarrolladores gestionar y llamar servidores del Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) directamente desde Claude. Proporciona comandos para listar servidores disponibles, llamar a sus herramientas con argumentos, y manejar la autenticación y el ciclo de vida del daemon. Utiliza esta habilidad para integrar y probar la funcionalidad de servidores MCP en tu flujo de trabajo de desarrollo.

Ver habilidad

adk-deployment-specialist

Desarrollo

Esta habilidad despliega y orquesta agentes Vertex AI ADK utilizando el protocolo A2A, gestionando el descubrimiento de AgentCard, el envío de tareas y soportando herramientas como el Sandbox de Ejecución de Código y el Banco de Memoria. Permite construir sistemas multiagente con patrones de orquestación secuencial, paralela o en bucle en Python, Java o Go. Úsela cuando se le solicite desplegar agentes ADK u orquestar flujos de trabajo de agentes en Google Cloud.

Ver habilidad