MCP HubMCP Hub
スキル一覧に戻る

exploratory-testing-advanced

proffesor-for-testing
更新日 Today
129 閲覧
99
21
99
GitHubで表示
その他exploratorysbtmrstheuristicstest-tourssession-based

について

このスキルは、計画セッション、バグ調査、品質リスクの発見のための高度な探索的テスト技法を提供します。チャーターの作成、SFDIPOTのようなRSTヒューリスティックスの適用、体系的なテストツアーの実行をユーザーに導きます。ソフトウェアにおける未知の問題を発見するために、構造化されたセッションベースの探索が必要な際にご利用ください。

クイックインストール

Claude Code

推奨
プラグインコマンド推奨
/plugin add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
Git クローン代替
git clone https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe.git ~/.claude/skills/exploratory-testing-advanced

このコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします

ドキュメント

Advanced Exploratory Testing

<default_to_action> When exploring software or investigating quality risks:

  1. CREATE charter with mission, scope, and time-box (45-90 min)
  2. APPLY heuristics: SFDIPOT (quality criteria), FEW HICCUPPS (consistency oracles)
  3. EXPLORE systematically using test tours (Business District, Bad Neighborhood, Historical)
  4. DOCUMENT findings in real-time with notes, screenshots, evidence
  5. DEBRIEF: What learned? What's next? Share via agent memory

Quick Heuristic Selection:

  • What to test → SFDIPOT (Structure, Function, Data, Interfaces, Platform, Operations, Time)
  • Recognize problems → FEW HICCUPPS (Familiar, Explainable, World, History, Image, Comparable, Claims, Users, Product, Purpose, Standards)
  • Navigate app → Test Tours (12 types for different exploration strategies)

Critical Success Factors:

  • Exploration is skilled, structured thinking - not random clicking
  • Document discoveries, not pre-planned test cases
  • Pair testing reveals more than solo exploration </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use

  • Investigating new or changed features
  • Finding bugs automation misses
  • Learning unfamiliar systems
  • Risk discovery before test planning

Session Structure (SBTM)

PhaseDurationActivity
Charter5 minDefine mission, scope, focus
Explore45-75 minSystematic investigation
NoteContinuousDocument findings real-time
Debrief10-15 minSummarize, prioritize, share

SFDIPOT Heuristic (What to Test)

LetterFocusExample Questions
StructureIs it properly composed?Code structure, UI layout, data schema
FunctionDoes it do what it should?Core features work correctly
DataHandles data correctly?CRUD, validation, persistence
InterfacesInteracts well?APIs, UI, integrations
PlatformWorks in environment?Browsers, OS, devices
OperationsCan be used/managed?Install, config, monitor
TimeHandles timing?Concurrency, timeouts, scheduling

FEW HICCUPPS Oracle (Recognize Problems)

Consistency WithCheck
Familiar problemsDoes this look like a known bug pattern?
ExplainableCan behavior be explained rationally?
WorldMatches real-world expectations?
HistoryConsistent with prior versions?
ImageMatches brand/product image?
ComparableSimilar to competing products?
ClaimsMatches specs/docs/marketing?
UsersMeets user expectations?
PurposeFulfills intended purpose?
StatementsMatches what devs said?

Test Tours (12 Types)

TourStrategy
Business DistrictCritical business flows
HistoricalWhere bugs clustered before
Bad NeighborhoodKnown problem areas
MoneyRevenue-impacting features
LandmarkNavigate by key features
IntellectualComplex, thinking-intensive features
FedExFollow data through system
Garbage CollectorCleanup and edge cases
MuseumHelp docs and examples
Rained-OutWhat happens when things fail?
Couch PotatoMinimal effort paths
Obsessive-CompulsiveRepetitive actions

Session Note Template

**Charter:** Explore [area] to discover [what] focusing on [heuristic]
**Time-box:** 60 min | **Tester:** [name] | **Date:** [date]

## Session Notes
- [timestamp] Observation/finding
- [timestamp] Bug: [description] - [severity]
- [timestamp] Question: [unclear behavior]

## Findings Summary
- Bugs: X (Critical: Y, Major: Z)
- Questions: X
- Ideas: X

## Coverage
- Areas explored: [list]
- Heuristics used: [SFDIPOT areas]
- % Time on: Bug investigation 30%, Exploration 50%, Setup 20%

## Next Steps
- [ ] Deep dive on [area]
- [ ] Follow up on question about [topic]

Agent-Assisted Exploration

// Collaborative exploration session
await Task("Exploratory Session", {
  charter: 'Explore checkout flow for payment edge cases',
  duration: '60min',
  heuristics: ['SFDIPOT', 'FEW_HICCUPPS'],
  tour: 'money',
  collaboration: 'human-navigator-agent-driver'
}, "qe-flaky-test-hunter");

// Agent generates test variations while human observes
await Task("Edge Case Generation", {
  area: 'payment-form',
  variations: ['boundary-values', 'invalid-inputs', 'concurrent-submits']
}, "qe-test-generator");

// Visual exploration
await Task("Visual Exploration", {
  tour: 'landmark',
  focus: 'responsive-breakpoints',
  compare: 'baseline-screenshots'
}, "qe-visual-tester");

Agent Coordination Hints

Memory Namespace

aqe/exploratory/
├── sessions/*           - Session notes and findings
├── charters/*           - Reusable charter templates
├── bug-clusters/*       - Historical bug patterns
└── heuristic-results/*  - What heuristics revealed

Fleet Coordination

const exploratoryFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
  strategy: 'exploratory-testing',
  agents: [
    'qe-flaky-test-hunter',   // Pattern recognition
    'qe-visual-tester',       // Visual anomalies
    'qe-quality-analyzer'     // Risk assessment
  ],
  topology: 'mesh'
});

Pairing Patterns

PatternHuman RoleAgent Role
Driver-NavigatorNavigate strategyExecute variations
Strong-StyleDictate actionsRecord findings
Ping-PongObserve one areaExplore another

Related Skills


Remember

Exploratory testing = simultaneous learning, test design, and test execution.

Not random clicking. Structured, skilled investigation guided by heuristics and oracles. Document discoveries in real-time. Pair testing amplifies findings.

With Agents: Agents generate variations, recognize patterns, and maintain session notes while humans apply judgment and intuition. Combine agent thoroughness with human insight.

GitHub リポジトリ

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe
パス: .claude/skills/exploratory-testing-advanced
agenticqeagenticsfoundationagentsquality-engineering

関連スキル

context-driven-testing

その他

This skill applies context-driven testing principles to help developers make testing decisions based on specific project needs rather than universal rules. It guides you to analyze your project's unique context, question existing practices, and adapt your testing approach accordingly. Use it when evaluating testing strategies, challenging dogma, or tailoring methods to address specific risks and constraints.

スキルを見る

context-driven-testing

その他

This skill applies context-driven testing principles to help developers make testing decisions based on specific project needs rather than rigid best practices. It guides you to analyze your project's unique context, question existing dogma, and adapt your testing approach accordingly. Use it when evaluating testing strategies, managing risks, or tailoring quality assurance to your situation.

スキルを見る

test-automation-strategy

その他

This Claude Skill helps developers design and implement effective test automation frameworks by applying the test pyramid, F.I.R.S.T. principles, and design patterns like Page Object Model. It focuses on integrating automation into CI/CD for fast feedback and improved test efficiency. Use it when building new automation strategies or optimizing existing test suites.

スキルを見る

testability-scoring

その他

This skill provides AI-powered testability assessment for web applications using Playwright and optional Vibium integration. It evaluates applications against 10 principles of intrinsic testability including Observability, Controllability, and Stability. Use it when assessing software testability, identifying improvements, or generating testability reports.

スキルを見る