iterate-pr
について
このClaude Skillは、プルリクエストにおけるCI失敗の修正とレビューフィードバックへの対応という反復プロセスを自動化します。フィードバック→修正→プッシュ→待機のサイクルを処理しながら、すべてのCIチェックが通過するまで継続的に修正をプッシュし、ステータスを確認します。GitHub CLIが必要であり、他のフィードバックに進む前に保留中のCIチェックの解決を優先します。
クイックインストール
Claude Code
推奨/plugin add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templatesgit clone https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates.git ~/.claude/skills/iterate-prこのコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします
ドキュメント
Iterate on PR Until CI Passes
Continuously iterate on the current branch until all CI checks pass and review feedback is addressed.
Requires: GitHub CLI (gh) authenticated and available.
Process
Step 1: Identify the PR
gh pr view --json number,url,headRefName,baseRefName
If no PR exists for the current branch, stop and inform the user.
Step 2: Check CI Status First
Always check CI/GitHub Actions status before looking at review feedback:
gh pr checks --json name,state,bucket,link,workflow
The bucket field categorizes state into: pass, fail, pending, skipping, or cancel.
Important: If any of these checks are still pending, wait before proceeding:
sentry/sentry-iocodecovcursor/bugbot/seer- Any linter or code analysis checks
These bots may post additional feedback comments once their checks complete. Waiting avoids duplicate work.
Step 3: Gather Review Feedback
Once CI checks have completed (or at least the bot-related checks), gather human and bot feedback:
Review Comments and Status:
gh pr view --json reviews,comments,reviewDecision
Inline Code Review Comments:
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{pr_number}/comments
PR Conversation Comments (includes bot comments):
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{pr_number}/comments
Look for bot comments from: Sentry, Codecov, Cursor, Bugbot, Seer, and other automated tools.
Step 4: Investigate Failures
For each CI failure, get the actual logs:
# List recent runs for this branch
gh run list --branch $(git branch --show-current) --limit 5 --json databaseId,name,status,conclusion
# View failed logs for a specific run
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
Do NOT assume what failed based on the check name alone. Always read the actual logs.
Step 5: Validate Feedback
For each piece of feedback (CI failure or review comment):
- Read the relevant code - Understand the context before making changes
- Verify the issue is real - Not all feedback is correct; reviewers and bots can be wrong
- Check if already addressed - The issue may have been fixed in a subsequent commit
- Skip invalid feedback - If the concern is not legitimate, move on
Step 6: Address Valid Issues
Make minimal, targeted code changes. Only fix what is actually broken.
Step 7: Commit and Push
git add -A
git commit -m "fix: <descriptive message of what was fixed>"
git push
Step 8: Wait for CI
Use the built-in watch functionality:
gh pr checks --watch --interval 30
This waits until all checks complete. Exit code 0 means all passed, exit code 1 means failures.
Alternatively, poll manually if you need more control:
gh pr checks --json name,state,bucket | jq '.[] | select(.bucket != "pass")'
Step 9: Repeat
Return to Step 2 if:
- Any CI checks failed
- New review feedback appeared
Continue until all checks pass and no unaddressed feedback remains.
Exit Conditions
Success:
- All CI checks are green (
bucket: pass) - No unaddressed human review feedback
Ask for Help:
- Same failure persists after 3 attempts (likely a flaky test or deeper issue)
- Review feedback requires clarification or decision from the user
- CI failure is unrelated to branch changes (infrastructure issue)
Stop Immediately:
- No PR exists for the current branch
- Branch is out of sync and needs rebase (inform user)
Tips
- Use
gh pr checks --requiredto focus only on required checks - Use
gh run view <run-id> --verboseto see all job steps, not just failures - If a check is from an external service, the
linkfield in checks JSON provides the URL to investigate
GitHub リポジトリ
関連スキル
content-collections
メタThis skill provides a production-tested setup for Content Collections, a TypeScript-first tool that transforms Markdown/MDX files into type-safe data collections with Zod validation. Use it when building blogs, documentation sites, or content-heavy Vite + React applications to ensure type safety and automatic content validation. It covers everything from Vite plugin configuration and MDX compilation to deployment optimization and schema validation.
evaluating-llms-harness
テストThis Claude Skill runs the lm-evaluation-harness to benchmark LLMs across 60+ standardized academic tasks like MMLU and GSM8K. It's designed for developers to compare model quality, track training progress, or report academic results. The tool supports various backends including HuggingFace and vLLM models.
sglang
メタSGLang is a high-performance LLM serving framework that specializes in fast, structured generation for JSON, regex, and agentic workflows using its RadixAttention prefix caching. It delivers significantly faster inference, especially for tasks with repeated prefixes, making it ideal for complex, structured outputs and multi-turn conversations. Choose SGLang over alternatives like vLLM when you need constrained decoding or are building applications with extensive prefix sharing.
cloudflare-turnstile
メタThis skill provides comprehensive guidance for implementing Cloudflare Turnstile as a CAPTCHA-alternative bot protection system. It covers integration for forms, login pages, API endpoints, and frameworks like React/Next.js/Hono, while handling invisible challenges that maintain user experience. Use it when migrating from reCAPTCHA, debugging error codes, or implementing token validation and E2E tests.
