run-ab-test-models
Acerca de
Esta habilidad permite realizar pruebas A/B para modelos de ML en producción mediante división de tráfico y pruebas de significancia estadística. Soporta implementaciones canario y en sombra para comparar versiones de modelos y medir el impacto empresarial. Úsela para validar nuevos modelos antes de un despliegue completo o para tomar decisiones de implementación basadas en datos.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/run-ab-test-modelsCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Run A/B Test for Models
See Extended Examples for complete configuration files and templates.
Run controlled experiments comparing model versions with traffic split + statistical analysis.
When Use
- Deploy new model version, want validate before full rollout
- Compare multiple candidate models (different algorithms, features)
- Test impact of hyperparameter changes on business metrics
- Measure model performance in prod without risk full traffic
- Regulatory needs gradual rollout (medical ML)
- Judge cost-performance tradeoffs between model sizes
Inputs
- Required: Champion model (current prod)
- Required: Challenger model(s) (new version to test)
- Required: Traffic allocation % (e.g., 5% to challenger)
- Required: Success metrics (business + ML)
- Required: Min sample size or test duration
- Optional: Guardrail metrics (latency, error rate thresholds)
- Optional: User segments for stratified testing
Steps
Step 1: Design Experiment
Define test parameters, success criteria, statistical needs.
# ab_test/experiment_config.py
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List, Dict
import numpy as np
from scipy.stats import norm
@dataclass
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Experiment config with stat-sound sample size calc, typical 5-10k samples per variant for 5-10% MDE.
If fail: Sample too large? Up traffic allocation, extend duration, or accept larger MDE; verify baseline metric estimate; consider sequential testing.
Step 2: Implement Traffic Splitting
Set up routing — randomly assign requests to models.
# ab_test/traffic_router.py
import hashlib
import random
from typing import Dict, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Consistent user-to-variant assignment, accurate traffic split matches configured %, all assignments logged.
If fail: Verify hash uniform (test 10k user IDs), check user_id stable across requests (not session_id), logs capture all predictions, validate split in first 1000 requests.
Step 3: Implement Shadow Deployment (Optional)
Run challenger in parallel without affecting users (shadow mode).
# ab_test/shadow_deployment.py
import asyncio
from typing import Dict, Any
import logging
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
import time
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Champion served at normal latency, challenger logged async without blocking, prediction diffs captured.
If fail: Set challenger timeout < champion SLA, handle challenger errors gracefully, monitor memory (two models loaded), consider sampling (log 10% of shadow predictions).
Step 4: Collect and Analyze Metrics
Gather data, run statistical tests.
# ab_test/analysis.py
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
from typing import Dict, Tuple
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Stat test results with p-values, CIs, clear decision (rollout/keep/inconclusive), typical after 7-14 days or sample size.
If fail: Verify ground truth labels available (delayed analysis maybe), check sample ratio mismatch (SRM = assignment bugs), enough sample size, look for novelty/primacy effects in early data, consider sequential testing if fixed-horizon too slow.
Step 5: Monitor Guardrail Metrics
Continuous check challenger does not violate safety thresholds.
# ab_test/guardrails.py
import pandas as pd
import logging
from typing import Dict, List
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Guardrail violations detected within 5-15 min, auto stop if critical thresholds breached (latency, errors), alerts to team.
If fail: Verify thresholds realistic (not too tight), monitoring loop runs continuous, check stop_experiment() updates routing, test alert delivery.
Step 6: Make Rollout Decision
From results, decide rollout challenger.
# ab_test/rollout_decision.py
import logging
from typing import Dict
from dataclasses import dataclass
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete implementation)
Got: Clear decision (full/gradual rollout, keep champion, extend test) with justification + action items.
If fail: Decision unclear? Subgroup analysis (segment, time, device), check interaction effects, review business context (2% lift worth eng cost?), consult stakeholders.
Checks
- Traffic split matches configured % (within 1%)
- Same user always to same variant
- Sample size calc reasonable (5-50k per variant)
- Stat tests produce p-values consistent with manual calc
- Guardrail violations trigger alerts within 5 min
- Shadow deployment shows <5% prediction divergence
- Reports include CIs
- Rollout decision documented
Pitfalls
- Sample ratio mismatch (SRM): Observed split differs from configured (95/5 becomes 92/8) = assignment bug; check hash uniformity
- Peeking: Check results before sample size inflates Type I error; use sequential testing or wait for pre-set end date
- Novelty effect: Users respond different to new model at first; run 2+ weeks for steady state
- Carryover effects: Prev variant exposure affects current; use new users or washout
- Multiple testing: Many metrics = false positive risk; correct with Bonferroni or single primary metric
- Insufficient power: Small allocation = months to detect; balance power with risk
- Ignore segments: Aggregate lift hides negative on important segments; subgroup analysis
- Attribution errors: Outcome metrics attributed to predictions (not other system changes)
See Also
deploy-ml-model-serving- Model deployment infra, versioningmonitor-model-drift- Post-rollout monitoring
Repositorio GitHub
Habilidades relacionadas
evaluating-llms-harness
PruebasEsta Skill de Claude ejecuta el benchmark lm-evaluation-harness para evaluar modelos de lenguaje en más de 60 tareas académicas estandarizadas como MMLU y GSM8K. Está diseñada para que los desarrolladores comparen la calidad de los modelos, realicen seguimiento del progreso del entrenamiento o reporten resultados académicos. La herramienta admite varios backends, incluidos modelos de HuggingFace y vLLM.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
PruebasEsta habilidad proporciona conocimiento integral para implementar Cron Triggers de Cloudflare y programar Workers mediante expresiones cron. Cubre la configuración de tareas periódicas, trabajos de mantenimiento y flujos de trabajo automatizados, manejando problemas comunes como expresiones cron inválidas y inconvenientes de zonas horarias. Los desarrolladores pueden utilizarla para configurar manejadores programados, probar activadores cron e integrar con Workflows y Green Compute.
webapp-testing
PruebasEsta habilidad de Claude proporciona un kit de herramientas basado en Playwright para probar aplicaciones web locales mediante scripts de Python. Permite verificación de frontend, depuración de interfaz de usuario, captura de pantallas y visualización de registros, mientras gestiona los ciclos de vida del servidor. Úsela para tareas de automatización de navegadores, pero ejecute los scripts directamente en lugar de leer su código fuente para evitar contaminación del contexto.
finishing-a-development-branch
PruebasEsta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a completar el trabajo terminado verificando que las pruebas pasen y luego presentando opciones estructuradas de integración. Guía el flujo de trabajo para fusionar, crear PRs o limpiar ramas después de que se completa la implementación. Úsala cuando tu código esté listo y probado para finalizar sistemáticamente el proceso de desarrollo.
