customer-journey-mapping-workshop
Acerca de
Esta habilidad ejecuta un taller interactivo para crear mapas detallados de viaje del cliente, guiando de manera adaptativa a los usuarios en la definición de personas, etapas, acciones y emociones. Ayuda a desarrolladores y equipos de producto a visualizar experiencias de principio a fin para identificar puntos de dolor y oportunidades de mejora. Úsala para alinear a los equipos en torno a problemas reales de los clientes, en lugar de saltar a soluciones supuestas.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skillsgit clone https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills.git ~/.claude/skills/customer-journey-mapping-workshopCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Purpose
Guide product managers through creating a customer journey map by asking adaptive questions about the actor (persona), scenario/goal, journey phases, actions/emotions, and opportunities for improvement. Use this to visualize the end-to-end customer experience, identify pain points, and create a shared mental model across teams—avoiding surface-level feature lists and ensuring discovery work focuses on real customer problems, not assumed solutions.
This is not a feature roadmap—it's a discovery and alignment tool that uncovers where the experience breaks down and where improvements will have the greatest impact.
Key Concepts
What is a Customer Journey Map?
A journey map (NNGroup) visualizes "the process that a person goes through in order to accomplish a goal." It compiles user actions into a timeline, enriched with thoughts and emotions to create a narrative, then condenses and polishes into a visual artifact.
Five Key Components (NNGroup Framework)
- Actor — A specific persona or user whose perspective anchors the map
- Scenario + Expectations — The situational context and associated goals
- Journey Phases — High-level stages organizing the experience (e.g., discover, try, buy, use, seek support)
- Actions, Mindsets, and Emotions — User behaviors, thoughts, and emotional responses throughout phases
- Opportunities — Insights identifying where experience can improve
Journey Map Structure
Actor: [Persona Name]
Scenario: [Goal/Context]
Phase 1: Discover → Phase 2: Try → Phase 3: Buy → Phase 4: Use → Phase 5: Support
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Actions: Actions: Actions: Actions: Actions:
Thoughts: Thoughts: Thoughts: Thoughts: Thoughts:
Emotions: 😊😐😞 Emotions: Emotions: Emotions: Emotions:
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Opportunities: Opportunities: Opportunities: Opportunities: Opportunities:
Why This Works
- Forces conversation: Teams align on shared understanding of customer experience
- Reveals pain points: Emotions + actions highlight where experience breaks down
- Prioritizes improvements: Opportunities ranked by impact guide roadmap decisions
- Human-centered: Focuses on customer perspective, not internal processes
Anti-Patterns (What This Is NOT)
- Not a service blueprint: Journey maps focus on customer perspective; service blueprints map internal operations
- Not a user story map: Journey maps support discovery; user story maps facilitate implementation planning
- Not an experience map: Journey maps target specific users and products; experience maps explore broader human behaviors
When to Use This
- Starting customer discovery (understanding current experience)
- Identifying pain points for retention/engagement initiatives
- Aligning cross-functional teams on customer perspective
- Prioritizing which problems to solve first
When NOT to Use This
- When you already understand the customer journey deeply
- For technical refactoring (no customer-facing journey)
- As a substitute for user research (maps require research input)
Facilitation Source of Truth
Use workshop-facilitation as the default interaction protocol for this skill.
It defines:
- session heads-up + entry mode (Guided, Context dump, Best guess)
- one-question turns with plain-language prompts
- progress labels (for example, Context Qx/8 and Scoring Qx/5)
- interruption handling and pause/resume behavior
- numbered recommendations at decision points
- quick-select numbered response options for regular questions (include
Other (specify)when useful)
This file defines the domain-specific assessment content. If there is a conflict, follow this file's domain logic.
Application
This interactive skill asks up to 5 adaptive questions, offering 3-4 enumerated options at each step.
Interaction pattern: Pair with skills/workshop-facilitation/SKILL.md when you want a one-step-at-a-time flow with numbered recommendations at decision points and quick-select options for regular questions. If the user asks for a single-shot output, skip the multi-turn facilitation.
Step 0: Gather Context (Before Questions)
Agent suggests:
Before we create your journey map, let's gather context:
Customer Research:
- User interviews, discovery notes, support tickets
- Churn reasons, exit surveys, NPS feedback
- Analytics data (drop-off points, feature usage)
- Personas or proto-personas
Product Context:
- Website copy, product descriptions, positioning
- Competitor journey maps or reviews (G2, Capterra)
- Existing journey documentation (if any)
You can paste this content directly, or describe the customer experience briefly.
Question 1: Identify Actor (Persona)
Agent asks: "Who is the actor for this journey map? (Which persona or user segment?)"
Offer 4 enumerated options:
- Primary persona — "Your main target customer (e.g., 'small business owner')" (Most common starting point)
- Secondary persona — "A secondary user segment with different needs (e.g., 'enterprise admin' vs. 'end user')" (Use if primary persona already mapped)
- High-churn persona — "User segment with highest churn rate (e.g., 'trial users who don't convert')" (Good for retention initiatives)
- Newly discovered persona — "Emerging user segment from recent research (e.g., 'remote teams' post-COVID)" (Good for market expansion)
Or describe your specific persona.
Adaptation: Use personas from context (proto-personas, JTBD research, etc.)
User response: [Selection or custom]
Question 2: Define Scenario + Goal
Agent asks: "What's the scenario and goal for this journey? (What is the actor trying to accomplish?)"
Offer 4 enumerated options:
- First-time use — "New user onboarding, from discovery to activation" (Common for SaaS, apps)
- Core workflow — "Recurring task the user does regularly (e.g., 'create invoice,' 'run report')" (Common for established products)
- Problem resolution — "User encounters issue and seeks help (e.g., 'forgot password,' 'billing question')" (Good for support/retention)
- Upgrade/expansion — "Free user considering paid plan, or existing customer expanding usage" (Good for growth initiatives)
Or describe your specific scenario.
User response: [Selection or custom]
Agent extracts:
- Actor: [Persona from Q1]
- Scenario: [Context from Q2]
- Goal: [What actor is trying to accomplish]
Question 3: Identify Journey Phases
Agent says: "Let's break the journey into high-level phases (typically 4-6 phases from start to end)."
Agent generates 4-6 journey phases based on scenario (Q2).
Example (if Scenario = "First-time use"):
Journey Phases (left to right):
1. Discover — User learns about product
2. Evaluate — User researches, compares alternatives
3. Try — User signs up, starts onboarding
4. Activate — User reaches "aha moment," experiences value
5. Use — User integrates product into workflow
6. Expand — User considers upgrading or inviting team
Agent asks: "Do these phases capture the full journey? Should we add, remove, or rename phases?"
User response: [Approve or modify]
Question 4: Map Actions, Thoughts, Emotions per Phase
Agent says: "Now let's map what the actor does, thinks, and feels in each phase."
Agent generates 3-5 actions, thoughts, and emotions per phase based on context (Step 0) and scenario (Q2).
Example (for Phase 3: "Try — User signs up, starts onboarding"):
Phase 3: Try (Onboarding)
Actions:
- Signs up with email
- Receives welcome email
- Logs in for the first time
- Sees empty dashboard
- Searches for "getting started" guide
Thoughts:
- "This looks promising, but I'm not sure where to start"
- "Do I need to watch a tutorial video?"
- "What's the first step?"
Emotions:
- Curious but uncertain 🤔
- Slightly frustrated (no clear next step) 😕
- Hopeful it will get easier 🙂
Pain Points:
- No onboarding checklist or guided tour
- Empty state doesn't suggest next action
- Too many options in navigation (overwhelming)
Agent repeats for all journey phases, showing full map.
Agent asks: "Does this capture the customer experience accurately? Should we adjust actions, thoughts, or emotions?"
User response: [Approve or modify]
Question 5: Identify Opportunities (Pain Points to Address)
Agent says: "Based on the journey map, let's identify opportunities for improvement—ranked by impact."
Agent generates 5-7 opportunities (pain points with highest emotional intensity or drop-off rates).
Example:
# Opportunities (Ranked by Impact)
## 1. Onboarding lacks guided first steps (Phase 3: Try)
**Pain Point:** Users see empty dashboard, don't know what to do first
**Evidence:** 60% of signups don't complete first action within 24 hours
**Opportunity:** Add interactive onboarding checklist ("Create your first project," "Invite a teammate")
**Impact:** HIGH — Directly affects activation rate
---
## 2. Pricing page is confusing (Phase 2: Evaluate)
**Pain Point:** Users don't understand which plan fits their needs
**Evidence:** High bounce rate on pricing page (70% leave without signing up)
**Opportunity:** Add plan comparison tool or "Which plan is right for me?" quiz
**Impact:** HIGH — Directly affects trial conversion
---
## 3. Support is hard to find (Phase 5: Use)
**Pain Point:** Users encounter issues, struggle to find help
**Evidence:** Support tickets often say "I couldn't find an answer in docs"
**Opportunity:** Add in-app help widget, contextual tooltips
**Impact:** MEDIUM — Affects retention, but fewer users hit this phase
---
## 4. Email confirmations lack context (Phase 1: Discover)
**Pain Point:** Marketing emails don't explain value clearly
**Evidence:** Low click-through rate on email campaigns (5% vs. industry avg 15%)
**Opportunity:** Rewrite emails with customer language, clear CTAs
**Impact:** MEDIUM — Affects top-of-funnel awareness
---
## 5. Upgrade prompts feel pushy (Phase 6: Expand)
**Pain Point:** Users perceive upgrade prompts as sales-y, not helpful
**Evidence:** Negative sentiment in NPS comments ("too many upgrade popups")
**Opportunity:** Show upgrade value contextually (when user hits free plan limit)
**Impact:** LOW — Affects smaller user subset
Agent asks: "Do these opportunities align with your priorities? Which should we focus on first?"
User response: [Selection or custom]
Output: Customer Journey Map + Opportunity List
After completing the flow, the agent outputs:
# Customer Journey Map: [Scenario from Q2]
**Actor:** [Persona from Q1]
**Scenario:** [Context from Q2]
**Goal:** [What actor is trying to accomplish]
**Date:** [Today's date]
---
## Journey Phases
[Phase 1] → [Phase 2] → [Phase 3] → [Phase 4] → [Phase 5] → [Phase 6]
---
## Full Journey Map
### Phase 1: [Name]
**Actions:**
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]
- [Action 3]
**Thoughts:**
- "[Quote 1]"
- "[Quote 2]"
**Emotions:**
- [Emotion 1] 😊
- [Emotion 2] 😐
**Pain Points:**
- [Pain point 1]
- [Pain point 2]
---
### Phase 2: [Name]
[...repeat structure for all phases...]
---
## Opportunities (Prioritized)
### Opportunity 1: [Name] (HIGH IMPACT)
**Phase:** [Journey phase]
**Pain Point:** [Description]
**Evidence:** [Data/research]
**Proposed Solution:** [How to address]
**Impact:** HIGH — [Rationale]
---
### Opportunity 2: [Name] (HIGH IMPACT)
**Phase:** [Journey phase]
**Pain Point:** [Description]
**Evidence:** [Data/research]
**Proposed Solution:** [How to address]
**Impact:** HIGH — [Rationale]
---
[...continue for all opportunities...]
---
## Next Steps
1. **Validate opportunities:** Use `discovery-interview-prep.md` to test hypotheses with customers
2. **Prioritize fixes:** Use `prioritization-advisor.md` to choose which opportunities to tackle first
3. **Create problem statements:** Use `problem-statement.md` to frame top opportunities
4. **Build experiments:** Use `opportunity-solution-tree.md` to design solutions and POCs
---
**Ready to start addressing opportunities? Let me know if you'd like to refine the map or dive into a specific pain point.**
Examples
Example 1: Good Journey Map (SaaS Onboarding)
Q1 Response: "Primary persona — Small business owner"
Q2 Response: "First-time use — New user onboarding, from discovery to activation"
Q3 - Phases Generated:
Discover → Evaluate → Try → Activate → Use → Expand
Q4 - Phase 3 (Try) Mapped:
Actions:
- Signs up via Google SSO
- Receives welcome email
- Logs in, sees empty dashboard
- Clicks "Help" button, watches 5-min tutorial
- Attempts to create first project, gets stuck on form
Thoughts:
- "This looks easy enough"
- "Wait, what's a 'workspace' vs. 'project'?"
- "Do I need to fill out all these fields?"
Emotions:
- Excited initially 😊
- Confused by terminology 😕
- Frustrated by unclear form 😞
Pain Points:
- No guided onboarding checklist
- Terminology not explained (workspace vs. project)
- Form has too many required fields upfront
Q5 - Opportunities Identified:
- Add onboarding checklist (HIGH — affects activation)
- Simplify terminology (MEDIUM — affects understanding)
- Reduce required form fields (MEDIUM — affects completion rate)
Why this works:
- Emotions + actions reveal pain points clearly
- Opportunities tied to specific phases
- Evidence from research (drop-off data, support tickets)
Example 2: Bad Journey Map (Too Generic)
Phase: "Use Product"
Actions:
- Uses product
- Does tasks
Thoughts:
- "This is good"
Emotions:
- Happy 😊
Why this fails:
- No specificity (what tasks? which features?)
- No pain points identified (everything is "good")
- Can't extract actionable opportunities
Fix:
- Get specific: "User creates invoice → sends to client → tracks payment status"
- Include real customer quotes: "I wish I could bulk-send invoices"
- Show emotional highs AND lows (not just happy)
Common Pitfalls
Pitfall 1: Mapping Internal Process, Not Customer Experience
Symptom: Journey phases = "Lead generated → Qualified → Demo scheduled → Deal closed"
Consequence: Focuses on sales process, not customer perspective
Fix: Map from customer POV: "Discovers problem → Researches solutions → Tries product → Adopts"
Pitfall 2: No Emotions or Pain Points
Symptom: Journey map lists actions only, no thoughts/emotions
Consequence: Misses the point—can't identify where experience breaks down
Fix: Add customer quotes, emotional states (frustrated, delighted, confused)
Pitfall 3: Too Many Personas in One Map
Symptom: Trying to map "all users" in a single journey
Consequence: Loses focus, becomes generic
Fix: One map per persona. If multiple personas, create separate maps.
Pitfall 4: Opportunities Aren't Prioritized
Symptom: List 20 opportunities with no ranking
Consequence: Team paralyzed, doesn't know where to start
Fix: Rank by impact (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) based on evidence and emotional intensity
Pitfall 5: Map Created in Isolation
Symptom: PM creates journey map alone, doesn't involve team
Consequence: No shared mental model, map doesn't drive decisions
Fix: Facilitate workshop with cross-functional team (PM, design, engineering, support)
References
Related Skills
customer-journey-map.md— Component skill with journey map templateproto-persona.md— Defines actor for journey mappingproblem-statement.md— Converts opportunities into problem statementsdiscovery-interview-prep.md— Gathers research input for mappingopportunity-solution-tree.md— Designs solutions for journey opportunities
External Frameworks
- Nielsen Norman Group, "Journey Mapping 101" (2016) — Definitive guide to journey mapping
- Adaptive Path, "Guide to Experience Mapping" (2013) — Experience vs. journey maps
Dean's Work
- [If Dean has journey mapping resources, link here]
Skill type: Interactive
Suggested filename: customer-journey-mapping-workshop.md
Suggested placement: /skills/interactive/
Dependencies: Uses customer-journey-map.md, proto-persona.md, problem-statement.md, jobs-to-be-done.md
Repositorio GitHub
Frequently asked questions
What is the customer-journey-mapping-workshop skill?
customer-journey-mapping-workshop is a Claude Skill by deanpeters. Skills package instructions and resources that Claude loads on demand, so Claude can perform customer-journey-mapping-workshop-related tasks without extra prompting.
How do I install customer-journey-mapping-workshop?
Use the install commands on this page: add customer-journey-mapping-workshop to Claude Code as a plugin, or clone its repository into your skills directory, then restart Claude so it picks up the skill.
What category does customer-journey-mapping-workshop belong to?
customer-journey-mapping-workshop is in the Other category, tagged ai.
Is customer-journey-mapping-workshop free to use?
Yes. customer-journey-mapping-workshop is listed on AIMCP and free to install. It runs inside Claude, so no separate service account is required to use the skill itself.
Habilidades relacionadas
LlamaGuard es el modelo de Meta de 7-8B parámetros para moderar las entradas y salidas de LLM en seis categorías de seguridad como violencia y discurso de odio. Ofrece una precisión del 94-95% y puede implementarse usando vLLM, Hugging Face o Amazon SageMaker. Utiliza esta skill para integrar fácilmente filtrado de contenido y barreras de seguridad en tus aplicaciones de IA.
Esta Skill de Claude ayuda a los desarrolladores a optimizar los costes en la nube mediante el ajuste de tamaño de recursos, estrategias de etiquetado y análisis de gastos. Proporciona un marco para reducir los gastos en la nube e implementar una gobernanza de costes en AWS, Azure y GCP. Úsala cuando necesites analizar los costes de infraestructura, ajustar el tamaño de los recursos o cumplir con restricciones presupuestarias.
Esta habilidad de Claude analiza los mercados de apuestas deportivas, incluyendo spreads, over/unders y apuestas de propuestas, mediante el examen de tendencias históricas y estadísticas situacionales para identificar apuestas de valor. Proporciona una salida en markdown estructurado con recomendaciones accionables con fines educativos. Los desarrolladores deben utilizar esto para herramientas de análisis de apuestas deportivas, teniendo en cuenta que está diseñado únicamente para entretenimiento/educación.
Esta habilidad cuantiza LLMs a precisión de 8 o 4 bits utilizando bitsandbytes, logrando una reducción de memoria del 50-75% con pérdida mínima de precisión. Es ideal para ejecutar modelos más grandes en memoria GPU limitada o para acelerar la inferencia, admitiendo formatos como INT8, NF4 y FP4. La habilidad se integra con HuggingFace Transformers y permite entrenamiento QLoRA y optimizadores de 8 bits.
