MCP HubMCP Hub
Volver a habilidades

manage-change-control

pjt222
Actualizado 6 days ago
15 vistas
17
2
17
Ver en GitHub
Pruebaswordautomationdesign

Acerca de

Esta habilidad gestiona el proceso de control de cambios para sistemas informáticos validados en entornos regulados. Maneja la clasificación de cambios, la evaluación de impacto, los flujos de trabajo de aprobación y la verificación posterior al cambio para actualizaciones de software, parches o modificaciones de configuración. Úsela al implementar modificaciones en sistemas validados manteniendo la documentación de cumplimiento normativo.

Instalación rápida

Claude Code

Recomendado
Principal
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Comando PluginAlternativo
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativo
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/manage-change-control

Copia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad

Documentación

管變控

評、批、施、驗確認計算系統之變而保確認態。

  • 確認系統需軟件升、補、配變
  • 基礎設施變(服遷、OS 升、網變)影確認系統
  • CAPA 或審計識需系統改
  • 業程變需系統重配
  • 急變需加速批與回文

  • :變述(何變與何故)
  • :所影系統及當確認態
  • :變請者與業理
  • :供應商發行註或技文
  • :相關 CAPA 或審計識
  • :所影系統之現確認文

一:造並歸變請

# Change Request
## Document ID: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### 1. Change Description
**Requestor:** [Name, Department]
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**System:** [System name and version]
**Current State:** [Current configuration/version]
**Proposed State:** [Target configuration/version]

### 2. Justification
[Business, regulatory, or technical reason for the change]

### 3. Classification
| Type | Definition | Approval Path | Timeline |
|------|-----------|--------------|----------|
| **Emergency** | Urgent fix for safety, data integrity, or regulatory compliance | System owner + QA (retrospective CCB) | Implement immediately, document within 5 days |
| **Standard** | Planned change with potential impact on validated state | CCB approval before implementation | Per CCB schedule |
| **Minor** | Low-risk change with no impact on validated state | System owner approval | Documented before implementation |

**This change is classified as:** [Emergency / Standard / Minor]
**Rationale:** [Why this classification]

得:變請有獨 ID、明述、有理之歸。 敗:歸有爭→默為 Standard 令 CCB 裁。

二:行影響評

評變對確認態諸維:

# Impact Assessment
## Change Request: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Impact Matrix
| Dimension | Affected? | Details | Risk |
|-----------|-----------|---------|------|
| Software configuration | Yes/No | [Specific parameters changing] | [H/M/L] |
| Source code | Yes/No | [Modules, functions, or scripts affected] | [H/M/L] |
| Database schema | Yes/No | [Tables, fields, constraints changing] | [H/M/L] |
| Infrastructure | Yes/No | [Servers, network, storage affected] | [H/M/L] |
| Interfaces | Yes/No | [Upstream/downstream system connections] | [H/M/L] |
| User access/roles | Yes/No | [Role changes, new access requirements] | [H/M/L] |
| SOPs/work instructions | Yes/No | [Procedures requiring update] | [H/M/L] |
| Training | Yes/No | [Users requiring retraining] | [H/M/L] |
| Data migration | Yes/No | [Data transformation or migration needed] | [H/M/L] |
| Audit trail | Yes/No | [Impact on audit trail continuity] | [H/M/L] |

### Regulatory Impact
- [ ] Change affects 21 CFR Part 11 controls
- [ ] Change affects EU Annex 11 controls
- [ ] Change affects data integrity (ALCOA+)
- [ ] Change requires regulatory notification

得:各維有明是否與理。 敗:影響不能定而需測→歸為「未知——需察」並令生前沙盒評。

三:定重確認範

按影響評定所需驗活動:

# Revalidation Determination

| Revalidation Level | Criteria | Activities Required |
|--------------------|----------|-------------------|
| **Full revalidation** | Core functionality changed, new GAMP category, or major version upgrade | URS review, RA update, IQ, OQ, PQ, TM update, VSR |
| **Partial revalidation** | Specific functions affected, configuration changes | Targeted OQ for affected functions, TM update |
| **Documentation only** | No functional impact, administrative changes | Update validation documents, change log entry |
| **None** | No impact on validated state (e.g., cosmetic change) | Change log entry only |

### Determination for CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
**Revalidation level:** [Full / Partial / Documentation only / None]
**Rationale:** [Specific reasoning based on impact assessment]

### Required Activities
| Activity | Owner | Deadline |
|----------|-------|----------|
| [e.g., Execute OQ test cases TC-OQ-015 through TC-OQ-022] | [Name] | [Date] |
| [e.g., Update traceability matrix for URS-007] | [Name] | [Date] |
| [e.g., Update SOP-LIMS-003 section 4.2] | [Name] | [Date] |

得:重確認範按變影成比——不多不少。 敗:範有爭→向多測偏。不足確認乃規險;過確認僅本。

四:獲批

按適批流路變:

# Change Approval

### Approval for: CR-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

| Role | Name | Decision | Signature | Date |
|------|------|----------|-----------|------|
| System Owner | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| QA Representative | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| IT Representative | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |
| Validation Lead | | Approve / Reject / Defer | | |

### Conditions (if any)
[Any conditions attached to the approval]

### Planned Implementation Window
- **Start:** [Date/Time]
- **End:** [Date/Time]
- **Rollback deadline:** [Point of no return]

得:諸所需批者於施前簽(急變除)。 敗:急變→由系統所有者與 QA 得口頭批,施變,並於 5 業日內畢正式記。

五:施並驗

執變並後驗:

# Implementation Record

### Pre-Implementation
- [ ] Backup of current system state completed
- [ ] Rollback procedure documented and tested
- [ ] Affected users notified
- [ ] Test environment validated (if applicable)

### Implementation
- **Implemented by:** [Name]
- **Date/Time:** [YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM]
- **Steps performed:** [Detailed implementation steps]
- **Deviations from plan:** [None / Description]

### Post-Change Verification
| Verification | Result | Evidence |
|--------------|--------|----------|
| System accessible and functional | Pass/Fail | [Screenshot/log reference] |
| Changed functionality works as specified | Pass/Fail | [Test case reference] |
| Unchanged functionality unaffected (regression) | Pass/Fail | [Test case reference] |
| Audit trail continuity maintained | Pass/Fail | [Audit trail screenshot] |
| User access controls intact | Pass/Fail | [Access review reference] |

### Closure
- [ ] All verification activities completed successfully
- [ ] Validation documents updated per revalidation determination
- [ ] SOPs updated and effective
- [ ] Training completed for affected users
- [ ] Change record closed in change control system

得:施匹批計,諸驗活動過。 敗:驗敗→即執回滾並記敗為偏。無 QA 同意勿進。

  • 變請有獨 ID、述、歸
  • 影響評覆諸維(軟、數據、基、SOP、訓)
  • 重確認範定附理
  • 諸所需批於施前得(急 5 日內)
  • 前備份與回滾法記
  • 後驗示變行且他無破
  • 確認文更以反變
  • 變記正式閉

  • 「小」變略影評:即微變可有意外影。似無害之配切換可禁審計跡或變算
  • 急變濫:若 > 10% 為「急」→變程被繞。審緊急準
  • 回滾計不全:以回滾為「復備份」忽備至滾間生之數據。各回滾情定數據處
  • 施後批:回批(除記急外)為合規違。CCB 須於工始前批
  • 缺回歸測:僅驗變功不足。回歸測須證現確認功無受影

  • design-compliance-architecture — 定變控委之治理框
  • write-validation-documentation — 造變觸之重確認文
  • perform-csv-assessment — 為需全重確認之大變行全 CSV 重評
  • write-standard-operating-procedure — 更變影之 SOP
  • investigate-capa-root-cause — 變由 CAPA 觸

Repositorio GitHub

pjt222/agent-almanac
Ruta: i18n/wenyan-ultra/skills/manage-change-control
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Habilidades relacionadas

evaluating-llms-harness

Pruebas

Esta Skill de Claude ejecuta el benchmark lm-evaluation-harness para evaluar modelos de lenguaje en más de 60 tareas académicas estandarizadas como MMLU y GSM8K. Está diseñada para que los desarrolladores comparen la calidad de los modelos, realicen seguimiento del progreso del entrenamiento o reporten resultados académicos. La herramienta admite varios backends, incluidos modelos de HuggingFace y vLLM.

Ver habilidad

cloudflare-cron-triggers

Pruebas

Esta habilidad proporciona conocimiento integral para implementar Cron Triggers de Cloudflare y programar Workers mediante expresiones cron. Cubre la configuración de tareas periódicas, trabajos de mantenimiento y flujos de trabajo automatizados, manejando problemas comunes como expresiones cron inválidas y inconvenientes de zonas horarias. Los desarrolladores pueden utilizarla para configurar manejadores programados, probar activadores cron e integrar con Workflows y Green Compute.

Ver habilidad

webapp-testing

Pruebas

Esta habilidad de Claude proporciona un kit de herramientas basado en Playwright para probar aplicaciones web locales mediante scripts de Python. Permite verificación de frontend, depuración de interfaz de usuario, captura de pantallas y visualización de registros, mientras gestiona los ciclos de vida del servidor. Úsela para tareas de automatización de navegadores, pero ejecute los scripts directamente en lugar de leer su código fuente para evitar contaminación del contexto.

Ver habilidad

finishing-a-development-branch

Pruebas

Esta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a completar el trabajo terminado verificando que las pruebas pasen y luego presentando opciones estructuradas de integración. Guía el flujo de trabajo para fusionar, crear PRs o limpiar ramas después de que se completa la implementación. Úsala cuando tu código esté listo y probado para finalizar sistemáticamente el proceso de desarrollo.

Ver habilidad