MCP HubMCP Hub
Volver a habilidades

du-dum

pjt222
Actualizado Yesterday
2 vistas
17
2
17
Ver en GitHub
Metaaiapidesigndata

Acerca de

La habilidad du-dum implementa una arquitectura de dos relojes para separar la observación continua y económica de la toma de decisiones ocasional y costosa en agentes autónomos. Utiliza un reloj rápido para recopilar datos en un resumen y un reloj lento que solo desencadena acciones costosas (como llamadas a LLM) cuando se encuentra trabajo pendiente. Este patrón es ideal para optimizar el costo y el rendimiento en bucles de agentes donde la mayoría de los ciclos de observación no requieren ninguna acción.

Instalación rápida

Claude Code

Recomendado
Principal
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Comando PluginAlternativo
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternativo
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/du-dum

Copia y pega este comando en Claude Code para instalar esta habilidad

Documentación

Du-Dum: Batch-Then-Act Pattern

Split observe/act → 2 clocks diff freq. Fast (analysis) = cheap → writes digest. Slow (action) = reads digest → acts if pending. Digest empty → exit immediate. Zero cost idle.

Name = heartbeat: du-dum. First beat (du) observes. Second (dum) acts. Mostly only first fires.

Use When

  • Autonomous agent budget → observe often, act rare
  • Heartbeat calls LLM every tick → waste
  • Observe cheap (API read, file parse, log scan), act expensive (LLM, write, notify)
  • Decoupled fail → observe fails → last digest still valid
  • Cron agent → analysis + action = separate jobs

In

  • Required: Data sources fast clock observes (APIs, files, logs, feeds)
  • Required: Action slow clock takes when pending
  • Optional: Fast interval (default: 4h)
  • Optional: Slow interval (default: 1/day)
  • Optional: Daily cost ceiling
  • Optional: Digest format (md, JSON, YAML)

Do

Step 1: Identify 2 Clocks

Split work → observe (cheap, freq) vs act (exp, rare).

  1. List every op
  2. Classify → observe (reads → summary) or act (LLM/write/msg)
  3. Verify split: observe ≈0 marginal, act = expensive
  4. Assign freq: fast catches events, slow meets response-time
ClockCostFreqExample
Fast (analysis)Cheap: API read, parse, no LLM4-6x/dayGitHub notifs, RSS, logs
Slow (action)Exp: LLM, write1x/dayCompose reply, dashboard, alert

→ Clean split. Every op on 1 clock. Fast = no LLM. Slow = no gather.

If err: op needs both → split. Fast collects raw → digest. Slow summarizes. Digest = boundary.

Step 2: Design Digest Format

Digest = low-bandwidth msg between clocks. Compact, human-readable, parseable.

  1. Define path + format (md recommended)
  2. Header: timestamp + source meta
  3. "Pending" section → items needing action
  4. "Status" section → current state
  5. Clear empty indicator (pending: none)

Example:

# Digest — 2026-03-22T06:30:00Z

## Pending

- PR #42 needs review response (opened 2h ago, author requested feedback)
- Issue #99 has new comment from maintainer (action: reply)

## Status

- Last analyzed: 2026-03-22T06:30:00Z
- Sources checked: github-notifications, rss-feed, error-log
- Items scanned: 14
- Items pending: 2

Empty:

# Digest — 2026-03-22T06:30:00Z

## Pending

(none)

## Status

- Last analyzed: 2026-03-22T06:30:00Z
- Sources checked: github-notifications, rss-feed, error-log
- Items scanned: 8
- Items pending: 0

→ Template w/ clear pending/empty. Slow clock decides by single check.

If err: digest >50 lines → too much raw. Move details to data file, digest = summary + pointers.

Step 3: Fast Clock (Analysis)

Observation scripts on fast schedule.

  1. 1 script per source (indep failures)
  2. Each reads, extracts, appends/rewrites digest
  3. File lock / atomic write → no partial digest
  4. Log run (ts, items, errs) → separate log
  5. Never LLM / write beyond digest
# Pseudocode: analyze-notifications.sh
fetch_notifications()
filter_actionable(notifications)
format_as_digest_entries(filtered)
atomic_write(digest_path, entries)
log("analyzed {count} notifications, {pending} actionable")

Cron:

# Fast clock: analyze every 4 hours
30 */4 * * *  /path/to/analyze-notifications.sh >> /var/log/analysis.log 2>&1
0  6   * * *  /path/to/analyze-pr-status.sh     >> /var/log/analysis.log 2>&1

→ Analysis scripts update digest. Indep → 1 fails, others continue.

If err: source down → log + keep prev entries. Never clear on source fail → stale > missing.

Step 4: Slow Clock (Action)

Reads digest, decides act.

  1. Read digest (Step 0)
  2. Pending empty/"none" → exit immediate w/ log
  3. Items pending → exp op (LLM, compose)
  4. After act → clear/archive processed entries
  5. Log run (items, cost, duration)
# Pseudocode: heartbeat.sh (the slow clock)
digest = read_file(digest_path)

if digest.pending is empty:
    log("heartbeat: nothing pending, exiting")
    exit(0)

# Only reaches here if work exists
response = call_llm(digest.pending, system_prompt)
execute_actions(response)
archive_digest(digest_path)
log("heartbeat: processed {count} items, cost: {tokens} tokens")

Cron:

# Slow clock: act once per day at 7am
0 7 * * *  /path/to/heartbeat.sh >> /var/log/heartbeat.log 2>&1

→ Script exits <1s idle. Active → processes + clears.

If err: LLM fails → no clear. Items retry next cycle. Consider retry counter → no infinite retry.

Step 5: Idle Detection

Savings = idle detect. Distinguish "nothing"/"something" min overhead.

  1. Idle check = single fast op (file read + str check)
  2. Verify idle path: 0 ext calls (no API/LLM/net)
  3. Measure duration <1s
  4. Log idle differently from active
# Minimal idle check
if grep -q "^(none)$" "$DIGEST_PATH" || grep -q "pending: 0" "$DIGEST_PATH"; then
    echo "$(date -u +%FT%TZ) heartbeat: idle" >> "$LOG_PATH"
    exit 0
fi

→ Idle = 1 file read + str match. No net, no spawn.

If err: unreliable check (false pos = missed work, false neg = waste LLM) → simplify digest. Single bool field (has_pending: true/false) most reliable.

Step 6: Validate Cost Model

Calculate → confirm savings.

  1. Fast runs/day: fast_runs = 24 / fast_interval_hours
  2. Slow runs/day: typ 1
  3. Observe cost: fast_runs * cost_per_analysis_run (~$0 no LLM)
  4. Act cost: active_days_fraction * cost_per_action_run
  5. Idle cost: (1 - active_days_fraction) * cost_per_idle_check (~$0)
  6. Compare w/ original
ArchitectureDaily (active)Daily (idle)Monthly (80% idle)
Single loop (LLM every 30min)$13.74/37h$13.74/37h~$400
Du-dum (6 analyses + 1 action)$0.30$0.00~$6

→ Model shows ≥10x cheaper on idle days.

If err: no savings → (a) fast too freq, (b) fast has hidden LLM, (c) rarely idle. Du-dum wants high idle ratio. Always active → simpler polling.

Check

  • Fast/slow split clean → no LLM in fast path
  • Digest has clear empty indicator
  • Idle detect <1s, 0 ext calls
  • Fast fail → no digest corrupt (stale preserved)
  • Slow fail → no clear pending (retry next)
  • Cost model ≥10x savings idle days
  • Both clocks log runs
  • Digest bounded (archive/clear after process)

Traps

  • Digest unbounded: Append no clear → growing log. Always clear/archive after act.
  • Fast too fast: Analysis every 5min, events daily → wastes API/IO. Match freq to event rate.
  • Slow too slow: Once/day but need same-hour → too slow. Increase freq or urgent shortcut.
  • LLM in fast: Breaks cost model. Audit fast scripts → 0 LLM. Defer summary to slow.
  • Coupled fast scripts: 1 depends on another → cascade fail. Keep indep → own source, own section.
  • Silent idle log: No log → can't distinguish "running idle" vs "crashed". Always log idle.
  • Clear digest on analysis fail: Source down → no empty write. Slow would skip actual pending. Preserve last good.

  • manage-token-budget — cost framework du-dum makes practical; du-dum = pattern, budget = accounting
  • circuit-breaker-pattern — failure case (tools breaking); du-dum = normal case (nothing to do). Together: du-dum idle, circuit-breaker fail
  • observe — methodology for fast clock; du-dum structures when observes become actionable via digest
  • forage-resources — strategic explore layer; du-dum = execution rhythm
  • coordinate-reasoning — stigmergic signaling; digest = stigmergy (indirect coord via env artifact)

Repositorio GitHub

pjt222/agent-almanac
Ruta: i18n/caveman-ultra/skills/du-dum
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Habilidades relacionadas

content-collections

Meta

Esta habilidad proporciona una configuración probada en producción para Content Collections, una herramienta centrada en TypeScript que transforma archivos Markdown/MDX en colecciones de datos con tipado seguro mediante validación Zod. Úsala al construir blogs, sitios de documentación o aplicaciones Vite + React con mucho contenido para garantizar seguridad de tipos y validación automática de contenido. Abarca todo, desde la configuración del plugin de Vite y compilación MDX hasta la optimización de despliegue y validación de esquemas.

Ver habilidad

polymarket

Meta

Esta habilidad permite a los desarrolladores crear aplicaciones con la plataforma de mercados de predicción Polymarket, incluyendo la integración de API para operaciones y datos de mercado. También proporciona transmisión de datos en tiempo real a través de WebSocket para monitorear operaciones en vivo y actividad del mercado. Úsela para implementar estrategias de trading o crear herramientas que procesen actualizaciones de mercado en tiempo real.

Ver habilidad

creating-opencode-plugins

Meta

Esta habilidad ayuda a los desarrolladores a crear complementos de OpenCode que se conectan a más de 25 tipos de eventos, como comandos, archivos y operaciones LSP. Proporciona la estructura del complemento, las especificaciones de la API de eventos y los patrones de implementación para módulos en JavaScript/TypeScript. Úsala cuando necesites interceptar, monitorear o extender el ciclo de vida del asistente de IA de OpenCode con lógica personalizada basada en eventos.

Ver habilidad

sglang

Meta

SGLang es un framework de alto rendimiento para el servicio de LLM que se especializa en generación rápida y estructurada para JSON, expresiones regulares y flujos de trabajo de agentes utilizando su caché de prefijos RadixAttention. Ofrece una inferencia significativamente más rápida, especialmente para tareas con prefijos repetidos, lo que lo hace ideal para salidas complejas y estructuradas, y conversaciones multiturno. Elige SGLang sobre alternativas como vLLM cuando necesites decodificación restringida o estés construyendo aplicaciones con uso extensivo de prefijos compartidos.

Ver habilidad