generate-status-report
Acerca de
Esta habilidad genera informes exhaustivos del estado del proyecto analizando artefactos existentes, como actas constitutivas y carteras de trabajo, para calcular métricas e identificar obstáculos. Resume el progreso utilizando indicadores RAG para el cronograma, el alcance, el presupuesto y la calidad. Úsela al final de los sprints, antes de las reuniones de gobierno o cuando surjan nuevos riesgos para actualizar a las partes interesadas.
Instalación rápida
Claude Code
Recomendadonpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/generate-status-reportCopia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad
Documentación
Generate a Project Status Report
Make periodic status report. Analyze project artifacts, compute progress metrics, summarize accomplishments, blockers, upcoming work with RAG (Red/Amber/Green) health indicators.
When Use
- End of sprint or reporting period (weekly, biweekly, monthly)
- Stakeholder asks for project health update
- Before steering committee or governance meetings
- Project health indicators change (new blocker or risk)
- Periodic checkpoint vs charter milestones
Inputs
- Required: Reporting period (start + end date)
- Required: At least one project artifact (BACKLOG.md, SPRINT-PLAN.md, WBS.md, PROJECT-CHARTER.md)
- Optional: Previous status reports (trend comparison)
- Optional: Budget or resource tracking data
- Optional: Risk register updates
Steps
Step 1: Read Existing Artifacts
Scan project directory for PM artifacts:
- PROJECT-CHARTER.md — milestones, success criteria
- BACKLOG.md — item counts by status, burn-down data
- SPRINT-PLAN.md — sprint goal, committed items, task completion
- WBS.md — work package completion percentages
- Previous STATUS-REPORT-*.md files — trend data
Read available files. Not all will exist — adapt report to available data.
Got: At least one artifact read successful, key metrics extracted.
If fail: No artifacts exist? Report can't be generated. Create charter or backlog first with draft-project-charter or manage-backlog.
Step 2: Compute Progress Metrics
Compute metrics from available data:
Agile metrics (from BACKLOG.md / SPRINT-PLAN.md):
- Velocity: story points done this sprint
- Sprint completion: items done / items committed
- Backlog burn-down: total remaining points vs previous period
- Cycle time: average days from In Progress to Done
Classic metrics (from WBS.md):
- % complete: work packages done / total
- Schedule variance: planned milestone dates vs actual
- Effort variance: estimated effort vs actual
## Metrics
| Metric | Value | Previous | Trend |
|--------|-------|----------|-------|
| Velocity | [N] pts | [N] pts | ↑/↓/→ |
| Sprint Completion | [N]% | [N]% | ↑/↓/→ |
| Backlog Remaining | [N] pts | [N] pts | ↓ (good) |
| Schedule Variance | [+/-N days] | [+/-N days] | |
Got: 3-5 metrics computed with previous period comparison.
If fail: No historical data (first report)? Skip Previous + Trend columns. Data incomplete → note gaps in report footer with actions to establish tracking.
Step 3: Find Blockers, Risks, Issues
List active blockers + risks:
## Blockers & Risks
| ID | Type | Description | Severity | Owner | Status | Action Required |
|----|------|------------|----------|-------|--------|----------------|
| R-001 | Risk | [Description] | High | [Name] | Open | [Action] |
| B-001 | Blocker | [Description] | Critical | [Name] | Active | [Action by date] |
| I-001 | Issue | [Description] | Medium | [Name] | Investigating | [Action] |
Cross-reference vs charter risk register. Flag new risks not previously identified.
Got: All active blockers + top risks documented with owners + actions.
If fail: No blockers? State "No active blockers" — no empty section. Blocker without owner? Escalate to project manager.
Step 4: Summarize Accomplishments + Next Period Plan
Write two sections:
## Accomplishments (This Period)
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]
## Planned (Next Period)
- [Planned item/milestone with target]
- [Planned item/milestone with target]
- [Planned item/milestone with target]
Got: 3-5 accomplishments with concrete evidence, 3-5 planned items for next period.
If fail: No accomplishments? Report reason (blocked, re-planning, team unavailable). Next period plan unclear → list "Planning session scheduled for [date]" as primary.
Step 5: Assign RAG + Write Report
Assess project health across four dimensions:
| Dimension | Green | Amber | Red |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule | On track or ahead | 1-2 weeks behind | >2 weeks behind or milestone missed |
| Scope | No uncontrolled changes | Minor scope adjustments | Scope creep affecting deliverables |
| Budget | Within 5% of plan | 5-15% over plan | >15% over plan or untracked |
| Quality | Tests pass, criteria met | Minor quality issues | Critical defects or acceptance failures |
Write complete report:
# Status Report: [Project Name]
## Report Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
## Reporting Period: [Start] to [End]
## Document ID: SR-[PROJECT]-[YYYY-MM-DD]
### Overall Health
| Dimension | Status | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Schedule | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Scope | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Budget | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Quality | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
### Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences: overall status, key achievement, biggest risk]
### Metrics
[From Step 2]
### Accomplishments
[From Step 4]
### Blockers & Risks
[From Step 3]
### Planned Next Period
[From Step 4]
### Decisions Needed
- [Decision 1 — needed by date, from whom]
---
*Report prepared by: [Name/Agent]*
Save as STATUS-REPORT-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.
Got: Complete status report saved with RAG indicators, metrics, narrative.
If fail: Data insufficient for RAG assessment? Use ⚪ (Grey) = "insufficient data", list what data needs collecting for next report.
Checks
- Status report file created with date-stamped filename
- RAG indicators assigned for all four dimensions with justification
- At least 3 metrics computed from project artifacts
- Blockers section present (even if "No active blockers")
- Accomplishments listed with evidence
- Next period plan included
- Executive summary 2-3 sentences, not paragraph
- Every blocker + risk has owner + action with deadline
Pitfalls
- Report without data: Status reports must be evidence-based. Every claim references artifact or metric.
- All green always: Persistent green RAG without evidence = not honest. Challenge green assessments.
- Blocker without owner: Every blocker needs owner + action. Unowned blockers don't resolve.
- Metric without context: "Velocity = 18" means nothing without comparison. Always include previous period or target.
- Too long: Status report scannable in 2 min. Keep to 1-2 pages.
- Missing decisions section: Project needs stakeholder decisions? Make explicit with deadlines.
- Stale data: Outdated artifacts → misleading reports. Verify artifact dates match reporting period.
- Missing trend data: First-time reports can't show trends, but subsequent reports must compare.
See Also
draft-project-charter— charter provides milestones + success criteria for status trackingmanage-backlog— backlog metrics feed status reportplan-sprint— sprint results provide velocity + completion datacreate-work-breakdown-structure— WBS completion drives classic progress metricsconduct-retrospective— status report data feeds retrospective
Repositorio GitHub
Habilidades relacionadas
content-collections
MetaEsta habilidad proporciona una configuración probada en producción para Content Collections, una herramienta centrada en TypeScript que transforma archivos Markdown/MDX en colecciones de datos con tipado seguro mediante validación Zod. Úsala al construir blogs, sitios de documentación o aplicaciones Vite + React con mucho contenido para garantizar seguridad de tipos y validación automática de contenido. Abarca todo, desde la configuración del plugin de Vite y compilación MDX hasta la optimización de despliegue y validación de esquemas.
polymarket
MetaEsta habilidad permite a los desarrolladores crear aplicaciones con la plataforma de mercados de predicción Polymarket, incluyendo la integración de API para operaciones y datos de mercado. También proporciona transmisión de datos en tiempo real a través de WebSocket para monitorear operaciones en vivo y actividad del mercado. Úsela para implementar estrategias de trading o crear herramientas que procesen actualizaciones de mercado en tiempo real.
creating-opencode-plugins
MetaEsta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a crear complementos de OpenCode que se conectan a más de 25 tipos de eventos, como comandos, archivos y operaciones LSP. Proporciona la estructura del complemento, las especificaciones de la API de eventos y los patrones de implementación para módulos en JavaScript/TypeScript. Úsala cuando necesites interceptar, monitorear o extender el ciclo de vida del asistente de IA de OpenCode con lógica personalizada basada en eventos.
sglang
MetaSGLang es un framework de alto rendimiento para el servicio de LLM que se especializa en generación rápida y estructurada para JSON, expresiones regulares y flujos de trabajo de agentes utilizando su caché de prefijos RadixAttention. Ofrece una inferencia significativamente más rápida, especialmente para tareas con prefijos repetidos, lo que lo hace ideal para salidas complejas y estructuradas, y conversaciones multiturno. Elige SGLang sobre alternativas como vLLM cuando necesites decodificación restringida o estés construyendo aplicaciones con uso extensivo de prefijos compartidos.
