analyze-prime-numbers
Acerca de
Esta habilidad proporciona algoritmos para el análisis de números primos, incluyendo pruebas de primalidad, factorización y cálculos de distribución. Implementa métodos como Miller-Rabin, división por tentativa y la Criba de Eratóstenes para tareas de teoría computacional de números. Úsala cuando necesites verificar números primos, encontrar factores primos o generar listas de primos dentro de demostraciones o aplicaciones.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/analyze-prime-numbersCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Analyze Prime Numbers
Select + apply right algo: primality, factorization, distribution. Verify computationally + relate to Prime Number Theorem.
Use When
- Int prime or composite?
- Complete prime factorization
- Count/list primes up to bound
- Verify PNT approx for range
- Investigate prime props in number-theoretic proof/compute
In
- Required: Int(s) to analyze, or bound for distribution
- Required: Task — primality, factorization, distribution
- Optional: Preferred algo (trial div, Miller-Rabin, Sieve Eratosthenes, Pollard's rho)
- Optional: Formal proof or computational verdict
- Optional: Out format (factor tree, prime list, count, table)
Do
Step 1: Determine Task
Classify → 1 of 3 + select algo path:
- Primality: Int n, prime?
- Factorization: Composite n, complete prime factorization
- Distribution: Bound N, analyze primes ≤ N (count, list, gaps, density)
Record task + in values.
→ Clear classification + in values recorded.
If err: Ambiguous ("analyze 60") → ask clarify primality vs factorization vs distribution. Default factorization for composites + primality confirm suspected primes.
Step 2: Primality Testing (if task = primality)
Test n prime, algo matched to size:
-
Trivial: n < 2 not prime. n = 2 or 3 prime. n even + n > 2 → composite.
-
Small n (<10^6): Trial division.
- Test div all primes p ≤ floor(sqrt(n)).
- Opt: test 2, then odd 3, 5, 7, ... or 6k +/- 1 wheel.
- No divisor → prime.
-
Large n (>=10^6): Miller-Rabin probabilistic.
- n - 1 = 2^s * d, d odd.
- Per witness a in {2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37}:
- Compute x = a^d mod n.
- x = 1 or x = n - 1 → pass.
- Else square x up to s - 1 times. x = n - 1 ever → pass.
- No pass → composite (a = witness).
- n < 3.317 * 10^24 → witnesses give deterministic result.
-
Record verdict: prime or composite + witness/cert.
Small primes (1st 25):
| Index | Prime | Index | Prime | Index | Prime |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 10 | 29 | 19 | 67 |
| 2 | 3 | 11 | 31 | 20 | 71 |
| 3 | 5 | 12 | 37 | 21 | 73 |
| 4 | 7 | 13 | 41 | 22 | 79 |
| 5 | 11 | 14 | 43 | 23 | 83 |
| 6 | 13 | 15 | 47 | 24 | 89 |
| 7 | 17 | 16 | 53 | 25 | 97 |
| 8 | 19 | 17 | 59 | ||
| 9 | 23 | 18 | 61 |
→ Definitive (prime/composite) + algo used + witnesses/divisors.
If err: Miller-Rabin "probably prime" + certainty needed → escalate deterministic (AKS or ECPP). Trial div too slow → Miller-Rabin.
Step 3: Factorization (if task = factorization)
Factor n completely → prime power decomposition:
-
Extract small factors by trial div:
- Divide 2 as many times as possible, record exponent.
- Divide odd primes 3, 5, 7, 11, ... up to cutoff (10^4 or sqrt(n) if small).
- After each div, update n → cofactor.
-
Cofactor > 1 + <10^12: Continue trial div ≤ sqrt(cofactor).
-
Cofactor >= 10^12: Pollard's rho.
- f(x) = x^2 + c (mod n), random c.
- Floyd cycle: x = f(x), y = f(f(y)).
- d = gcd(|x - y|, n) each step.
- 1 < d < n → non-trivial factor. Recurse d + n/d.
- d = n → retry diff c.
-
Verify: Multiply all prime factors + exponents = original n. Test each factor primality.
-
Present: n = p1^a1 * p2^a2 * ... * pk^ak, p1 < p2 < ... < pk.
Algo complexity:
| Algo | Complexity | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Trial division | O(sqrt(n)) | n < 10^12 |
| Pollard's rho | O(n^{1/4}) expected | n up to ~10^18 |
| Quadratic sieve | L(n)^{1+o(1)} | n up to ~10^50 |
| GNFS | L(n)^{(64/9)^{1/3}+o(1)} | n > 10^50 |
→ Complete prime factorization canonical form + multiplication verified.
If err: Pollard's rho fails after many iters (cycle w/o non-trivial gcd) → try diff c (≥5 attempts). All fail → cofactor may be prime → confirm primality.
Step 4: Distribution Analysis (if task = distribution)
Distribution of primes up to N:
-
Generate via Sieve Eratosthenes:
- Bool array size N + 1, true.
- Set 0 + 1 false (not prime).
- Per p from 2 to floor(sqrt(N)):
- Still true → mark multiples p^2, p^2 + p, p^2 + 2p, ... false.
- Collect indices still true.
-
Count: pi(N) = primes up to N.
-
Compare w/ PNT:
- PNT approx: pi(N) ~ N / ln(N).
- Logarithmic integral: Li(N) = integral 2 to N of 1/ln(t) dt.
- Relative err: |pi(N) - N/ln(N)| / pi(N).
-
Analyze gaps (optional):
- Gaps between consecutive primes.
- Max gap, avg gap, twin primes (gap = 2).
- Avg gap near N ~ ln(N).
-
Present summary:
Bound N: 1,000,000
pi(N): 78,498
N/ln(N): 72,382
Li(N): 78,628
Relative error (N/ln(N)): 7.79%
Relative error (Li(N)): 0.17%
Max prime gap: 148 (between 492113 and 492227)
Twin primes: 8,169 pairs
→ Count + PNT compare + optional gap analysis.
If err: N too large in-mem sieve (N > 10^9) → segmented sieve processes range in blocks. Count only (no list) → Meissel-Lehmer for pi(N) direct.
Step 5: Verify Computationally
Cross-check via independent method:
-
Primality: Trial div used → verify quick Miller-Rabin (or vice versa). Known primes → check published tables or OEIS.
-
Factorization: Multiply factors + confirm = original. Independently test each claimed prime.
-
Distribution: Spot-check 3-5 numbers from sieve out for primality. Compare pi(N) published values (pi(10^k) k = 1, ..., 9).
Published pi(N):
| N | pi(N) |
|---|---|
| 10 | 4 |
| 100 | 25 |
| 1,000 | 168 |
| 10,000 | 1,229 |
| 100,000 | 9,592 |
| 10^6 | 78,498 |
| 10^7 | 664,579 |
| 10^8 | 5,761,455 |
| 10^9 | 50,847,534 |
- Doc verification + method + outcome.
→ All results independently verified no discrepancies.
If err: Verification → discrepancy → re-run w/ extra checks (verbose trial div logging). Common: off-by-one sieve bounds, int overflow modular arithmetic, pseudoprime mistaken prime.
Check
- Task correctly classified (primality, factorization, distribution)
- Algo appropriate for in size
- Trivial cases (n < 2, n = 2, even n) handled pre-general
- Primality verdicts definitive (not "probably prime" unqualified)
- Factorizations multiply back to original
- Every claimed prime factor tested primality
- Sieve bounds include sqrt(N) coverage
- PNT compare uses correct formula (N/ln(N) or Li(N))
- Results verified by independent method or published values
- Edge cases (n = 0, 1, 2, neg) addressed
Traps
-
Forget n = 1 not prime: Convention — 1 neither prime nor composite. Many algos silently misclassify.
-
Int overflow modular exp: Computing a^d mod n for Miller-Rabin, naive exp overflows. Use modular exp (repeated squaring + mod each step).
-
Sieve off-by-one: Mark composites starting p^2, not 2p. 2p wastes time but correct; p+1 wrong.
-
Pollard's rho cycle w/ d = n: gcd(|x - y|, n) = n → algo found trivial factor. Retry diff c not just starting pt.
-
Carmichael nums fooling Fermat: Nums like 561 = 3 * 11 * 17 pass Fermat primality all coprime bases. Always Miller-Rabin, not plain Fermat.
-
Confuse pi(n) w/ constant pi: Prime counting fn pi(n) + circle constant 3.14159 share notation. Ctx unambiguous.
→
solve-modular-arithmetic— underpins Miller-Rabin + factorizationexplore-diophantine-equations— factorization prereq for solving manyformulate-quantum-problem— Shor's algo for factorization connects primes → quantum
Repositorio GitHub
Habilidades relacionadas
evaluating-llms-harness
PruebasEsta Skill de Claude ejecuta el benchmark lm-evaluation-harness para evaluar modelos de lenguaje en más de 60 tareas académicas estandarizadas como MMLU y GSM8K. Está diseñada para que los desarrolladores comparen la calidad de los modelos, realicen seguimiento del progreso del entrenamiento o reporten resultados académicos. La herramienta admite varios backends, incluidos modelos de HuggingFace y vLLM.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
PruebasEsta habilidad proporciona conocimiento integral para implementar Cron Triggers de Cloudflare y programar Workers mediante expresiones cron. Cubre la configuración de tareas periódicas, trabajos de mantenimiento y flujos de trabajo automatizados, manejando problemas comunes como expresiones cron inválidas y inconvenientes de zonas horarias. Los desarrolladores pueden utilizarla para configurar manejadores programados, probar activadores cron e integrar con Workflows y Green Compute.
webapp-testing
PruebasEsta habilidad de Claude proporciona un kit de herramientas basado en Playwright para probar aplicaciones web locales mediante scripts de Python. Permite verificación de frontend, depuración de interfaz de usuario, captura de pantallas y visualización de registros, mientras gestiona los ciclos de vida del servidor. Úsela para tareas de automatización de navegadores, pero ejecute los scripts directamente en lugar de leer su código fuente para evitar contaminación del contexto.
finishing-a-development-branch
PruebasEsta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a completar el trabajo terminado verificando que las pruebas pasen y luego presentando opciones estructuradas de integración. Guía el flujo de trabajo para fusionar, crear PRs o limpiar ramas después de que se completa la implementación. Úsala cuando tu código esté listo y probado para finalizar sistemáticamente el proceso de desarrollo.
