resolve-git-conflicts
について
このClaudeスキルは、開発者がGitのマージ、リベース、チェリーピックにおける競合を解決するための支援を行います。競合の発生源を特定し、マーカーを読み取り、解決戦略を選択することで対応します。操作の継続や失敗したマージ/リベースの中止を含む、安全な回復オプションを提供します。Gitコマンドが競合を報告した場合や、失敗したバージョン管理操作を安全に再開する必要がある際にご利用ください。
クイックインストール
Claude Code
推奨npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/resolve-git-conflictsこのコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします
ドキュメント
Resolve Git Conflicts
Identify, resolve, recover from merge and rebase conflicts.
When Use
git mergeorgit rebasereports conflictsgit cherry-pickcannot apply cleanlygit pullresults in conflicting changesgit stash popconflicts with current working tree
Inputs
- Required: Repository with active conflicts
- Optional: Preferred resolution strategy (ours, theirs, manual)
- Optional: Context about which changes should take priority
Steps
Step 1: Identify Conflict Source
Determine what operation caused conflict:
# Check current status
git status
# Look for indicators:
# "You have unmerged paths" — merge conflict
# "rebase in progress" — rebase conflict
# "cherry-pick in progress" — cherry-pick conflict
Status output tells you which files have conflicts and what operation in progress.
Got: git status shows files listed under "Unmerged paths" and indicates active operation.
If fail: git status shows clean tree but you expected conflicts? Operation may have already been completed or aborted. Check git log for recent activity.
Step 2: Read Conflict Markers
Open each conflicting file. Locate conflict markers:
<<<<<<< HEAD
// Your current branch's version
const result = calculateWeightedMean(data, weights);
=======
// Incoming branch's version
const result = computeWeightedAverage(data, weights);
>>>>>>> feature/rename-functions
<<<<<<< HEADto=======: Your current branch (or branch you are rebasing onto)=======to>>>>>>>: Incoming changes (branch being merged or commit being applied)
Got: Each conflicting file contains one or more blocks with <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> markers.
If fail: No markers found but files show as conflicting? Conflict may be binary file or deleted-vs-modified conflict. Check git diff --name-only --diff-filter=U for full list.
Step 3: Choose Resolution Strategy
Manual merge (most common): Edit file to combine both changes logically. Then remove all conflict markers.
Accept ours (keep current branch version):
# For a single file
git checkout --ours path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R
# For all conflicts
git checkout --ours .
git add -A
Accept theirs (keep incoming branch version):
# For a single file
git checkout --theirs path/to/file.R
git add path/to/file.R
# For all conflicts
git checkout --theirs .
git add -A
Got: After resolution, file contains correct merged content with no remaining conflict markers.
If fail: Chose wrong side? Re-read conflicting version from merge base. During merge, git checkout -m path/to/file re-creates conflict markers so you can try again.
Step 4: Mark Files as Resolved
After editing each conflicting file:
# Stage the resolved file
git add path/to/resolved-file.R
# Check remaining conflicts
git status
Repeat for every file listed under "Unmerged paths".
Got: All files move from "Unmerged paths" to "Changes to be committed". No conflict markers remain in any file.
If fail: git add fails or markers remain? Re-open file and ensure all <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> lines removed.
Step 5: Continue the Operation
Once all conflicts resolved:
For merge:
git commit
# Git auto-populates the merge commit message
For rebase:
git rebase --continue
# May encounter more conflicts on subsequent commits — repeat steps 2-4
For cherry-pick:
git cherry-pick --continue
For stash pop:
# Stash pop conflicts don't need a continue — just commit or reset
git add .
git commit -m "Apply stashed changes with conflict resolution"
Got: Operation completes. git status shows clean working tree (or moves to next commit during rebase).
If fail: Continue command fails? Check git status for remaining unresolved files. All conflicts must be resolved before continue.
Step 6: Abort if Needed
Resolution too complex or chose wrong approach? Abort safely:
# Abort merge
git merge --abort
# Abort rebase
git rebase --abort
# Abort cherry-pick
git cherry-pick --abort
Got: Repository returns to state before operation started. No data loss.
If fail: Abort fails (rare)? Check git reflog to find commit before operation. Then git reset --hard <commit> to restore it. Use with caution — discards uncommitted changes.
Step 7: Verify Resolution
After operation completes:
# Verify clean working tree
git status
# Check that the merge/rebase result is correct
git log --oneline -5
git diff HEAD~1
# Run tests to confirm nothing is broken
# (language-specific: devtools::test(), npm test, cargo test, etc.)
Got: Clean working tree, correct merge history, tests pass.
If fail: Tests fail after resolution? Merge may have introduced logical errors even though syntax conflicts resolved. Review diff careful and fix.
Checks
- No conflict markers (
<<<<<<<,=======,>>>>>>>) remain in any file -
git statusshows clean working tree - Merge/rebase history correct in
git log - Tests pass after conflict resolution
- No unintended changes introduced
Pitfalls
- Blindly accept one side:
--oursor--theirsdiscards other side entirely. Only use when certain one version completely correct. - Leave conflict markers in code: Always search entire file for remaining markers after editing. Partial resolution breaks the code.
- Amend during rebase: During interactive rebase, do not
--amendunless rebase step specifically calls for it. Usegit rebase --continueinstead. - Lose work on abort:
git rebase --abortandgit merge --abortdiscard all resolution work. Only abort if want to start over. - No test after resolution: Syntactically clean merge can still be logically wrong. Always run tests.
- Force-push after rebase: After rebasing shared branch, coordinate with collaborators before force-pushing — it rewrites history.
See Also
commit-changes- committing after conflict resolutionmanage-git-branches- branch workflows that lead to conflictsconfigure-git-repository- repository setup and merge strategies
GitHub リポジトリ
関連スキル
executing-plans
デザインexecuting-plansスキルは、完全な実装計画があり、それを管理されたバッチでレビューチェックポイントを設けながら実行する場合に使用します。このスキルは計画を読み込んで批判的にレビューした後、小さなバッチ(デフォルトは3タスク)でタスクを実行し、各バッチの間に進捗状況を報告してアーキテクトのレビューを受けます。これにより、品質管理チェックポイントが組み込まれた体系的な実装が保証されます。
requesting-code-review
デザインこのスキルは、コードレビュアーサブエージェントを起動し、処理を進める前に要件に対してコード変更を分析します。タスク完了後、主要な機能の実装後、またはmainブランチへのマージ前などに使用すべきです。このレビューは、現在の実装と元の計画を比較することで、問題を早期に発見するのに役立ちます。
connect-mcp-server
デザインこのスキルは、開発者がHTTP、stdio、またはSSEトランスポートを使用してMCPサーバーをClaude Codeに接続するための包括的なガイドを提供します。GitHub、Notion、カスタムAPIなどの外部サービスを統合するためのインストール、設定、認証、セキュリティについて解説しています。MCP統合のセットアップ、外部ツールの設定、またはClaudeのModel Context Protocolを扱う際にご利用ください。
web-cli-teleport
デザインこのスキルは、タスク分析に基づいて開発者がClaude Code WebとCLIインターフェースの選択を支援し、これらの環境間でのシームレスなセッションテレポーテーションを可能にします。Web、CLI、モバイル環境を切り替える際のセッション状態とコンテキストを管理することで、ワークフローを最適化します。様々な段階で異なるツールを必要とする複雑なプロジェクトにご活用ください。
