setup-gxp-r-project
について
このスキルは、21 CFR Part 11などのGxP規制に準拠したRプロジェクト構造を作成し、検証済み環境、適格性文書、電子記録の設定を自動化します。規制の厳しい製薬・バイオテクノロジー環境でR分析プロジェクトを開始する際に使用し、監査対応体制を確実に整えます。臨床試験、規制当局への提出、変更管理に関する要件に対応します。
クイックインストール
Claude Code
推奨npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/setup-gxp-r-projectこのコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします
ドキュメント
Set Up GxP R Project
Make R project structure that meets GxP regulatory requirements for validated computing.
When Use
- Start R analysis project in regulated env (pharma, biotech, medical devices)
- Set up R for clinical trial analysis
- Make validated computing env for regulatory submissions
- Implement 21 CFR Part 11 or EU Annex 11 requirements
Inputs
- Required: Project scope + regulatory framework (FDA, EMA, both)
- Required: R version + package versions to validate
- Required: Validation strategy (risk-based)
- Optional: Existing SOPs for computerized systems
- Optional: QMS integration requirements
Steps
Step 1: Create Validated Project Structure
gxp-project/
├── R/ # Analysis scripts
│ ├── 01_data_import.R
│ ├── 02_data_processing.R
│ └── 03_analysis.R
├── validation/ # Validation documentation
│ ├── validation_plan.md # VP: scope, strategy, roles
│ ├── risk_assessment.md # Risk categorization
│ ├── iq/ # Installation Qualification
│ │ ├── iq_protocol.md
│ │ └── iq_report.md
│ ├── oq/ # Operational Qualification
│ │ ├── oq_protocol.md
│ │ └── oq_report.md
│ ├── pq/ # Performance Qualification
│ │ ├── pq_protocol.md
│ │ └── pq_report.md
│ └── traceability_matrix.md # Requirements to tests mapping
├── tests/ # Automated test suite
│ ├── testthat.R
│ └── testthat/
│ ├── test-data_import.R
│ └── test-analysis.R
├── data/ # Input data (controlled)
│ ├── raw/ # Immutable raw data
│ └── derived/ # Processed datasets
├── output/ # Analysis outputs
├── docs/ # Supporting documentation
│ ├── sop_references.md # Links to relevant SOPs
│ └── change_log.md # Manual change documentation
├── renv.lock # Locked dependencies
├── DESCRIPTION # Project metadata
├── .Rprofile # Session configuration
└── CLAUDE.md # AI assistant instructions
Got: Complete dir structure exists with R/, validation/ (including iq/, oq/, pq/ subdirs), tests/testthat/, data/raw/, data/derived/, output/, docs/ dirs.
If fail: Dirs missing? Create with mkdir -p. Verify in correct project root. For existing projects, create only missing dirs rather than overwriting.
Step 2: Create Validation Plan
Create validation/validation_plan.md.
# Validation Plan
## 1. Purpose
This plan defines the validation strategy for [Project Name] using R [version].
## 2. Scope
- R version: 4.5.0
- Packages: [list with versions]
- Analysis: [description]
- Regulatory framework: 21 CFR Part 11 / EU Annex 11
## 3. Risk Assessment Approach
Using GAMP 5 risk-based categories:
- Category 3: Non-configured products (R base)
- Category 4: Configured products (R packages with default settings)
- Category 5: Custom applications (custom R scripts)
## 4. Validation Activities
| Activity | Category 3 | Category 4 | Category 5 |
|----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| IQ | Required | Required | Required |
| OQ | Reduced | Standard | Enhanced |
| PQ | N/A | Standard | Enhanced |
## 5. Roles and Responsibilities
- Validation Lead: [Name]
- Developer: [Name]
- QA Reviewer: [Name]
- Approver: [Name]
## 6. Acceptance Criteria
All tests must pass with documented evidence.
Got: validation/validation_plan.md complete with scope, GAMP 5 risk categories, validation activities matrix, roles + responsibilities, acceptance criteria. Plan references specific R version + regulatory framework.
If fail: Regulatory framework unclear? Consult org's QA dept for applicable SOPs. Do not proceed with validation activities until plan reviewed + approved.
Step 3: Lock Dependencies with renv
# Initialize renv with exact versions
renv::init()
# Install specific validated versions
renv::install("[email protected]")
renv::install("[email protected]")
# Snapshot
renv::snapshot()
renv.lock file serves as controlled package inventory.
Got: renv.lock exists with exact version numbers for all required packages. renv::status() reports no issues. Every package version pinned (e.g., [email protected]), not floating.
If fail: renv::install() fails for specific version? Check version exists on CRAN archives. Use renv::install("package@version", repos = "https://packagemanager.posit.co/cran/latest") for archived versions.
Step 4: Implement Version Control
git init
git add .
git commit -m "Initial validated project structure"
# Use signed commits for traceability
git config user.signingkey YOUR_GPG_KEY
git config commit.gpgsign true
Got: Project under git version control with signed commits enabled. Initial commit contains validated project structure + renv.lock.
If fail: GPG signing fails? Verify GPG key configured with gpg --list-secret-keys. For envs without GPG, document deviation, use unsigned commits with manual audit trail entries in docs/change_log.md.
Step 5: Create IQ Protocol
validation/iq/iq_protocol.md.
# Installation Qualification Protocol
## Objective
Verify that R and required packages are correctly installed.
## Test Cases
### IQ-001: R Version Verification
- **Requirement**: R 4.5.0 installed
- **Procedure**: Execute `R.version.string`
- **Expected:** "R version 4.5.0 (date)"
- **Result**: [ PASS / FAIL ]
### IQ-002: Package Installation Verification
- **Requirement**: All packages in renv.lock installed
- **Procedure**: Execute `renv::status()`
- **Expected:** "No issues found"
- **Result**: [ PASS / FAIL ]
### IQ-003: Package Version Verification
- **Procedure**: Execute `installed.packages()[, c("Package", "Version")]`
- **Expected:** Versions match renv.lock exactly
- **Result**: [ PASS / FAIL ]
Got: validation/iq/iq_protocol.md contains test cases for R version verification, package install verification, package version verification, each with clear expected results + pass/fail fields.
If fail: IQ protocol template does not match org SOP requirements? Adapt format while keeping required fields (requirement, procedure, expected, actual, pass/fail). Consult QA for approved templates.
Step 6: Write Automated OQ/PQ Tests
# tests/testthat/test-analysis.R
test_that("primary analysis produces validated results", {
# Known input -> known output (double programming validation)
test_data <- read.csv(test_path("fixtures", "validation_dataset.csv"))
result <- primary_analysis(test_data)
# Compare against independently calculated expected values
expect_equal(result$estimate, 2.345, tolerance = 1e-3)
expect_equal(result$p_value, 0.012, tolerance = 1e-3)
expect_equal(result$ci_lower, 1.234, tolerance = 1e-3)
})
Got: Automated test files in tests/testthat/ covering OQ (operational verification of each function) + PQ (end-to-end validation against independent reference values). Tests use explicit numeric tolerances.
If fail: Reference values not yet available from independent calc (e.g., SAS)? Create placeholder tests with skip("Awaiting independent reference values"), document in traceability matrix.
Step 7: Create Traceability Matrix
# Traceability Matrix
| Req ID | Requirement | Test ID | Test Description | Status |
|--------|-------------|---------|------------------|--------|
| REQ-001 | Import CSV data correctly | OQ-001 | Verify data dimensions and types | PASS |
| REQ-002 | Calculate primary endpoint | PQ-001 | Compare against reference results | PASS |
| REQ-003 | Generate report output | PQ-002 | Verify report contains all sections | PASS |
Got: validation/traceability_matrix.md links every requirement to at least one test case, every test linked to a requirement. No orphaned requirements or tests.
If fail: Requirements untested? Create test cases or document risk-based justification for exclusion. Tests with no linked requirement? Either link to existing requirement or remove as out-of-scope.
Checks
- Project structure follows documented template
- renv.lock contains all deps with exact versions
- Validation plan complete + approved
- IQ protocol executes successfully
- OQ test cases cover all configured functionality
- PQ tests validate against independently computed results
- Traceability matrix links requirements to tests
- Change control process documented
Pitfalls
- Use
install.packages()without version pinning: Always use renv with locked versions - Missing audit trail: Every change must be documented. Use git signed commits.
- Over-validating: Apply risk-based approach. Not every CRAN package needs Category 5 validation.
- Forget system-level qualification: OS + R installation need IQ too
- No independent verification: PQ should compare against results computed independently (SAS, manual calc)
See Also
write-validation-documentation- detailed validation document creationimplement-audit-trail- electronic records + audit trailsvalidate-statistical-output- double programming + output validationmanage-renv-dependencies- dep locking for validated envs
GitHub リポジトリ
関連スキル
content-collections
メタこのスキルは、Content Collections(Markdown/MDXファイルを型安全なデータコレクションに変換するTypeScriptファーストのツール)の本番環境でテストされた設定を提供します。Zodバリデーションによる型安全性を実現し、ブログ、ドキュメントサイト、コンテンツ重視のVite + Reactアプリケーション構築時にご利用ください。Viteプラグインの設定、MDXコンパイルから、デプロイ最適化、スキーマバリデーションまで、すべてを網羅しています。
polymarket
メタこのスキルは、開発者がPolymarket予測市場プラットフォームを活用したアプリケーション構築を可能にします。API統合による取引や市場データの取得に加え、WebSocketを介したリアルタイムデータストリーミングにより、ライブ取引や市場活動を監視できます。取引戦略の実装や、ライブ市場更新を処理するツールの作成にご利用ください。
creating-opencode-plugins
メタこのスキルは、開発者がコマンド、ファイル、LSP操作など25種類以上のイベントタイプにフックするOpenCodeプラグインを作成することを支援します。JavaScript/TypeScriptモジュール向けに、プラグイン構造、イベントAPI仕様、および実装パターンを提供します。カスタムイベント駆動ロジックでOpenCode AIアシスタントのライフサイクルをインターセプト、監視、または拡張する必要がある場合にご利用ください。
sglang
メタSGLangは、高性能なLLMサービングフレームワークであり、RadixAttentionプレフィックスキャッシュを活用したJSON、正規表現、エージェントワークフロー向けの高速で構造化された生成を特長とします。特にプレフィックスが繰り返されるタスクにおいて、大幅に高速な推論を実現し、複雑な構造化出力やマルチターン対話に最適です。制約付きデコードが必要な場合や、広範なプレフィックス共有を伴うアプリケーションを構築する場合は、vLLMなどの代替案ではなくSGLangを選択してください。
