MCP HubMCP Hub
Volver a habilidades

run-chaos-experiment

pjt222
Actualizado 2 days ago
7 vistas
17
2
17
Ver en GitHub
Pruebasaitesting

Acerca de

Esta habilidad permite a los desarrolladores diseñar y ejecutar experimentos de ingeniería del caos utilizando Litmus o Chaos Mesh para probar la resiliencia del sistema mediante la inyección controlada de fallos. Ayuda a validar pruebas basadas en hipótesis y a mejorar los procesos de recuperación ante fallos. Úsela antes de lanzamientos importantes, después de cambios arquitectónicos o durante GameDays para validar suposiciones sobre modos de fallo.

Instalación rápida

Claude Code

Recomendado
Principal
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Comando PluginAlternativo
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativo
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/run-chaos-experiment

Copia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad

Documentación

Chaos-Experiment durchfuehren

Inject controlled failures to test and improve system resilience.

Wann verwenden

  • Before major product launches (load testing)
  • After architecture changes (validate resilience)
  • During GameDays or disaster recovery drills
  • To validate assumptions about failure modes
  • As part of SRE maturity program

Eingaben

  • Erforderlich: Kubernetes cluster (for Litmus or Chaos Mesh)
  • Erforderlich: Steady-state definition (what "normal" looks like)
  • Erforderlich: Hypothesis to test (e.g., "API stays available if one pod crashes")
  • Optional: Observability stack (Prometheus, Grafana) to measure impact
  • Optional: Rollback plan

Vorgehensweise

Schritt 1: Definieren Steady State and Hypothesis

Dokumentieren normal system behavior:

## Steady State Definition

### Service: API Gateway
- **Availability**: 99.9% (< 0.1% error rate)
- **Latency**: p95 < 200ms
- **Throughput**: 1000 req/s
- **Dependencies**: Database (Postgres), Cache (Redis), Auth Service

### Metrics
- `rate(http_requests_total{job="api"}[5m])`
- `histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))`
- `rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m])`

## Hypothesis
**"If one API pod is killed, the remaining pods will handle the load with <5s
disruption and no increase in error rate."**

### Validation Criteria
- Error rate remains <1%
- p95 latency stays <300ms (50ms grace)
- Service recovers within 5 seconds
- No cascading failures to downstream services

Erwartet: Clear, measurable definition of normal behavior and success criteria.

Bei Fehler: If you can't define steady state, observability is insufficient. Hinzufuegen metrics first.

Schritt 2: Set Blast Radius Limits

Scope the experiment to minimize risk:

# chaos-config.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Namespace
metadata:
  name: chaos-testing

---
# Label pods participating in chaos experiments
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
  labels:
    chaos-enabled: "true"
    environment: staging  # NEVER production for first run

Set safeguards:

## Blast Radius Controls

### Environment
- **Scope**: Staging only (first 5 runs)
- **Production**: Only after 5 successful staging runs
- **Timing**: Business hours (09:00-17:00 local), never weekends/holidays

### Target Selection
- **Limit**: Max 1 pod per service
- **Percentage**: Max 25% of replicas
- **Exclusions**: Database, payment service, auth service (critical path)

### Auto-Abort Conditions
- Error rate >10% for >30 seconds
- Customer-facing alerts fire
- Manual abort signal from on-call engineer

### Rollback Plan
- Kubernetes will auto-restart killed pods
- Manual rollback: `kubectl rollout undo deployment/api`
- Incident declared if recovery takes >5 minutes

Erwartet: Experiment has clear boundaries, won't take down entire system.

Bei Fehler: If blast radius is too large, narrow scope. Starten with one non-critical service.

Schritt 3: Installieren Chaos Mesh

Bereitstellen Chaos Mesh (Kubernetes-native):

# Add Chaos Mesh Helm repo
helm repo add chaos-mesh https://charts.chaos-mesh.org
helm repo update

# Install Chaos Mesh in isolated namespace
helm install chaos-mesh chaos-mesh/chaos-mesh \
  --namespace chaos-mesh \
  --create-namespace \
  --set dashboard.create=true \
  --set controllerManager.replicaCount=1

# Verify installation
kubectl get pods -n chaos-mesh

# Access dashboard
kubectl port-forward -n chaos-mesh svc/chaos-dashboard 2333:2333
# Open http://localhost:2333

Alternative: Litmus (vendor-neutral):

# Install Litmus
kubectl apply -f https://litmuschaos.github.io/litmus/litmus-operator-v2.14.0.yaml

# Wait for Litmus pods
kubectl get pods -n litmus

# Install Litmus CRDs
kubectl apply -f https://hub.litmuschaos.io/api/chaos/master?file=charts/generic/experiments.yaml

Erwartet: Chaos Mesh or Litmus running, dashboard accessible.

Bei Fehler: Check RBAC Berechtigungs. Chaos tools need cluster-wide access.

Schritt 4: Erstellen and Ausfuehren Experiment

Example: Pod Kill Experiment (Chaos Mesh):

# pod-kill-experiment.yaml
apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: PodChaos
metadata:
  name: api-pod-kill-test
  namespace: chaos-testing
spec:
  action: pod-kill
  mode: one  # Kill one pod only
  selector:
    namespaces:
      - production
    labelSelectors:
      app: api-gateway
      chaos-enabled: "true"
  duration: "30s"
  scheduler:
    cron: "@every 5m"  # Repeat every 5 minutes (for sustained testing)

Anwenden the experiment:

# Apply experiment
kubectl apply -f pod-kill-experiment.yaml

# Watch experiment status
kubectl get podchaos -n chaos-testing -w

# View detailed status
kubectl describe podchaos api-pod-kill-test -n chaos-testing

# Check which pods were affected
kubectl get events -n production --sort-by=.metadata.creationTimestamp | grep api-gateway

Ueberwachen impact in Grafana:

# Error rate during experiment
rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5..", job="api"}[1m])

# Latency spike
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{job="api"}[1m]))

# Pod restarts
rate(kube_pod_container_status_restarts_total{pod=~"api-.*"}[5m])

Erwartet: Pod is killed, Kubernetes restarts it, service continues with minor blip.

Bei Fehler: If error rate spikes or service degrades erheblich, abort experiment and investigate.

Schritt 5: Analysieren Results and Iterate

Erstellen experiment report:

# Chaos Experiment Report: API Pod Kill

**Date**: 2025-02-09
**Hypothesis**: API stays available if one pod crashes
**Tool**: Chaos Mesh
**Environment**: Staging
**Duration**: 30 seconds (pod kill + recovery)

## Results

### Metrics During Experiment
- **Error Rate**: Increased from 0.1% to 2.3% (spike lasted 8 seconds)
- **p95 Latency**: Increased from 180ms to 450ms (spike lasted 12 seconds)
- **Recovery Time**: 8 seconds (pod restart + load balancer update)

### Hypothesis Outcome
**FAILED**: Error rate exceeded 1% threshold, latency spike >300ms

## Root Cause Analysis
- Load balancer continued routing to killed pod for 8 seconds (stale endpoint)
- Readiness probe set to 10s interval (too slow)
- No pre-stop hook to drain connections gracefully

## Improvements Made
1. **Reduced readiness probe interval**: 10s → 2s
2. **Added pre-stop hook**: 5-second sleep for connection draining
3. **Tuned load balancer**: Enabled faster endpoint updates

## Follow-Up Experiment
- Re-run with same parameters in 1 week
- Expected: Error rate <1%, recovery <5s

Verfolgen experiments in a log:

# chaos-experiment-log.csv
date,experiment,environment,status,error_rate_peak,recovery_time_s,outcome
2025-02-09,pod-kill-api,staging,complete,2.3%,8,failed
2025-02-16,pod-kill-api,staging,complete,0.8%,4,passed
2025-02-23,network-delay-db,staging,aborted,15%,N/A,failed

Erwartet: Learnings captured, fixes implemented, follow-up scheduled.

Bei Fehler: If no action is taken post-experiment, chaos engineering becomes theater. Priorisieren fixes.

Schritt 6: Graduate to Production (Carefully)

Once staging experiments pass consistently:

# Production pod-kill experiment (more conservative)
apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: PodChaos
metadata:
  name: api-pod-kill-prod
  namespace: chaos-testing
spec:
  action: pod-kill
  mode: one
  selector:
    namespaces:
      - production
    labelSelectors:
      app: api-gateway
      chaos-enabled: "true"
  duration: "10s"  # Shorter than staging
  scheduler:
    cron: "0 10 * * 2"  # Tuesdays at 10 AM only (predictable, low-risk time)

Production safeguards:

# Create a kill switch for production chaos
kubectl create configmap chaos-killswitch \
  -n chaos-testing \
  --from-literal=enabled=true

# Update experiments to check kill switch
# (implementation depends on chaos tool)

Erwartet: Production experiments run waehrend low-risk windows, with kill switch ready.

Bei Fehler: If production experiment causes incident, disable sofort and post-mortem.

Validierung

  • Steady state and hypothesis clearly defined
  • Blast radius limited (environment, scope, timing)
  • Chaos tool (Chaos Mesh or Litmus) installed and tested
  • Experiment runs erfolgreich in staging
  • Results documented with metrics and analysis
  • Improvements implemented basierend auf findings
  • Follow-up experiment validates fixes
  • Production experiments run only nach 5+ staging successes

Haeufige Stolperfallen

  • No hypothesis: Running chaos "to see what happens" wastes time. Always have a hypothesis.
  • Too broad scope: Killing all pods at once tests disaster recovery, not resilience. Starten small.
  • Production-first: Never run first experiment in production. Staging first, always.
  • Ignoring results: Chaos ohne action is theater. Beheben what you learn.
  • Alarmieren fatigue: Chaos experiments trigger alerts. Annotate Grafana or silence expected alerts.
  • No abort plan: If experiment goes wrong, you need a kill switch. Have it ready.

Verwandte Skills

  • setup-prometheus-monitoring - metrics to measure experiment impact
  • configure-alerting-rules - alerts that fire waehrend chaos (expected)
  • define-slo-sli-sla - steady state tied to SLOs

Repositorio GitHub

pjt222/agent-almanac
Ruta: i18n/de/skills/run-chaos-experiment
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Habilidades relacionadas

evaluating-llms-harness

Pruebas

Esta Skill de Claude ejecuta el benchmark lm-evaluation-harness para evaluar modelos de lenguaje en más de 60 tareas académicas estandarizadas como MMLU y GSM8K. Está diseñada para que los desarrolladores comparen la calidad de los modelos, realicen seguimiento del progreso del entrenamiento o reporten resultados académicos. La herramienta admite varios backends, incluidos modelos de HuggingFace y vLLM.

Ver habilidad

cloudflare-cron-triggers

Pruebas

Esta habilidad proporciona conocimiento integral para implementar Cron Triggers de Cloudflare y programar Workers mediante expresiones cron. Cubre la configuración de tareas periódicas, trabajos de mantenimiento y flujos de trabajo automatizados, manejando problemas comunes como expresiones cron inválidas y inconvenientes de zonas horarias. Los desarrolladores pueden utilizarla para configurar manejadores programados, probar activadores cron e integrar con Workflows y Green Compute.

Ver habilidad

webapp-testing

Pruebas

Esta habilidad de Claude proporciona un kit de herramientas basado en Playwright para probar aplicaciones web locales mediante scripts de Python. Permite verificación de frontend, depuración de interfaz de usuario, captura de pantallas y visualización de registros, mientras gestiona los ciclos de vida del servidor. Úsela para tareas de automatización de navegadores, pero ejecute los scripts directamente en lugar de leer su código fuente para evitar contaminación del contexto.

Ver habilidad

finishing-a-development-branch

Pruebas

Esta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a completar el trabajo terminado verificando que las pruebas pasen y luego presentando opciones estructuradas de integración. Guía el flujo de trabajo para fusionar, crear PRs o limpiar ramas después de que se completa la implementación. Úsala cuando tu código esté listo y probado para finalizar sistemáticamente el proceso de desarrollo.

Ver habilidad