provider-test-patterns
について
このスキルは、terraform-plugin-testingフレームワークを使用した受け入れテストの記述に関するパターンとガイダンスをTerraformプロバイダー開発者に提供します。テスト構造、状態チェックやプランチェックといった主要なテストコンポーネント、インポート検証やエフェメラルリソーステストを含む一般的なテストシナリオを網羅しています。プロバイダーの受け入れテストを記述、レビュー、またはデバッグする際に、ベストプラクティスを実装するためにご利用ください。
クイックインストール
Claude Code
推奨npx skills add hashicorp/agent-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/hashicorp/agent-skillsgit clone https://github.com/hashicorp/agent-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/provider-test-patternsこのコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします
ドキュメント
Provider Acceptance Test Patterns
Patterns for writing acceptance tests using terraform-plugin-testing with the Plugin Framework.
Source: HashiCorp Testing Patterns
References (load when needed):
references/checks.md— statecheck, plancheck, knownvalue types, tfjsonpath, comparersreferences/sweepers.md— sweeper setup, TestMain, dependenciesreferences/ephemeral.md— ephemeral resource testing, echoprovider, multi-step patterns
Test Lifecycle
The framework runs each TestStep through: plan → apply → refresh → final
plan. If the final plan shows a diff, the test fails (unless
ExpectNonEmptyPlan is set). After all steps, destroy runs followed by
CheckDestroy. This means every test automatically verifies that
configurations apply cleanly and produce no drift — no assertions needed for
that.
Test Function Structure
func TestAccExample_basic(t *testing.T) {
var widget example.Widget
rName := acctest.RandStringFromCharSet(10, acctest.CharSetAlphaNum)
resourceName := "example_widget.test"
resource.ParallelTest(t, resource.TestCase{
PreCheck: func() { testAccPreCheck(t) },
ProtoV6ProviderFactories: testAccProtoV6ProviderFactories,
CheckDestroy: testAccCheckExampleDestroy,
Steps: []resource.TestStep{
{
Config: testAccExampleConfig_basic(rName),
ConfigStateChecks: []statecheck.StateCheck{
stateCheckExampleExists(resourceName, &widget),
statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName,
tfjsonpath.New("name"), knownvalue.StringExact(rName)),
statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName,
tfjsonpath.New("id"), knownvalue.NotNull()),
},
},
},
})
}
Use resource.ParallelTest by default. Use resource.Test only when tests
share state or cannot run concurrently.
Provider Factory
// provider_test.go — Plugin Framework with Protocol 6 (use Protocol5 variant if needed)
var testAccProtoV6ProviderFactories = map[string]func() (tfprotov6.ProviderServer, error){
"example": providerserver.NewProtocol6WithError(New("test")()),
}
TestCase Fields
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
PreCheck | func() — verify prerequisites (env vars, API access) |
ProtoV6ProviderFactories | Plugin Framework provider factories |
CheckDestroy | TestCheckFunc — verify resources destroyed after all steps |
Steps | []TestStep — sequential test operations |
TerraformVersionChecks | []tfversion.TerraformVersionCheck — gate by CLI version |
TestStep Fields
Config Mode
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
Config | Inline HCL string to apply |
ConfigStateChecks | []statecheck.StateCheck — modern assertions (preferred) |
ConfigPlanChecks | resource.ConfigPlanChecks{PreApply: []plancheck.PlanCheck{...}} |
ExpectError | *regexp.Regexp — expect failure matching pattern |
ExpectNonEmptyPlan | bool — expect non-empty plan after apply |
PlanOnly | bool — plan without applying |
Destroy | bool — run destroy step |
PreConfig | func() — setup before step |
Import Mode
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
ImportState | true to enable import mode |
ImportStateVerify | Verify imported state matches prior state |
ImportStateVerifyIgnore | []string — attributes to skip during verify |
ImportStateKind | resource.ImportBlockWithID — import block generation |
ResourceName | Resource address to import |
ImportStateId | Override the ID used for import |
Check Functions
Modern: ConfigStateChecks (preferred)
Type-safe with aggregated error reporting. Compose built-in checks with custom
statecheck.StateCheck implementations. See references/checks.md for full
knownvalue types, tfjsonpath navigation, and comparers.
ConfigStateChecks: []statecheck.StateCheck{
stateCheckExampleExists(resourceName, &widget),
statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName,
tfjsonpath.New("name"), knownvalue.StringExact("my-widget")),
statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName,
tfjsonpath.New("enabled"), knownvalue.Bool(true)),
statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName,
tfjsonpath.New("id"), knownvalue.NotNull()),
statecheck.ExpectSensitiveValue(resourceName,
tfjsonpath.New("api_key")),
},
Do not mix Check (legacy) and ConfigStateChecks in the same step.
Legacy: Check (for CheckDestroy and migration)
CheckDestroy on TestCase requires TestCheckFunc. The Check field on
TestStep also accepts TestCheckFunc but prefer ConfigStateChecks for new
tests.
Check: resource.ComposeAggregateTestCheckFunc(
resource.TestCheckResourceAttr(name, "key", "expected"),
resource.TestCheckResourceAttrSet(name, "id"),
resource.TestCheckNoResourceAttr(name, "removed"),
resource.TestMatchResourceAttr(name, "url", regexp.MustCompile(`^https://`)),
resource.TestCheckResourceAttrPair(res1, "ref_id", res2, "id"),
),
ComposeAggregateTestCheckFunc reports all errors; ComposeTestCheckFunc
fails fast on the first.
Config Helpers
Use numbered format verbs — %[1]q for quoted strings, %[1]s for raw:
func testAccExampleConfig_basic(rName string) string {
return fmt.Sprintf(`
resource "example_widget" "test" {
name = %[1]q
}
`, rName)
}
func testAccExampleConfig_full(rName, description string) string {
return fmt.Sprintf(`
resource "example_widget" "test" {
name = %[1]q
description = %[2]q
enabled = true
}
`, rName, description)
}
Scenario Patterns
Basic + Update (combine in one test — updates are supersets of basic)
Steps: []resource.TestStep{
{
Config: testAccExampleConfig_basic(rName),
ConfigStateChecks: []statecheck.StateCheck{
stateCheckExampleExists(resourceName, &widget),
statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName,
tfjsonpath.New("name"), knownvalue.StringExact(rName)),
},
},
{
Config: testAccExampleConfig_full(rName, "updated"),
ConfigStateChecks: []statecheck.StateCheck{
stateCheckExampleExists(resourceName, &widget),
statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName,
tfjsonpath.New("description"), knownvalue.StringExact("updated")),
},
},
},
Import
After a config step, verify import produces identical state. Use
ImportStateKind for import block generation:
{
ResourceName: resourceName,
ImportState: true,
ImportStateVerify: true,
ImportStateKind: resource.ImportBlockWithID,
},
Disappears (resource deleted externally)
{
Config: testAccExampleConfig_basic(rName),
ConfigStateChecks: []statecheck.StateCheck{
stateCheckExampleExists(resourceName, &widget),
stateCheckExampleDisappears(resourceName),
},
ExpectNonEmptyPlan: true,
},
Validation (expect error)
{
Config: testAccExampleConfig_invalidName(""),
ExpectError: regexp.MustCompile(`name must not be empty`),
},
Regression (two-commit workflow)
A proper bug fix uses at least two commits: first commit the regression test (which fails, confirming the bug), then commit the fix (test passes). This lets reviewers independently verify the test reproduces the issue by checking out the first commit, then advancing to the fix.
Name and document regression tests to identify the issue they fix. Include a link to the original bug report when possible.
// TestAccExample_regressionGH1234 verifies fix for https://github.com/org/repo/issues/1234
func TestAccExample_regressionGH1234(t *testing.T) {
rName := acctest.RandStringFromCharSet(10, acctest.CharSetAlphaNum)
resourceName := "example_widget.test"
resource.ParallelTest(t, resource.TestCase{
PreCheck: func() { testAccPreCheck(t) },
ProtoV6ProviderFactories: testAccProtoV6ProviderFactories,
CheckDestroy: testAccCheckExampleDestroy,
Steps: []resource.TestStep{
{
// Reproduce the issue: this config triggered the bug
Config: testAccExampleConfig_regressionGH1234(rName),
ConfigStateChecks: []statecheck.StateCheck{
stateCheckExampleExists(resourceName, nil),
statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName,
tfjsonpath.New("computed_field"), knownvalue.NotNull()),
},
},
},
})
}
Helper Functions
Custom StateCheck: Exists
Implement statecheck.StateCheck for API existence verification. Separate the
exists check into its own function for reuse across steps — the source
recommends this as a design principle:
type exampleExistsCheck struct {
resourceAddress string
widget *example.Widget
}
func (e exampleExistsCheck) CheckState(ctx context.Context, req statecheck.CheckStateRequest, resp *statecheck.CheckStateResponse) {
r, err := stateResourceAtAddress(req.State, e.resourceAddress)
if err != nil {
resp.Error = err
return
}
id, ok := r.AttributeValues["id"].(string)
if !ok {
resp.Error = fmt.Errorf("no id found for %s", e.resourceAddress)
return
}
conn := testAccAPIClient()
widget, err := conn.GetWidget(id)
if err != nil {
resp.Error = fmt.Errorf("%s not found via API: %w", e.resourceAddress, err)
return
}
if e.widget != nil {
*e.widget = *widget
}
}
func stateCheckExampleExists(name string, widget *example.Widget) statecheck.StateCheck {
return exampleExistsCheck{resourceAddress: name, widget: widget}
}
Custom StateCheck: Disappears
Delete a resource via API to simulate external deletion:
type exampleDisappearsCheck struct {
resourceAddress string
}
func (e exampleDisappearsCheck) CheckState(ctx context.Context, req statecheck.CheckStateRequest, resp *statecheck.CheckStateResponse) {
r, err := stateResourceAtAddress(req.State, e.resourceAddress)
if err != nil {
resp.Error = err
return
}
id := r.AttributeValues["id"].(string)
conn := testAccAPIClient()
resp.Error = conn.DeleteWidget(id)
}
func stateCheckExampleDisappears(name string) statecheck.StateCheck {
return exampleDisappearsCheck{resourceAddress: name}
}
State Resource Lookup (shared utility)
func stateResourceAtAddress(state *tfjson.State, address string) (*tfjson.StateResource, error) {
if state == nil || state.Values == nil || state.Values.RootModule == nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("no state available")
}
for _, r := range state.Values.RootModule.Resources {
if r.Address == address {
return r, nil
}
}
return nil, fmt.Errorf("not found in state: %s", address)
}
Destroy Check (TestCheckFunc — required by CheckDestroy)
func testAccCheckExampleDestroy(s *terraform.State) error {
conn := testAccAPIClient()
for _, rs := range s.RootModule().Resources {
if rs.Type != "example_widget" {
continue
}
_, err := conn.GetWidget(rs.Primary.ID)
if err == nil {
return fmt.Errorf("widget %s still exists", rs.Primary.ID)
}
if !isNotFoundError(err) {
return err
}
}
return nil
}
PreCheck
func testAccPreCheck(t *testing.T) {
t.Helper()
if os.Getenv("EXAMPLE_API_KEY") == "" {
t.Fatal("EXAMPLE_API_KEY must be set for acceptance tests")
}
}
GitHub リポジトリ
関連スキル
evaluating-llms-harness
テストこのClaudeスキルは、lm-evaluation-harnessを実行し、MMLUやGSM8Kなど60以上の標準化学術タスクでLLMをベンチマークします。開発者がモデルの品質を比較し、トレーニングの進捗を追跡し、学術的な結果を報告するために設計されています。このツールはHuggingFaceやvLLMモデルを含む様々なバックエンドをサポートしています。
cloudflare-cron-triggers
テストこのスキルは、cron式を使用してWorkersをスケジュールするためのCloudflare Cron Triggersの実装に関する包括的な知識を提供します。定期的なタスクの設定、メンテナンスジョブ、自動化されたワークフローの構築を網羅し、無効なcron式やタイムゾーン問題といった一般的な課題への対処法も含みます。開発者はこれを使用して、スケジュールされたハンドラーの設定、cronトリガーのテスト、WorkflowsやGreen Computeとの連携を構成できます。
webapp-testing
テストこのClaude Skillは、Playwrightベースのツールキットを提供し、Pythonスクリプトを通じてローカルWebアプリケーションのテストを可能にします。フロントエンドの検証、UIデバッグ、スクリーンショット撮影、ログ表示を実現し、サーバーライフサイクルを管理します。ブラウザ自動化タスクにご利用いただけますが、コンテキストの汚染を避けるため、スクリプトのソースコードを読むのではなく直接実行してください。
finishing-a-development-branch
テストこのスキルは、開発者がテストの合格を確認し、構造化された統合オプションを提示することで、完成した作業を仕上げることを支援します。実装が完了した後のマージ、PR作成、ブランチの整理といったワークフローを案内します。コードが準備できてテスト済みの際に使用し、開発プロセスを体系的に完了させましょう。
